Viscosity measurements in semi-solid metal processing: current status and recent developments
- Critical Review
- Published: 30 November 2021
- Volume 119 , pages 1435–1459, ( 2022 )
Cite this article
- Arumugampillai Megalingam 1 ,
- Asnul Hadi Bin Ahmad 1 , 2 ,
- Mohd Rashidi Bin Maarof 2 &
- Kumarasamy Sudhakar 2 , 3
1283 Accesses
6 Citations
Explore all metrics
Semi-solid metal processing (SSMP) is an ideal method of producing high-quality products with fewer defects in casting technology. Viscosity is the most important physical and chemical property for the flow behaviour of the SSMP. Currently, there are several approaches, both theoretical and experimental, to evaluate the viscosity of semi-solid metals. This paper comprehensively reviews the single point and multi-point viscometry for SSMP. Features, similarities, and limitations of different viscometers for SSMP applications are then compared. The effect of influencing factors on the viscosity behaviour of SSMP is also highlighted. The importance of the non-dendritic globular microstructure and the instantaneous drop in viscosity caused by the scattering of solid particles during SSMP are explained. It is expected that the study will assist the researcher in identifying the best method of viscosity measurement during SSMP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Similar content being viewed by others
Implementing shear-punch test for the assessment of mechanical properties of cast and selective laser melted AlSi10Mg alloys
Squeeze casting for metal alloys and composites: An overview of influence of process parameters on mechanical properties and microstructure
Toward Achieving Grain Refinement in Al2014 Alloy Through Multi-pass FSP: Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior
Availability of data and material.
Data can be made available upon request subject to the approval of all parties involved in the research.
Mehrabian R, Spencer B (1976) United States Patent (19)
Atkinson HV (2013) Alloys for semi-solid processing. Solid State Phenom 192–193:16–27. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.192-193.16
Omar MZ, Alhawari K (2014) An overview of semi-solid metal processing. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 369–373
Mohammed MN, Omar MZ, Salleh MS, Alhawari KS, Kapranos P (2013) Semisolid metal processing techniques for nondendritic feedstock production. Sci World J 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/752175
Nafisi S, Ghomashchi R (2005) Semi-solid metal processing routes: an overview. Can Metall Q 44:289–304. https://doi.org/10.1179/cmq.2005.44.3.289
Article Google Scholar
Husain NH, Ahmad AH, Rashidi MM (2017) An overview of thixoforming process. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 257. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/257/1/012053
Kim NS, Kang GG (2000) An investigation of flow characteristics considering the effect of viscosity variation in the thixoforming process. J Mater Process Technol 103:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00441-0
Beltyukov A, Olyanina N, Ladyanov V (2019) The viscosity of liquid Co-Si-B alloys. J Mol Liq 281:204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.02.064
Gancarz T, Jourdan J, Gasior W, Henein H (2018) Physicochemical properties of Al, Al-Mg and Al-Mg-Zn alloys. J Mol Liq 249:470–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.061
Dobosz A, Plevachuk Y, Sklyarchuk V, Sokoliuk B, Gancarz T (2018) The application of liquid metals in cooling systems: a study of the thermophysical properties of eutectic Ga-Sn-Zn with Al additions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 126:414–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.045
Dogan A, Arslan H (2016) Geometric modelling of viscosity of copper-containing liquid alloys. Philos Mag 96:459–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2015.1133938
Jonas I, Hembree W, Yang F, Busch R, Meyer A (2018) Industrial grade versus scientific pure: influence on melt properties. Appl Phys Lett 112:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5021764
Gao S, Jiao K, Zhang J (2019) Review of viscosity prediction models of liquid pure metals and alloys. Philos Mag 99:853–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2018.1562281
Jethra R (1994) Viscosity measurement. ISA Trans 33:307–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-0578(94)90101-5
Cheng J, Gröbner J, Hort N, Kainer KU, Schmid-Fetzer R (2014) Measurement and calculation of the viscosity of metals - a review of the current status and developing trends. Meas Sci Technol 25. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/25/6/062001
Nafisi S, Ghomashchi R (2016) Semi-solid processing of aluminum alloys
Bakhtiyarov S, Siginer DA (2019) Rheoprocessing of semisolid aluminum alloys. Encycl Alum Its Alloy. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351045636-140000239
Brooks RF, Dinsdale AT, Quested PN (2005) The measurement of viscosity of alloys - a review of methods, data and models. Meas Sci Technol 16:354–362. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/16/2/005
Srivastava N, Burns MA (2006) Analysis of non-Newtonian liquids using a microfluidic capillary viscometer. Anal Chem 78:1690–1696. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0518046
Ram A, Tamir A (1964) A capillary viscometer for non-newtonian liquids. Ind Eng Chem 56:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50650a009
Wunderlich BK, Bausch AR (2013) Differential capillary viscometer for measurement of non-Newtonian fluids. RSC Adv 3:21730–21735. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra42921k
Han SH, Kang CG, Sung JH (2007) Investigation of viscosity properties for rheology forming of AM50A magnesium alloy. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:335–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.195
Lashkari O, Ghomashchi R (2006) The implication of rheological principles for characterization of semi-solid Al-Si cast billets. J Mater Sci 41:5958–5965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0280-8
Shah A, Brabazon D, Looney L (2008) Design of a capillary viscometer with numerical and computational methods. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 15:246–252. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2008.019663
Pola A, Tocci M, Kapranos P (2018) Microstructure and properties of semi-solid aluminum alloys: a literature review. Metals (Basel) 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8030181
Lashkari O, Ghomashchi R, Ajersch F (2007) Deformation behavior of semi-solid A356 Al-Si alloy at low shear rates: the effect of sample size. Mater Sci Eng A 444:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.08.067
Proni CTW, Robert MH, Zoqui EJ (2015) Effect of casting procedures in the structure and flow behaviour of semisolid A356 alloy. Arch Mater Sci Eng 73:82–93
Google Scholar
Das P, Samanta SK, Chattopadhyay H, Dutta P, Barman N (2013) Rheological characterization of semi-solid A356 aluminium alloy. Solid State Phenom 192–193:329–334. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.192-193.329
Sheykh-jaberi F, Cockcroft SL, Maijer DM, Phillion AB (2019) Comparison of the semi-solid constitutive behaviour of A356 and B206 aluminum foundry alloys. J Mater Process Technol 266:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.029
Deepak Kumar S, Ghose J, Mandal A (2019) Thixoforming of light-weight alloys and composites: an approach toward sustainable manufacturing. Elsevier Inc
Atkinson HV (2005) Modelling the semisolid processing of metallic alloys. Prog Mater Sci 50:341–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.04.003
Sołek KP, Rogal Ł, Kapranos P (2017) Evolution of globular microstructure and rheological properties of Stellite TM 21 alloy after heating to semisolid state. J Mater Eng Perform 26:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2421-9
Canyook R, Petsut S, Wisutmethangoon S, Flemings MC, Wannasin J (2010) Evolution of microstructure in semi-solid slurries of rheocast aluminum alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (English Ed 20:1649–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(09)60353-8
Atkinson HV, Liu D (2008) Microstructural coarsening of semi-solid aluminium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 496:439–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.06.013
Agarwal M, Srivastava R (2016) Influence of solid fraction casting on microstructure of aluminum alloy 6061. Mater Manuf Process 31:1958–1967. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1127956
Flemings MC, Martinez RA (2006) Principles of microstructural formation in semi-solid metal processing. Solid State Phenom 116–117:1–8. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.116-117.1
Lashkari O, Ghomashchi R (2007) The implication of rheology in semi-solid metal processes: an overview. J Mater Process Technol 182:229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.08.003
Qin RS, Fan Z (2001) Fractal theory study on morphological dependence of viscosity of semisolid slurries. Mater Sci Technol 17:1149–1152. https://doi.org/10.1179/026708301101511086
Lipchitz A, Harvel G, Sunagawa T (2015) Experimental investigation of the thermal conductivity and viscosity of liquid In-Bi-Sn eutectic alloy (Field’s metal) for use in a natural circulation experiental loop. Int Conf Nucl Eng Proceedings, ICONE 2015-Janua:
Gecu R, Acar S, Kisasoz A, Guler KA, Karaaslan A (2017) Aging of A356 aluminum billets produced by semi- solid metal processing. 3–5
Kapranos P (2019) Current state of semi-solid net-shape die casting. Metals (Basel) 9:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9121301
Koke J, Modigell M (2003) Flow behaviour of semi-solid metal alloys. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 112:141–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(03)00080-6
Wannasin J, Canyook R, Burapa R, Sikong L, Flemings MC (2008) Evaluation of solid fraction in a rheocast aluminum die casting alloy by a rapid quenching method. Scr Mater 59:1091–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.07.029
Franco JM, Partal Pedro (2010) Non-Newtonian fluids. Rheology 1
SoŁlek K, Korolczuk-Hejnak M, Karbowniczek M (2011) An analysis of steel viscosity in the solidification temperature range. Arch Metall Mater 56:593–598. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10172-011-0063-3
Acharya PC, Suares D, Shetty S, Fernandes C, Tekade RK (2018) Rheology and its implications on performance of liquid dosage forms. Elsevier Inc
Sołek K, Korolczuk-Hejnak M, Ślȩzak W (2012) Viscosity measurements for modeling of continuous steel casting. Arch Metall Mater 57:333–338. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10172-012-0031-6
Ma Z, Zhang H, Song W, Wu X, Jia L, Zhang H (2020) Pressure-driven mold filling model of aluminum alloy melt/semi-solid slurry based on rheological behavior. J Mater Sci Technol 39:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.048
Zhu BW, Li LX, Liu X, Zhang LQ, Xu R (2015) Effect of viscosity measurement method to simulate high pressure die casting of thin-wall AlSi10MnMg alloy castings. J Mater Eng Perform 24:5032–5036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-015-1783-8
Ferreira IL, de Castro JA, Garcia A (2019) On the prediction of temperature-dependent viscosity of multicomponent liquid alloys. Contin Mech Thermodyn 31:1369–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-019-00753-7
Atkinson HV, Rassili A (2010) A review of the semi-solid processing of steel. Int J Mater Form 3:791–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0889-7
Volpe V, Pantani R (2018) Determination of the effect of pressure on viscosity at high shear rates by using an injection molding machine. J Appl Polym Sci 135:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.45277
Omar MZ, Atkinson H V., Palmiere EJ, Howe AA, Kapranos P (2006) Viscosity - shear rate relationship during the thixoforming of HP9/4/30 steel. Solid State Phenom 116–117:677–680. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.116-117.677
Reynolds C, Thompson R, McLeish T (2018) Pressure and shear rate dependence of the viscosity and stress relaxation of polymer melts. J Rheol (N Y N Y) 62:631–642. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.5012969
Carlesso (2008) The foaming behavior of alkane emulsified ceramic suspension: from LAPES to HAPES. 1–91. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20992.12803
McLelland ARA, Henderson NG, Atkinson HV, Kirkwood DH (1997) Anomalous rheological behaviour of semi-solid alloy slurries at low shear rates. Mater Sci Eng A 232:110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-5093(97)00105-6
Lashkari O, Ajersch F, Charette A, Chen XG (2008) Microstructure and rheological behavior of hypereutectic semi-solid Al-Si alloy under low shear rates compression test. Mater Sci Eng A 492:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.05.018
Brabazon D, Browne DJ, Carr AJ (2002) Mechanical stir casting of aluminium alloys from the mushy state: process, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A 326:370–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01832-9
Favier V, Atkinson HV (2011) Micromechanical modelling of the elastic-viscoplastic response of metallic alloys under rapid compression in the semi-solid state. Acta Mater 59:1271–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.059
Modigell M, Pola A, Tocci M (2018) Rheological characterization of semi-solid metals: a review. Metals (Basel) 8:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8040245
He M, Wang Y, Forssberg E (2004) Slurry rheology in wet ultrafine grinding of industrial minerals: a review. Powder Technol 147:94–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2004.09.032
Kulisiewicz L, Delgado A (2010) High-pressure rheological measurement methods: a review. Appl Rheol 20:130181–1301815. https://doi.org/10.3933/ApplRheol-20-13018
Assael MJ, Kalyva AE, Antoniadis KD, Michael Banish R, Egry I, Wu J, Kaschnitz E, Wakeham WA (2010) Reference data for the density and viscosity of liquid copper and liquid tin. J Phys Chem Ref Data 39. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3467496
Walters K, Jones WM (2010) Measurement of viscosity, 4th edn. Elsevier
Kestin J, Sokolov M, Wakeham W (1973) Theory of capillary viscometers. Appl Sci Res 27:241–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382489
Shin S, Keum DY (2003) Viscosity measurement of non-Newtonian fluid foods with a mass-detecting capillary viscometer. J Food Eng 58:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00327-8
Nowak J, Odenbach S (2016) A capillary viscometer designed for the characterization of biocompatible ferrofluids. J Magn Magn Mater 411:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.03.057
Iida T, Guthrie RIL, Morita Z (1988) An equation for the viscosity of liquid metals. Can Metall Q 27:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1179/cmq.1988.27.1.1
Bakhtiyarov SI, Overfelt RA (1999) Measurement of liquid metal viscosity by rotational technique. Acta Mater 47:4311–4319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00307-9
Dinsdale AT, Quested PN (2004) The viscosity of aluminium and its alloys - a review of data and models. J Mater Sci 39:7221–7228. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000048735.50256.96
Kehr M, Hoyer W, Egry I (2007) A new high-temperature oscillating cup viscometer. Int J Thermophys 28:1017–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-007-0216-9
Nunes VMB, Lourenço MJV, Santos FJV, Nieto De Castro CA (2010) Viscosity of industrially important Al-Zn alloys. I-quasi-eutectic alloys Int J Thermophys 31:2348–2360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-010-0848-z
Deng Y, Zhang J, Jiao K (2018) Viscosity measurement and prediction model of molten iron. Ironmak Steelmak 45:773–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/03019233.2018.1491171
Zhu P, Lai J, Shen J, Wu K, Zhang L, Liu J (2018) An oscillating cup viscometer based on Shvidkovskiy algorithm for molten metals. Meas J Int Meas Confed 122:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.023
Roscoe R (1958) Viscosity determination by the oscillating vessel method I: theoretical considerations. Proc Phys Soc 72:576–584. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/72/4/312
Alan D, Newell GF Theory of oscillation type viscometers : The Oscillating Cup. 450–465
Mao Z, Zhang T (2017) Numerical analysis of an improved heating device for the electromagnetically driven oscillating cup viscometer. Adv Mech Eng 9:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017729075
Yakymovych A, Vus V, Mudry S (2016) Viscosity of liquid Cu-In-Sn alloys. J Mol Liq 219:845–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.055
Brooks RF, Day AP, Andon RJL, Chapman LA, Mills KC, Quested PN (2001) Measurement of viscosities of metals and alloys with an oscillating viscometer. High Temp - High Press 33:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1068/htwu139
Solomons C, White MS (1967) Oscillating plate viscometry. 305–315
Busciglio A, Montante G, Kracík T, Moucha T, Paglianti A (2017) Rotary sloshing induced by impeller action in unbaffled stirred vessels. Chem Eng J 317:433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.02.099
Nunes VMB, Queirós CSGP, Lourenço MJV, Santos FJV, Nieto de Castro CA (2018) Viscosity of industrially important Zn–Al alloys part II: alloys with higher contents of Al and Si. Int J Thermophys 39:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-018-2388-x
Quqazeh M, Aldabbas HA, Krishan MM, Musa N (2016) Characteristics and analysis for mechanical instrumentation used to measure fluid viscosity. 1–6
Elahi SH, Abdi H, Shahverdi HR (2013) Investigating viscosity variations of molten aluminum by calcium addition and stirring. Mater Lett 91:376–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.09.109
Kono Y, Kenney-Benson C, Shibazaki Y, Park C, Shen G, Wang Y (2015) High-pressure viscosity of liquid Fe and FeS revisited by falling sphere viscometry using ultrafast X-ray imaging. Phys Earth Planet Inter 241:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2015.02.006
Jo RS, Jo HS, Chai A (2017) Development of low-cost vision-based falling sphere viscometer. Proc 2017 IEEE Int Conf Signal Image Process Appl ICSIPA 2017 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIPA.2017.8120621
Elahi SH, Adelnia H, Shahverdi HR (2012) A simple accurate method for measuring viscosity of liquid metals at high temperatures. J Rheol (N Y N Y) 56:941–954. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.4709431
Lohöfer G (2020) Viscosity measurement by the oscillating drop method: the case of strongly damped oscillations. Int J Thermophys 41:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-020-2608-z
Mohr M, Wunderlich RK, Koch S, Galenko PK, Gangopadhyay AK, Kelton KF, Jiang JZ, Fecht HJ (2019) Surface tension and viscosity of Cu 50 Zr 50 measured by the oscillating drop technique on board the international space station. Microgravity Sci Technol 31:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12217-019-9678-1
Ishikawa T, Paradis PF, Okada JT, Kumar MV, Watanabe Y (2013) Viscosity of molten Mo, Ta, Os, Re, and W measured by electrostatic levitation. J Chem Thermodyn 65:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2013.05.036
Arashiro EY, Demarquette NR (1999) Use of the pendant drop method to measure interfacial tension between molten polymers. Mater Res 2:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-14391999000100005
Kargl F, Yuan C, Greaves GN (2015) Aerodynamic levitation: thermophysical property measurements of liquid oxides. Int J Microgravity Sci Appl 32:320212. https://doi.org/10.15011/ijmsa.32.320212
Wunderlich RK, Mohr M (2019) Non-linear effects in the oscillating drop method for viscosity measurements. High Temp - High Press 49:233–251. https://doi.org/10.32908/hthp.v48.648
Ma C, Zhao J, Cao C, Lin TC, Li X (2016) Fundamental study on laser interactions with nanoparticles-reinforced metals-part II: effect of nanoparticles on surface tension, viscosity, and laser melting. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 138. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033446
Xiao X, Hyers RW, Wunderlich RK, Fecht HJ, Matson DM (2018) Deformation induced frequency shifts of oscillating droplets during molten metal surface tension measurement. Appl Phys Lett 113:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5039336
Assael MJ, Kakosimos K, Banish RM, Brillo J, Egry I, Brooks R, Quested PN, Mills KC, Nagashima A et al (2006) Reference data for the density and viscosity of liquid aluminum and liquid iron. J Phys Chem Ref Data 35:285–300. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2149380
Gancarz T, Moser Z, Gąsior W, Pstruś J, Henein H (2011) A comparison of surface tension, viscosity, and density of Sn and Sn-Ag alloys using different measurement techniques. Int J Thermophys 32:1210–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-011-1011-1
Barber EM, Muenger JR, Villforth FJ (1955) A high rate of shear rotational viscometer. Anal Chem 27:425–429. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60099a030
Malik MM, Jeyakumar M, Hamed MS, Walker MJ, Shankar S (2010) Rotational rheometry of liquid metal systems: measurement geometry selection and flow curve analysis. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 165:733–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.03.009
Gabrysh AF, Eyring H, Ma SM, Liang K (1962) Automatic rotational viscometer and high-pressure apparatus for the study of the non-newtonian behavior of materials. Rev Sci Instrum 33:670–682. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1746649
Blanco A, Azpilgain Z, Lozares J, Kapranos P, Hurtado I (2010) Rheological characterization of A201 aluminum alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (English Ed 20:1638–1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(09)60351-4
Li Y, Mao W, Zhu W, Yang B (2014) Rheological behavior of semi-solid 7075 aluminum alloy at steady state. China Foundry 11:79–84
Nishimura K (1996) Viscosity of fluidized snow. Cold Reg Sci Technol 24:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-232X(95)00023-5
Jeng SC, Chen SW (1996) Determination of the solidification characteristics of the A356.2 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Forum 217–222:283–288. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.217-222.283
Riyaaz (2018) Searle viscosity differential flowmeter. Int J Pure Appl Math 118
Hirai M, Takebayashi K, Yoshikawa Y (1994) Effect of chemical composition on apparent viscosity of semisolid alloys. Isij Int 33:1182–1189. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.33.1182
Korolczuk-Hejnak M, Migas P (2012) Analysis of selected liquid steel viscosity. Arch Metall Mater 57:963–969. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10172-012-0107-3
Vieira EA, Kliauga AM, Ferrante M (2004) Microstructural evolution and rheological behaviour of aluminium alloys A356, and A356 + 0.5% Sn designed for thixocasting. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:1623–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.358
Corey H, Creswick N (1970) A versatile recording Couette-type viscometer. J Texture Stud 1:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1970.tb00720.x
Manrique LA, Porter RS (1975) An improved Couette high shear viscometer. Rheol Acta 14:926–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01515893
Berberian JG (1980) A method for measuring small rotational velocities for a couette-type viscometer. Rev Sci Instrum 51:1136–1137. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1136361
Barnes H (2011) Viscosity measurement. Thermopedia. https://doi.org/10.1615/AtoZ.v.viscosity_measurement
Gücüyener IH, Kok MV, Batmaz T (2002) End effect evaluation in rheological measurement of drilling fluids using Coutte coaxial cylinder viscometer. Energy Sources 24:441–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310252889942
Hembree W, Bochtler B, Busch R (2018) High-temperature rotating cylinder rheometer for studying metallic glass forming liquids. Rev Sci Instrum 89:. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5039318
Wunderlich AM, Brunn PO (1989) The complex rheological behavior of an aqueous cationic surfactant solution investigated in a Couette-type viscometer. Colloid Polym Sci 267:627–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01410440
Cullen PJ, O’Donnell CP, Houška M (2003) Rotational rheometry using complex geometries - a review. J Texture Stud 34:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.2003.tb01052.x
Modigell M, Pape L (2008) A comparison of measuring devices used to prevent wall slip in viscosity measurements of metallic suspensions. Solid State Phenom 141–143:307–312. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.141-143.307
Soualhi H, Kadri EH, Ngo TT, Bouvet A, Cussigh F, Tahar ZEA (2017) Design of portable rheometer with new vane geometry to estimate concrete rheological parameters. J Civ Eng Manag 23:347–355. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2015.1128481
Barnes HA, Nguyen QD (2001) Rotating vane rheometry-a review. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 98:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(01)00095-7
Article MATH Google Scholar
Bataineh KM (2014) Numerical investigation of secondary flow effect in cone-plate viscometer. Comput Fluids 101:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.06.009
Markovitz H, Elyash LJ, Padden FJ, DeWitt TW (1955) A cone-and-plate viscometer. J Colloid Sci 10:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-8522(55)90023-4
Giacomin AJ, Gilbert PH (2017) Exact-solution for cone-plate viscometry. 175101
Falah NM (2016) Study the flow behavior of GNPs filled water and polymer using cone-on-plate viscometer. 488–494
Hellström LO, Samaha M, Wang K, Smits A, Hultmark M (2015) Errors in parallel-plate and cone-plate rheometer measurements due to sample underfill. Meas Sci Technol 26. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/1/015301
Viscoelastic O, Simulation F, Shuichi T, Michal KZ, Naoki W (2009) Evaluation of parallel plate type rheometer using an 37:113–120
Renuka A, Muthtamilselvan M, Doh DH, Cho GR (2020) Entropy analysis and nanofluid past a double stretchable spinning disk using homotopy analysis method. Math Comput Simul 171:152–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2019.05.008
Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
Song Y, Won C, Kang S, hoon, Lee H, Park SJ, Park SH, Yoon J, (2018) Characterization of glass viscosity with parallel plate and rotational viscometry. J Non Cryst Solids 486:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.02.003
Dealy JM, Giacomin AJ (1993) Sliding plate and sliding cylinder rheometers. Rheol Meas 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2898-0_12
Koran F, Dealy JM (1999) A high pressure sliding plate rheometer for polymer melts. J Rheol (N Y N Y) 43:1279–1290. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.551046
Roselli RJ, Diller KR (2011) Biotransport: principles and applications
Laxmanan V, Flemings MC (1980) Deformation of semi-solid Sn-15 Pct Pb alloy. Metall Trans A 11:1927–1937. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655112
Yurko JA, Flemings MC (2002) Rheology and microstructure of semi-solid aluminum alloys compressed in the drop-forge viscometer. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 33:2737–2746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-0396-7
Lashkari O, Ghomashchi R (2007) A new machine to characterize microstructural evolution of semi-solid metal billets through viscometery. Mater Des 28:1321–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.01.023
Lashkari O, Nafisi S, Ghomashchi R (2006) Microstructural characterization of rheo-cast billets prepared by variant pouring temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 441:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.075
Fukui Y, Nara D, Kumazawa N (2015) Evaluation of the deformation behavior of a semi-solid hypereutectic Al-Si alloy compressed in a drop-forge viscometer. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 46:1908–1916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-015-2777-8
Malagutti L, Mollica F, Mazzanti V (2020) Error amplification in capillary viscometry of power law fluids with slip. Polym Test 91:106816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106816
Lee E, Kim B, Choi S (2020) Hand-held, automatic capillary viscometer for analysis of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. Sensors Actuators, A Phys 313:112176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2020.112176
Fischer F, Bartz J, Schmitz K, Brouwer L, Schwarze H (2018) A numerical approach for the evaluation of a capillary viscometer experiment. BATH/ASME 2018 Symp Fluid Power Motion Control FPMC 2018 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1115/FPMC2018-8815
Chou TC, Lee J, Hsiai TK, Tai YC (2017) A vacuum capillary viscometer that measures the viscosity of biofluids. TRANSDUCERS 2017 - 19th Int Conf Solid-State Sensors, Actuators Microsystems 1547–1550. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2017.7994355
Sieben M, Hanke R, Büchs J (2019) Contact-free determination of viscosity in multiple parallel samples. Sci Rep 9:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44859-z
Zhu P, Lai J, Wu K, Zhang Z, Huang X, Zhang L, Liu J (2017) An attenuated time measurement based on pulse interval for oscillating cup viscometer. Proc - 2017 Chinese Autom Congr CAC 2017 2017-Janua:3109–3111. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC.2017.8243309
Abbas KA, Abdulkarim SM, Saleh AM, Ebrahimian M (2010) Suitability of viscosity measurement methods for liquid food variety and applicability in food industry - a review. J Food, Agric Environ 8:100–107
Reilly A, Miller A, Jamali S, Newaz and (2020) A high precision falling-ball viscometer using a fast camera. 1–8
Kurkin EI, Chertykovtseva VO, Zakhvatkin YV (2020) Processing a brookfield rotational viscometer measurement results in the MATLAB. Key Eng Mater 834 KEM:82–89. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.834.82
Wang G, Du H, Guo B (2018) Determination of viscosity and wall slip behavior of a polymer-gel used for leakage control from Couette viscometry data. J Energy Resour Technol Trans ASME 140. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038384
Bakhtiyarov S, Siginer DA (2019) Rheoprocessing of semisolid aluminum alloys. Encycl Alum Its Alloy 2395–2406. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351045636-140000239
Lang L, Alexandrov S, Lyamina E, Manh DV (2020) The Behavior of Melts with Vanishing Viscosity in the Cone-and-Plate Rheomete. Appl Sci 10(1):172. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010172
Jiang T, Li J, Zhang S (2020) Design of a new structure for rotary viscometer. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 782. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/782/2/022102
Simlandi S (2018) Rheological behaviour of semisolid A356 alloy slurry during cooling – an overview. 4:784–787
Download references
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under Fundamental research grant No. FRGS/1/2019/TK03/UMP/02/8 (University reference RDU1901122) and Universiti Malaysia Pahang under Internal Research grant RDU160311 and RDU 1603125.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300, Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
Arumugampillai Megalingam & Asnul Hadi Bin Ahmad
Centre for Automotive Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
Asnul Hadi Bin Ahmad, Mohd Rashidi Bin Maarof & Kumarasamy Sudhakar
Energy Centre, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, 462003, India
Kumarasamy Sudhakar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Contributions
Writing: Arumugampillai Megalingam; supervision and investigation: Dr. Asnul Hadi Bin Ahmad, Dr. Mohd rashidi Bin Maarof, and Dr. Kumarasamy Sudhakar.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Asnul Hadi Bin Ahmad .
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
The manuscript has not been submitted to any other journal for simultaneous consideration. All authors voluntarily agree to participate in this research study.
Consent for publication
The participants provided informed consent for the publication of their statements.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Megalingam, A., Ahmad, A.H.B., Maarof, M.R.B. et al. Viscosity measurements in semi-solid metal processing: current status and recent developments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119 , 1435–1459 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08356-w
Download citation
Received : 15 March 2021
Accepted : 08 November 2021
Published : 30 November 2021
Issue Date : March 2022
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08356-w
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Semi-solid metal processing
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
- Gases and liquids
- Structure of matter
- Atomic models
- Chemical bonds
- Structure of metals
- Ductility of metals
- Solidification of metals
- Steelmaking
- Iron-carbon phase diagram
- Heat treatment of steels
- Material testing
- Planetary gear
- Involute gear
- Cycloidal gear
- Temperature
- Kinetic theory of gases
- Thermodynamic processes in closed systems
- Thermodynamic processes in open systems
- Geometrical optics
Experimental determination of viscosity (viscometer)
Viscometry is the experimental determination of the viscosity of liquids and gases with so-called viscometers.
Definition of viscosity (Newton’s law of fluid friction)
Viscosity describes the internal resistance to flow of a fluid (internal friction). It is defined by the shear stress τ required to shift two plates moving relative to each other. The higher the relative velocity Δv of the plates and the smaller the distance Δy between the plates, the greater the shear stress. The proportionality constant between these quantities is the (dynamic) viscosity η. This law is also known as Newton’s law of fluid friction:
\begin{align} \label{t} &\boxed{\tau= \eta \cdot \frac{\Delta v}{\Delta y}} ~~~&&\text{Newton’s law of fluid friction}\\[5px] &{\tau=\frac{F}{A}} ~~~&&\text{ shear stress} \\[5px] \end{align}
More detailed information on viscosity and Newton’s law of fluid friction can be found in the article Viscosity .
Rotational viscometer
The confinement of a fluid between two plates to define the viscosity is a very descriptive procedure, but is hardly feasible in practice. How should the fluid be held within the gap between two plates? In practice, therefore, a spindle is used which rotates at a constant speed in a cylindrical vessel. The vessel contains the fluid whose viscosity is to be determined. Such an apparatus for determining the viscosity is also called a rotational viscometer .
Depending on the viscosity, the drive of the spindle requires a certain torque. The higher the viscosity, the greater the torque required to keep the rotational speed constant. This torque is measured directly at the motor and can be used to determine the viscosity after an appropriate calibration. However, the rotational speed must not be selected too high, because at too high speeds no laminar flow is developed but a turbulent flow .
Falling sphere viscometer
The viscosity of a liquid can also be determined by experiments with a ball sinking into the liquid. The speed at which a ball sinks to the ground in a fluid is directly dependent on the viscosity of the fluid. The fluids used are mainly liquids.
The physicist George Gabriel Stokes derived the following equation, which shows the relationship between the speed v at which a sphere of radius r is drawn through a fluid of viscosity η and the resulting frictional force F f :
\begin{align} \label{s} &\boxed{F_f = 6\pi \cdot r \cdot \eta \cdot v} ~~~\text{Stokes’ law of friction} \\[5px] \end{align}
Note that Stoke’s law only applies to spherical bodies that are laminar flowed around!
If a ball is dropped in a viscous liquid, the speed increases at first until the opposing frictional force is as great as the weight force of the ball. For more accurate measurements, the upward buoyant force must also be taken into account. All three forces balance each other in the steady case and a constant sinking speed is obtained:
\begin{align} \label{gg} &F_g \overset{!}{=} F_f + F_b \\[5px] \end{align}
The weight force F g of the ball can be determined via the volume V b and the density of the ball ϱ b :
\begin{align} \label{g} &F_g = m_b \cdot g = V_b \cdot \rho_b \cdot g= \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \cdot \rho_b \cdot g\\[5px] \end{align}
The buoyant force F b is determined on the basis of the Archimedes’ principle from the weight force of the displaced liquid, whereby the displaced volume corresponds exactly to the volume of the ball:
\begin{align} \label{a} &F_b = m_f \cdot g = V_b \cdot \rho_f \cdot g= \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \cdot \rho_f \cdot g \\[5px] \end{align}
If one now uses the equations (\ref{s}), (\ref{g}) and (\ref{a}) and put them into equation (\ref{gg}), then the viscosity η of the liquid can be determined from its sinking speed v s :
\begin{align} &F_g \overset{!}{=} F_f + F_b \\[5px] &\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \cdot \rho_b \cdot g = 6\pi \cdot r \cdot \eta \cdot v_\text{s} + \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \cdot \rho_f \cdot g \\[5px] &6\pi \cdot r \cdot \eta \cdot v_\text{s} = \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \cdot \rho_b \cdot g ~- \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \cdot \rho_f \cdot g \\[5px] &6\pi \cdot r \cdot \eta \cdot v_\text{s} = \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 g \left(\rho_b-\rho_f\right) \\[5px] \label{e} &\boxed{\eta = \frac{2r^2g}{9~ v_\text{s}}\left(\rho_b-\rho_f\right) } ~~~~~r \ll R\\[5px] \end{align}
When performing the experiment, however, the sink rate must not be too high. On the one hand, because then it cannot be ensured that a state of equilibrium has been reached before the ball hits the ground. On the other hand, a laminar flow around the ball must always be assured, which is not the case at high speeds, as turbulence is then created.
Furthermore, the radius R of the cylindrical tube should be large compared to the radius r of the ball falling within it, otherwise there will be flow effects between the ball and the tube wall that can no longer be neglected. This results in additional friction of the liquid flowing past and a reduction in the sinking speed of the ball (principle of hydraulic damping). Due to the finite radius of the tube, the sinking speed of the ball is therefore always measured too small in practice. Therefore, the sinking velocity is corrected with an empirical correction factor L (called Ladenburg factor ):
\begin{align} \label{h} &\boxed{\eta = \frac{2r^2g}{9 ~v_\text{s} \cdot L}\left(\rho_b-\rho_f\right) } ~~~\text{where}~~~ \boxed{L=1+2.1 \frac{r}{R}}>1 \\[5px] \end{align}
In practice, the correction factor is usually determined in advance of the test using a liquid of known viscosity.
Falling sphere viscometer by Höppler
The falling ball viscometer by Höppler is based on the falling sphere method described in the previous section. A ball falls to the ground in a tube which contains the liquid to be examined. Two markings are attached to the tube which indicate a defined measuring distance Δs (“falling distance”). The time Δt required for the ball to pass through this measuring distance is measured by means of light barriers. The speed of descent v s of the sphere is therefore given by the following formula:
\begin{align} & v_\text{s} = \frac{\Delta s}{\Delta t}\\[5px] \end{align}
If the formula for the rate of descent is used in equation (\ref{h}), the viscosity η of the liquid can be determined with the following formula:
\begin{align} &\eta = \underbrace{\color{red}{\frac{2r^2g}{9 \cdot \Delta s \cdot L}}}_{\text{constant}~ \color{red}{C}} \cdot \left(\rho_b-\rho_f\right) \cdot \Delta t\\[5px] \label{eta} &\boxed{\eta = C \cdot \left(\rho_b-\rho_f\right) \cdot \Delta t } \\[5px]\\[5px] \end{align}
The term marked in red is a specific constant of the measuring apparatus, which also depends on the test sphere used. Depending on the viscosity to be expected, the manufacturers of Höppler viscometers provide various balls for which the test constant C has been determined in advance.
This constant also takes into account that the tube is not exactly vertical, but inclined. Therefore the ball sinks not only by falling, but also by rolling. This rolling motion guides the test ball stably downwards. In this way, turbulence in the liquid is avoided and the validity of Stokes’ Law is ensured, i.e. in particular the proportionality between frictional force and sinking speed. In the case of turbulent flow, the frictional force would no longer be proportional to the sinking speed and the viscosity would no longer be a linear function of the duration of the fall – equation (\ref{eta}) would no longer be valid.
In order to study the temperature influence on the viscosity, the tube is usually placed in another tube filled with water. Circulating thermostats can be used to precisely control the temperature of the water bath and thus the liquid to be examined.
Capillary viscometer by Ubbelohde
The capillary viscometer is based on the Hagen-Poiseuille law for pipe flows. This law states that the volumetric flow rate V* through a capillary is dependent on the viscosity η of the liquid flowing through (assumed that the flow is fully developed):
\begin{align} &\boxed{\dot V = – \frac{\pi R^4}{8 l \eta}\Delta p } \\[5px] \end{align}
In this equation, R denotes the radius of the capillary and l its length. The pressure difference Δp corresponds to the pressure drop between the beginning and end of the capillary, which ultimately causes the flow of the liquid. Below the capillary is an L-shaped tube so that the same ambient pressure applies above and below the capillary. Thus the liquid is driven only by the hydrostatic pressure . The pressure drop Δp is thus dependent on the density of the liquid.
The volumetric flow rate through the capillary can be determined by measuring time and mass that has flowed through. However, manufacturers of capillary viscometers usually summarize the device-dependent variables such as radius and length of the capillary in a constant C. Thus, only the time period t has to be determined within which the liquid in the reservoir has passed two marks. In addition, the density of the fluid ϱ f is required, since this determines the pressure drop in the Hagen-Poiseuille law. With the following formula the viscosity η can then be determined:
\begin{align} &\boxed{\eta= C \cdot \rho_f \cdot (t-t_c)} \\[5px] \end{align}
As already mentioned, the Hagen-Poiseuille law only applies to a fully developed flow. At transition from reservoir to capillary (and up to some degree also within the capillary) however, the flow is not yet fully developed, but is accelerated. The energy required to accelerate the fluid means an additional pressure drop. To take this into account, the measured time is therefore corrected by a so-called Hagenbach correction time t c .
Dip cup viscometer
A very simple method for determining viscosity is the dip cup viscometer . This method makes use of the fact that the discharge of a liquid through a hole in a vessel also depends on the viscosity. Due to the high flow resistance, highly viscous liquids take a relatively long time to flow out through a hole in the dip cup . For a given cup volume, the time required to discharge the liquid is therefore a direct measure of viscosity.
Manufacturers of dip cups list the corresponding viscosity in their data sheets depending on the discharge time. Depending on the viscosity to be expected, different dip cups are to be used. In order to obtain valid results, the discharge time must also be within a certain range. If this is not the case, another dip cup must be used.
The dip cup viscosimeter is mainly used to determine the viscosity of paints or lacquers. These liquids would otherwise heavily contaminate conventional viscometers. Furthermore, very fast results are obtained with a dip cup viscometer, so that paints or lacquers can be checked and further processed immediately after mixing.
RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR
Archimedes’ principle of buoyancy (crown of Archimedes)
Why does water boil faster at high altitudes?
Derivation of the Navier-Stokes equations
Derivation of the Euler equation of motion (conservation of momentum)
Derivation of the continuity equation (conservation of mass)
Viscosity of an ideal gas
- Privacy Policy
Related stories
Maintaining sample integrity during repeated freeze/thaw cycles, how to measure the complex poisson’s ratio based on the indirect method with axial-torsional dynamic mechanical analysis, scamming in the laboratory industry: a growing threat, laboratory products, rotational viscometry: improve the flow of your production process.
--> Feb 20 2023 --> Read 1844 Times -->
Author: Tamara Kurzmann on behalf of Anton Paar GmbH
Free to read.
This article has been unlocked and is ready to read.
Practically all industries rely on viscosity checks to develop, formulate, and produce a product with consistent characteristics. Many important parameters for the production control of materials and also for the development of new products are directly related to the product’s viscosity. Rotational viscometers are perfectly suited for the determination of the viscosity of samples ranging from liquid (e.g., nose drops, juices) to semi-solid (e.g., waxes, sauces). This article provides insights into the basics of viscometry, quality control parameters, and application examples.
Principles of viscosity
The physical quantity ‘viscosity’ gives information on how thick a fluid is and how easily it flows. In scientific terms, viscosity is the measure of a fluid’s internal flow resistance. If you compare a high-viscosity fluid such as honey to a low-viscosity fluid such as eye drops, you will find that at the same temperature, the honey flows slower than the eye drops. The two-plates model provides a mathematical description for viscosity (Figure 1). Think of a kind of sandwich [1]: There are two plates with fluid placed in-between. The lower plate does not move. The upper plate drifts aside very slowly and subjects the fluid to a stress, which is parallel to its surface: the shear stress (tau). The force applied to the upper plate divided by this plate’s area defines the shear stress. Force/area results in the unit N/m2. The shear rate (gamma-dot) is the velocity of the upper plate divided by the distance between the two plates. Its unit is reciprocal second [s-1]. According to Newton’s Law [2], shear stress is viscosity times shear rate. Therefore, the viscosity (eta) is shear stress divided by shear rate: ƞ= τ/γ ̇ Figure 1. The virtual viscous sandwich: the two-plates model.
Viscosity measurement with a rotational viscometer
Most rotational viscometers work according to the Searle principle: A motor drives a spindle inside a fixed cup (Figure 2). The test sequence is the following: The user attaches a spindle to the rotational viscometer and sets a speed. The spindle starts to rotate and the sample contained in the cup will follow this movement. While the driving speed is preset, the torque (better: the force) required for turning the spindle against the fluid’s viscous forces is measured. The operator receives the dynamic viscosity and the torque (mostly in %). For most commonly used spring-type viscometers, the rotation of the spindle causes a deflection of a spring. Several instrument models with different spring types are available in order to measure low-viscosity to high-viscosity substances. In case of low-viscosity substances, the spring needs to be sufficiently sensitive, whereas for samples in the high-viscosity range, a more robust spring is required. Figure 2. Rotational viscometer – Searle principle. Motor and measuring unit (1), stand (2), user interface (3), measuring spindle (rotor) (4), sample-filled cup (5).
Flow behaviour
Viscosity values are not constant values as they are affected by many conditions (Figure 4): • The ambient conditions: temperature and pressure. • The substance’s inner structure: A highly viscous substance features tightly linked molecules and resists deformation. • The shear rate or the shear stress as external force: This includes all kinds of actions like wiping a substance, or gravity. The influence further depends on the strength and on the duration of the external force. A viscosity curve is used to determine the flow behaviour of a substance. The viscosity is plotted against the shear rate (Figure 3). Such a curve can be generated with a rotational viscometer by increasing the shear rate step-wise with a defined measurement point duration. The temperature and other ambient conditions are constant. If a fluid’s internal flow resistance is independent of the external force (shear rate) acting upon the fluid, it is ideally viscous (Figure 3: curve 1). Such fluids are named Newtonian liquids after Sir Isaac Newton. Typical materials from this group include water, mineral oil, salad oil, and solvents. Shear-thinning behaviour (or: pseudoplastic) is characterised by decreasing viscosity with increasing shear rates (Figure 3: curve 2). Typical materials are coatings, glues, shampoos, and polymer solutions. Shear-thickening (or: dilatant) means increasing viscosity with increasing shear rates (Figure 3: curve 3). Materials that typically display such behaviour include highly filled dispersions, such as ceramic suspensions, starch dispersions, and dental filling mass. Figure 3. Viscosity curve. Different types of flow behaviour: Newtonian (1), shear-thinning (2), shear-thickening (3).
Yield point
The yield point (also called yield stress) is the lowest shear-stress value above which a material will behave like a fluid and below which the material will act like a solid [3]. The yield point is the minimum force that must be applied to those samples so that they start to flow. The yield point is of vital importance for many practical issues and applications e.g., for quality control of final products or for optimising the production process. The yield point is not a material constant but depends on the measuring and analysis method used. There are many different methods available. On rotational viscometers, the yield point is often calculated from flow curves measured with a linear increase of the shear rate. The yield point is calculated using model functions (e.g., Bingham, Casson, or Herschel-Bulkley). For all these approximation models, the yield point value τ0 is determined by extrapolation of the flow curve towards a low shear rate value (Figure 4). Each different model function produces a different yield point because the calculation is different. Figure 4. Flow curve. Sample without yield point (1), sample with yield point (2).
Another method for yield point determination is the vane technique. It is a very quick and easy method for analysing the yield point of paste-like samples. A vane spindle with four thin blades arranged at equal angles is used for the test. A constant low speed is preset on the rotational viscometer. The maximum yield stress, which can be detected during the measurement, is the yield point value. To illustrate the yield point in a graph, the torque is plotted against the time (Figure 5). The diagram has three typical regions [4]: • The shear stress increases due to deformation as an elastic response. • A shear stress peak is achieved due to a collapse of the microstructure of the material. This point is called the yield point. • A stress decay due to the structural breakdown can be visualised. Figure 5. Yield point determination with the vane technique (red line = yield point).
Example applications with various rotational viscometer configurations
Concentric cylinder systems: The viscosity of cough syrup was analysed using a spring-type viscometer (R-model for regular viscosity samples) with a concentric cylinder measuring system (Figure 6). Concentric cylinder systems are absolute measuring systems. Due to the defined spindle geometry, it is possible to calculate shear rate values. The sample volume needed for the measurement is relatively low (approx. 2 mL to 20 mL). In contrast, for a typical rotational viscosity test with standard spindles, a sample volume of 500 mL is required. In contrast to, for example, water and juices, cough syrup has a relatively high viscosity in order to coat the surface of the throat (Figure 7). To evaluate the flow behaviour of the sample, it is useful to calculate the shear-thinning index. If the value is >1, the sample is shear-thinning. If the value is <1, the sample is shear-thickening. The measured cough syrup has a shear-thinning index of 1, which means that the sample shows a so-called Newtonian behaviour. This means that the sample’s viscosity does not change, even if a higher speed is applied, for instance, during swallowing. Figure 7. Viscosity measurement of cough syrup. Cone-plate measuring systems: The quality of a gel for muscle and joint pain was controlled by rotational viscosity testing using a spring-type viscometer (R-model for regular/medium viscosity samples) with a cone-plate measuring system (Figure 8). The cone-plate system offers the chance to reduce the required sample volume for a viscosity measurement down to 0.5 mL to 2 mL. Moreover, cone-plate measuring systems provide absolute viscosity determinations for sophisticated and reliable measurements.
The Herschel-Bulkley model gives the product’s yield stress as well as the product’s flow index and consistency index (Figure 9). 93.38 N/m² need to be applied on the tube to make the gel flow. In order to prevent liquids like gels from flowing out of the tube when no force is applied, the yield point has to be analysed. A flow index of 0.4155 (<1) means that the gel has a shear-thinning flow behaviour. Gels have to show shear-thinning flow behaviour because the viscosity has to decrease when a force is applied, for example, when squeezing it out of a tube or applying it to the skin. Figure 9. Flow curve diagram and yield point determination of gel using the Herschel-Bulkley mathematical regression model. Vane spindles: The yield point of porridge was analysed using a spring-type viscometer (R-model for regular viscosity samples) with a vane spindle (Figure 10). Vane spindles are required for measuring the yield point of paste-like samples (also with particles). These spindles reduce slippage and minimise structural changes of the sample during immersion of the spindle. The spindles are also suitable for viscosity measurements at a certain speed. Vanes are relative measuring systems but are the only solution for measuring paste-like samples with particles. They are also cheap. The measured porridge shows a yield stress of 252 N/m2 (Figure 11). This parameter can be important for production, as it defines how much pump power is needed. Furthermore, it is known that the mouthfeel of food products is related to the yield stress. Creaminess correlates with a higher yield stress value. Figure 11. Yield stress measurement of porridge with vane spindle T-bar spindles with motorised stand adapter: The viscosity of mayonnaise was measured using a spring-type viscometer (R-model for regular viscosity samples) with a motorised stand adapter and T-bar spindle (Figure 12). A motorised stand adapter with T-bar spindles is a cheap and reliable measurement configuration for pasty, non-flowing samples like mayonnaise (without particles). The motorised stand adapter replaces the hand-wheel of the viscometer. Figure 13. Viscosity measurement of mayonnaise with a rotational viscometer equipped with a motorised stand adapter and T-bar spindle. The viscosity values of the last 30 s of the measurement have been averaged. It moves the spindle during the measurement up- and downwards within the sample at a slow speed. It eliminates the so-called ‘channelling’ problem. Any spindle that rotates constantly at the same height will create an air channel within the sample, which will lead to meaningless viscosity values as the sample is not in contact with the spindle anymore. The moving viscometer head with T-bar spindles eliminates this problem by continuously measuring the intact sample due to the helical spindle movement. At the beginning of the measurement, the viscosity of the mayonnaise is zero because the measurement started approximately half a centimetre above the sample (Figure 13). Then the spindle rotates through the sample, which leads to a viscosity plateau after a short period of time. Within this plateau, the viscosity can be averaged. The selected mayonnaise has an average viscosity of 14,830 mPa·s (74.2 % torque). The goal of production is that mayonnaise has a proper thickness for the application regardless of the fat content.
1. Mezger, T. 2011. The Rheology Handbook. 3rd revised edition. Hanover: Vincentz Network. 2. Newton, I. 1687. Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica (“Principia”). London. 3. ISO 3219:1994-10. 1994. Plastics – Polymers/Resins in the Liquid State or as Emulsions or Dispersions – Determination of Viscosity Using a Rotational Viscometer with Defined Shear Rate. 4. Genovese, D. B., and M. A. Rao. 2005. “Components of Vane Yield Stress of Structured Food Dispersions.” Journal of Food Science, 70(8): E498–E504.
I agree to the Labmate Online Privacy Policy .
I am over 16 years old.
Digital Edition
Lab asia 31.4 august 2024.
August 2024
Chromatography Articles - HPLC gradient validation using non-invasive flowmeters Mass Spectrometry & Spectroscopy Articles - MS detection of Alzheimer’s blood-based biomarkers Labo...
View all digital editions
Advances in plasma medicine with atmospheric pr...
Geological clocks prove age of Tibetan glacier
New HPLC columns to accelerate advanced therapy...
MS detection of Alzheimer’s blood-based bioma...
Selecting the right TOC analyser for your labor...
Understanding PFAS: Analysis and Implications
€10 million investment to generate 80 new job...
UV-Vis and fluorescence spectroscopy illuminate...
Scamming in the laboratory industry: A growing...
Digital transformation of the pharmaceutical in...
Aug 25 2024 Copenhagen, Denmark
Lab Cambodia 2024
Aug 28 2024 Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Sep 04 2024 Chiba, Tokyo, Japan
BMSS-BSPR Super Meeting 2024
Sep 04 2024 University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Thailand Lab 2024
Sep 11 2024 Bangkok, Thailand
View all events
International Labmate Limited Oak Court Business Centre Sandridge Park, Porters Wood St Albans Hertfordshire AL3 6PH United Kingdom
T +44 (0)1727 858 840 F +44 (0)1727 840 310 E [email protected]
Our other channels
Copyright © 2024 Labmate Online. All rights reserved.
- Terms & Conditions
Searle principle: the instrument's motor rotates the measuring bob inside an immovable cup filled with slurry (α cyl.cone = 120 • ).
Contexts in source publication
Similar publications.
- Afaf Saaidi
- EUR J MECH B-FLUID
- J TAIWAN INST CHEM E
- Xiaohou Zhou
- Xinlong Wang
- Hamid Mazouz
- Jean-Michel Ghidaglia
- Recruit researchers
- Join for free
- Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up
IMAGES
COMMENTS
In this video, I have discussed the theory of Searle's viscometer to find the viscosity of a high viscous fluid and derived the formula to find the viscosity. Video is created using open-source ...
In the concentric cylinder viscometer (coaxial double cylinder viscometer or simply coaxial cylinder viscometer), the viscosity is determined by placing the liquid in the gap between the inner cylinder and the outer cylinder. Viscosity measurement can be performed by rotating the inner cylinder (Searle type viscometer) or the outer cylinder (Couette type viscometer), as shown in Figures 2.2.10 ...
The viscosity of a given sample using Redwood viscometer should be denoted with Redwood seconds at the specified temperature. Repeatability of the experiments should be duly compared at low and high temperatures.
Subbiah Pandian Viscosity 5 Searle s Viscometer Experiment 3 in English SubbiahPandian 3.03K subscribers Subscribed 59 5.5K views 6 years ago ...more
In the Searle-type viscometer, the outer cylinder (cup) is fixed, and the inner cylinder (bop) is set to rotate, for example, Stormer viscometer and Brookfield viscometer [ 103 ].
The objectives of this experiment are: (1) to derive an equation to determine the viscosity of a fluid using the Thomas Stormer viscometer, (2) to develop a methodology to calibrate viscosity measurements from a Cole Palmer viscometer, and (3) to recommend the best viscometer for use in measuring the viscosity of oils.
Searle principle is a common though neglected piece of theory that is in use every day. The Searle principle is primarily concerned with the relation of a motors torque to the dynamic viscosity of the liquid under test. The Searle principle is commonly used in many rotational viscometers. The rotational viscometers have many different shaped bobs used and suited for varying situations, here we ...
Viscometry is the experimental determination of the viscosity of liquids and gases with so-called viscometers.
Viscosity measurement with a rotational viscometer Most rotational viscometers work according to the Searle principle: A motor drives a spindle inside a fixed cup (Figure 2). The test sequence is the following: The user attaches a spindle to the rotational viscometer and sets a speed.
Download scientific diagram | Searle principle: the instrument's motor rotates the measuring bob inside an immovable cup filled with slurry (α cyl.cone = 120 • ). from publication: Rheological ...
About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket © 2024 Google LLC
Learn how to determine the Viscosity by Using Ostwald-type, Suspended-level and Rotating Viscometer.
A viscometer or rheometer is employed to measure the flow/deformation behavior of a liquid/viscoelastic food. Viscometers are conventionally used to measure the viscous properties of thin and thick liquids while rheometers are more sophisticated than a viscometer to measure the viscous and viscoelastic characteristics.
SKU:100413. It is used for measuring viscosity of very viscose liquids. The outer cylinder can be clamped at any desired height and the inner cylinder is graduated in mms and slot is covered by a transparent cover. Complete with scale pans and releasing pin. Viscometer Searle's Pattern Catalog No. 100413.
A viscometer is an instrument used to measure the co-efficient of viscosity of highly viscos liquid or fluid, like Caster Oil or Engine Oil, Glycerine, Honey and Transformer Oil by Searle's Viscometer. The value of the coefficient of viscosity for a liquid such as glycerine may be obtained at any desired height. The outer cylinder can be ...
Description It is used for measuring viscosity of very viscose liquids. The outer cylinder can be clamped at any desired height and the inner cylinder is graduated in mms and slot is covered by a transparent cover. Complete with scale pans and releasing pin. Viscometer Searle's Pattern
It measures viscosity of every viscos liquid. The outer cylinder can be clamped at any desired height and the inner cylinder is graduated in mms and slot is covered by a transparent cover. Complete with scale pans and releasing pins. Signup Newsletter Email address: Follow Us Links About Us Philosophy Become Dealer Credibility Contact Us Infralab Product Range Analytical Clinical & Industrial ...
EMAIL : [email protected] / [email protected] Mobile : 9892256737 / 7021548561 / 8108474704 / 9821198397 Mobile: 7021548561 0 VISCOSITY OF LIQUID (Searle's Pattern) SEARLE'S VISCOMETER
For centuries, Tyumen vied with the nearby city of Tobolsk—once the official capital of Siberia—for the prestige of the region's most important city. Tyumen won in the end, when the Trans ...
LIKE SHARE SUBSCRIBEAim :- To determine the Coefficient of Viscosity of water by Studying its flow through capillary or by Poiseuille's method.Link for D...
THE REQUEST: The parallel connection of e.sybox improves performance in terms of water flow, making the pumping set particularly suitable for apartment complexes. This was the case with Tyumen, where 28 apartments on 7 floors were equipped with a centralised pressurisation system consisting of three e.sybox. The set split the flow rate equally, and all three units work at the same time only ...
Samotlor Field is the largest oil field of Russia and the sixth largest in the world, [ 1] owned and operated by Rosneft. The field is located at Lake Samotlor in Nizhnevartovsk district, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Tyumen Oblast. It covers 1,752 square kilometres (676 sq mi). [ 2]
The climate of Tyumen ()Tyumen is located in the southern part of Russia on the banks of the river Tura and is the capital of the Tyumen oblast (administrative division).