research paper on cafeteria food

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Int J Food Sci
• v.2019; 2019

The Impact of Food Service Attributes on Customer Satisfaction in a Rural University Campus Environment

Mireille serhan.

1 University of Balamand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutritional Sciences, Deir El Balamand, P.O. Box 100, Tripoli, Lebanon

Carole Serhan

2 University of Balamand, Issam Fares Faculty of Technology, Department of Business Management and Administration, Deir El Balamand, P.O. Box 100, Tripoli, Lebanon

Associated Data

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

The purpose of this study was to determine different food service attributes that have an impact on customers' overall satisfaction at a rural university cafeteria. Over 5 weeks, 676 cafeteria users, including academics, staff, and students, were selected through convenience sampling. They completed an anonymous-designed survey with closed questions ( n = 29) assessing quality of food and beverages, quality of service and setting, and satisfaction with food service attributes. In order to measure the existence and degree of significant relationships between different research variables, Pearson correlation coefficients were employed to analyse the data. Means of scores and frequencies were calculated. Results indicated that customers' satisfaction with different service attributes was above average. All service attributes had a significant and positive effect on the overall satisfaction. Since most customers (62.9%) would like to continue eating at the cafeteria, the most common improvements suggested to the university management included among others, improving diet quality by offering more nutritious food. Gaining insight into the different food service attributes can enable the university management to meet the needs and expectations of its academics, staff, and students in order to increase their confidence in the food provided.

1. Introduction

Cafeteria food services can be found in hospital facilities, nursing homes, child and senior care centers, prisons, schools, and university campuses. The quality of food service is one of the most relevant items of quality perceived by customers. In health care, the satisfaction of patients is ultimately related to the provided service quality [ 1 ]. In hotel restaurants, the quality of physical environment, service, and food affects guests' satisfaction and intention [ 2 ]. In the higher education milieu, more than ever, food service attributes have become an essential component affecting the quality of campus life [ 3 , 4 ].

The majority of existing research on university food service has focused either on students' satisfaction with products, services, and service environments [ 3 , 5 – 8 ] or on the nutritional intake of students consuming on campus food and their health implications [ 9 – 11 ].

Moreover, the higher education market has become competitive and global [ 12 ]. In this dynamic context, university food service operators have to adapt to changing expectations of their customers, increased competition from fast food segments on and off campus [ 13 ], and economic trends in uncertain markets [ 14 ]. According to Lugosi [ 15 ], when customers' expectations are high, the campus food services are expected to be more responsive. The workplace is a captive environment where the overall satisfaction of consumers could be an important element of the overall eating experience on campus [ 16 ].

Therefore, building on previous research, the evaluation of university food services became essential. No previously published data investigated the quality of food service in Lebanese universities and its effect on customers' satisfaction, leaving a gap in the body of knowledge of costumers' opinions and behaviours of the on-campus food service in Lebanon. This study is aimed at addressing this issue through five main objectives: assess current opinion and explore the determinants of quality of food and beverages (1), service (2), setting (3), price and value (4), and the overall satisfaction of costumers (5) as presented in Figure 1 . The study is also aimed at identifying future avenues for good practice that may inform facilities and service development decisions on what changes they would like to see to improve the on-campus food experience as part of constructive interventions.

Food service attributes and customer satisfaction.

2. Literature Review

2.1. customers' satisfaction in higher education.

By reviewing the existing literature on customers' satisfaction, there are a large number of studies on customer's satisfaction in the private or public business sector. In the context of higher education, few studies on customer's satisfaction have been conducted [ 17 – 19 ]. According to Navarro and Iglesias [ 20 ], numerous attempts have been made by researchers to define the concept of satisfaction in relation to services offered in higher education [ 21 – 23 ]. They acknowledge that satisfaction is the final state of psychological process. Amelia and Garg [ 24 ] stated that the first impression is the one of the main considerations along with the quality and correctness of the served food and the gentleness of the staff in service. In university cafeterias, students make up the majority as users' satisfaction of institutional food services; thus, campus food service is becoming popular and important [ 3 , 18 , 19 , 22 ]. Kwun [ 4 ] has taken into consideration the gender difference while studying the effect of campus food service attributes on perceived value, satisfaction, and consumer attitudes. According to Garg and Kumar [ 17 ], the dining experience has influenced the satisfaction and loyalty of both students and staff customers. In university cafeteria, customer satisfaction is totally related to the served food and beverage quality, variety and choices, to hygiene and cleanliness, and to price and value fairness [ 21 , 25 ]. Based on the aforementioned attributes, there were many factors found to influence customers when choosing a food service.

2.2. Attribute 1: Quality of Food and Beverage

Previous studies indicated the degree of satisfaction with university cafeteria depends mostly on food and beverage quality [ 22 , 26 – 28 ]. Food quality is the quality characteristics of food that is acceptable to customer [ 22 ]. Overall quality of the food and beverage, the taste, the freshness, the nutritious aspect, and the portion size is categorized under food quality measurement. As a core product of a food service operation, food and beverage quality has been given a great importance and has been checked for many aspects such as temperature, texture, flavour, and aroma [ 26 – 29 ]. Food and beverage quality is considered to affect the customers' intentions to come back again to a specific restaurant. Oh [ 23 ] found a high positive relationship between consumer satisfaction with food and beverage quality and their intention to continue eating in a specific restaurant. Furthermore, workplace eating is frequently associated with poor quality and bad food choices which have negative consequences [ 30 ]. Tam et al. [ 25 ] have stated various aspects for encouraging customers to eat healthy. Institutions have a responsibility to provide an environment that makes it easier for students to make healthier food easier. Previous research indicates that many institutions food environments are filled with energy-dense nutrient-poor food that may be heavily promoted [ 31 , 32 ]. Moreover, it is the operators' role to provide a variety of products in their menus that will give its customers more options to choose from. The menu is definitely one of the key indicators of restaurants' marketing plans [ 33 ]. Accordingly, the following research hypothesis is thus posited:

2.2.1. Hypothesis 1

Quality of food and beverage offered at university cafeteria has a significant and positive effect on customers' overall satisfaction.

2.3. Attribute 2: Quality of Service

Service quality is considered a key element in the restaurant sector, bearing in mind that dining in restaurants is essentially a social event [ 34 , 35 ].

In some studies, it was found that service quality was more important than food quality in dining satisfaction. Yuksel and Yusel [ 36 ] suggested that service quality has significant effect on dining satisfaction at an aggregate market level and particularly for adventurous or healthy food seekers.

Furthermore, the quality of the service has been nowadays measured with respect to the customers' expectations and insights towards the offered service [ 37 ]. As per Inkumsah [ 38 ], it was found that customer satisfaction is affected by the quality of offered food service. In the same context, Garg [ 39 ] stated that food service has an impact on customers' perceptions towards a restaurant. Küçükaltan [ 40 ] declared that different customers can judge differently the same food service, and this is mainly related to the customers' opinions regarding the food service provided. If the offered service does not meet or is less than the customers' expectations, then the perceived service quality will be low; if it does exceed the customers' expectations, then the perceived service quality will be high [ 41 ]. Abo-Baker [ 42 ] described service quality as the organization's ability to satisfy the customers, within the determination of specifications, characteristics, and requirements of service that gratify the desires and needs of customers and exceed their expectations.

In the higher education milieu, according to Kim et al. [ 27 ], students' expectations and perceptions regarding the quality of service vary from one student to another and from one semester to the next. Hence, this variation leads to a more complex, diverse, and dynamic business environment, a difficulty in measuring service quality, and a difficulty in identifying the determinants of service quality. Tan et al. [ 43 ] specified that this intangible element is one of the vital components in service quality. Because services are intangible, it is difficult to measure them. Moreover, the employees especially in service quality play a vital role in the success of food service outlets. The personality traits and the use of social networking affect job satisfaction among workers [ 44 ].

Employees' behaviour affects customers' perceptions of service quality [ 45 ]. The interaction between cafeteria staff and customers, such as friendly gestures, e.g., greetings and high levels of responsiveness, cleanliness, and quick service, is important as it influences satisfaction with the service quality [ 46 ]. It is worth mentioning that service operators should enhance the quality of service provided on-campus to discourage students from searching for alternative food service operations off-campus. Students are not limited to on-campus food service quality, as they are aware of surrounding food service quality.

Many instruments were developed and refined by researchers for measuring perceived quality of service in the literature.

SERVQUAL is a known instrument which was implemented by Zeithaml et al. [ 47 ]. It consists of five service dimensions which are tangibles (physical facilities, equipment, and appearance of personnel), responsiveness, reliability, assurance, and empathy.

LODGSERV is another instrument, which was developed to assess service quality in hotels and function halls [ 45 ]. Additionally, Stevens et al. [ 48 ] adopted and refined the DINSERV scale from SERVQUAL and LODGSERV to assess customers' perceptions of restaurant quality. The DINSERV scale comprises 29 statements in five dimensions of the SERVQUAL scale. It is frequently used as a valid measurement tool to evaluate service quality in different hospitality establishments and mainly food service operations which is the case of the current study. Kim et al. [ 27 ] have investigated the relative importance of institutional DINESERV factors on customer satisfaction, return intention, and word-of-mouth in the university dining facility. Recently, service quality is influenced by the utilization of information technology, with reference to the signaling theory [ 49 ]. Accordingly, the following research hypothesis is thus posited:

2.3.1. Hypothesis 2

Quality of service offered at university cafeteria has a significant and positive effect on customers' overall satisfaction.

2.4. Attribute 3: Quality of Setting

According to Kwun [ 4 ], the setting of the campus food service sampled is often referred to its environment and operational facets. The expectations and insights of customers differ based on where they consume. It is noteworthy to mention that the setting has been considered as a further dimension that has an impact on customers' insights towards campuses' food service. Several studies show that cleanliness, dining room environment, comfort level, operating hours and days, atmosphere, and capacity had significant effects on satisfactions and revisit intentions [ 26 , 27 , 50 ].

In a study conducted by Cardello et al. [ 51 ], home and traditional full service restaurants ranked higher than institutional food service, while airline and hospital food service ranked lower than school food service, with reference to the expected acceptability of quality of food.

Hence, prior research by Story et al. [ 52 ] found that food packaging, plate size and design, lighting, and dining companions at the cafeteria influences the individual's immediate setting.

The atmosphere is an intangible component made up of everything related to the brand that will yield an impression towards the specific location. The setting components can also include the seating's organization, the various decorations, and the music ambient [ 28 ]. Various scholars [ 53 – 55 ] identified a relationship among food information and quality, eating behaviours, seating's organization, and food distribution environment. Accordingly, the following research hypothesis is thus posited:

2.4.1. Hypothesis 3

Quality of setting has a significant and positive effect on customers' overall satisfaction with the university cafeteria.

2.5. Attribute 4: Price and Value

In campus food service, it is noteworthy that students have restricted financial resources that influence their choices and decisions of picking food service operations, as they continually seek reasonable prices, due to limited budget [ 56 ]. Similarly, Nadzirah et al. [ 57 ] found that cost is the primary factor in university food service operations since students have limited funds. According to Nadzirah et al. [ 57 ], food service operators should ameliorate their menus through reconsidering their prices and thus ensuring customers are using the university cafeteria and not any off-campus food service operators. Soriano [ 58 ] found that the customers' quality expectations depend on the price they pay for receiving the service and when this price increases the quality expectations will increase consequently. In the same study, they showed that the price of a meal is equally important to other satisfaction determinants.

Several studies have been carried out by many researchers on price fairness or price and value. Price fairness means the judgment of whether an outcome or the process to reach an outcome is reasonable or acceptable [ 59 ]. In the same vein, the price to be paid for a service determines the level of quality to be demanded [ 58 ]. He also stressed that the price (value) of the meal and service are equally important when compared to other service dimensions. Ng [ 21 ] and Xi and Shuai [ 26 ] did consider price and value in assessing students' service quality in dining hall services. Martin-Consuegra et al. [ 60 ] found that perceived price fairness positively influences customer satisfaction. The effect of food quality, price fairness, staff performance, and ambience on students' satisfaction of cafeteria food services by comparing responses from two universities (MBU) was analysed using the partial least squares (PLS) application in Smart PLS computer software [ 61 ].

Similarly, Klassen et al. [ 50 ] found that price is the most significant factor in choosing a food and beverage service provider for students with limited budgets. In another study, customers indicated that receiving the right value for the money paid is among the most important factors that encourage them to revisit a food service establishment again [ 36 ]. Accordingly, the following hypothesis is posited:

2.5.1. Hypothesis 4

Price and value have a significant and positive effect on customers' overall satisfaction with the university cafeteria.

3. Methodology

3.1. research approach and sampling method.

The main aim of this study is to determine cafeteria customers' satisfaction and perceptions of quality of food and beverages and services offered at the university cafeteria. Therefore, in order to empirically test the suggested aforementioned hypotheses in this study, a quantitative research approach, based on the distribution of personally administered questionnaires, was the applied method, allowing respondents to have more time to complete the questionnaire and making it easier and more convenient for them to respond. It involves the collection of customer-based data, which can be analysed statistically [ 62 ]. The target population of this research study included all academics, staff, and students at a rural university in Lebanon. According to official data pertaining to the university for academic year 2018-2019, there are more than 6,000 academics, staff, and students. Due to this large number, it is difficult to use random sampling techniques. Therefore, a convenience sampling technique is the most suitable sampling technique to use in this research.

With reference to the new management body of the university, it is working effectively through different approaches to improve student retention. These approaches include identifying and prioritizing the main reasons for student recruitment and corresponding retention solutions. The new management body of the university has taken the initiative to involve students in the decision-making process about food services, as well as in many other academic/service areas. The management body requested that there should be a process by which the university cafeteria operator will be continuously evaluated; students and other customers will have an input in evaluating the food services on campus. The new management body of the university will monitor the improvement actions for the coming years to measure their efficiency based on student feedback and to identify areas warranting further improvement attention.

3.2. Survey Development

The questionnaire in the current study was adopted from a previously validated tool used by El-Said and Fathy [ 3 ], with modifications. In comparison with El-Said and Fathy [ 3 ], the sample includes more categories (academics and staff), in order to provide more representative results and to improve sample generalizability. It comprised two sections. The first section is aimed at collecting demographic data of cafeteria customers and their behaviour characteristics (academic, staff, student, gender, and age; number of visits to the cafeteria, monthly expenditure, and intention to continue eating at the cafeteria). The second section of the questionnaire consisted of four parts. Statements in these parts were adapted from the DINESERV questionnaire. DINESERV is adapted from the SERVQUAL instrument and was created by Barsky [ 46 ] and designed for the food service industry. The first part of the second section consisted of eight statements and aimed at measuring customers' perceptions of quality of food and beverages offered at the cafeteria. Part two of the second section consisted of 4 statements and aimed at measuring customers' service quality perceptions in the cafeteria. Part three of the second section consisted of 5 statements and aimed at measuring customers' perceptions regarding the quality of the setting. The fourth part of the second section was designed to measure customers' perceptions of price compared to the value they receive. The questionnaire of the last section is aimed at measuring customers' overall satisfaction in terms of overall satisfaction with food and beverage quality, overall satisfaction with service quality, overall satisfaction with the quality of the setting, overall satisfaction with the price paid versus the value obtained, and their overall satisfaction with the dining experience. A 5-point Likert scale will be used for evaluation, where 5 = very satisfied, 4 = satisfied, 3 = neutral, 2 = unsatisfied, and 1 = very unsatisfied.

In order to determine the internal consistency of the survey questionnaire, a Cronbach's alpha coefficient reliability analysis was performed. This method shows an indication of the average correlation between all the items of the research questionnaire on the Likert scale, in this case. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the questionnaire was measured to be 0.960. Therefore, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient is well above the 0.7 standard reliability. Item analysis was achieved as well to provide item-to-total correlations and Cronbach's alpha if the item was deleted from the survey questionnaire. To evaluate the construct validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with promax rotation was conducted. Finally, to check the content validity, a convenience sample of panel of experts (6 professors who were familiar with the scope of the study) checked the questionnaire through reviewing the content of each item in the modified version. Results showed that the final version of the questionnaire is valid and reliable and can be used in future studies for testing customers' satisfaction and perceptions of quality of food and beverages and services offered at university cafeterias.

3.3. Implementation and Participants

Before implementation, the survey was piloted to 30 persons (5 academics, 10 staff, and 15 students) to discover the extent of their understanding of sentences as well as the time taken to answer questions. Finally, based on the pilot test review, minor changes were performed to reach the final version of the questionnaire.

In order to calculate the sample size, there is a need to determine the accurate population size, the margin of error, and the confidence level. The most common used margin of error is 5% and the most common used confidence level is 95%. These percentages are standards in quantitative research [ 63 ]. Using the G∗Power sample size software, version 3.1.3 ( http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/abteilungen/aap/gpower3/ , Faul et al. [ 64 ]), one of the leading software used for sample size calculation in various fields, a minimum of 362 respondents were required to achieve power for a population of 6000 based on precision level of 5%, confidence internal level of 95%, and P = 0.05.

To guarantee the collection of the targeted sample size, students as part of their work on campus, students were asked to help in the data collection and given information about the research topic and the content of the survey form. Additionally, they were trained on how to deal with respondents and how to gather required data. They approached their peers, as well as academics and staff from different faculties and asked them in person to fill out the questionnaire. It took between 5 and 10 minutes to complete. Anonymity was ensured. A total of 676 questionnaires were collected during the period of December 2018-January 2019. From this number, 24 questionnaires were invalid, and therefore, the total target sample for this study was 652 freshmen, undergraduate, and graduate students, academics, and professional staff employed at this rural university. The latter has an on-campus food service venue with 150 seats.

3.4. Statistical Analysis

Only completed surveys were analyzed. Data was processed and analyzed by the SPSS statistical software, Windows Version 23.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Means and frequencies as well as coefficients of Pearson correlations were used, in order to achieve the objective of this study. Frequencies were computed to examine demographic and behavioural characteristics of respondents. Means of scores were calculated in order to assess students' perceptions regarding different service attributes.

3.5. Ethical Considerations

For ethical considerations, a written permission to use and modify the survey questionnaire was obtained by the authors of the original questionnaire [ 3 ]. Ethical approval to conduct the study and to contact academics, staff, and students was obtained from the University Management Board. An informed consent was signed by those who agreed to fill the questionnaire.

4.1. Demographic and Behavioural Characteristics of Respondents

The demographic characteristics of respondents are presented in Table 1 .

Demographic characteristics of respondents.

The sample consisted of 37.4% male respondents and 62.6% female respondents. Among the 652 respondents, 83.7% of respondents were university students, 10.9% were academic, and 5.4% were staff.

A high percentage of respondents (62.0%) were aged between 17 and 21 years, 22.0% were between 22 and 24 years old, only 6.60% were between 25 and 35, and 9.4% were 35 years old and above.

Table 2 shows the behavioural characteristics of respondents. As shown in the table, 3.5% of surveyed respondents visited the cafeteria daily, 13.4% visited the cafeteria twice a week, and 26.7% of respondents visited the cafeteria once a week.

Behavior characteristics of respondents.

∗ 1 LBP = 0.00066 USD.

Approximately half of the respondents (56.4%) visited the cafeteria once a month.

Only 8.3% of respondents reported that their monthly average expenditure was above 100 000 Lebanese Pounds, and approximately half of the respondents (48.5%) spent between 10 000 and 50 000 Lebanese Pounds monthly. Furthermore, about 37.1% of respondents did not intend to continue having their meals at the university cafeteria, while almost the majority (62.9%) would like to continue eating at the cafeteria.

4.2. Food Service Attributes and Customer Satisfaction

The means of scores of respondents' perceptions of different research variables were computed, as presented in Table 3 . Respondents rated their levels of satisfaction with attitude statements that were positively phrased using a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 = very unsatisfied and 5 = very satisfied. Firstly, respondents' overall perceptions regarding the quality of food and beverage products presented at the cafeteria were above average (overall mean for the quality of food and beverage items = 3.41). According to the results presented in the table, a high percentage of respondents were satisfied with the taste of food and beverages ( M = 3.46), as well the display ( M = 3.45) and diversity of products ( M = 3.42). Respondents satisfaction with the freshness of food and beverage items ( M = 3.39), the nutritious products ( M = 3.34), and the appropriate serving temperature (M = 3.39) recorded the lowest mean score among the quality attributes. Similar opinions were given about the items related to the quality of service. Respondents' overall perceptions regarding the service quality presented at the university cafeteria were above the average (overall mean for the service quality attributes = 3.53). The friendly treatment by cafeteria staff, the staff knowledge of the items sold, and the cooperation of workers recorded the highest mean score among service quality attributes. Satisfaction means ranged from 3.57 to 3.61. However, the speed of service recorded the lowest mean score ( M = 3.46).

Frequencies and means for the research variables.

The third variable that respondents were asked about was the quality of the setting. The ambience, the lighting, and the organization of the delivery process recorded the highest mean score, above the mean ( M = 3.31). The cleanliness and hygiene ( M = 3.18) as well as the comfort and sitting availability ( M = 3.26) recorded the lowest mean score.

Opinions were given about the price respondents paid compared to the value they received. The value that respondents received was measured in terms of the quality and quantity of food and beverage items they received. As shown in Table 3 , most respondents felt that the quantity of food and beverage items provided was suitable and above the mean score, given the price paid ( M = 3.25). Additionally, respondents' satisfaction with the quality of food and beverage items, given the price paid, was perceived to be not satisfactory ( M = 3.20).

The last research variable measured was respondents' overall satisfaction. Overall respondents' satisfaction was measured using the following statements: overall satisfaction regarding the quality of food and beverage items ( M = 3.42) and overall satisfaction regarding the service quality ( M = 3.51) recorded the highest mean score, above the mean ( M = 3.39). Overall satisfaction regarding the prices ( M = 3.24) and overall satisfaction regarding the setting ( M = 3.38) recorded the lowest mean score.

As shown in Table 4 , the existence and level of correlation between different research variables and respondents' overall satisfaction were investigated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The results indicated a significant correlation between food and beverage quality and respondents' overall satisfaction ( r = 0.873, P < 0.01). The Pearson correlation coefficient values emphasize the positive correlation between food and beverage quality and students' overall satisfaction. Therefore, H1 was supported after the Pearson correlation testing was performed.

Variables' correlations.

∗∗ Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Furthermore, the results of the Pearson correlation test revealed a significant and positive correlation between service quality ( r = 0.834, P < 0.01), setting quality ( r = 0.836, P < 0.01), and respondents' overall satisfaction ( r = 0.959, P < 0.01). Therefore, the resulting hypotheses H2 and H3 were also supported. Results indicated that there was a statistically significant and positive association between the price and value ( r = 0.853, P < 0.01) and respondents' overall satisfaction, with reference to H4.

5. Discussions and Conclusions

The purpose of this study was to determine the cafeteria customers' overall satisfaction with on-campus food service attributes. The findings suggest some important implications for university food service operator. The food service manager should recognize the customers' characteristics such as age groups. The results of the study showed that the age groups between 17 and 21 are the largest customers. Therefore, the campus food service manager should develop strategies catered to appeal different segments of customers based on the various age groups.

The regression analysis showed that the quality of service was the strongest predictor of customer satisfaction. Thus, university food service operator should continue to train their employees to greet their customers in a polite manner, to be attentive and friendly, and to increase their knowledge about the food items served. Maintaining the quality of their service ensures that they can still continue to meet or exceed costumer expectations [ 65 ]. Lashley [ 66 ] has shown that sincere and affective relationships between the host and the guest can operate in a commercial environment.

Food and beverages quality turned out to be the second important element affecting customer satisfaction. In sum, some of the possible strategic implementations may include more variety of nutritious products, adjusting the serving temperature, and paying more attention to the freshness of the products sold. This result is consistent with the previous findings of Kjøllesdal et al. [ 30 ]. Kjøllesdal et al. [ 30 ] asserted that workplace eating is frequently associated with poor-quality food and bad choices, which have negative consequences. In rural universities, accessing food in places of work, as healthy options and varied choices may be limited. Ham [ 8 ] mentioned that good-quality food service provision can contribute to the overall campus experience. Absence of trust in the quality of food has an impact on diet through avoidance of certain products deemed to be unsafe or untrustworthy [ 67 ]. The challenge for the university food service operator is to provide products and services that enhance and facilitate positive healthy food choices. Given the amount of employees eating at their place of work, most research on this topic relates to the direct importance of making healthy dishes available [ 68 ].

Furthermore, the university food service operator should pay more attention to the quality of the setting. They should carefully design cafeteria interiors and exteriors to deliver a relaxed and comfortable atmosphere to attract new customers and to retain current ones. University food service operator should maintain the cleanliness and hygiene of the facility to a standard level. The findings are in line with the previous results of Kim et al. [ 7 ]. Improving customer satisfaction with reference to the quality of the setting will not only strengthen the customer loyalty but also improve the facility reputation and this is also good for their businesses. Lugosi [ 15 ] has studied the campus food service experience with reference to student well-being and has emphasized on the campus food service as a cowork space. Among several factors driving social interaction, contemporary designs of university campuses have adopted many of the features of cowork spaces [ 69 – 71 ], with furnishings and layout of the infrastructure of the space, facilitating the positive experience.

Particularly, cleanliness or hygiene was the third most important factor, after food variety and convenient location, which influences costumer selection of a food service to dine in. Although costumers are increasingly concerned about the nutritional value of the food they consume, food safety remains far more important than as the associated risk can be substantial. Food service hygiene is indeed important. Fatimah et al. [ 72 ], in their study, have identified four underlying food service hygiene factors from the consumer perspective: food and location, staff and handling, premise and practices, and ambient scent. The priority should be given to service quality. Low service quality is attributed to low-scale food services.

Moreover, customers tend out to be the least dissatisfied with the price paid, with reference to the quality of food and beverage products provided. The university food service operator should improve the quality of the products served and should offer reasonable pricing, in order to prevent customers from switching to other off-campus restaurants, which will result in less sales and lower revenue in the long term. Higher customer satisfaction should increase revisit/return intention and provide word-of-mouth endorsements of the university food service facility [ 73 ].

From the managerial perspective, the great importance of customer place on the quality of the food service requires that the food service provided by the university campus should take into consideration the customers' insights and perceptions and thus give a push to many institutions to overhaul their campus food service operations. Demand for healthy food and quality of the setting, with reference to the comfort of the sitting area, is an important lever for positive and promising change.

6. Limitations and Future Research

The limitations of the study are that a single university campus cannot represent all the university campuses and all universities in Lebanon. Results should be interpreted with caution. Also, the survey questionnaire was distributed by students. This might affect students' attitudes and opinions as they took the survey. For future research, it would be important to replicate the study on another campus, to determine how and if the findings hold true given a diverse sample, in an urban campus. Another constraint of this research is the feature of its samples. More than 80% of the participants in the survey were students. Surprisingly, the majority of staff and academics were not interested in filling out the survey. Therefore, performing another study in a larger scale is suggested to expand the results of this research and to provide more representative results and to improve sample generalizability. The current study can, however, help to provide a roadmap for helping the university management better understand the key importance of food and service quality. Based on the results, several implications and recommendations could be derived for university management to increase student satisfaction about food and beverage services provided by university cafeteria. University management (1) should investigate about cafeteria users' opinions continuously in order to solve any problems promptly, (2) should institutionalize systems for continuous training of cafeteria employees through customized programs designed for them, (3) should invest in improving the quality of the setting, with reference to the comfort of the sitting area, (4) should invest, in coordination with the cafeteria operator, in offering more nutritious food in order to be able to meet cafeteria users' needs, (5) should give special attention to contract with the best operator, (6) should develop strategies catered to appeal different segments of customers based on the various age groups, and (7) should place more emphasis on identifying and meeting the needs of students and staff (offering late night meals).

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the university administration and the cafeteria operator for their support.

Data Availability

Conflicts of interest.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Nudging healthier food choices in a cafeteria setting: A sequential multi-intervention field study

Affiliations.

• 1 Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Society and Communication, Dalgas Have 15, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark. Electronic address: [email protected].
• 2 Zeppelin University, Center for Consumer, Markets and Politics, Am Seemooser Horn 20, 88045, Friedrichshafen, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].
• 3 ConPolicy GmbH - Institute for Consumer Policy, Friedrichstraße 224, 10969, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].
• 4 Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Society and Communication, Dalgas Have 15, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark; Zeppelin University, Center for Consumer, Markets and Politics, Am Seemooser Horn 20, 88045, Friedrichshafen, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].
• PMID: 33422678
• DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105106

Creating more health-fostering environments is high on the agenda of public and private actors. The behavioral approach to nudge people towards healthier food choices is gaining popularity despite limited understanding about where, and for whom, which specific nudges work. This study contributes by reporting on three different nudging interventions in the same setting and presents effects on different sub-populations. We find overall small effects that are heterogeneous, ranging from robustly more to even less healthy choices. We discuss the importance of transparency and reactance to health interventions and the potential interplay of interventions with habitual behavior among different sub-populations.

Keywords: Cafeteria; Food choice; Habits; Health nudges; Reactance.

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Cafeteria Online: Nudges for Healthier Food Choices in a University Cafeteria-A Randomized Online Experiment. Kawa C, Ianiro-Dahm PM, Nijhuis JFH, Gijselaers WH. Kawa C, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;18(24):12924. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412924. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34948533 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
• Cueing healthier alternatives for take-away: a field experiment on the effects of (disclosing) three nudges on food choices. Cheung TTL, Gillebaart M, Kroese FM, Marchiori D, Fennis BM, De Ridder DTD. Cheung TTL, et al. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7323-y. BMC Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31331307 Free PMC article.
• Nudges and choice architecture to promote healthy food purchases in adults: A systematized review. Lindstrom KN, Tucker JA, McVay M. Lindstrom KN, et al. Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;37(1):87-103. doi: 10.1037/adb0000892. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Psychol Addict Behav. 2023. PMID: 36395010 Review.
• Nudging customers towards healthier food and beverage purchases in a real-life online supermarket: a multi-arm randomized controlled trial. Stuber JM, Lakerveld J, Kievitsbosch LW, Mackenbach JD, Beulens JWJ. Stuber JM, et al. BMC Med. 2022 Jan 17;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02205-z. BMC Med. 2022. PMID: 35034635 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
• Nudging to get our food choices on a sustainable track. Vandenbroele J, Vermeir I, Geuens M, Slabbinck H, Van Kerckhove A. Vandenbroele J, et al. Proc Nutr Soc. 2020 Feb;79(1):133-146. doi: 10.1017/S0029665119000971. Epub 2019 Jun 28. Proc Nutr Soc. 2020. PMID: 31250781 Review.
• Effects of a Nudging Cue Targeting Food Choice in a University Cafeteria: A Field Study. Kawa C, Ianiro-Dahm PM, Nijhuis JFH, Gijselaers WH. Kawa C, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 3;11(9):1307. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091307. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37174849 Free PMC article.
• A Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Nudge Research Using VOSviewer. Jia C, Mustafa H. Jia C, et al. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Dec 25;13(1):19. doi: 10.3390/bs13010019. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36661591 Free PMC article. Review.
• Sensory Appeal and Routines Beat Health Messages and Visibility Enhancements: Mixed-Methods Analysis of a Choice-Architecture Intervention in a Workplace Cafeteria. Rantala E, Järvelä-Reijonen E, Pettersson K, Laine J, Vartiainen P, Närväinen J, Pihlajamäki J, Poutanen K, Absetz P, Karhunen L. Rantala E, et al. Nutrients. 2022 Sep 10;14(18):3731. doi: 10.3390/nu14183731. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 36145107 Free PMC article.
• Measuring "Nudgeability": Development of a Scale on Susceptibility to Physical Activity Nudges among College Students. Wang X, Song G, Wan X. Wang X, et al. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 1;12(9):318. doi: 10.3390/bs12090318. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36135122 Free PMC article.
• Are You "Nudgeable"? Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Healthy Eating Nudges in a Cafeteria Setting. Kawa C, Gijselaers WH, Nijhuis JFH, Ianiro-Dahm PM. Kawa C, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):4107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074107. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35409789 Free PMC article.

Publication types

• Search in MeSH

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Elsevier Science

Other Literature Sources

• scite Smart Citations
• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Students’ Satisfaction with the University Cafeteria: Structural Relationships of Food Quality, Staff, Price Fairness, and Ambiance

• Conference paper
• Cite this conference paper

• Mui Ling Dyana Chang 4 ,
• Norazah Mohd Suki 5 &
• Norbayah Mohd Suki 6  

1729 Accesses

4 Citations

This study aims to investigate the relationship between the food quality, price fairness, staff, and ambiance of the university cafeteria with students’ satisfaction. To test the conceptual model and test the proposed hypotheses, a quantitative survey was performed via a structured self-administered questionnaire among 78 undergraduates from Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sabah campus, Malaysia, utilizing convenience sampling method. Data was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) technique via AMOS 21.0 computer program with maximum likelihood estimation. The empirical results provided strong support that students’ satisfaction with the university cafeteria is very much influenced by food quality, followed by staff and ambiance, respectively. Implications of the study from managerial and theoretical perspectives together with directions for future research are also discussed. The findings of this study may help the university cafeteria to improve service quality and raise students’ satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

The student’s choice based on consumer psychology: an analysis applied to higher education institutions of brazil, high-order pls path model for multi-group analysis: the prosumership service quality model.

Construction and validation of a revised satisfaction index model for the Chinese urban and rural resident-based basic medical insurance scheme

Noel-Levitz. (2009). Report on student retention trends . Retrieved February 21, 2014, from http://www.noellevitz.com

Abdullah Sani, N., & Siow, O. N. (2014). Knowledge, attitudes and practices of food handlers on food safety in food service operations at the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Food Control, 37 (2014), 210–217.

Article   Google Scholar  

Norhati, I., & Nur Hafisah, F. (2013). Informal setting for learning on campus: Usage and preference. Procedia Social and Behavior Sciences, 105 (2013), 344–351.

Google Scholar  

Raman, S., & Chinniah, S. (2011). An investigation on higher learning students’ satisfaction on food services at university. International Journal of Research Commerce, IT and Management, 1 (2), 12–16.

Ali, I., Fauziah, S. A., & Mohd Hassan, M. O. (2014). An Integrated framework: Intercultural competence, service quality and customer satisfaction in grocery retailing. Procedia Social and Behavior Sciences, 109 (2014), 492–496.

Kwun, D. J. (2011). Effects of campus foodservice attributes on perceived value, satisfaction, and consumer attitude: A gender-difference approach. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30 (2), 252–261.

Gilbert, G. R., & Veloutsou, C. (2006). A cross-industry comparison of customer satisfaction. Journal of Services Marketing, 20 (5), 298–308.

Norazah, M. S. (2013). Students’ demand for smartphones: Structural relationships of product features, brand name, product price and social influence. Campus-Wide Information System Journal, 30 (4), 236–248.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). SERVQUAL: A multiple–item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12–40.

Yildiz, S. M., & Kara, A. (2009). The PESPERF scale: An instrument for measuring service quality in the school of Physical Education and Sports Sciences (PESS). Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 17 (4), 393–415.

Garvin, D. A. (1987). Competing on the eight dimensions of quality. Harvard Business Review, 65 (November–December), 43–52.

Fecikova, I. (2004). Index method for measurement of customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management Magazine, 16 (1), 57–66.

Medler-Liraz, H. (2012). Service quality and tipping: The moderating role of the quality of food. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31 (4), 1327–1329.

Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremier, D. D. (2008). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Law, A. K. Y., Hui, Y. V., & Zhao, X. (2004). Modelling repurchase frequency and customer satisfaction for fast food outlets. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 21 (5), 545–563.

Kivela, J., Inbakaran, R., & Reece, J. (1999). Consumer research in the restaurant environment, part 1: A conceptual model of dining satisfaction and return patronage. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 11 (5), 205–222.

Hwang, L., Eves, A., & Desombre, T. (2003). Gap analysis of patient meal service perceptions. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 16 (9), 143–153.

Qin, H., & Prybutok, V. R. (2009). Service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioural intentions in fast-food restaurants. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1 (1), 78–95.

Das, G. (2014). Linkages of retailer personality, perceived quality and purchase intention with retailer loyalty: A study of Indian non-food retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21 (3), 407–414.

Ha, J., & Jang, S. C. (2010). Effects of service quality and food quality: The moderating role of atmospherics in an ethnic restaurant segment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29 (3), 520–529.

Kafetzopoulos, D. P., & Gotzamani, K. D. (2014). Critical factors, food quality management and organizational performance. Food Control, 40 (2014), 1–11.

Kim, W. G., & Kim, H. B. (2004). Measuring customer-based restaurant brand equity. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 45 (2), 115–131.

Hensley, R. L., & Sulek, J. (2007). Customer satisfaction with waits in multi-stage services. Managing Service Quality, 17 (2), 152–173.

Herrmann, A., Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Huber, F. (2007). The influence of price fairness on customer satisfaction. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 16 (1), 49–58.

Barlett, J. E., & Han, F. (2007). Analysis of service quality in restaurants in China: An eastern perspective . ABR and TLC Conference Proceedings. Journal of Retailing, 77 (2), 273–289.

Martin-Consuegra, D., Molina, A., & Esteban, A. (2007). An integrated model of price, satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical analysis in the service sector. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 16 (7), 459–468.

Namkung, Y., & Jang, S. (2008). Are highly satisfied restaurant customers really different? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20 (2), 142–155.

Story, M., Kaphingst, K. M., Robinson-O’Brien, R., & Glanz, K. (2008). Creating healthy food and eating environments: Policy and environmental approaches. Annual Review of Public Health, 29 (1), 253–272.

Flegal, K. M., Carroll, M. D., Ogden, C. L., & Curtin, L. R. (2010). Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303 (3), 235–241.

Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

Mui Ling Dyana Chang

Labuan Faculty of International Finance, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Federal Territory of Labuan, Malaysia

Norazah Mohd Suki

Labuan Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Federal Territory of Labuan, Malaysia

Norbayah Mohd Suki

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mui Ling Dyana Chang .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Universiti Teknologi MARA, Alor Gajah, Melaka, Malaysia

Roaimah Omar

Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia

Hasan Bahrom

Geraldine de Mello

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Chang, M.L.D., Suki, N.M., Suki, N.M. (2015). Students’ Satisfaction with the University Cafeteria: Structural Relationships of Food Quality, Staff, Price Fairness, and Ambiance. In: Omar, R., Bahrom, H., de Mello, G. (eds) Islamic perspectives relating to business, arts, culture and communication. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-429-0_35

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-429-0_35

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-287-428-3

Online ISBN : 978-981-287-429-0

eBook Packages : Humanities, Social Sciences and Law Social Sciences (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Cafe Politics: How Food Service Operators Influence University Students’ Satisfaction and Dining Frequency

2023, Politica

The study delves into the intricate relationship between cafe operations and politics and how it influences the overall dining experience of university students. This research aims to explore the influence of cafe operations on the satisfaction and behaviour of university students and its effect on their dining frequency. The data were gathered through a survey of 201 students, employing a convenient sampling technique. The results suggest that the quality of food, ambience, value for money, food and beverage options, and service quality significantly impact students' overall satisfaction with the campus meal service operation and their dining frequency. These findings emphasize the importance of food service operators focusing on food quality, ambience, value for money, food and beverage options, and service quality to attain student satisfaction. These factors could positively impact the university's reputation, student retention, and marketability to potential students. This study is significant for university food service operators as it provides valuable insights into the various elements of the food service experience that influence student satisfaction and dining frequency. This research contributes to the existing literature by filling the gap in knowledge regarding the impact of cafe operations on student behaviour and satisfaction. Moreover, this study provides a robust framework for future research. Ultimately, this research aims to enhance university students' dining experience, thereby improving their overall academic performance and well-being.

Related Papers

Asian Journal of Empirical Research

Bakul Sarkar

Abdallah Mohamed , Eslam Fathy

Food and beverage quality Service quality Reasonable prices and overall student satisfaction In this study, perceptions of different service attributes that have an impact on university students' overall satisfaction were examined. Students using different university cafeterias were selected through convenience samples of different college students at the university. A total number of 543 valid questionnaires were used for statistical analysis. Results indicated that student satisfaction with different service attributes was below average. Moreover, all service attributes were found to have a significant and positive impact on the overall student satisfaction. Based on the results of the current study, several recommendations were derived for university management to increase student satisfaction with food and beverage services provided at different university cafeterias.

shahrim karim

On-campus foodservices were thought to be the first choice for university students to dine in. However, these seemingly captive consumers have been opting for off-campus foodservice as their preferred outlet. This paper aims to uncover specific factors that motivate undergraduate students to dine-in at university foodservice facilities using Profile Accumulation Technique (PAT). PAT is a semi-quantitative method that provides freedom for informants to answer in their own terms and words, alternatively the data could be analyzed statistically. 115 questionnaires were distributed to students and staff of a local university. Findings include a list of factors (positive perception, negative perception and expectations) that the students considered to be significant in determining their choice of food outlet. These factors are then descriptively analyzed to determine attributes influencing university customer preferences. This paper significantly contributes in providing a deeper insight...

European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation

Anshul Garg

This study investigates the link between the different service characteristics that have an influence on customer satisfaction in university cafeteria food services. A conceptual model comprising of different variables like food and beverage quality, service quality, food choice, price and value equality, and ambience were studied for customer satisfaction to explore the relationship among them. This study examined how dining experiences influence the satisfaction and loyalty of both non-mature (students) and mature (staff) customers, in order to find their similarities and differences within the context of university cafeteria services. The study was conducted at Taylor's University in Malaysia by using a quantitative research approach, and 231 students and 63 staff members of the university participated in the study. The findings reveal that the various quality factors considered in the study are positively correlated with customer satisfaction and have a significant impact on the satisfaction level of both students and staff who dined at the university cafeteria. It could be concluded from the results that the influence of price offered at the university cafeteria had a significant effect on respondents' loyalty. The result of this study offers a direction towards better the services and facilities, which lead to an increase of the competitive influence of the restaurant business in the marketplace.

Bharath Josiam

Kisang Ryu , Faizan Ali

Purpose – This study aims to examine student’s foodservice experience and its effect on satisfaction, dining frequency and expenditures. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 674 samples collected at a large Malaysian private university were used for data analysis. Structural equation modelling based on partial least squares method was conducted. Findings – Results confirm that student foodservice experience significantly influences satisfaction, dining frequency and dining expenditure. Furthermore, four first-order constructs (product component, service component, price component and healthy component) are also validated on the designated second-order construct (customer foodservice experience). Research limitations/implications – These findings indicate that on-campus foodservice operators should focus on student experience and satisfaction to increase visits and expenditures. Originality/value – This study would enable on-campus foodservice operators to have a better understanding of various dimensions of foodservice experience which will lead to students’ satisfaction and encourage the development of their visits and expenditure.

International Hospitality Review

Andrea McNeil

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine the students’ perceptions of an on-campus foodservice operation at an identified historically black college and university (HBCU) and its effect on their satisfaction and dining frequency. Design/methodology/approach A survey of 685 students was conducted to collect data. Partial least squares based structural equation modeling is used to test the proposed structural model with SmartPLS 3.0. Findings Results confirm that quality of food, ambience, value for money, food and beverage options and service quality have a positively significant impact on students’ overall satisfaction with the on-campus foodservice operation and dining frequency. As such, all the hypotheses are supported. Research limitations/implications These findings indicate that on-campus foodservice operators should focus on quality of food, ambience, value for money, food and beverage options and service quality to achieve student satisfaction. This in turn could po...

Asian Social Science

Norazah Mohd Suki

Public Health Nutrition

Sarah Colby , Melissa D Olfert , Kendra Kattelmann , Tanya Horacek , C. Byrd-bredbenner

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

International Journal of Engineering & Technology

dyana chang

Shebnem Sva

arvic ricafort

Noor Zainol

BOUARGUE Amal

Asmaliyana Ghani

The Journal of College and University Student Housing

Mack Shelley

Darrin Thomas

Lynn Huffman

Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences

IJSES Editor

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Hanna Górska-Warsewicz

Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Studies

nazmul sardar , Nurul Raihen

Sustainability

zahwa akbara

Foodservice Research International

Juliet Getty

Ekonomika poljoprivrede

Ivana Blešić

Amir Azahari

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, restaurant and foodservice research: a critical reflection behind and an optimistic look ahead.

International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management

ISSN : 0959-6119

Article publication date: 10 April 2017

The purpose of this paper is to present a review of the foodservice and restaurant literature that has been published over the past 10 years in the top hospitality and tourism journals. This information will be used to identify the key trends and topics studied over the past decade, and help to identify the gaps that appear in the research to identify opportunities for advancing future research in the area of foodservice and restaurant management.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper takes the form of a critical review of the extant literature that has been done in the foodservice and restaurant industries. Literature from the past 10 years will be qualitatively assessed to determine trends and gaps in the research to help guide the direction for future research.

The findings show that the past 10 years have seen an increase in the number of and the quality of foodservice and restaurant management research articles. The topics have been diverse and the findings have explored the changing and evolving segments of the foodservice industry, restaurant operations, service quality in foodservice, restaurant finance, foodservice marketing, food safety and healthfulness and the increased role of technology in the industry.

Research limitations/implications

Given the number of research papers done over the past 10 years in the area of foodservice, it is possible that some research has been missed and that some specific topics within the breadth and depth of the foodservice industry could have lacked sufficient coverage in this one paper. The implications from this paper are that it can be used to inform academics and practitioners where there is room for more research, it could provide ideas for more in-depth discussion of a specific topic and it is a detailed start into assessing the research done of late.

Originality/value

This paper helps foodservice researchers in determining where past research has gone and gives future direction for meaningful research to be done in the foodservice area moving forward to inform academicians and practitioners in the industry.

• Hospitality management
• Restaurants
• Food and beverage
• Foodservice research

DiPietro, R. (2017), "Restaurant and foodservice research: A critical reflection behind and an optimistic look ahead", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management , Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 1203-1234. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2016-0046

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles

All feedback is valuable.

Please share your general feedback

Report an issue or find answers to frequently asked questions

Contact Customer Support

• Corpus ID: 168550286

AN INVESTIGATION ON HIGHER LEARNING STUDENTS SATISFACTION ON FOOD SERVICES AT UNIVERSITY CAFETERIA

• Saravanan Raman Subhaseni Chinniah
• Published 7 July 2011
• Business, Education
• International Journal of Research in Commerce, IT and Management

21 Citations

Investigating international students’ perception of foodservice attributes in malaysian research universities.

• Highly Influenced

Outsourcing at Walter Sisulu University: students’ perceptions of an outsourced campus-based cafeteria.

• 11 Excerpts

International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 4, Issue 1 (June) ISSN 2289-1552

Assessment of service quality and customer satisfaction in higher learning institutions' cafeterias: an empirical study of college of business education (cbe), dodoma city, tanzania, factors affecting university image among undergraduate students: the case study of qatar university, an empirical study on students’ satisfaction from mawlana bhashani science & technology university, bangladesh, the impact of food service attributes on customer satisfaction in a rural university campus environment, consumer choices and service quality in the university canteens in warsaw, poland, stakeholder approach and the impact of brand image within higher education in the middle east: student and staff perspective, investigating university students satisfaction with on-campus cafeteria services: an empirical study in perspective of private university, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

• Skip to Guides Search
• Skip to breadcrumb
• Skip to main content
• Skip to footer
• Skip to chat link
• Report accessibility issues and get help
• Go to Penn Libraries Home
• Go to Franklin catalog

Critical Writing: Black Food Matters (Fall 2024): Researching the White Paper

• Getting started
• News and Opinion Sites
• Academic Sources
• Grey Literature
• Substantive News Sources
• What to Do When You Are Stuck
• Understanding a citation
• Examples of Quotation
• Examples of Paraphrase
• Chicago Manual of Style: Citing Images
• Researching the Op-Ed
• Researching Prospective Employers
• Resume Resources
• Cover Letter Resources

Research the White Paper

Researching the white paper:.

The process of researching and composing a white paper shares some similarities with the kind of research and writing one does for a high school or college research paper. What’s important for writers of white papers to grasp, however, is how much this genre differs from a research paper.  First, the author of a white paper already recognizes that there is a problem to be solved, a decision to be made, and the job of the author is to provide readers with substantive information to help them make some kind of decision--which may include a decision to do more research because major gaps remain. 

Thus, a white paper author would not “brainstorm” a topic. Instead, the white paper author would get busy figuring out how the problem is defined by those who are experiencing it as a problem. Typically that research begins in popular culture--social media, surveys, interviews, newspapers. Once the author has a handle on how the problem is being defined and experienced, its history and its impact, what people in the trenches believe might be the best or worst ways of addressing it, the author then will turn to academic scholarship as well as “grey” literature (more about that later).  Unlike a school research paper, the author does not set out to argue for or against a particular position, and then devote the majority of effort to finding sources to support the selected position.  Instead, the author sets out in good faith to do as much fact-finding as possible, and thus research is likely to present multiple, conflicting, and overlapping perspectives. When people research out of a genuine desire to understand and solve a problem, they listen to every source that may offer helpful information. They will thus have to do much more analysis, synthesis, and sorting of that information, which will often not fall neatly into a “pro” or “con” camp:  Solution A may, for example, solve one part of the problem but exacerbate another part of the problem. Solution C may sound like what everyone wants, but what if it’s built on a set of data that have been criticized by another reliable source?  And so it goes. 

For example, if you are trying to write a white paper on the opioid crisis, you may focus on the value of  providing free, sterilized needles--which do indeed reduce disease, and also provide an opportunity for the health care provider distributing them to offer addiction treatment to the user. However, the free needles are sometimes discarded on the ground, posing a danger to others; or they may be shared; or they may encourage more drug usage. All of those things can be true at once; a reader will want to know about all of these considerations in order to make an informed decision. That is the challenging job of the white paper author.     
 The research you do for your white paper will require that you identify a specific problem, seek popular culture sources to help define the problem, its history, its significance and impact for people affected by it.  You will then delve into academic and grey literature to learn about the way scholars and others with professional expertise answer these same questions. In this way, you will create creating a layered, complex portrait that provides readers with a substantive exploration useful for deliberating and decision-making. You will also likely need to find or create images, including tables, figures, illustrations or photographs, and you will document all of your sources. 

Africana Studies Librarian

Connect to a Librarian Live Chat or "Ask a Question"

• Librarians staff live chat from 9-5 Monday through Friday . You can also text to chat: 215-543-7674
• You can submit a question 24 hours a day and we aim to respond within 24 hours 
• You can click the "Schedule Appointment" button above in librarian's profile box (to the left), to schedule a consultation with her in person or by video conference.  
• You can also make an appointment with a  Librarian by subject specialization . 
• Connect by email with a subject librarian

Find more easy contacts at our Quick Start Guide

• Next: Getting started >>
• Last Updated: Sep 4, 2024 10:00 AM
• URL: https://guides.library.upenn.edu/c.php?g=1420564