How to convert risk scores (CVSSv1, CVSSv2, CVSSv3, OWASP Risk …
There are many reasons why CVSS and OWASP Risk Ranking are not compatible with FAIR (or each other) and I think the resources I provided cover that specific topic in quite accurate detail, such as the fact that CVSS and the OWASP Risk Rating Methodology (like NIST SP 800-30 and others before them) utilize non-standard risk language and invalid (e.g., …
What risk rating models are used for calculating risk scores of web ...
What risk rating methods, models, assessments or methodologies are used for calculating or estimating a risk score of vulnerabilities (for example, like described in the OWASP top 10) and which of those are best to use for web vulnerabilities? I'm aware of the following three: OWASP Risk Rating Methodology, CVSS (version 1, 2 and 3),
Using OWASP Top 10 for assigning vulnerability severity in a …
For an individual vulnerability, prevalence is irrelevant, all that matters is risk. Even for risk, the T10 makes lots of generalizations and, by necessity, cannot determine business risk for your company. From Top 10-2017 Note About Risks: This rating does not take into account the actual impact on your business.
risk threat vulnerability
Skip to the end of the ENISA Risk Assessment document where it states that risk evaluation involves: consequences (e.g. impacts), the likelihood of events, the cumulative impact of a series of events that could occur simultaneously; In other words, risk = impact x likelihood This is also exactly what the OWASP Risk Rating Methodology prescribes
Using the OWASP testing guide, if password strength policy verification is implemented only client-side, can that be considered a vulnerability? In which category? Also which CVSS it should have?
Questions tagged [risk-analysis]
What risk rating methods, models, assessments or methodologies are used for calculating or estimating a risk score of vulnerabilities (for example, like described in the OWASP top 10) and which of ...
Newest 'risk' Questions
What risk rating methods, models, assessments or methodologies are used for calculating or estimating a risk score of vulnerabilities (for example, like described in the OWASP top 10) and which of ...
Information Security Risk Analytics
That's just an example. If the company is more into Application Security, I would suggest WASC or OWASP. For OWASP, a Risk Rating Methodology does specify what risks are grave in nature (generically) which means these threats were to be solved in priority.
Reducing risk from logging
I am following the OWASP Risk methodology and have the threat "Installed software exploitation". I've created this risk based on the idea that a risk is found in say phpMyAdmin which can be exploited. My question is how does one practically reduce the risk under the section Vulnerability Factors > Intrusion detection?
Newest 'owasp' Questions
Recently, OWASP introduced two new set of categories as of 2017, April - to it's OWASP Top 10: Insufficient Attack Protection Unprotected APIs I understand, Unprotected APIs does have an immediate ...
COMMENTS
There are many reasons why CVSS and OWASP Risk Ranking are not compatible with FAIR (or each other) and I think the resources I provided cover that specific topic in quite accurate detail, such as the fact that CVSS and the OWASP Risk Rating Methodology (like NIST SP 800-30 and others before them) utilize non-standard risk language and invalid (e.g., …
What risk rating methods, models, assessments or methodologies are used for calculating or estimating a risk score of vulnerabilities (for example, like described in the OWASP top 10) and which of those are best to use for web vulnerabilities? I'm aware of the following three: OWASP Risk Rating Methodology, CVSS (version 1, 2 and 3),
For an individual vulnerability, prevalence is irrelevant, all that matters is risk. Even for risk, the T10 makes lots of generalizations and, by necessity, cannot determine business risk for your company. From Top 10-2017 Note About Risks: This rating does not take into account the actual impact on your business.
Skip to the end of the ENISA Risk Assessment document where it states that risk evaluation involves: consequences (e.g. impacts), the likelihood of events, the cumulative impact of a series of events that could occur simultaneously; In other words, risk = impact x likelihood This is also exactly what the OWASP Risk Rating Methodology prescribes
Using the OWASP testing guide, if password strength policy verification is implemented only client-side, can that be considered a vulnerability? In which category? Also which CVSS it should have?
What risk rating methods, models, assessments or methodologies are used for calculating or estimating a risk score of vulnerabilities (for example, like described in the OWASP top 10) and which of ...
What risk rating methods, models, assessments or methodologies are used for calculating or estimating a risk score of vulnerabilities (for example, like described in the OWASP top 10) and which of ...
That's just an example. If the company is more into Application Security, I would suggest WASC or OWASP. For OWASP, a Risk Rating Methodology does specify what risks are grave in nature (generically) which means these threats were to be solved in priority.
I am following the OWASP Risk methodology and have the threat "Installed software exploitation". I've created this risk based on the idea that a risk is found in say phpMyAdmin which can be exploited. My question is how does one practically reduce the risk under the section Vulnerability Factors > Intrusion detection?
Recently, OWASP introduced two new set of categories as of 2017, April - to it's OWASP Top 10: Insufficient Attack Protection Unprotected APIs I understand, Unprotected APIs does have an immediate ...