- Search Menu
- Sign in through your institution
- Advance articles
- Author Guidelines
- Submission Site
- Self-Archiving Policy
- Why publish with us?
- Calls for Papers
- About Psychoradiology
- About West China Hospital
- Editorial Board
- Advertising & Corporate Services
- Journals on Oxford Academic
- Books on Oxford Academic
Article Contents
Smartphone (over-)use and brain structure (structural mri studies), smartphone (over-)use and functional mri, summary of the current status and a roadmap for future research, conclusions, conflict of interest, acknowledgments and funding.
- < Previous
Neuroimaging the effects of smartphone (over-)use on brain function and structure—a review on the current state of MRI-based findings and a roadmap for future research
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Supplementary Data
Christian Montag, Benjamin Becker, Neuroimaging the effects of smartphone (over-)use on brain function and structure—a review on the current state of MRI-based findings and a roadmap for future research, Psychoradiology , Volume 3, 2023, kkad001, https://doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkad001
- Permissions Icon Permissions
The smartphone represents a transformative device that dramatically changed our daily lives, including how we communicate, work, entertain ourselves, and navigate through unknown territory. Given its ubiquitous availability and impact on nearly every aspect of our lives, debates on the potential impact of smartphone (over-)use on the brain and whether smartphone use can be “addictive” have increased over the last years. Several studies have used magnetic resonance imaging to characterize associations between individual differences in excessive smartphone use and variations in brain structure or function. Therefore, it is an opportune time to summarize and critically reflect on the available studies. Following this overview, we present a roadmap for future research to improve our understanding of how excessive smartphone use can affect the brain, mental health, and cognitive and affective functions.
At the time of writing, more than six billion smartphone subscriptions have been estimated for the year 2022 (Statista, 2022 ). This tremendously high number reflects that over the last 15 years—since the inception of the iPhone in 2007 (Macedonia, 2007 )—a global mobile digital revolution happened leading to ubiquitously and permanently available smartphone technologies around the world. Smartphones enable us to find our way in unknown territory, to initiate and maintain social communications, to join and provide content for social networks, and find information on whatever we are interested in as long a network signal is available. Due to the numerous applications in occupational and recreational contexts the smartphone has attracted many users around the globe. The gigantic rise of social media over the last 15 years is highly interwoven with the digital mobile revolution (Jurgenson, 2012 ; Korolija, 2020 ).
Adverse consequences of excessive smartphone use
Despite the many obvious improvements in our daily life by the smartphone, the scientific and public debates have drawn attention toward potential detrimental effects of smartphone (over-)use on different levels ranging from the societal to the individual level. Initial evidence suggests negative effects of excessive smartphone use on cognitive and affective domains, such that excessive smartphone use has being linked to lower productivity (Duke & Montag, 2017 ), lower learning outcomes/academic achievements (Sapci et al ., 2021 ; Sunday et al ., 2021 ), and elevated levels of negative emotionality (Elhai et al ., 2019 ; Montag et al ., 2016 ). Moreover, being distracted by the smartphone in the traffic represents a considerable danger on the road (Jannusch et al ., 2021 ; Rosenthal et al ., 2022 ). Although the cross-sectional nature of many of the available studies does not allow to make causal interpretations with respect to the associations—as it is, for example, also conceivable that higher negative emotionality renders individuals at an increased risk to develop escalating smartphone use—the reported associations between excessive smartphone use and adverse outcomes led to scientific and societal debates around the globe. Most of the research endeavors to date have been trying to understand how the digital revolution and the ubiquitous use of digital platforms may affect mental health, daily life functioning, social interactions, and also the brain (Firth et al ., 2019 ; Montag & Diefenbach, 2018 ). In the context of smartphone use, much research has focused in recent years on the question of how (excessive) smartphone use is linked to altered cognition (Liebherr et al ., 2020 ) and whether excessive smartphone use resembles an addictive behavior.
Debate on the medium versus function of smartphones
One critical debate concerns the differentiation of the medium versus function in the discussion on “smartphone addiction.” From the perspective of substance addiction, it would clearly be misleading to refer to being addicted to bottles, but reasonably the content of the bottle matters (Kuss & Griffiths, 2017 ; Panova & Carbonell, 2018 ). Applying this example to the area of excessive smartphone use or “smartphone addiction,” one would need to disentangle which specific contents the smartphone transmits and ultimately which specific needs these contents fulfill. Initial evidence suggests that drivers of excessive smartphone use likely are social media applications (Montag, 2021 ; Rozgonjuk et al ., 2020 ; Sha et al ., 2019 ) promoted through highly immersive app designs (Montag, Lachmann, et al ., 2019 ). Of note, many social media apps need to be considered in the context of the so-called data business model, which aims to prolong online time to enlarge the digital footprints of their users (Montag & Hegelich, 2020 ). Other drivers of excessive smartphone use might be video games on the phone (Leung et al ., 2020 ) and other functions such as unregulated access to work-related e-mails (Sadeghi et al ., 2022 ), which in turn might lower well-being (Kushlev & Dunn, 2015 ). In the context of ongoing debates about the conceptualization of excessive and potentially harmful smartphone use a very recent systematic meta-analysis reported global prevalence rates as high as 26.99% (Meng et al ., 2022 ) and another work mentioned an increase of “smartphone addiction” around the world (Olson et al ., 2022 ). Interestingly, the work by Meng et al . ( 2022 ) observed that prevalence rates of smartphone addiction are particularly high among adults (26.84%), followed by adolescents (21.62%), and children (15.19%). Males and females did not differ significantly. For a review on antecedents and consequences of smartphone addiction, see a recent overview by Busch & McCarthy ( 2021 ).
Is the actual nature of excessive smartphone use “addictive”?
In addition to the need for a more detailed examination with respect to which specific contents on smartphones drive excessive use, a large and growing number of studies (primarily employing self-report questionnaires) has examined excessive smartphone behavior within an addiction framework. Within the addiction framework, one would hypothesize that excessive—and ultimately problematic—use of the smartphone would be characterized by symptoms such as loss of control and preoccupation with use, reflected in, for example, unsuccessful attempts to reduce use or continued use despite negative consequences, as well as social problems and functional impairments in daily life—which represent key diagnostic symptoms of both substance and behavioral addictions (e.g. see also the new Gaming Disorder criteria by the WHO; Montag, Schivinski et al ., 2021 ). Of note, the duration of use, so spending a considerable amount of time on the smartphone, is not a distinct criterion per se. On the one hand, not everyone who spends much time on the smartphone shows problematic smartphone use behavior (for instance, the time could reflect constant job-related smartphone use); however, on the other hand, those using the smartphone in an “addictive” way will inherently spend much of their time on the smartphone. The most prominent self-report measures to assess problematic use of the smartphone are currently perhaps Kwon's Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS) (Kwon et al ., 2013 ) and the Korean Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale (SAPS) (D. Kim et al ., 2014 ). This notion is also supported by their use in many of the brain imaging studies discussed in the present review.
While the introduced scales and several of the current studies refer to smartphone addiction some researchers argue that the term “addiction” should not be simply transferred into the context of smartphone use (Panova & Carbonell, 2018 ) or propose that the term should be abandoned (Carbonell et al ., 2022 ) “to refocus clinical and research efforts on real disorders” (p. 2). Further, many researchers refer in the context of smartphone addiction research to problematic smartphone use as a more neutral term (Elhai et al ., 2017 ; Fischer-Grote et al ., 2019 ), while others prefer terms such as Smartphone Use Disorder (SmUD) to align the terminology with substance addictions and addictive behaviors in the ICD-11 of the World Health Organization (Gao, Jia, et al ., 2020 ; Gao, Sun, et al ., 2020 ). We currently consider the term SmUD as most suitable as it aligns well with the WHO terminology of Gaming Disorder in the realm of addictive behaviors (Marengo et al ., 2020 ; Montag et al ., 2021 ), but explicitly state that SmUD (or the other terms used) are not officially recognized at the moment and in many studies at best tendencies toward SmUD are investigated. Moreover, we have iterated already on the many problem areas when using terms such as smartphone addiction or SmUD. It is important to not overpathologize everyday behavior, and this is what needs to be kept in mind in this research field (Billieux et al ., 2015 ) until evidence from different areas comes up to understand the actual nature of excessive behavior (Brand et al ., 2020 )—here, excessive smartphone use. A final thought on the terminology: the umbrella term “Smartphone Use Disorder”—instead of focusing exclusively on excessive use of single app groups such as game apps or social-media apps—might also be relevant, when people show problematic use behavior in several categories on their phones. In this case, the SmUD terminology can summarize the problematic behavior being observed across several apps on the smartphone.
Although research on the detrimental effects of smartphone (over-)use or SmUD has only recently begun, initial studies have employed neuroimaging techniques, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to explore associations between excessive smartphone use and individual variations in brain structure and function. These variations may reflect adaptations that neurally underlie excessive use or mediate the association between problematic smartphone use and affective, cognitive, and behavioral dysregulations. The initial yet rapidly growing literature has used different MRI-based approaches to examine variations in the structural organization of the brain using e.g. voxel-based morphometry (VBM) or diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), the functional organization of the brain using resting state functional MRI (fMRI) techniques, and functional alterations during cognitive and affective processes, using task-based fMRI (Ahn et al ., 2021 ; Arató et al ., 2023 ; Cho et al ., 2021 ; Choi et al ., 2021 ; Chun et al ., 2017 , 2018 ; Han & Kim, 2022 ; Hirjak et al ., 2022 ; Horvath et al ., 2020 ; Hu et al ., 2017 ; Kwon et al ., 2022 ; Lee et al ., 2019 ; D. Liu et al ., 2022 ; Lou et al ., 2019 ; Paik et al ., 2019 ; Pyeon et al ., 2021 ; Rashid et al ., 2021 ; Schmitgen et al ., 2020 , 2022 ; Tymofiyeva et al ., 2020 ; Wang et al ., 2016 ; Yoo et al ., 2021 ; Zou et al ., 2021 , 2022 ). Please note that the papers cited here will be reviewed in the next section of the present work (for a summary, see Tables 1 and 2 ; see also an overview in Fig. 1 ).
Structural and functional MRI studies on SmUD tendencies (also known as smartphone addiction or problematic smartphone use) as reviewed in the present work.
Findings from structural MRI studies on smartphone (over-)use (in alphabetic order following the surname of the first author); gray shaded boxes represent DTI studies, the Wang et al . ( 2016 ) and Zou et al . ( 2021 ) studies in the table include both a VBM and DTI approach.
GMV = gray matter volume, SPA = smartphone addiction, PSU = problematic smartphone use (smartphone use disorder tendencies), SPAI = Smartphone Addiction Inventory, TBSS = tract-based spatial statistics, SAS-SV = SAS-Short Version, MPAI = Mobile Phone Addiction Index, MPD = Mobile Phone Dependent group.
Findings from functional MRI studies on smartphone (over-)use (in alphabetic order following the surname of the first author); gray colored parts of the table represent task-based fMRI studies, the remaining studies represent resting state fMRI studies.
Meanwhile >20 studies on MRI-neuroimaging and excessive smartphone use or SmUD have been published and the number has strongly increased since 2020. Within this context, it is an opportune time for a review that (i) critically reflects on where the field stands and how strong the evidence is for smartphone-use associated brain changes, and (ii) provides a roadmap that outlines critical issues in the field and next steps that can help to shed light on the cognitive, affective, and neurobiological basis of smartphone (over-)use.
Neuroimaging of SmUD
The last few years have seen a strong increase in studies investigating individual differences in SmUD and associated brain variations by means of MRI. As depicted in Fig. 1 , the studies encompass structural MRI focusing on use-associated variations in gray and white matter as well as functional MRI studies examining associations with the intrinsic functional organization of the brain or during engagement in cognitive and affective tasks.
Associations between SmUD and the structural organization of the brain have been examined on the level of gray and white matter. Further, different methodological strategies including the use of individual differences association designs (e.g. examining linear relationships between the level of SmUD and brain structural variations) as well as between group designs aiming to examine brain structural differences between groups of individuals with high and low SmUD levels have been implemented. Differences in the gray matter organization of the brain are commonly examined by means of voxel based morphometry of T1 images [Ashburner & Friston ( 2000 ); for recent methodological aspects see the work by Zhou et al . ( 2022 ) and for information on cortical thickness or cortical folding patterns the work by Chen et al . ( 2013 ); additional insights can be derived from the work by Jiang et al . ( 2022 )]. Investigations on the level of the white matter tract organization are for instance examined using DTI (and the application of tract based spatial statistics: Bach et al ., 2014 ). While structural brain imaging provides insights into the structural brain architecture, fMRI is applied to study the intrinsic functional organization of the brain (resting state fMRI) or the engagement of specific brain regions during cognitive or affective task paradigms (task-based fMRI). To better understand individual differences in SmUD tendencies both task-based fMRI and resting state fMRI have been applied. During task-based fMRI studies, the individuals engage into specific cognitive or affective processes of interest, e.g. viewing a smartphone stimulus that can trigger "cue-reactivity." Cue-reactivity is a process during which a stimulus that is frequently paired with the addictive substance or the addictive behavior gains strong incentive salience (e.g. Yu et al ., 2020 ; X. Zhou et al ., 2019 ). In contrast, resting state fMRI aims to gain insights into the intrinsic functional architecture of the brain ("at rest") while the participants do not engage in a specific mental operation ("do not think of something in particular") (Gonzalez-Castillo et al ., 2021 ; Markett et al ., 2018 ).
The structural and functional MRI-approaches have been extensively used—either separately or in combination—to determine the brain basis of substance-related and (established) behavioral addictions (for quantitative and qualitative reviews, see also Klugah-Brown et al ., 2021 ; Taebi et al ., 2022 ; Tolomeo & Yu, 2022 ; and Zilverstand et al ., 2018 for examples). The combination of the different imaging approaches can allow a more holistic evaluation at different levels and allow to examine different research questions with respect to potential addiction-related changes. The present review aims to provide a brief overview on the smartphone-(over-)use MRI literature, and is divided in both structural and functional MRI sections summarizing the results of the current literature (Fig. 1 ). Next, the review presents a roadmap for future studies in the field of SmUD and associated brain changes.
As becomes apparent in Table 1 , several studies examined differences in gray matter brain volumes in the context of SmUD tendencies. Overall deriving a consistent picture of SmUD tendency associated variations in brain structure is currently limited by the use of varying SmUD assessments in these studies. Moreover, differences in MRI analysis strategy may further limit direct comparisons. In this context, recent studies have shown that the specific brain structural variations that are identified may strongly depend on the choice of processing pipeline (see Zhou et al ., 2022 for a methodological evaluation of the effects of choice of processing pipeline on brain structural analyses). Moreover, some of the identified studies focused in their analysis on specific hypothesis-driven brain regions such as the brain stem (Cho et al ., 2021 ) or specifically on striatal morphology (Yoo et al ., 2021 ), whereas other studies used whole-brain analytic approaches (Horvath et al ., 2020 ; Rashid et al ., 2021 ). Further complicating matters is the use of different rigor in the brain analysis and in the level of description of the analyses used, such that for several studies the exact multiple comparisons approach used remains unclear.
An initial overview of the reported associations between brain volume and SmUD tendencies mostly suggests an association of inverse nature (such that higher SmUD tendencies associated with lower volumes in specific brain regions, e.g. Wang et al ., 2016 ; Zou et al ., 2021 ). Accordingly, between-group designs comparing participants with high versus low SmUD often revealed decreased regional brain volumes in the group of excessive smartphone users compared to control individuals (e.g. Lee et al ., 2019 ; Yoo et al ., 2021 ). With respect to the volumetric gray matter approach, studies reported lower gray matter volume in regions such as the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal regions, and the striatum (caudate). These regions partly resemble regions that have been identified in previous works examining brain volumetric alterations in substance and behavioral addictions (e.g. see the following studies: Klugah-Brown et al ., 2021 ; Koester et al ., 2012 ; Qin et al ., 2020 ; Yu et al ., 2022 ; Zhang et al ., 2021 ). However, none of the regions consistently replicated across SmUD studies and, together with the lack of standardized SmUD assessments and brain structural analyses strategies, the previous studies currently do not allow to draw clear conclusions with respect to the specific regions that might show brain structural alterations associated with excessive smartphone use. While the lack of consistently reported regions and the methodological limitations do not allow a clear interpretation of the underlying brain structural variations, previous studies in behavioral addictions have associated volumetric decreases in some of the mentioned regions with, for example, the severity of problematic online gaming or social media engagement (Montag et al ., 2018 ; F. Zhou et al ., 2019 ) or higher impulsivity in cocaine dependent individuals (Moreno-López et al ., 2012 ), which may suggest an association with key features of addiction. For details on the specific regions reported in the SmUD studies, please see also Table 1 .
Although the reviewed number of structural studies - from our perspective - is currently too small and heterogenous to support an overarching picture, we further refer to studies that examined either white matter tract integrity (Hu et al ., 2017 ; Tymofiyeva et al ., 2020 ; Zou et al ., 2021 ) or variations in cortical folding (Hirjak et al ., 2022 ) in the context of SmUD tendencies.
Table 2 shows studies investigating the neural correlates of SmUD tendencies using fMRI. Most previous studies employed a resting state fMRI approach examining associations between SmUD tendencies and the intrinsic functional organization of the brain (Ahn et al ., 2021 ; Chun et al ., 2018 ; Horvath et al ., 2020 ; Kwon et al ., 2022 ; D. Liu et al ., 2022 ; Lou et al ., 2019 ; Paik et al ., 2019 ; Pyeon et al ., 2021 ; Rashid et al ., 2021 ; Schmitgen et al ., 2022 ; Zou et al ., 2022 ). A direct comparison between the studies is hindered by differences in the methodological approaches, ranging from different preprocessing methods to different network analytic strategies. The studies reported potential associations between SmUD tendencies and variations in the intrinsic architecture of a number of brain systems and large-scale networks, including for instance altered connectivity of striatal, limbic, and frontal regions (e.g. Pyeon et al ., 2021 ; Zou et al ., 2022 ; Chun et al ., 2018 ; Paik et al ., 2019 ), as well as altered functional interaction between and within large scale networks including the default mode network and the salience network (Ahn et al ., 2021 ; Kwon et al ., 2022 ). While the different approaches employed in these studies and the methodological limitations prevent clear conclusions at the present stage, the identified pathways partly overlap with the intrinsic pathways and networks that have been identified in substance and behavioral addictions (Zhou et al ., 2018 ; Taebi et al ., 2022 ; Tolomeo & Yu, 2022 ; Yan et al ., 2021 ; Zimmermann et al ., 2018 ). Within the context of the previous literature on the role of dysregulations in the intrinsic functional organization of the brain in addiction, it is conceivable that alterations in specific systems may promote different symptomatic features. Alterations in salience and executive control systems may, for instance, underly dysregulations in several affective and cognitive domains, while alterations in the striato-frontal organization may reflect the development of compulsive behavior and alterations in the default mode network may promote dysfunctional self-related decision-making (Taebi et al ., 2022 ; Tolomeo & Yu, 2022 ; Yan et al ., 2021 ; Yu et al ., 2022 ; Zhang & Volkow, 2019 ; X. Zhou et al ., 2019 ; Zimmermann et al ., 2018 ). However, clear conclusions with respect to consistent and robust effects of excessive smartphone use or SmUD on the functional architecture of the brain remain to be determined.
Five studies investigated the neural basis of altered cognitive and affective behaviors related to SmUD tendencies by means of task-based functional MRI (Arató et al ., 2023 ; Choi et al ., 2021 ; Chun et al ., 2017 ; Han & Kim, 2022 ; Schmitgen et al ., 2020 ). An early study by Chun et al . ( 2017 ) examined facial emotion processing alterations in participants with high SmUD versus participants with low SmUD and found that the high SmUD group displayed decreased activiation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and dorsal ACC during the presentation of angry faces. Schmitgen et al . ( 2020 ) used a cue reactivity paradigm during which participants were presented with smartphone or neutral images and reported group differences between participants with high and low SmUD tendencies in several regions including anterior cingulate, medial prefrontal, and temporal regions. Choi et al . ( 2021 ) used a modified version of a cognitive conflict task and reported that participants with high SmUD exhibited lower task performance accompanied by enhanced recruitment of fronto-parietal regions. Han and Kim ( 2022 ) used a modified oddball task in participants with high versus low risk for SmUD and observed attention filtering impairments and a lower engagement of the frontopolar cortex in participants at high risk for SmUD. The most current study by Arató et al . ( 2023 ) applied a facial emotion recognition paradigm, where higher scores in the smartphone application-based addiction scale were associated with higher functional connectivity among brain regions related to emotional/cognitive control. While these findings may reflect that (social) cognitive and addiction-related changes in SmUD are accompanied by changes in corresponding brain systems, the low number of available studies and some other methodological limitations, such as the comparably small samples and lack of replication designs, do not allow to draw conclusions at present with respect to robust task-based brain functional alterations related to excessive smartphone use. Please note that two studies are not listed in Table 2 as they did not investigate SmUD tendencies, but either directly investigated links between objective smartphone use measures and resting state fMRI (Huckins et al ., 2019 ) or applied a general screen time self-report measure/time spent on reading to investigate functional connectivity in children (Horowitz-Kraus & Hutton, 2018 ).
From the literature review, it becomes apparent that although the smartphone technology has now been available for over 15 years and the detrimental consequences of excessive smartphone use have been increasingly debated, the present knowledge about how smartphone use affects our neurobiology or is linked to variations in brain structure and function still is very limited. The available literature—although growing—does currently not allow us to draw firm conclusions with respect to potential effects of excessive smartphone use on the brain. This is partly because no consensus exists on which inventories to best use to assess smartphone (over-)use and a lack of studies including “objective” tracked smartphone data in the available MRI literature (see exceptions in studies such as those by Huckins et al ., 2019 and Montag et al ., 2017 ). While the conventional (neuroimaging) studies in this field employ a combination of self-report data for determining the severity or the extent of smartphone (over-)use with respect to symptoms or actual duration of use, “objective” in this context refers to tracked behavior on smartphones providing quantifiable and precise data of actual use, including, for example, how often a person checks the phone, what apps are used in particular, etc. (for a tracking app, see Montag, Baumeister, et al ., 2019 ). This approach is often described as digital phenotyping or mobile sensing in the literature (Baumeister & Montag, 2023 ). In this context, it is of importance to mention that SmUD tendencies not necessarily need to strongly overlap with time spent on the phone [“not everyone spending much time on the phone is addicted”; see also lack of association between fear of missing out (FOMO) with actual phone behavior (Rozgonjuk et al ., 2021 )]. With respect to the design of the studies, several of the studies cited here are underpowered for determining robust brain alterations in SmUD and some studies do not adhere to multiple correction procedures, which are the current standard in the field. Finally, the predominance of retrospective cross-sectional study designs limits the conclusions that can be drawn with respect to disentangling predisposing brain variations from effects that are directly linked to smartphone (over-)usage.
Nevertheless, the available literature suggests a potential association between smartphone (over-)use and variations in brain structure and function that may mediate cognitive and behavioral changes, as well as detrimental effects on mental health and probably even addictive usage. Going forward, it will be essential to apply strategies and experimental designs that have been evaluated in the context of other mental disorders to disentangle the potential impact of different factors and thus to describe potential smartphone (over-)use associated brain changes. In contrast to other fields of research on the neurobiological basis of addiction, i.e. substance addiction, animal models for SmUD have not been developed and it will be challenging—or even impossible—to develop corresponding mechanistic animal models. Within this context, neuroimaging potential brain changes in humans will be even more important as a strategy to determine the underlying neurobiological and potentially neuropathological pathways. Based on the present overview, we outline the following key questions and strategies as a roadmap on the way forward to determining brain changes associated with smartphone (over-)use.
SmUD (or smartphone addiction/problematic smartphone use) consists of many symptoms such as loss of control, functional impairments due to excessive use of the smartphone, and preoccupation with the smartphone, etc. Therefore, it is of importance to not only understand how overall SmUD scores are linked to brain structure and function, but also the different symptoms/facets. Initial studies have begun to determine separable and common brain alterations associated with different facets of general internet gaming behavior (e.g. Yu et al ., 2022 ). Within the SmUD context similar approaches may allow to better describe associations between specific symptomatic and behavioral dysregulations and associated brain changes. Moreover, we mention that several studies are hard to compare because different inventories to assess SmUD have been applied, as no agreement exists regarding a conceptual framework (but see Billieux's framework to understand problematic smartphone use; Billieux, 2012 ). Beyond this, it will be vital to disentangle brain changes that are specifically associated with SmUD and to separate these from other psychological processes that might be associated with or even inherently linked with SmUD. The construct fear of missing out (FOMO) for instance has gained increasing interest in the field of digital addictions (Elhai, Yang, Montag, et al ., 2020 ; Elhai, Yang, Rozgonjuk, et al ., 2020 ) and has been associated with individual variations in brain morphology (Wang et al ., 2022 ). Moreover, it will be critical to further separate brain changes related to specific or unspecific pathology relevant domains such as depression and anxiety—which have been related to brain structural and functional variations (X. Liu et al ., 2021 , 2022 ; Serra-Blasco et al ., 2021 ; Wise et al ., 2017 )—from variations that specifically associate with SmUD.
The literature search demonstrated (see also Fig. 1 ), that only few studies applied task-based fMRI methods in the field of SmUD. While resting state and brain structural approaches may allow to determine variations in the intrinsic architecture of the brain, task-based fMRI studies will further allow to determine the neural alterations that underlie dysregulations in domains that have been found to be disrupted across other addictive disorders. Promising underlying domains in this respect may be to examine whether: (a) smartphone-associated stimuli have gained an increased salience or even engage habit and compulsive use associated circuits during cue reactivity paradigms (for substance related addictions, see e.g. Vollstädt-Klein et al ., 2010 ; X. Zhou et al ., 2019 ; for behavioral addictions, see e.g. L. Liu et al ., 2017 ; for SmUD see Schmitgen et al ., 2020 ); (b) whether cognitive functions, in particular executive functions and the underlying fronto-parietal networks, show alterations in SmUD (for studies in other addictions please see Klugah-Brown et al ., 2021 ; Zheng et al ., 2019 ); and whether brain systems involved in (c) emotion and stress reactivity; or (d) natural reward processing are affected by SmUD (for studies in other addictions see e.g. Luijten et al ., 2017 ; J. Zhang et al ., 2020 ; Zhao et al., 2020 ).
Aside from self-reported SmUD tendencies, more studies need to correlate objective tracked smartphone use with brain data to add a further data layer to the neuroscientific study on smartphone use (Montag, Elhai, et al ., 2021b ). Meanwhile, it became clear that humans have problems in correctly assessing their technology use, in particular regarding the quantity of technology use (Parry et al ., 2021 ).
To our knowledge no study in the field investigated potential changes of the brain due to smartphone use in term of structure and function with repeated MRI measures. This will be of particular importance within prospective longitudinal designs that hold the promise to separate predisposing brain alterations that render participants at an increased risk of developing SmUD from effects that are rather a consequence of escalating smartphone use or develop in association with the transition to addictive use (for prospective longitudinal designs in substance addiction research, see also the following studies: Becker et al ., 2013 , 2015 ; Jager et al ., 2007 ). The implementation of prospective longitudinal designs would allow to draw stronger conclusions with respect to whether and how the smartphone technology affects human neurobiology (for comparable approaches in the field of behavioral addictions, see also previous studies: Gleich et al ., 2017 ; Kühn et al ., 2018 ; Yu et al ., 2020 ; Zhou et al ., 2019 ).
The scientific works available in the field usually study the different MRI sources in an independent fashion, hence they correlate the smartphone behavior or SmUD scores with the brain data without shedding light on what differences in structure mean for functionality of the brain when studying smartphone use. Bringing these different brain sources together in a meaningful fashion would open interesting research avenues.
As already mentioned, to understand how smartphone (over-)use affects human neurobiology, a closer look needs to be taken on what smartphone applications humans use in what intensity and in what context. A taxonomy of different smartphone use patterns will be needed to be taken into account to better grasp the nature of smartphone (over-)use and potential brain changes (Marengo et al ., 2021 ; Montag et al ., 2021 ). Generalized views on overusing the smartphone might be helpful to get a bird's eye view on the topic, but consuming different contents might lead to different results when one is trying to understand the neurobiology of smartphone (over-)use. See also exemplary research in related areas investigating general social media (over-)use, specific social media (over-)use or e-mail (over-)use (He et al ., 2017 ; Lee et al ., 2021 ; Montag et al ., 2017 , 2018 ; Nasser et al ., 2020 ; Sadeghi et al ., 2022 ; Sherman et al ., 2016 ; Turel et al ., 2014 , 2018 ), which at best would directly be also put in the context of smartphone (over-)use research (seldom done at the moment). We also mention highly interesting work investigating smartphone touchscreen use and the brain (Balerna & Ghosh, 2018 ; Gindrat et al ., 2015 ).
Finally, the present review showed that most studies (to our knowledge) focused on the study of SmUD or related topics by means of MRI. There is so much else to be studied in the context of smartphone use—which likely will result in the study of so called digital biomarkers (Montag, Elhai, et al ., 2021a ). By this, we mean that the digital footprints left on smartphones (and other devices of the Internet of Things) can help us to get insights into the neurobiology of a person (Montag, Elhai, et al ., 2021b ). Given that the smartphone is our companion with whom we interact in many everyday life situations, it is not surprising that the smartphone can provide a detailled characterization of behavioral, cognitive and affective domains and this could inform not only psychological but also neuroscientific approaches.
An increasing number of studies suggests sex differences in the brain correlates of addiction (see e.g. Grace et al ., 2021 ) and going forward it will be important to explore potential differences in the effects of smartphone (over-)use in men and women. Moreover, it will be important to determine the effects of smartphone (over-)use on the brain over the life span, it is e.g. conceivable that in particular developing brains are more sensitive to the impact of excessive usage (but see interesting opposing prevalence numbers as mentioned above; Meng et al ., 2022 ).
In terms of a general challenge of the MRI-based research field it will be vital to better address and enhance the replicability of MRI research (see e.g. Klugah-Brown et al . ( 2022 ) for an example of replicable brain structural markers in behavioral addictions), employing designs that extend the view of the traditional case-control designs in neuroimaging of mental disorders (Etkin, 2019 ), and implement transparent data and code sharing as well as preregistration of studies that allow an a priori specification of brain-based hypotheses (see also Nichols et al ., 2017 ; Poldrack et al ., 2017 ).
The present paper provides an initial overview on research examining potential brain changes related to smartphone (over-)use from studies applying MRI techniques (studies are of cross-sectional nature though). While many studies observed functional and structural differences and associations with SmUD in brain systems spanning cortical and subcortical regions involved in reward/motivational processes, affective and cognitive domains, and the development of addictive behavior, the current evidence remains patchy and overarching neuroscientific frameworks uniquely touching on smartphone (over-)use are lacking. The studies do not allow us to determine whether the observed brain characteristics are a result of a certain kind of smartphone use or merely represent a predisposition to use the smartphone in a certain kind of way. Many study findings are based on small study populations. In this context, prospective longitudinal designs and replication studies are needed soon to determine the direction of the associations and the robustness of the findings. Finally, MRI, although being a powerful tool to understand the human brain, comes with technical limitations—among others a limited temporal resolution. Therefore, multimodal assessments that integrate the advantages of different brain imaging methods are warranted. Within this context, we shortly hint toward already existing literature investigating the present smartphone use complex with means of electroencephalography (S.-K. Kim et al ., 2015 ; Weon, 2017 ), fNIRS (Li et al ., 2022 ; Xiang et al ., 2023 ) as well as positron emission tomography (Westbrook et al ., 2021 ). The combination of advanced prospective study designs with different neuroscientific techniques (also hormones and genetics) can promote a better and more complete understanding of the neurobiological changes related to smartphone (over-)use.
The author B.B. is editorial-board member of Psychoradiology . He was blinded from the review process and making decisions on the manuscript.
C.M. reports no conflict of interest. Nevertheless, for reasons of transparency, C.M. mentions that he has received (to Ulm University and earlier University of Bonn) grants from agencies such as the German Research Foundation (DFG). C.M. has performed grant reviews for several agencies; has edited journal sections and articles; has given academic lectures in clinical or scientific venues or companies; and has generated books or book chapters for publishers of mental health texts. For some of these activities he received royalties, but never from the gaming or social media industry. C.M. was part of a discussion circle (Digitalität und Verantwortung: https://about.fb.com/de/news/h/gespraechskreis-digitalitaet-und-verantwortung/ ) debating ethical questions linked to social media, digitalization, and society/democracy at Meta. In this context, he received no salary for his activities. C.M. currently functions as independent scientist on the scientific advisory board of the Nymphenburg group (Munich, Germany). This activity is financially compensated. Further, he is on the scientific advisory board of Applied Cognition (Redwood City, CA, USA), an activity that is also compensated.
The present study was partly supported by the China Brain Project (MOST2030, grant no. 2022ZD0208500), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. NSFC 82271583; 32250610208) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2018YFA0701400).
Ahn J , Lee D , Namkoong K et al. ( 2021 ) Altered functional connectivity of the salience network in problematic smartphone users . Front Psychiatry . 12 : 636730 .
Google Scholar
Arató Á , Nagy S , Perlaki G et al. ( 2023 ) Emotional face expression recognition in problematic internet use and excessive smartphone use: task-based fMRI study . Sci Rep . 13 : 354 .
Ashburner J , Friston KJ ( 2000 ) Voxel-based morphometry—the methods . Neuroimage . 11 : 805 – 21 .
Bach M , Laun FB , Leemans A et al. ( 2014 ) Methodological considerations on tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) . Neuroimage . 100 : 358 – 69 .
Balerna M , Ghosh A ( 2018 ) The details of past actions on a smartphone touchscreen are reflected by intrinsic sensorimotor dynamics . NPJ Digital Med . 1 : Article 1 .
Baumeister H , Montag C ( 2023 ) Digital phenotyping and mobile sensing in psychoinformatics—a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary research endeavor . In Montag C. , Baumeister H. (Eds.), Digital Phenotyping and Mobile Sensing: New Developments in Psychoinformatics (pp. 1 – 9 .). Springer International Publishing .
Google Preview
Becker B , Wagner D , Koester P et al. ( 2013 ) Memory-related hippocampal functioning in ecstasy and amphetamine users: a prospective fMRI study . Psychopharmacology . 225 : 923 – 34 .
Becker B , Wagner D , Koester P et al. ( 2015 ) Smaller amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex predict escalating stimulant use . Brain . 138 : 2074 – 86 .
Billieux J ( 2012 ) Problematic use of the mobile phone: a literature review and a pathways model . Curr Psychiatry Rev . 8 : 299 – 307 .
Billieux J , Schimmenti A , Khazaal Y et al. ( 2015 ) Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research . J Behav Addict . 4 : 119 – 23 .
Brand M , Rumpf H-J , Demetrovics Z et al. ( 2020 ) Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of “other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors”? . J Behav Addict . 11 : 150 – 9 .
Busch PA , McCarthy S ( 2021 ) Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: a systematic literature review of an emerging research area . Comput Hum Behav . 114 : 106414 .
Carbonell X , Panova T , Carmona A ( 2022 ) Commentary: editorial: significant influencing factors and effective interventions of mobile phone addiction . Front Psychol . 13 : 957163 .
Chen H , Zhang T , Guo L et al. ( 2013 ) Coevolution of gyral folding and structural connection patterns in primate brains . Cereb Cortex . 23 : 1208 – 17 .
Cho IH , Yoo JH , Chun J-W et al. ( 2021 ) Reduced volume of a brainstem substructure in adolescents with problematic smartphone use . J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry . 32 : 137 – 43 .
Choi J , Cho H , Choi J-S et al. ( 2021 ) The neural basis underlying impaired attentional control in problematic smartphone users . Translational Psychiatry . 11 : 129 .
Chun J-W , Choi J , Cho H et al. ( 2018 ) Role of frontostriatal connectivity in adolescents with excessive smartphone use . Front Psychiatry . 9 : 437 .
Chun J-W , Choi J , Kim J-Y et al. ( 2017 ) Altered brain activity and the effect of personality traits in excessive smartphone use during facial emotion processing . Sci Rep . 7 : 12156 .
Duke É , Montag C ( 2017 ) Smartphone addiction, daily interruptions and self-reported productivity . Addict Behav Rep . 6 : 90 – 5 .
Elhai JD , Dvorak RD , Levine JC et al. ( 2017 ) Problematic smartphone use: a conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology . J Affect Disord . 207 : 251 – 9 .
Elhai JD , Yang H , Montag C ( 2019 ) Cognitive- and emotion-related dysfunctional coping processes: transdiagnostic mechanisms explaining depression and Anxiety's relations with problematic smartphone use . Curr Addict Rep . 6 : 410 – 7 .
Elhai JD , Yang H , Montag C et al. ( 2020 ) Fear of missing out (FOMO): overview, theoretical underpinnings, and literature review on relations with severity of negative affectivity and problematic technology use . Braz J Psychiatry, AHEAD . 43 : 203 – 9 .
Elhai JD , Yang H , Rozgonjuk D et al. ( 2020 ) Using machine learning to model problematic smartphone use severity: the significant role of fear of missing out . Addict Behav . 103 : 106261 .
Etkin A ( 2019 ) A reckoning and research agenda for neuroimaging in psychiatry . Am J Psychiatry . 176 : 507 – 11 .
Firth J , Torous J , Stubbs B et al. ( 2019 ) The “online brain”: how the internet may be changing our cognition . World Psychiatry . 18 : 119 – 29 .
Fischer-Grote L , Kothgassner OD , Felnhofer A ( 2019 ) Risk factors for problematic smartphone use in children and adolescents: a review of existing literature . Neuropsychiatrie . 33 : 179 – 90 .
Gao Q , Jia G , Fu E et al. ( 2020 ) A configurational investigation of smartphone use disorder among adolescents in three educational levels . Addict Behav . 103 : 106231 .
Gao Q , Sun R , Fu E et al. ( 2020 ) Parent–child relationship and smartphone use disorder among Chinese adolescents: the mediating role of quality of life and the moderating role of educational level . Addict Behav . 101 : 106065 .
Gindrat A-D , Chytiris M , Balerna M et al. ( 2015 ) Use-dependent cortical processing from fingertips in touchscreen phone users . Curr Biol . 25 : 109 – 16 .
Gleich T , Lorenz RC , Gallinat J et al. ( 2017 ) Functional changes in the reward circuit in response to gaming-related cues after training with a commercial video game . Neuroimage . 152 : 467 – 75 .
Gonzalez-Castillo J , Kam JWY , Hoy CW et al. ( 2021 ) How to interpret resting-state fMRI: ask your participants . J Neurosci . 41 : 1130 – 41 .
Grace S , Rossetti MG , Allen N et al. ( 2021 ) Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of alcohol dependence: hippocampus and amygdala subregions in a sample of 966 people from the ENIGMA Addiction Working Group . Transl Psychiatry . 11 : 156 .
Han SW , Kim CH ( 2022 ) Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying internet/smartphone addiction: a preliminary fMRI study . Tomography . 8 : 1781 – 90 .
He Q , Turel O , Brevers D et al. ( 2017 ) Excess social media use in normal populations is associated with amygdala-striatal but not with prefrontal morphology . Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging . 269 : 31 – 5 .
Hirjak D , Henemann GM , Schmitgen MM et al. ( 2022 ) Cortical surface variation in individuals with excessive smartphone use . Dev Neurobiol . 82 : 277 – 87 .
Horowitz-Kraus T , Hutton JS ( 2018 ) Brain connectivity in children is increased by the time they spend reading books and decreased by the length of exposure to screen-based media . Acta Paediatr . 107 : 685 – 93 .
Horvath J , Mundinger C , Schmitgen MM et al. ( 2020 ) Structural and functional correlates of smartphone addiction . Addict Behav . 105 : 106334 .
Hu Y , Long X , Lyu H et al. ( 2017 ) Alterations in white matter integrity in young adults with smartphone dependence . Front Hum Neurosci . 11 : 532 .
Huckins JF , daSilva AW , Wang R et al. ( 2019 ) Fusing mobile phone sensing and brain imaging to assess depression in college students . Front Neurosci . 13 : 248 .
Jager G , de Win MM , Vervaeke HK et al. ( 2007 ) Incidental use of ecstasy: no evidence for harmful effects on cognitive brain function in a prospective fMRI study . Psychopharmacology . 193 : 403 – 14 .
Jannusch T , Shannon D , Völler M et al. ( 2021 ) Smartphone use while driving: an investigation of young novice driver (YND) behaviour . Transp Res F Traffic Psychol Behav . 77 : 209 – 20 .
Jiang M , Chen Y , Yan J et al. ( 2022 ) Anatomy-guided spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks (AG-STGCNs) for modeling functional connectivity between gyri and sulci across multiple task domains . IEEE Trans Neural Network Learning Syst , 1 – 11 . PP .
Jurgenson N ( 2012 ) When atoms meet bits: social Media, the mobile web and augmented revolution . Future Internet . 4 : Article 1 .
Kim D , Lee Y , Lee J et al. ( 2014 ) Development of Korean smartphone addiction proneness scale for youth . PLoS ONE . 9 : e97920 .
Kim S-K , Kim S-Y , Kang H-B ( 2015 ) Comparison of EEG during watching emotional videos according to the degree of smartphone addiction . J Korea Multimedia Soc . 18 : 599 – 609 .
Klugah-Brown B , Zhou X , Pradhan BK et al. ( 2021 ) Common neurofunctional dysregulations characterize obsessive–compulsive, substance use, and gaming disorders—An activation likelihood meta-analysis of functional imaging studies . Addict Biol . 26 : e12997 .
Klugah-Brown B , Zhou X , Wang L et al. ( 2022 ) Associations between levels of Internet Gaming Disorder symptoms and striatal morphology replicate and may mediate the effects on elevated social anxiety . Psychoradiology . 2 : 207 – 15 .
Koester P , Tittgemeyer M , Wagner D et al. ( 2012 ) Cortical thinning in amphetamine-type stimulant users . Neuroscience . 221 : 182 – 92 .
Korolija D ( 2020 ) Why iPhones and Social Media Go Hand in Hand in the United States . https://streetsignals.com/iphone-social-media-united-states/ (accessed on 24th February 2023) .
Kühn S , Kugler D , Schmalen K et al. ( 2018 ) The myth of blunted gamers: no evidence for desensitization in empathy for pain after a violent video game intervention in a longitudinal fMRI study on non-gamers . Neurosignals . 26 : 22 – 30 .
Kushlev K , Dunn EW ( 2015 ) Checking email less frequently reduces stress . Comput Hum Behav . 43 : 220 – 8 .
Kuss DJ , Griffiths MD ( 2017 ) Social networking sites and addiction: ten lessons learned . Int J Environ Res Public Health . 14 : Article 3 .
Kwon M , Jung Y-C , Lee D et al. ( 2022 ) Altered resting-state functional connectivity of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex with intrinsic brain networks in male problematic smartphone users . Front Psychiatry . 13 : 1008557 .
Kwon M , Kim D-J , Cho H et al. ( 2013 ) The Smartphone Addiction Scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents . PLoS ONE . 8 : e83558 .
Lee D , Lee J , Namkoong K et al. ( 2021 ) Altered functional connectivity of the dorsal attention network among problematic social network users . Addict Behav . 116 : 106823 .
Lee D , Namkoong K , Lee J et al. ( 2019 ) Lateral orbitofrontal gray matter abnormalities in subjects with problematic smartphone use . J Behav Addict . 8 : 404 – 11 .
Leung H , Pakpour AH , Strong C et al. ( 2020 ) Measurement invariance across young adults from Hong Kong and Taiwan among three internet-related addiction scales: bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), Smartphone application-based Addiction Scale (SABAS), and Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form (IGDS-SF9) (Study Part A) . Addict Behav . 101 : 105969 .
Li X , Li Y , Wang X et al. ( 2022 ) Reduced brain activity and functional connectivity during creative idea generation in individuals with smartphone addiction . Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci . 18 : nsac052 . https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsac052
Liebherr M , Schubert P , Antons S et al. ( 2020 ) Smartphones and attention, curse or blessing? - A review on the effects of smartphone usage on attention, inhibition, and working memory . Comput Hum Behav Rep . 1 : 100005 .
Liu D , Liu X , Long Y et al. ( 2022 ) Problematic smartphone use is associated with differences in static and dynamic brain functional connectivity in young adults . Front Neurosci . 16 : 1010488 .
Liu L , Yip SW , Zhang J-T et al. ( 2017 ) Activation of the ventral and dorsal striatum during cue reactivity in Internet gaming disorder . Addict Biol . 22 : 791 – 801 .
Liu X , Klugah-Brown B , Zhang R et al. ( 2022 ) Pathological fear, anxiety and negative affect exhibit distinct neurostructural signatures: evidence from psychiatric neuroimaging meta-analysis . Transl Psychiatry . 12 : 405 .
Liu X , Lai H , Li J et al. ( 2021 ) Gray matter structures associated with neuroticism: a meta-analysis of whole-brain voxel-based morphometry studies . Hum Brain Mapp . 42 : 2706 – 21 .
Lou J-H , Zhang Z-Z , Guan M et al. ( 2019 ) Altered default-mode network functional connectivity in college students with mobile phone addiction . Int J Clin Exp Med . 12 : 1877 – 87 .
Luijten M , Schellekens AF , Kühn S et al. ( 2017 ) Disruption of reward processing in addiction: an image-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies . JAMA Psychiatry . 74 : 387 – 98 .
Macedonia M ( 2007 ) IPhones target the tech elite . Computer . 40 : 94 – 5 .
Marengo D , Sariyska R , Schmitt HS et al. ( 2021 ) Objective recordings of smartphone and instant messaging and social network app usage are associated with self-reported tendencies towards smartphone use disorder: the distinctive role of image-based apps (Preprint) . J Med Internet Res . 9 : e27093 .
Marengo D , Sindermann C , Häckel D et al. ( 2020 ) The association between the Big five personality traits and smartphone use disorder: a meta-analysis . J Behav Addict . 9 : 534 – 50 .
Markett S , Montag C , Reuter M ( 2018 ) Network neuroscience and personality . Personal Neurosci . 1 : E14 .
Meng S-Q , Cheng J-L , Li Y-Y et al. ( 2022 ) Global prevalence of digital addiction in general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Clin Psychol Rev . 92 : 102128 .
Montag C ( 2021 ) Du gehörst uns! Die psychologischen Strategien von Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat & Co—Und wie wir uns vor der großen Manipulation schützen . Blessing .
Montag C , Baumeister H , Kannen C et al. ( 2019 ) Concept, possibilities and pilot-testing of a new smartphone application for the social and life sciences to study Human behavior including validation data from personality psychology . J—Multidisciplinary Sci J . 2 : Article 2 .
Montag C , Diefenbach S ( 2018 ) Towards Homo Digitalis: important research issues for psychology and the neurosciences at the dawn of the Internet of Things and the digital society . Sustainability . 10 : Article 2 .
Montag C , Elhai JD , Dagum P . ( 2021a ) On blurry boundaries when defining digital biomarkers: how much biology needs to be in a digital biomarker? . Front Psychiatry . 12 : 1690 .
Montag C , Elhai JD , Dagum P . ( 2021b ) Show me your smartphone… and then I will show you your brain structure and brain function . Hum Behav Emerg Technol . 3 : 891 – 7 .
Montag C , Hegelich S ( 2020 ) Understanding detrimental aspects of social Media use: will the real culprits please stand up? . Front Sociol . 5 : 599270 .
Montag C , Lachmann B , Herrlich M et al. ( 2019 ) Addictive features of social media/messenger platforms and freemium games against the background of psychological and economic theories . Int J Environ Res Public Health . 16 : Article 14 .
Montag C , Markowetz A , Blaszkiewicz K et al. ( 2017 ) Facebook usage on smartphones and gray matter volume of the nucleus accumbens . Behav Brain Res . 329 : 221 – 8 .
Montag C , Schivinski B , Pontes H ( 2021 ) Is the proposed distinction of gaming disorder into a predominantly online vs. offline form meaningful? Empirical evidence from a large German speaking gamer sample . Addict Behav Rep . 14 : 100391 .
Montag C , Sindermann C , Becker B et al. ( 2016 ) An affective neuroscience framework for the molecular study of internet addiction . Front Psychol . 7 : 1906 .
Montag C , Wegmann E , Sariyska R et al. ( 2021 ) How to overcome taxonomical problems in the study of internet use disorders and what to do with “smartphone addiction”? . J Behav Addict . 9 : 908 – 14 .
Montag C , Zhao Z , Sindermann C et al. ( 2018 ) Internet Communication Disorder and the structure of the human brain: initial insights on WeChat addiction . Sci Rep . 8 : 2155 .
Moreno-López L , Catena A , Fernández-Serrano MJ et al. ( 2012 ) Trait impulsivity and prefrontal gray matter reductions in cocaine dependent individuals . Drug Alcohol Depend . 125 : 208 – 14 .
Nasser NS , Sharifat H , Rashid AA et al. ( 2020 ) Cue-reactivity among young adults with problematic Instagram use in response to Instagram-themed risky behavior cues: a pilot fMRI study . Front Psychol . 11 : 556060 .
Nichols TE , Das S , Eickhoff SB et al. ( 2017 ) Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI . Nat Neurosci . 20 : 299 – 303 .
Olson JA , Sandra DA , Colucci ÉS et al. ( 2022 ) Smartphone addiction is increasing across the world: a meta-analysis of 24 countries . Comput Hum Behav . 129 : 107138 .
Paik S-H , Park C , Kim J-Y et al. ( 2019 ) Prolonged bedtime smartphone use is associated with altered resting-state functional connectivity of the insula in adult smartphone users . Front Psychiatry . 10 : 516 .
Panova T , Carbonell X ( 2018 ) Is smartphone addiction really an addiction? . J Behav Addict . 7 : 252 – 9 .
Parry DA , Davidson BI , Sewall CJR et al. ( 2021 ) A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use . Nat Hum Behav . 5 : 1535 – 47 .
Poldrack RA , Baker CI , Durnez J et al. ( 2017 ) Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research . Nat Rev Neurosci . 18 : 115 – 26 .
Pyeon A , Choi J , Cho H et al. ( 2021 ) Altered connectivity in the right inferior frontal gyrus associated with self-control in adolescents exhibiting problematic smartphone use: a fMRI study . J Behav Addict . 10 : 1048 – 60 .
Qin K , Zhang F , Chen T et al. ( 2020 ) Shared gray matter alterations in individuals with diverse behavioral addictions: a voxel-wise meta-analysis . J Behav Addict . 9 : 44 – 57 .
Rashid AA , Suppiah S , Nasser NS et al. ( 2021 ) The neurobiology of smartphone addiction in emerging adults evaluated using brain morphometry and resting-state functional MRI . Neurosci Res Notes . 4 : Article 4 .
Rosenthal SR , Li Y , Wensley IA et al. ( 2022 ) Smartphone addiction and traffic accidents: the moderating role of texting while driving . J Technol Behav Sci . 7 : 406 – 13 .
Rozgonjuk D , Elhai JD , Sapci O et al. ( 2021 ) Discrepancies between self-reports and behavior: fear of missing out (FoMO), self-reported problematic smartphone use severity, and objectively measured smartphone use . Digital Psychology . 2 : Article 2 .
Rozgonjuk D , Sindermann C , Elhai JD et al. ( 2020 ) Associations between symptoms of problematic smartphone, Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram use: an item-level exploratory graph analysis perspective . J Behav Addict . 9 : 686 – 97 .
Sadeghi S , Takeuchi H , Shalani B et al. ( 2022 ) Brain anatomy alterations and mental health challenges correlate to email addiction tendency . Brain Sci . 12 : Article 10 .
Sapci O , Elhai JD , Amialchuk A et al. ( 2021 ) The relationship between smartphone use and students` academic performance . Learn Individ Differ . 89 : 102035 .
Schmitgen MM , Horvath J , Mundinger C et al. ( 2020 ) Neural correlates of cue reactivity in individuals with smartphone addiction . Addict Behav . 108 : 106422 .
Schmitgen MM , Wolf ND , Sambataro F et al. ( 2022 ) Aberrant intrinsic neural network strength in individuals with “smartphone addiction”: an MRI data fusion study . Brain Behav . 12 : e2739 .
Serra-Blasco M , Radua J , Soriano-Mas C et al. ( 2021 ) Structural brain correlates in major depression, anxiety disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder: a voxel-based morphometry meta-analysis . Neurosci Biobehav Rev . 129 : 269 – 81 .
Sha P , Sariyska R , Riedl R et al. ( 2019 ) Linking internet communication and smartphone use disorder by taking a closer look at the Facebook and WhatsApp applications . Addict Behav Rep . 9 : 100148 .
Sherman LE , Payton AA , Hernandez LM et al. ( 2016 ) The power of the like in adolescence: effects of peer influence on neural and behavioral responses to social media . Psychol Sci . 27 : 1027 – 35 .
Statista ( 2023 ) Number of smartphone subscriptions worldwide from 2016 to 2021, with forecasts from 2022 to 2027 . Statista . https://www.statista.com/statistics/330695/number-of-smartphone-users-worldwide/ (accessed on 24th February 2023) .
Sunday OJ , Adesope OO , Maarhuis PL ( 2021 ) The effects of smartphone addiction on learning: a meta-analysis . Comput Hum Behav Rep . 4 : 100114 .
Taebi A , Becker B , Klugah-Brown B et al. ( 2022 ) Shared network-level functional alterations across substance use disorders: a multi-level kernel density meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity studies . Addict Biol . 27 : e13200 .
Tolomeo S , Yu R ( 2022 ) Brain network dysfunctions in addiction: a meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity . Transl Psychiatry . 12 : 41 .
Turel O , He Q , Brevers D et al. ( 2018 ) Delay discounting mediates the association between posterior insular cortex volume and social media addiction symptoms . Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci . 18 : 694 – 704 .
Turel O , He Q , Xue G et al. ( 2014 ) Examination of neural systems sub-serving facebook “addiction” . Psychol Rep . 115 : 675 – 95 .
Tymofiyeva O , Yuan JP , Kidambi R et al. ( 2020 ) Neural correlates of smartphone dependence in adolescents . Front Hum Neurosci . 14 : 564629 .
Vollstädt-Klein S , Wichert S , Rabinstein J et al. ( 2010 ) Initial, habitual and compulsive alcohol use is characterized by a shift of cue processing from ventral to dorsal striatum . Addiction . 105 : 1741 – 9 .
Wang L , Zhou X , Song X et al. ( 2022 ) Fear of missing out (FOMO) associates with reduced cortical thickness in core regions of the posterior default mode network and higher levels of problematic smartphone and social media use . preprint ( BioRxiv.org ; doi: 10.1101/2022.10.24.513508) .
Wang Y , Zou Z , Song H et al. ( 2016 ) Altered gray matter volume and white matter integrity in college students with mobile phone dependence . Front Psychol . 7 : 597 .
Weon H-W ( 2017 ) Comparison of QEEG between EEG asymmetry and coherehnce with elderly people according to smart_phone game addiction tendency . J Korea Academia-Industrial Coop Soc . 18 : 644 – 52 . https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201734964190221.page
Westbrook A , Ghosh A , van den Bosch R et al. ( 2021 ) Striatal dopamine synthesis capacity reflects smartphone social activity . IScience . 24 : 102497 .
Wise T , Radua J , Via E et al. ( 2017 ) Common and distinct patterns of grey-matter volume alteration in major depression and bipolar disorder: evidence from voxel-based meta-analysis . Mol Psychiatry . 22 : 1455 – 63 .
Xiang M-Q , Lin L , Song Y-T et al. ( 2023 ) Reduced left dorsolateral prefrontal activationin problematic smartphone users during the Stroop task: An fNIRS study . Front Psychiatry . 13 : 1097375 .
Yan H , Li Q , Yu K et al. ( 2021 ) Large-scale network dysfunction in youths with internet gaming disorder: a meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity studies . Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry . 109 : 110242 .
Yoo JH , Chun J-W , Choi MR et al. ( 2021 ) Caudate nucleus volume mediates the link between glutamatergic neurotransmission and problematic smartphone use in youth . J Behav Addict . 10 : 338 – 46 .
Yu F , Li J , Xu L et al. ( 2022 ) Opposing associations of Internet Use Disorder symptom domains with structural and functional organization of the striatum: a dimensional neuroimaging approach . J Behav Addict . 1 : 1068 – 79 .
Yu F , Sariyska R , Lachmann B et al. ( 2020 ) Convergent cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence for gaming-cue specific posterior parietal dysregulations in early stages of internet gaming disorder . Addict Biol . 26 : e12933 .
Zhang J , Dong H , Zhao Z et al. ( 2020 ) Altered neural processing of negative stimuli in people with internet gaming disorder: fMRI evidence from the comparison with recreational game users . J Affect Disord . 264 : 324 – 32 .
Zhang M , Gao X , Yang Z et al. ( 2021 ) Shared gray matter alterations in subtypes of addiction: a voxel-wise meta-analysis . Psychopharmacology . 238 : 2365 – 79 .
Zhang R , Volkow ND ( 2019 ) Brain default-mode network dysfunction in addiction . Neuroimage . 200 : 313 – 31 .
Zhao W , Zimmermann K , Zhou X et al. ( 2020 ) Impaired cognitive performance under psychosocial stress in cannabis-dependent men is associated with attenuated precuneus activity . J Psychiatry Neurosci . 45 , 88 – 97 .
Zheng H , Hu Y , Wang Z et al. ( 2019 ) Meta-analyses of the functional neural alterations in subjects with internet gaming disorder: similarities and differences across different paradigms . Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry . 94 : 109656 .
Zhou F , Montag C , Sariyska R et al. ( 2019 ) Orbitofrontal gray matter deficits as marker of internet gaming disorder: converging evidence from a cross-sectional and prospective longitudinal design . Addict Biol . 24 : 100 – 9 .
Zhou F , Zimmermann K , Xin F et al. ( 2018 ) Shifted balance of dorsal versus ventral striatal communication with frontal reward and regulatory regions in cannabis-dependent males . Hum Brain Mapp . 39 : 5062 – 73 .
Zhou X , Wu R , Zeng Y et al. ( 2022 ) Choice of voxel-based morphometry processing pipeline drives variability in the location of neuroanatomical brain markers . Commun Biol . 5 : 913 .
Zhou X , Zimmermann K , Xin F et al. ( 2019 ) Cue reactivity in the ventral striatum characterizes heavy cannabis use, whereas reactivity in the dorsal striatum mediates dependent use . Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging . 4 : 751 – 62 .
Zilverstand A , Huang AS , Alia-Klein N et al. ( 2018 ) Neuroimaging impaired response inhibition and salience attribution in human drug addiction: a systematic review . Neuron . 98 : 886 – 903 .
Zimmermann K , Yao S , Heinz M et al. ( 2018 ) Altered orbitofrontal activity and dorsal striatal connectivity during emotion processing in dependent marijuana users after 28 days of abstinence . Psychopharmacology . 235 : 849 – 59 .
Zou L , Wu X , Tao S et al. ( 2021 ) Anterior cingulate gyrus acts as a moderator of the relationship between problematic mobile phone use and depressive symptoms in college students . Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci . 16 : 484 – 91 .
Zou L , Wu X , Tao S et al. ( 2022 ) Functional connectivity between the parahippocampal gyrus and the middle temporal gyrus moderates the relationship between problematic mobile phone use and depressive symptoms: evidence from a longitudinal study . J Behav Addict . 11 : 40 – 8 .
- neuroimaging
- magnetic resonance imaging
- mental health
- cell phones
Email alerts
Citing articles via.
- Advertising and Corporate Services
- Journals Career Network
Affiliations
- Online ISSN 2634-4416
- Copyright © 2024 West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital (WCSM/WCH) of Sichuan University
- About Oxford Academic
- Publish journals with us
- University press partners
- What we publish
- New features
- Open access
- Institutional account management
- Rights and permissions
- Get help with access
- Accessibility
- Advertising
- Media enquiries
- Oxford University Press
- Oxford Languages
- University of Oxford
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide
- Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
- Cookie settings
- Cookie policy
- Privacy policy
- Legal notice
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
The mobile phone is stimulating one of the most important technological revolutions in human history. This article first presents impacts, challenges, and predictions of mobile phone use.
Growing use of mobiles phones (MP) and other wireless devices (WD) has raised concerns about their possible effects on children and adolescents’ wellbeing. Understanding whether these technologies affect children and adolescents’ mental health in ...
Smartphone ownership is highest among people aged 18–29 (Pew Research Center, 2018), an age group in which students are highly represented. Moreover, there are many theoretical reasons based on which a direct effect of (heavy) smartphone use on academic performance is expected.
The study instrument comprised eight segments, namely, informed consent form, demographic details, habituation, mobile phone fact and EMR details, mobile phone awareness education, psychomotor (anxious behavior) analysis, and health issues.
Studies have investigated the impacts of smartphones in education. For example, Anshari et al. (2017) asserted that the advantages of smartphones in educational contexts include rich content transferability and the facilitation of knowledge sharing and dynamic learning.
Our search and screening process identified 22 studies that met our inclusion criteria and shed light on our research questions: whether mobile phone use in schools impacts academic outcomes, mental health and wellbeing and cyberbullying. We found an absence of randomized controlled trials with evidence resting on a small number of studies with ...
Research on smartphone use among college students is extensive. Although numerous studies have examined the relationships between mobile phone use and academic achievements, many such studies have yielded mixed findings.
Initial evidence suggests negative effects of excessive smartphone use on cognitive and affective domains, such that excessive smartphone use has being linked to lower productivity (Duke & Montag, 2017), lower learning outcomes/academic achievements (Sapci et al., 2021; Sunday et al., 2021), and elevated levels of negative emotionality (Elhai et...
Findings: The overall meta-analysis indicated that the average effect of mobile phone usage on student outcomes was r = −0.162 with a 95% confident interval of −0.196 to −0.128.
The following section reviews research on mobile phones in college classrooms and resulting research questions. Specifically, it covers the importance of integrating technology with pedagogy, effects of student mobile phone use, and technology policies.