- Linguistics
- Join Newsletter
Our Promise to you
Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy , ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.
Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.
What Is the Critical Period Hypothesis?
The critical period hypothesis is a theory in the study of language acquisition which posits that there is a critical period of time in which the human mind can most easily acquire language. This idea is often considered with regard to primary language acquisition, and those who agree with this hypothesis argue that language must be learned in the first few years of life or else the ability to acquire language is greatly hindered. The critical period hypothesis is also used in secondary language acquisition, regarding the idea of a time period in which a secondary language can be most easily acquired.
With regard to primary language acquisition, which refers to the process by which a person learns his or her first language , the critical period hypothesis is quite dramatic. This idea indicates that a person has only a set period of time in which he or she can learn a first language, usually the first three to ten years of development. During this time, language can be learned and acquired through exposure to language; simply hearing others talking on an ongoing and regular basis is sufficient. Once this time period is over, however, those who agree with the critical period hypothesis argue that primary language acquisition may be impossible or greatly impaired.
There is a great deal of research into human brain development that supports this hypothesis, but it is still difficult to prove. One of the only conclusive ways to prove this hypothesis would be to have a person isolated from infancy until about the age of ten, without exposure to human speech. Such upbringing would be unthinkable, however, so this type of experiment cannot be conducted and the hypothesis remains largely unproven.
Unfortunate situations in which a child has been abused and isolated by his or her caregivers have provided opportunities to support the critical period hypothesis. In at least one instance, medical care and study of the child did demonstrate that full language acquisition was nearly impossible. Though this occurrence did support the hypothesis, secondary factors such as possible brain damage make the evidence flawed.
The critical period hypothesis is also frequently applied to secondary language acquisition, though in a somewhat less dramatic way. With regard to secondary language, many linguists and speech therapists agree that a second language can be acquired more easily when someone is young. Studies of the brain indicate that in youth the brain is still developing more quickly and new linguistic information can be processed and incorporated into the brain more easily. Once this period is over, however, secondary language acquisition is still certainly possible, though it can be more difficult.
- https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/2112gchild.html
Editors' Picks
Related Articles
- What Is Language Acquisition?
- What Is a Second Language?
- What Are the Different Types of Second Language Acquisition Theories?
Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.
- Subject List
- Take a Tour
- For Authors
- Subscriber Services
- Publications
- African American Studies
- African Studies
- American Literature
- Anthropology
- Architecture Planning and Preservation
- Art History
- Atlantic History
- Biblical Studies
- British and Irish Literature
- Childhood Studies
- Chinese Studies
- Cinema and Media Studies
- Communication
- Criminology
- Environmental Science
- Evolutionary Biology
- International Law
- International Relations
- Islamic Studies
- Jewish Studies
- Latin American Studies
- Latino Studies
Linguistics
- Literary and Critical Theory
- Medieval Studies
- Military History
- Political Science
- Public Health
- Renaissance and Reformation
- Social Work
- Urban Studies
- Victorian Literature
- Browse All Subjects
How to Subscribe
- Free Trials
In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Critical Periods
Introduction, general overviews.
- Critical Periods in Language: Background Readings
- First-Language Acquisition (L1A)
- Age and Second-Language Acquisition (L2A)
- Controversy around the Critical Period Hypothesis for Second-Language Acquisition (CPH/L2A)
- Critical Period Geometry and Timing in L2A
- Brain-Based Studies of Critical Periods in L2A
- Bilingualism
- First-Language Attrition
- Sign Language
- Foreign Language Education
- Animal Models of Critical Periods
- Absolute Pitch
Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about
About related articles close popup.
Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet
Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.
- Acceptability Judgments
- Acquisition of Possessives
- Acquisition of Pragmatics
- Bilingualism and Multilingualism
- Biology of Language
- Children’s Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge
- Early Child Phonology
- Experimental Linguistics
- Genetics and Language
- Language Acquisition
- Language in Autism Spectrum Disorders
- Language Nests
- Learnability
- Psycholinguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism
- Roman Jakobson
- The Prague Linguistic Circle
- Variationist Sociolinguistics
- Visual Word Recognition
Other Subject Areas
Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.
- Attention and Salience
- Edward Sapir
- Text Comprehension
- Find more forthcoming articles...
- Export Citations
- Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Critical Periods by David P. Birdsong LAST REVIEWED: 12 January 2023 LAST MODIFIED: 12 January 2023 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0139
A critical period is a bounded maturational span during which experiential factors interact with biological mechanisms to determine neurocognitive and behavioral outcomes. In humans, the construct of critical period (CP) is commonly applied to first-language (L1) and second-language (L2) development. Some language researchers hold that during a CP, various mechanisms are at work that result in successful language acquisition and language processing. Outside of the period, other factors and mechanisms are involved, resulting in deficits in acquisition and processing. Many researchers believe that L1 development is constrained by maturationally based CPs. However, this notion is more controversial in L2 acquisition research, where the Critical Period Hypothesis for L2 acquisition (CPH/L2A) is debated on empirical, theoretical, and methodological grounds. Bilingualism researchers study the possibility that CPs may govern the likelihood and degree of loss (attrition) of the L1 among bilinguals as they age. Studies of CPs in L1 acquisition and L2 acquisition have been conducted with learners of spoken languages, signed languages, and artificial languages. CP research is considered in educational policy, particularly in the context of foreign language instruction. On a terminological note, a distinction is sometimes drawn between “critical” and “sensitive” periods, the latter term denoting receptivity of the organism to shaping by experience (or, in certain studies, suggesting relatively mild effects). Some researchers use these terms interchangeably, while others use one but not the other. Here, “critical period” will be used as a cover term unless specific reference is being made to sensitive period.
Lillard and Erisir 2011 describes juvenile CPs in language, imprinting, and vision. The article includes an informative table covering seven levels of neural changes in the brain in juveniles versus adults, with notes on the time course of changes and affected brain areas in animal and human models. The authors observe that changes in neural architecture triggered by early versus late experiences differ in degree more than type, and that the variety of triggering experiences is reduced with age. A second table summarizes neuroanatomical, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging techniques for observing specific types of neuroplasticity. Knudsen 2004 is exceptionally informative with respect to: prerequisites for CPs; the properties, mechanisms, and timing of plasticity; reopening of critical periods; the roles of presence and absence of relevant stimulation; and sensitive periods versus critical periods. Knudsen points out that complex behaviors (which include language use) may be regulated by multiple CPs. Takesian and Hensch 2013 emphasizes the individual-level plasticity of the timing of CP onset, peak, and offset, which may vary according to excitatory/inhibitory circuit balance that is sensitive to drugs, sleep, trauma, and genetic perturbation (see also Werker and Hensch 2015 [cited under First-Language Acquisition (L1A) ). Reh, et al. 2020 examines how plasticity is regulated at multiple timescales during development and provides examples from language processing, mental illness, and recovery from brain injury. Gabard-Durnam and McLaughlin 2020 outlines a set of current approaches to the study of sensitive periods in humans. These approaches include environmental manipulations (deprivation, enrichment, substitution), plasticity manipulations via pharmacological intervention, and computational modeling. Frankenhuis and Walasek 2020 develops an evolutionary model that accounts for sensitive periods that occur beyond the early stages of ontogeny.
Frankenhuis, Willem E., and Nicole Walasek. 2020. Modeling the evolution of sensitive periods . Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 41:100715.
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100715
Sensitive periods in mid-ontogeny are favored by natural selection as a function of the reliability of relevant environmental cues.
Gabard-Durnam, Laurel, and Katie A. McLaughlin. 2020. Sensitive periods in human development: Charting a course for the future. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 36:120–128.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.09.003
Figures 1, 2 and 3 and their captions are particularly informative.
Knudsen, Eric I. 2004. Sensitive periods in the development of brain and behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16.8: 1412–1425.
DOI: 10.1162/0898929042304796
Focuses on the role of experience in modifying neural circuits during periods of plasticity, leading to connectivity patterns that become stable and less energy intensive, and making up what Knudsen calls the “stability landscape.”
Lillard, Angeline S., and Alev Erisir. 2011. Old dogs learning new tricks: Neuroplasticity beyond the juvenile period. Developmental Review 31:207–239.
DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.008
A largely uncritical review and synthesis of well-known studies.
Reh, Rebecca K., Brian G. Dias, Charles A. Nelson III, et al. 2020. Critical period regulation across multiple timescales . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117.38: 23242–23251.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820836117
A diverse group of specialists’ account of neurobiological CP mechanisms in animals and humans. Notes that “cortical plasticity is not only influenced by an animal’s life experiences but may also be modified by that of the parents. This occurs via parental behavior during the offspring’s early postnatal life, the in utero environment during gestation, or modification of the parental or fetal germ cells” (p. 23246).
Takesian, Anne E., and Takao K. Hensch. 2013. Balancing plasticity/stability across brain development. Progress in Brain Research 207:3–34.
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63327-9.00001-1
Illuminates the dynamic between the intrinsic plasticity of CP and the stabilization of neural networks, which limits maladaptive proliferation of circuit rewiring past the CP.
back to top
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .
- About Linguistics »
- Meet the Editorial Board »
- Accessibility Theory in Linguistics
- Acquisition, Second Language, and Bilingualism, Psycholin...
- Adpositions
- African Linguistics
- Afroasiatic Languages
- Algonquian Linguistics
- Altaic Languages
- Ambiguity, Lexical
- Analogy in Language and Linguistics
- Animal Communication
- Applicatives
- Applied Linguistics, Critical
- Arawak Languages
- Argument Structure
- Artificial Languages
- Australian Languages
- Austronesian Linguistics
- Auxiliaries
- Balkans, The Languages of the
- Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan
- Berber Languages and Linguistics
- Borrowing, Structural
- Caddoan Languages
- Caucasian Languages
- Celtic Languages
- Celtic Mutations
- Chomsky, Noam
- Chumashan Languages
- Classifiers
- Clauses, Relative
- Clinical Linguistics
- Cognitive Linguistics
- Colonial Place Names
- Comparative Reconstruction in Linguistics
- Comparative-Historical Linguistics
- Complementation
- Complexity, Linguistic
- Compositionality
- Compounding
- Comprehension, Sentence
- Computational Linguistics
- Conditionals
- Conjunctions
- Connectionism
- Consonant Epenthesis
- Constructions, Verb-Particle
- Contrastive Analysis in Linguistics
- Conversation Analysis
- Conversation, Maxims of
- Conversational Implicature
- Cooperative Principle
- Coordination
- Creoles, Grammatical Categories in
- Critical Periods
- Cross-Language Speech Perception and Production
- Cyberpragmatics
- Default Semantics
- Definiteness
- Dementia and Language
- Dene (Athabaskan) Languages
- Dené-Yeniseian Hypothesis, The
- Dependencies
- Dependencies, Long Distance
- Derivational Morphology
- Determiners
- Dialectology
- Distinctive Features
- Dravidian Languages
- Endangered Languages
- English as a Lingua Franca
- English, Early Modern
- English, Old
- Eskimo-Aleut
- Euphemisms and Dysphemisms
- Evidentials
- Exemplar-Based Models in Linguistics
- Existential
- Existential Wh-Constructions
- Fieldwork, Sociolinguistic
- Finite State Languages
- First Language Attrition
- Formulaic Language
- Francoprovençal
- French Grammars
- Gabelentz, Georg von der
- Genealogical Classification
- Generative Syntax
- Grammar, Categorial
- Grammar, Cognitive
- Grammar, Construction
- Grammar, Descriptive
- Grammar, Functional Discourse
- Grammars, Phrase Structure
- Grammaticalization
- Harris, Zellig
- Heritage Languages
- History of Linguistics
- History of the English Language
- Hmong-Mien Languages
- Hokan Languages
- Humor in Language
- Hungarian Vowel Harmony
- Idiom and Phraseology
- Imperatives
- Indefiniteness
- Indo-European Etymology
- Inflected Infinitives
- Information Structure
- Interface Between Phonology and Phonetics
- Interjections
- Iroquoian Languages
- Isolates, Language
- Jakobson, Roman
- Japanese Word Accent
- Jones, Daniel
- Juncture and Boundary
- Khoisan Languages
- Kiowa-Tanoan Languages
- Kra-Dai Languages
- Labov, William
- Language and Law
- Language Contact
- Language Documentation
- Language, Embodiment and
- Language for Specific Purposes/Specialized Communication
- Language, Gender, and Sexuality
- Language Geography
- Language Ideologies and Language Attitudes
- Language Revitalization
- Language Shift
- Language Standardization
- Language, Synesthesia and
- Languages of Africa
- Languages of the Americas, Indigenous
- Languages of the World
- Lexical Access, Cognitive Mechanisms for
- Lexical Semantics
- Lexical-Functional Grammar
- Lexicography
- Lexicography, Bilingual
- Linguistic Accommodation
- Linguistic Anthropology
- Linguistic Areas
- Linguistic Landscapes
- Linguistic Prescriptivism
- Linguistic Profiling and Language-Based Discrimination
- Linguistic Relativity
- Linguistics, Educational
- Listening, Second Language
- Literature and Linguistics
- Machine Translation
- Maintenance, Language
- Mande Languages
- Mass-Count Distinction
- Mathematical Linguistics
- Mayan Languages
- Mental Health Disorders, Language in
- Mental Lexicon, The
- Mesoamerican Languages
- Minority Languages
- Mixed Languages
- Mixe-Zoquean Languages
- Modification
- Mon-Khmer Languages
- Morphological Change
- Morphology, Blending in
- Morphology, Subtractive
- Munda Languages
- Muskogean Languages
- Nasals and Nasalization
- Niger-Congo Languages
- Non-Pama-Nyungan Languages
- Northeast Caucasian Languages
- Oceanic Languages
- Papuan Languages
- Penutian Languages
- Philosophy of Language
- Phonetics, Acoustic
- Phonetics, Articulatory
- Phonological Research, Psycholinguistic Methodology in
- Phonology, Computational
- Phonology, Early Child
- Policy and Planning, Language
- Politeness in Language
- Positive Discourse Analysis
- Possessives, Acquisition of
- Pragmatics, Acquisition of
- Pragmatics, Cognitive
- Pragmatics, Computational
- Pragmatics, Cross-Cultural
- Pragmatics, Developmental
- Pragmatics, Experimental
- Pragmatics, Game Theory in
- Pragmatics, Historical
- Pragmatics, Institutional
- Pragmatics, Second Language
- Pragmatics, Teaching
- Prague Linguistic Circle, The
- Presupposition
- Psycholinguistics
- Quechuan and Aymaran Languages
- Reading, Second-Language
- Reciprocals
- Reduplication
- Reflexives and Reflexivity
- Register and Register Variation
- Relevance Theory
- Representation and Processing of Multi-Word Expressions in...
- Salish Languages
- Sapir, Edward
- Saussure, Ferdinand de
- Second Language Acquisition, Anaphora Resolution in
- Semantic Maps
- Semantic Roles
- Semantic-Pragmatic Change
- Semantics, Cognitive
- Sentence Processing in Monolingual and Bilingual Speakers
- Sign Language Linguistics
- Sociolinguistics
- Sociolinguistics, Variationist
- Sociopragmatics
- Sound Change
- South American Indian Languages
- Specific Language Impairment
- Speech, Deceptive
- Speech Perception
- Speech Production
- Speech Synthesis
- Switch-Reference
- Syntactic Change
- Syntactic Knowledge, Children’s Acquisition of
- Tense, Aspect, and Mood
- Text Mining
- Tone Sandhi
- Transcription
- Transitivity and Voice
- Translanguaging
- Translation
- Trubetzkoy, Nikolai
- Tucanoan Languages
- Tupian Languages
- Usage-Based Linguistics
- Uto-Aztecan Languages
- Valency Theory
- Verbs, Serial
- Vocabulary, Second Language
- Voice and Voice Quality
- Vowel Harmony
- Whitney, William Dwight
- Word Classes
- Word Formation in Japanese
- Word Recognition, Spoken
- Word Recognition, Visual
- Word Stress
- Writing, Second Language
- Writing Systems
- Zapotecan Languages
- Privacy Policy
- Cookie Policy
- Legal Notice
- Accessibility
Powered by:
- [66.249.64.20|185.80.149.115]
- 185.80.149.115
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The critical period hypothesis states that the first few years of life is the crucial time in which an individual can acquire a first language if presented with adequate stimuli, and that first-language acquisition relies on neuroplasticity of the brain.
A critical period is a bounded maturational span during which experiential factors interact with biological mechanisms to determine neurocognitive and behavioral outcomes. In …
Why is the critical period hypothesis so heavily disputed, yet widely accepted; what are its major strengths and weaknesses; what other explanations exist for the perceived "critical period", if it does not exist?
Evidence for the critical period hypothesis (CPH) comes from a number of sources demonstrating that age is a crucial predictor for language attainment and that the capacity to …
Dec 18, 2008 · The ‘critical period hypothesis’ (CPH) is a particularly relevant case in point. This is the claim that there is, indeed, an optimal period for language acquisition, ending …
The critical period hypothesis of language development argues that children who fail to learn language before the end of childhood will not reach a ‘native-like’ level of mastery with the …
In second language acquisition research, the critical period hypothesis (cph) holds that the function between learners' age and their susceptibility to second language input …