- Skip to Content
Advertisement: Certified CEO Program
- Business Basics
- Business IT
- Finance And Risk
- Growing Your Business
- Managing People
- Personal Success
- Meet Some Of Our Contributors
- Business Books
- Purchase Audio Seminar Series
- Certified Manager Program
- Certified CEO Program
- Top CEO Issues
- Business Book Summaries
- Audio Seminar Library
- Business Book Extracts
- Learning Modules
- Video Seminars
- How IIDM CPD Works
- IIDM Knowledge Units
- Certification - CEOs, Senior Executives & Managers
- Approved Certification Courses
- Certified CPD Reporting
Advertisement: Join IIDM
Advertisement: register for newsletter, advertisement: cpd small top, developing your critical thinking leadership skills.
Critical thinking enables leaders at every level to understand the impact of their decisions on the business as a whole and ensures both alignment with organisational goals and accountability for results.
The "new normal" is a different kind of competitive landscape, buffeted by geopolitics and global instability, rapid technological change, unique financial pressures, a rising tide of data and information to filter through, and the proliferation of new corporate business models.
The mind-set that made leaders successful in the past probably won't ensure success in the future. In fact, several recent studies and surveys have identified critical thinking as the number one requirement for successful leadership in the 21st century. Yet there is mounting evidence that many current and emerging leaders lack this quality. And it is this competency gap that is shaking up and reshaping leadership as we have come to know it.
Leadership in the "new normal"
In the wake of the economic crisis, we all know what a failure of leadership looks like. The companies that folded in the GFC serve as stark examples of what happens when decisions are based upon erroneous, partially false or incomplete information and when management fails to think clearly and strategically about the full implications of its actions. The resulting fall-out put an end to business as usual and created a "new normal" that looks markedly different from anything anyone has seen before.
Business organisations must be prepared to do things differently if they expect different results. In this demanding, dynamic landscape, it is only natural that they also require a different mind-set from those in charge.
The equation works like this: Thinking drives behaviour; behaviour drives results. So enterprises that want to change the results - and, indeed, change the organisation itself - can achieve the highest leverage by changing the thinking of leaders and managers throughout the organisation.
But what kind of thinking - or rather rethinking - will be required of leaders if they want to succeed in the "new normal"?
Why critical thinking is critical
Critical thinking appears to be exactly what is needed from leaders who are navigating the volatility of the "new normal". Diane Halpern, an award-winning professor of psychology at Claremont McKenna College and a widely read author on the subject, offers this definition in her seminal book, Thought and Knowledge :
"Critical thinking is the use of those cognitive skills or strategies that increase the probability of a desirable outcome. It is used to describe thinking that is purposeful, reasoned, and goal-directed - the kind of thinking involved in solving problems, formulating inferences, calculating likelihoods, and making decisions ... it's the kind of thinking that makes desirable outcomes more likely."
If ever there was a time for clear, discerning, solution-centric thinking, this is it.
Every two years since 1983, Executive Development Associates (EDA) has conducted an extensive survey on trends, growth and the evolution of executive development. The 2009/2010 EDA Trends in Executive Development: A Benchmark Report revealed trouble on the horizon for corporations seeking future business leaders.
To gauge the readiness of the next generation of leadership talent, EDA asked senior executive development professionals to share their views on the strengths and weaknesses of the incoming leadership group - the people who are most likely to fill executive-level positions in the next three to five years - and the subsequent impact on executive development.
The survey identified "hot topics" in executive development for the next two to three years. At the top of the list was leadership, followed by "business acumen, honing skills in strategy execution, leading / managing change, and talent management."
But when asked "What competencies are your leaders lacking?" their responses indicated little confidence that leaders had what it takes to execute in these critical areas successfully. Here's what they said was missing:
- Strategic thinking
- Leading change
- Ability to create a vision and engage others around it
- Ability to inspire
- Understanding the total enterprise and how the parts work together
What critical thinking looks like
Having established the need for a mind-set shift to more critical thinking, we need to be clear on what that means in the workplace.
In general, critical thinking is the ability to deal with the contradictions and problems of a tumultuous environment in a reasoned, purposeful, productive way. Decisions are made using an approach that is fair, objective, accurate and based on information that is relevant to the situation.
Critical thinking is also reflective and focused, constantly evaluating the thinking process itself. It is thinking with a purpose. Critical thinking requires a healthy dose of skepticism and an equal measure of good judgement.
For decades, companies have relied on the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal , a widely used assessment tool for evaluating the cognitive ability of current and future leaders. Developed in 1925, the model identifies factors that are key to critical thinking and decision making and predicts judgment, problem solving, creativity, openness to experience and other leadership behaviours.
Five sub-tests measure critical thinking as a composite of attitudes, knowledge and skills:
- Recognition of assumptions
- Interpretation
- Evaluation of arguments
Professionals with high scores in these sub-tests are able to identify and examine the assumptions, influences and biases that might sway them. They stand back from the fray and strategically assess the strengths and weaknesses of alternative solutions, conclusions or approaches to problems. They make business decisions that answer the right questions, solve the right problems, mitigate risk and improve productivity. They also lead from a position of strength, being able to motivate and move people both inspirationally and intellectually by providing solid reasons for actions.
Whether they lead teams, departments or entire enterprises, leaders who apply the skills of critical thinking to their roles perform at a higher level and offer their organisations a distinct competitive advantage.
Critical thinkers think differently about their impact on the organisation - understanding how their decisions and actions influence business both inside and outside their narrow functional silos. These leaders are able to balance department or team issues with broader company issues and embrace a larger responsibility for the success of the organisation. This keen sense of accountability is what enables them to execute for results now while fulfilling their obligations to positively impact the future.
Leaders who engage in critical thinking also understand the total organisation and how the individual parts work together. Context is key. Now more than ever, business acumen is foundational to effective leadership. It is impossible to apply critical thinking skills to the business of making money without an understanding of the business drivers that connect day-to-day decisions and actions to key financial and strategic performance goals of the organisation. It is one thing to understand one's role as a leader. It is altogether another thing to understand how to set direction and directly affect the outcomes.
Critical thinking is big-picture thinking too. As Hagemann describes it, "Leaders need to be able to comfortably climb to the 30,000-foot view and analyse a dynamic system, while simultaneously and adeptly analysing information to quickly make decisions across levels." Critical thinkers operate from a broad perspective in order to make sure the correct problems are addressed and they are taking acceptable risk. They recognise the difference between short-term gains and sustainable, long-term results and lead accordingly.
The advantages of this kind of leadership behavior are readily apparent. Critical thinking enables leaders at every level to understand the impact of their decisions on the business as a whole and ensures both alignment with organisational goals and accountability for results. It's exactly the type of leadership behaviour demanded by the "new normal" - and exactly what's missing. And this disconnect is likely to intensify over time.
Given the critical-thinking competency gap exposed by the EDA survey and other research, the obvious assumption is that the traditional development process that businesses have relied upon in the past to prepare leaders simply hasn't kept up. So, what's the solution? To accelerate development and raise leadership accountability to a whole new level of awareness and action, there needs to be a new emphasis on critical thinking in leadership development.
Learning to think like a leader
The good news is critical thinking is a skill that can be taught. According to Halpern, "There is a large body of evidence showing that people can learn to think better. Of course, education makes us all more intelligent, but critical thinking is more focused. Everyone can learn to recognise and use the skills of critical thinking, and we can always get better."
New competencies, however, may require a deeper, more analytical approach. The challenge today is not to discard what has been learned in the past, but to build upon traditional competencies with a whole new and more complex set of skills, tools and sensitivities.
Leaders in the new normal need to learn how to be discerning, how to think clearly and wisely, and how to be accountable for their impact on the business.
Discovery learning in leadership courses
Critical thinking can be impacted by the right leadership courses. However, the process can be more challenging than improving a behavioural skill, because you can't easily measure it. Success is demonstrated in results.
As with any skill, intellectual or otherwise, the key to building critical thinking - and achieving successful results - is practice. Research has demonstrated that people learn best when they are actively involved in the learning process and engaging in the behaviours they want to learn. But what's vital in developing critical thinking skills is framing the concept of practice within a relevant, job-related context.
Acquiring critical thinking skills requires participating in learning experiences that force you to consider new ways of thinking about and acting within complex situations that are directly related to the work you do. You need the opportunity to respond to issues, reflect on and reframe your experiences, develop new thinking, and, in turn, engage in new behaviours and actions that are relevant to your position and objectives.
Developing your critical thinking skills
In addition to participating in these types of leadership courses, leaders can take charge of their own critical thinking development by taking these actions:
- Get some feedback about your critical thinking skills from a trusted boss, colleague or coach Are you jumping to conclusions or using a reasoned, analytic process as you work toward a goal? Are you able to put aside biases and assumptions during analysis and decision-making? What kind of "thinker" are you perceived to be and why?
- Challenge yourself to develop a deeper understanding of your company's business, especially its financial and strategic drivers of success Are you clear about what drives the organisation's decisions, how financial success is achieved and how you impact both strategy and the bottom line? Are you making decisions that are aligned with this understanding?Is your knowledge of the business strong enough to drive behaviour and to engage teams and employees?
- Use multiple sources of data to form an "information web" before making a decision or forming a conclusion Are you asking a lot of questions? Identifying stakeholders and their issues and opinions? Separating facts from assumptions?Are you using the Internet as "one" source of information rather than "the" source? Can you analyse information from different perspectives and viewpoints?
- Take time to think Are you rising above the fray when it's important to make a decision, take action or form an opinion? Are you aware of the distractions getting in the way of your thinking time and taking action to minimize these distractions? Are you finding time and space to let your mind focus and reflect on important issues?
- Ask for input, critique and opinions from others as you analyse alternatives Are you checking tentative conclusions with others? Using peers, coaches or mentors to critique your thinking process? Are you willing to open your mind to other ideas or alternatives?
Author Credits
Read similar articles.
Why Tapping Into The Power Of A Growth Mindset Boosts Performance
If you speak to most people, they will tell you that they feel as if are on a permanent rollercoaster they can’t get off. The pace of modern business and the related stress that comes from facing constant change and disruption is turning many into the worst version of themselves - commanding, overwhelmed and distracted. And it’s not letting up anytime soon. And it’s not just a public-sector thing.
Why Having More Thinking Space Is Your Anti-kryptonite As A Leader
We all know that Kryptonite is Superman’s biggest weakness and brings him quickly to his knees starting with a drain on his energy and strength. For directors, leaders and managers; lack of time space and capacity is like kryptonite to your leadership. Creating thinking space is your anti-kryptonite.
Why Leaders Need To Cultivate A Collective Mindset
Far from a passing fad, collaborating is an increasingly critical undertaking in most workplaces. Collaboration gets strategy executed, products to market, client needs met and goals achieved. High quality collaboration leads to better levels of problem solving, innovation and transformation. It also builds a culture of connectedness and sense of belonging to the collective purpose of the organisation. We become ‘in it together’ rather than in ‘it for me’.
- Board Dynamics & Composition
- Coaching & Mentoring
- Decision-Making, Negotiating & Influencing
- Delegating Effectively
- Delivering Great Presentations
- Developing Leadership Skills
- Directors Duties & Responsibilities
- Nurturing Emotional Intelligence & Thought Leadership
- Styles & Qualities Of Leaders
Featured Article 1
A fresh approach to leading today's sales teams.
7 Types Of Self-care That Every Business Leader Should Be Mindful Of
Featured Articles
Six Steps To Less Stress And More Balance
- Terms of Use
- Advertise With Us
- Testimonials
Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Directors and Managers ABN 26 112 140 299. All rights reserved.
- Our CEO Master Executive Coach
- Our Consulting Team & Coaches
- Our Advisory Board
- Our Strategic Partners
- Client Testimonials
- Overview of Books
- Abstract of C.R.I.S.I.S. Leadership
- The Making of a C.R.I.S.I.S. Leader
- Abstract of Disruptive Leadership (2 nd ed.)
- Disruptive Leadership (2 nd ed.)
- Disruptive Leadership (1 st ed.)
- Next Generation Leadership
- Crisis Leadership Book (2025)
- Second Edition Book (2023)
- First Edition Book (2020)
- NextGen Book (2019)
- Board & CEO Advisory Services
- Organizational Transformation Framework
- Disruptive and Crisis Management
- Cognitive Readiness
- Culture Development
- Talent Management & Succession Planning
- Digital Transformation
- Post-Pandemic Recovery
- Leadership 360 Assessments
- L.E.A.D.E.R. Framework
- C.R.I.S.I.S. Model
- R.B.L. Framework
- “P.P.T.” Mantra
- Fourth Industrial Revolution Framework
- VUCA Framework
- LEAP Framework
- Disruptive Digital Leadership Framework
- Megatrends of Future Disruptors
- Goleman’s Leadership Framework
- Goleman’s ESI Framework
- SCORE™ Framework
- AGREE Framework
- Paragon⁷ Framework
- R.E.D. Model
- A.D.A.M. Model
- G.R.O.W. Model
- A.R.T. Framework
- HPLD Framework
- Keynote Presentation
- Online Master Programs
- Master in Disruptive Leadership (MDL)
- Master in Digital Transformation (MDT)
- CEO & C-Suite Executive Coaching
- Disruptive Leadership Masterclass
- Crisis Leadership Masterclass
- Critical Thinking Bootcamp
- Prophetic Leadership Masterclass
- HiPO Development Program
- Program for Advanced Leadership & Management (PALM)
- Udemy Online Training
- Skillsoft E-learning
- White Papers
- Research Reports
- Online Resources
- IPMA Journal
- LinkedIn Posts
- Singapore Business Review
- The Straits Times Forum
The R.E.D. Model of Development of Critical Thinking Skills
- The R.E.D. Model of Development…
“How and why is critical thinking applied in the workplace? Critical thinking in the workplace comes in many forms. We see critical thinking being used in teams to help effectively resolve problems. We even see critical thinking being used in the workplace to help teams figure out what issues exist, and then we see teams come up with possible answers for those issues. Critical thinking is applied to leadership approaches because leaders need to have critical thinking skills, be able to understand logical relationships between ideas, recognize the importance and the relationship of an argument, as well as recognize mistakes in reasoning and then be able to make the right decisions.”
– sattar bawany (2023), what is critical thinking.
Critical thinking is an active form of reflection which is deliberate, persistent, and careful. It challenges preconceptions, perceptions, and received wisdom. And it is, most important of all, focused on deciding what to believe and what to do. It is, therefore, inherently practical and generates a set of guidelines for the practitioner. It involves what some have called metacognition or the act of thinking about how we think.
Critical thinking aims to better understand the meaning and implications of information, conclusions, options, and decisions and to identify and evaluate the assumptions upon which thinking (our own and others’) is based. It can bring a powerful rigor to crisis management if it is applied with perseverance, determination, and self-awareness.
Critical thinking in the business literature is often confused with skills like “problem solving.” In reality, “problem solving” is quite different from “critical thinking.”
Sometimes problem solving requires thinking skills, like how best to balance profit and loss statements, but not critical thinking skills—rational, reflective thinking. Some business-related problems, for example, require emotional intelligence, which is thinking that is neither rational nor reflective.
In other words, while critical thinking often refers to “problem solving,” not all problem solving is an example of critical thinking. Critical thinking consists more of “habits of mind” providing a framework in which problem solving can occur. Often, these distinctions aren’t clear in business education literature.
How and why is critical thinking applied in the workplace? Critical thinking in the workplace comes in many forms. We see critical thinking being used in teams to help effectively resolve problems. We even see critical thinking being used in the workplace to help teams figure out what issues exist, and then we see teams come up with possible answers for those issues.
Critical thinking is applied to leadership approaches because leaders need to have critical thinking skills, be able to understand logical relationships between ideas, recognize the importance and the relationship of an argument, as well as recognize mistakes in reasoning and then be able to make the right decisions.
The need for critical thinking in leadership has always been around. A model was developed in 1925, called the Watson–Glaser critical thinking model, which helps organizations identify factors in people that are important for critical thinking and judgment making, which explains why critical thinking needs to be a part of leadership approaches.
The Elements of the “R.E.D.” Model of Critical Thinking
Pearson has developed the following RED model—Recognize assumptions, Evaluate arguments, and Draw conclusions as a way to view and apply critical thinking principles when faced with a decision ( Chartrand, Ishikawa, and Flander 2018 ).
Recognize assumptions. This is the ability to separate fact from opinion. It is deceptively easy to listen to a comment or presentation and assume the information presented is true even though no evidence was given to back it up. Perhaps the speaker is particularly credible or trustworthy or the information makes sense or matches our own view. We just don’t question it. Noticing and questioning assumptions helps to reveal information gaps or unfounded logic. Taking it a step further, when we examine assumptions through the eyes of different people (e.g., the viewpoint of different stakeholders), the end result is a richer perspective on a topic.
Why does it matter? This is the ability to separate fact from opinion. It is deceptively easy to listen to a comment or presentation and assume the information presented is true even though no evidence was given to back it up. Noticing and questioning assumptions helps to reveal information gaps or unfounded logic. Taking it a step further, when we examine assumptions through the eyes of different people (e.g., the viewpoint of different stakeholders) the end result is a richer perspective on a topic.
How/when to use it? When you’re gathering information, listening to what people say, or assessing a situation, think about what assumptions you have going in. Perhaps you assume that a trusted co-worker is providing reliable information, but is there really evidence to back it up? Learn to see gaps in logic and opinion disguised as fact.
Evaluate arguments. It is difficult to suspend judgment systematically and walk through various arguments and information with the impartiality of Sherlock Holmes. The art of evaluating arguments entails analyzing information objectively and accurately, questioning the quality of supporting evidence, and understanding how emotion influences the situation. Common barriers include confirmation bias, which is the tendency to seek out and agree with the information that is consistent with your own point of view or allow emotions—yours or others’—to get in the way of objective evaluation. People may quickly conclude simply to avoid conflict. Being able to remain objective and sort through the validity of different positions helps people draw more accurate conclusions.
Why does it matter? We often have problems sorting through conflicting information because we unknowingly let our emotions or pride get in the way or because we only hear what we want to hear (confirmation bias). Being able to remain objective and sort through the validity of different positions helps people draw more accurate conclusions.
How/when to use it? The art of evaluating arguments entails analyzing information objectively and accurately, questioning the quality of supporting evidence, and understanding how emotions—yours or others—influence the situation or get in the way of objectivity. People may quickly conclude simply to avoid conflict. Learn how to push all that aside, and analyze information accurately and objectively.
Draw conclusions. People who possess these skills can bring diverse information together to arrive at conclusions that logically follow from the available evidence, and they do not inappropriately generalize beyond the evidence. Furthermore, they will change their position when the evidence warrants doing so. They are often characterized as having “good judgment” because they typically arrive at a quality decision.
Why does it matter? People who possess this skill can bring diverse information together to arrive at conclusions that logically follow from the available evidence, and they do not inappropriately generalize beyond that evidence. Furthermore, they will change their position when the evidence warrants doing so. They are often characterized as having “good judgment” because of their quality decisions.
How/when to use it? This is the payoff. When you think critically, the true picture becomes clear, and you can make the tough decision or attack the difficult problem.
Each of these critical thinking skills fits together in a process that is both fluid and sequential.
When presented with information, people typically alternate between recognizing assumptions and evaluating arguments. Critical thinking is sequential in that recognizing faulty assumptions or weak arguments improves the likelihood of reaching an appropriate conclusion. It is helpful to focus on each of the RED skills individually when practicing skill development. With concentrated practice over time, typically several months, critical thinking skills can be significantly increased.
Reference: Sattar Bawany (2023), Leadership in Disruptive Times: Negotiating the New Balance. Business Expert Press (BEP) LLC, New York, NY. Abstract available at: https://www.disruptiveleadership.institute/second-edition-book/
Privacy Overview
Click one of our representatives below to chat on WhatsApp or send us an email to [email protected]
Need help? Please contact +65 9002 3848