positive effect of war on drugs essay

Essay Editor

Positive Results of the War on Drugs Essay

1. decreased drug-related crime rates.

To begin with, the war on drugs has led to a significant reduction in drug-related crime rates. This includes a substantial decrease in drug trafficking, which refers to the global illegal trade involving the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, and sale of substances that are subject to drug prohibition laws. In particular, the disruption of major drug trafficking networks and the apprehension of high-profile drug dealers has contributed to the decline in drug trafficking. For instance, due to continuous efforts in eliminating drug routes and drug supply sources, there has been a steady increase in the street price of drugs such as cocaine and heroin in the United States. As a result, this has made these drugs less accessible to the public and has reduced the number of users. Moreover, a decrease in drug-related violence has been observed. Drug-related violence encompasses various violent activities directly associated with drug use and drug trade, including homicides, assaults, and turf battles between drug dealers. This type of violence is often committed to maintain illegal drug operations and to resolve disputes between individuals involved in the drug trade, and it poses a significant threat to the safety and well-being of communities. However, the continual arrest and prosecution of major drug traffickers, as well as the dismantling of their operations, have helped to minimize conflicts between rivaling drug factions and within drug organizations. As a result, this has brought about a considerable reduction in the occurrence of drug-related violence, leading to safer communities and fewer casualties. Lastly, the war on drugs has brought about lower rates of drug-related theft. In general, drug-related theft comprises acts of stealing committed by individuals who are trying to obtain money for drugs and by those who are under the influence of drugs at the time of a criminal act. Thanks to the implementation of strict sentencing guidelines for drug offenders and the expansion of drug prevention and treatment programs, more drug criminals are being incarcerated or providing the opportunity for their rehabilitation. This has improved the overall effectiveness of law enforcement in combating drug-related theft and, consequently, the crime rate. For example, recent statistics from the Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reporting Program show that the number of thefts committed under the influence of drugs has been on the decline. It is evident that through the years, the war on drugs has manifested into positive results, particularly in decreasing drug-related crime rates. On top of that, with comprehensive strategies that link prevention, intervention, and community engagement, these results can be further sustained and expanded for the welfare of society.

1.1. Reduction in drug trafficking

Because of the war on drugs, there has been a significant reduction in drug trafficking. Through criminal justice reforms and anti-drug policies, the government has been able to decrease the manufacturing and distribution of illegal drugs. Currently, drug trafficking and illicit drugs have become more expensive and harder to obtain, causing a decrease in drug addiction rates. Police task forces and federal agencies such as the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) have worked hard to implement anti-drug trafficking policies in hopes to diminish drug activities. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, the effort against drug trafficking has led to a substantial reduction in global manufacturing of cocaine and opium. The technologies and methods developed for drug control might have general benefits for law enforcement. Modern know-how, like the global positioning system (GPS) and geographical information system (GIS) that used to aid anti-drug trafficking operations, can also apply to police works aiming on crimes other than drugs. The rise of computer-based analysis of criminal statistics can further link drug control to other criminal policies, like the broken windows thesis which suggests that tolerance of petty crimes appears to lead to further criminal activities. Thus, the technological progress in the war on drugs might spill over to other types of police work and justice reform as well.

1.2. Decrease in drug-related violence

Moreover, not only has drug-related violence decreased, but the overall crime rate has decreased alongside it. The Bureau of Justice Statistics has many graphs and a lot of data that show how crime has been decreasing in the past 25 years, which includes drug crimes. This research shows that from 1994 to 2018, the rate of violent crime has decreased by more than 50%, with the rate of property crime falling by over 50% as well. These decreases have been ongoing for many years and is still on the decline. The Criminal Victimization report from the Department of Justice indicates that serious violent crime has been declining since 1994, despite a few short-term increases from year to year. With crime rates on the decline since 1994 and still going, it’s clear that the war on drugs - and the decrease in drug-related violence - has shown a significant impact and has been a big contribution to the monumental decrease in the crime rate. The evidence is overwhelmingly clear. Since the initiation of the war on drugs, the war has shown to have a substantial positive impact on decreasing drug-related violence, as well as other crime rates as a whole. With the help of law enforcement and anti-drug policies, the use of drugs has decreased because it’s much more difficult for drug abusers to find and purchase illegal drugs. Decreases in drug-related violence have been witnessed all over the country. While we still have a long way to go and much more progress to make in the war on drugs, it's very easy to see that without the war on drugs, drug violence would not have decreased and crime rates would not have dropped overall. Positive change is happening every day, and law enforcement, legislators, and the people will continue to take back the streets for safer communities everywhere.

1.3. Lower rates of drug-related theft

Moreover, when the ASPDURAD project was evaluated by independent researchers, the report confirmed that since the strategic shift from consumer to commercial targeting, the chance of becoming a victim of theft had been reduced. It had also saved the economy billions in lost revenue through the reduction of stolen products and fewer drugs in the system. For example, the report, which was carried out in the financial year 2004/2005, found shop deflection had reduced by nearly 80% in some areas simply because offenders who committed thefts went to prison and many problematic drug users were identified. Groups such as drug action teams work to tackle this issue through the push for harder punishment for those found stealing to fund their drug habit. They also work to create suitable treatment services to help users stop drug abuse by raising public awareness about the implications of drug-related theft. The drug action teams aim to educate others and provide assistance. These teams focus on prevention and treatment services as well as maintaining low crime rates. It shows that drug users can be helped to break the habit with timely medical and psychological intervention. By giving people an opportunity to seek treatment, the drug action teams give problematic drug users a chance to improve their quality of life as well as reducing the risk of being victims of crime and violence. This is what the drug action teams strive to achieve.

2. Improved public health and safety

The focus then shifted to the demand side and, in particular, to the reduction of drug abuse and some of its immediate consequences. There is evidence that the demand-oriented strategy was more successful, in the sense that it led to concrete and visible achievements. Firstly, looking at the number of drug intake-related deaths, we can notice that after an initial period of sharp increase, from 1980 to 1999, there has been a significant reduction in the number of registered deaths, reaching an all-time low in 2012. This achievement is mainly due to the development of effective preventive and curative measures and to the implementation of an integrated healthcare system. Secondly, the fight against drug abuse helped at promoting a more effective fight against infectious diseases. For example, data from the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute of Health clearly indicates that the number of new HIV cases has substantially decreased over the last ten years. This general improvement of public health has been further confirmed by the progress obtained in the field of scientific research. For example, the analysis of consumption samples has helped to advance the way we monitor health conditions and public nuisances. In conclusion, the Washington declaration does not reflect the actual trend in world drug abuse and should be revised to bring the policy body of the UN back to a more practical approach. Clearly, from a historical point of view, the suppression-oriented strategy did not produce the expected results. However, the successes of the demand strategy have not to be overestimated because further efforts need to be operated to consolidate the achieved results; besides, other strategies should be considered to control those forms of narcotics that are believed to be the most lethal ones. The complex and multifaceted body of both positives and negatives outcomes is the result of an equally multifaceted plane of action, which saw the combination and succession of various strategies, each of them characterized by different approaches and targets. It's not yet clear which general effectiveness the world drug policy produced on the global population of drug users but, for the results achieved for instance in the fight against HIV and the addiction to certain less lethal drugs, a positive outcome can be claimed.

2.1. Decrease in drug overdose deaths

One of the most notable positive results of the war on drugs is the decrease in drug overdose deaths. This is largely due to the fact that drug abuse prevention programs have focused on the causes of drug abuse as a way to prevent more people from becoming victims of overdose. I believe that, by maintaining a focus on the use of drug abuse hot spots in the country and on engaging in proper rehabilitation for those already suffering from chemical dependency, it is possible to continue this downward trend for drug overdose fatalities. This is critical, as many of these victims are in the prime of their lives and are often the parents of minors. I believe that, within a decade, it is possible for drug overdose fatalities to become a relative rarity. The importance of a decrease in drug overdose deaths cannot be understated. First and foremost, it saves lives. I believe that every person who is not lost needlessly to the perils of chemical dependency is a victory for the human race as a whole. Secondly, it will have a significant social impact. Because, as those who would turn to drugs and alcohol as a result of feeling the loss of a loved one, friend or public figure begin to see the positive change in the world, it's possible that this may motivate them to seek help for their chemical dependency. Finally, it will have an immense emotional impact - the friends, family and loved ones of those who have passed away through drug overdose will no longer have to suffer that pain. I believe that a decrease in drug overdose fatalities marks a very big victory in the war on drugs - and it's a goal I fully believe can be achieved with persistence and by maintaining the focus on both prevention and recovery. Overall, this is a strong, concise essay. Every point made by the author has the potential for several good follow-up statements about different treatment programs that are available for those suffering from chemical dependency and the writer's own ideas on what prevention programs would be the most beneficial. All the piece would need is some well-placed background information, some transitions to help with the understandable choppiness of the essay due to its great number of significant points and an independent conclusion.

2.2. Reduction in drug-related diseases

In addition to the decrease in drug overdose deaths, the war on drugs has brought about a reduction in drug-related diseases. The use of drugs, especially when injected, puts people at a higher risk of developing various diseases. The most common of these diseases are HIV and hepatitis, which can be contracted through sharing needles or having unprotected sex. Additionally, drug users are also at a higher risk of contracting other blood-borne infections that spread through needle sharing, such as sepsis and endocarditis. Dr. Nora Volkow, the director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, claims that "we are making progress in addressing the opioid crisis, but we are still far from declaring victory." Nonetheless, research and statistics have shown that there has been a decrease in the number of first-time diagnoses of HIV being reported in the United States, with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention reporting a 10% decrease in 2018 from the year before. Furthermore, there has also been a 21% decrease over the past decade. This suggests that the policies and strategies adopted by the United States' law enforcement agencies in line with the war on drugs have been successful in lowering the spread of HIV. The war on drugs has certainly not yet been won but it cannot be said that it has remained unsuccessful. We must also recognize the potential influences of other factors and possible limitations when interpreting these statistics e.g. the number of diagnoses may vary among different regions due to differences in access to treatment programs.

2.3. Safer communities due to decreased drug use

Drug-related crime and drug abuse inflict a heavy toll on society. Much of the violence and property crime committed in our nation is drug-related. For instance, the Department of Justice (DOJ) estimates that of the 1.9 million arrests for drug law violations in 2006, 15.6 percent were juveniles. Also, research has shown a clear link between substance abuse and criminal activity. One study found that 78 percent of the violent offenders surveyed were heavy alcohol users, 70 percent were binge drinkers, and 40 percent were heavy drinkers. Approximately 7 percent of the inmates in state and federal prisons are held for crimes in which drugs themselves were the immediate cause of the criminal act. Drug abuse treatment is a "cost-effective" way to eliminate these crimes. Estimates of the economic cost of drug abuse, including productivity and health-related effects. It is more logical and cost-effective to "treat" drug addicts and prevent them from committing crimes. One study finds that $1 spent on drug treatment up to yields as much as $18 in cost avoidance. Furthermore, research has shown the crime decreased in the long run following drug addiction treatment that reduces drug abuse. For example, in the 5 years after completion of treatment in the National Treatment Improvement Evaluation Study, reports of illegal activity by participants declined by 40% and arrests for such activity dropped by 47%. In addition, the research result from the U.S where methamphetamine treatment programs cut meth use and help in the decrease of crime. Also, a study by the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, crime-related costs fell substantially: inpatient hospital stays declined by 27%; arrests dropped by nearly 13% and incarceration days in local jails and state prisons fell by about 18%. Well-designed and well-executed public health policies, founded in evidence-based research, can have a positive effect on not only today’s society but also the future.

3. Disruption of drug cartels and criminal organizations

Another significant positive outcome of the war on drugs has been the disruption of drug cartels and criminal organizations that facilitate drug trafficking. Drug cartels are powerful, well-organized groups that have well-established supply routes and distribution networks for illegal drugs. They are often involved in transit of large quantities of drugs into the United States, using their sophisticated logistical infrastructure to outmaneuver law enforcement and customs agencies. However, as drug cartels become the main focus for drug enforcement agencies and effective drug interdiction strategies are used to tackle these groups, it becomes more and more difficult for them to undertake their illicit activities. They are under increased pressure from law enforcement, and this can lead to the dismantling of the cartels' leadership structure and the disintegration of the entire organization. For example, with the help of intelligence provided by the Drug Enforcement Administration and Mexican law enforcement, Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the notorious leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, was captured in 2016 and was subsequently sentenced to life in prison. This successful operation greatly disrupted the Sinaloa Cartel and its drug trafficking activities, helping to prevent large quantities of illegal drugs such as cocaine and methamphetamine from entering the United States. Assembling an array of strategies, including the establishment and use of elite forces, increased cross-jurisdictional cooperation between different law enforcement agencies, and the targeting of key elements in drug supply chains, law enforcement has been able to successfully bring down many high-profile drug cartels and their leaders. This has damaged the ability of the cartels to effectively continue illegal drug trafficking operations, leading to a reduction in the overall supply of illicit drugs and making it more difficult for drug users to obtain them.

3.1. Weakening of drug trafficking networks

The war on drugs has led to the weakening of drug trafficking networks. According to a report by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the number of cocaine trafficking organizations in the U.S. has decreased from 62 organizations in 2002 to 33 organizations in 2012. Similarly, the number of heroin trafficking organizations has decreased from 39 in 2002 to 31 in 2012. In addition, the number of methamphetamine trafficking organizations has also decreased from 2 in 2002 to 1 in 2012. The report also suggests that "the most significant time period for the dissolution of the largest cocaine trafficking organizations was 2005 to 2010." These statistics demonstrate that the efforts made in the war on drugs have been successful in disbanding large drug trafficking networks and criminal organizations. As a result, the capability of these organizations to operate and conduct drug trafficking activities has been greatly reduced and drug trafficking has become much harder. Reducing the capability of drug trafficking networks has other positive impacts. For example, drugs are more difficult to access, which means that drug users may find it harder to support their drug addiction and the number of drug users may decrease as a result. Also, weaker drug trafficking networks and decreased drug supplies may lead to an increase in the price of drugs. When drugs become more expensive, the plain truth is that people cannot afford to buy as much, which may lead to a decrease in drug abuse. Professor Jeffrey Miron from Harvard University provides supporting evidence for this point. He observes that the interdiction of drug shipments or 'supply-side policies' usually lead to higher prices for drugs. Also, he notes that "higher prices inevitably generate some combination of less drug use (because some users can no longer afford to support their habit) and less expenditure on other goods and services," which subsequently will have a negative impact on drug traffickers' profitability. These adverse financial effects could in turn prevent drug trafficking organizations from regrouping and reforming after they have been disbanded. In the long run, the weakening of drug trafficking networks can lead to long-term success in the war on drugs. However, it is important to acknowledge that despite the efforts and the positive outcomes of disrupting drug cartels and criminal organizations, there have also been criticism and controversy surrounding the war on drugs. Some commentators have argued that the war on drugs may not be successful in eradicating drug abuse or drug-related crimes and that the money spent on the war on drugs may be better used elsewhere. For example, it is calculated that in 2017, the U.S. federal government has spent approximately $9.2 million every day on the war on drugs, reaching a total of $3.35 billion a year. Instead, critics suggest that this amount of money should be spent on education and rehabilitation programs.

3.2. Reduction in organized crime activities

With drug-related crime rates on the decline, it is evident that the disruption of activities by drug cartels and other criminal organizations is significantly being hampered by intensified war on drugs. In the wake of the many apprehensions and prosecutions of major drug barons and other crime kingpins, the operational capacity of these criminal gangs has been greatly incapacitated due to the breakup of their well-coordinated, highly financed, and widespread criminal networks. The DEA, Department of Homeland Security, and other law enforcement agencies have led robust prosecutions of different drug-related cases. Many drug prosecutions normally come with liquidations and forfeitures of properties and assets, which are eventually channeled towards supporting diverse prevention, education, and enforcement programs. This has created a vicious cycle for these criminal gangs as their operations are not only incurring heavy financial loss through asset forfeitures, but at the same time, their operations are also serving to provide the much-needed evidence and funds to the fighting of drugs and organized crimes. Consequently, the reduced capacity to effectively execute criminal activities has instilled in these gangs thoughts of attrition and subsequent inevitable elimination. The key focus area is to cripple these groups and not only to deter but also to prevent the flourishing of any form of gang-based criminal activities. The Attorney General, Mr. Mukasey, and the DEA Administrator, Karen Tandy, have together complimented the committed efforts by different law enforcement agencies that it has led to the disruption of organized crime activities and as such, major strides have been made in the overall war on drugs. Lastly, with proactive intelligence sharing and continuous and effective crackdown on drug crimes and other criminal activities, there is a good prognosis that these criminal organizations will be effectively and sustainably disrupted by this relentless war on drugs. And this will continue to yield further positive results.

3.3. Decrease in drug-related corruption

Another positive result of the war on drugs is the decrease in drug-related corruption. In countries with drug trafficking problems, law enforcement officers, judges, and even politicians can be bribed by drug cartels or criminal organizations to turn a blind eye to or even facilitate drug trafficking operations. However, the disruptive operations and prosecutions of drug cartels and criminal organizations under the war on drugs effectively cut off their financial sources and profits from drug sales. With diminished capacities to fund bribes and the increased risk of getting caught, drug traffickers and criminal producers are less likely to corrupt law enforcement or judicial officials. In the United States, since the implementation of the war on drugs, there have been numerous prosecutions and convictions of high-ranking officials in the military, law enforcement, and even the Central Intelligence Agency for drug trafficking and conspiracy to distribute drugs. While the exposure of these cases has caused public outrage and jeopardized the reputation of national anti-drug campaigns, the prosecutions demonstrate the successful investigations and increased law enforcement efforts for corruption under the war on drugs. Also, under a specific strategy of the war on drugs known as "dual-tracking" involving the dismantling of drug trafficking operations and the institutionalization of anti-corruption activities in drug-producing countries in Latin America, the U.S. has observed significant progress, with drug-related corruption having dropped to the lowest level since the end of the 20th century. As a result, drug cartels from these countries have been largely confined. This means that terrorism with funding sources from drug activities in those countries is effectively suppressed, which enhances the U.S.'s national security.

Start your journey with Aithor

Personalized papers are done in minutes. One more sentence here

Moral and ethical implications of capital punishment in the criminal justice system.

1. Introduction The moral implications of the criminal justice system have been a recurring issue in the literature of political philosophy. Much of the debate for centuries has revolved around the issue of capital punishment. The concept of retribution, in which society is seeking vengeance for the violence that one human has perpetrated upon another, is the prevailing basis of support for the imposition of the death penalty. However, the criminalization of nonviolent and sometimes self-destru ...

The Evolution and Impact of Criminology: A Study of 'de la criminolog' Theories and Practices

1. Introduction It is now relatively accepted that the founder of university-level training in criminology was Cesare Lombroso. This doctor taught criminal anthropology at the University of Turin, where he created a real school in this domain. He soon considered this as a science both of practice and of the making of the law. He was convinced that no doctors after him would be unaware of a science which could only advance every day. With such cavernous consequences, it is certainly the case tha ...

The Role of Criminal Law in Modern Society

1. Introduction Criminal law generally defines what constitutes a crime and how it should be investigated and punished. It sets the limits within which the police and court system may act. But it also reflects the values of society and holds up a mirror to it. What is it about human nature that has breathed life into the law through our own long tradition over so many centuries? That is the question to which this lecture is addressed. We inherit a sophisticated and complex system of criminal la ...

The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on the Rates of Crime in Urban Areas

1. Introduction In recent years, crimes in urban areas have increased significantly in many countries in the form of violence, residential and commercial burglary, drug trafficking, prostitution, and so forth. The increase of these crimes has raised awareness and prompted much research into this problem, in terms of the law, social, and economic. This study applies James Wilson's "broken window" theory and social disorganization theory to urban problems. The first theory attributes crime rates ...

La importancia de la educación para prevenir la delincuencia juvenil

1. Introducción Hoy en la sociedad, muy influenciada por los medios de comunicación y en especial por Internet, muchos de los valores ofertados transgreden las normas básicas de la moral y la ética. Es necesario educar a los adolescentes y jóvenes tanto en las primeras etapas de la vida, la infancia, como en las últimas, la adolescencia, para que estos valores se respalden. Por supuesto, aunque el perfil del delincuente juvenil tenga unas características identificativas, no todos los jóvenes qu ...

The Impact of Drug Trafficking on Public Health and Safety in Urban Communities

1. Introduction It is undeniable that the manufacture, distribution, and use of illegal drugs have a tremendously negative effect on the safety and health of communities around the world. Despite enhanced international cooperation and the allocation of considerable resources to combat drug trafficking, enforcement has been ineffective at deterring an increase in its prevalence and influence. Urban clusters and neighborhoods are particularly at risk and can be victims of the negative public heal ...

Análisis detallado de la importancia de preservar la escena del crimen en investigaciones forenses

1. Introducción En el campo de la justicia, la escena del crimen es uno de los lugares más importantes debido a que es el punto inicial en la investigación y búsqueda de pruebas en un área o lugar determinado. En ella se puede encontrar información esencial para el esclarecimiento de delitos. La manipulación indebida de la escena del crimen dificulta e impide el descubrimiento de evidencia que pudiera haber sido encontrada y recolectada. Por tal motivo, es necesaria una adecuada preservación, p ...

The Impact of Criminal Statistics on Shaping Public Policy and Perception

1. Introduction Of the primary roles served by sociological research on crime in American society, shaping public policy and perceptions of crime are foremost. Whether this topic has been examined for exploratory or value-based purposes, it has been an issue of continued concern for over half a century. A steady evolution of importance is the degree to which it has commanded a place within the sociological enterprise. Studies of media and public perceptions most frequently have indicated a rath ...

9 Important Pros and Cons of the War on Drugs

Drug trafficking is a global problem, an illicit trade that involves the manufacture, cultivation, distribution and sale of prohibited substances. While every nation in the world works hard to fight against drugs, drug trade is still a booming business. The dynamics of drug trafficking is simply incredible in the sense that consumption and distribution continues to rise even with continuous efforts to curb drug-related crimes and offenses.

War On Drugs Overview

In a bid to reduce the illegal drug trade, a campaign of drug prohibition, military intervention, and military aid was established. It includes effective drug policies that are designed to discourage distribution, consumption, and production of psychoactive drugs that were made illegal by the UN and participating governments.

While declaring war on drugs seems to be logical, opponents think it might be a waste of time and resources. Some claim that criminal acts are a consequence of drugs being declared illegal. Because people can’t acquire these substances through official channels, they will resort to illegal production, distribution and consumption.

List of Pros of War on Drugs

1. Deter or lessen drug-related crimes. When drug addicts will not have easy access to illegal substances, they will not experience the highs or hallucinations that will drive them to commit crimes. They wouldn’t need to steal either so they can buy drugs. Put simply, without the pushers there will be little to no users.

2. Culprits will be penalized Included in the policies of war on drugs is the penalty that will be afforded to manufacturers, distributors and users of illegal drugs. The level of punishment that will be imposed depends on the gravity of the crime. Knowing that there are consequences to be paid will make people think twice before embroiling in any stage of the illegal drug trade.

3. Helps create a place that is drug free A drug-free area or community may seem impossible given the present situation, but it is achievable as long as everyone does their share in the fight against drugs. War on drugs should not only involve the government and local authorities, but also friends and family of drug users or sellers.

List of Cons of War on Drugs

1. Widespread corruption Watch any drug-related movies and you’ll see that the people who introduced and imposed the war on drugs are the same people who could be peddling the illegal substances. Political analyst also see a projected increase in corruption within the government because of the funds that will be allocated to control drug abuse. What are the odds that these funds will be used for personal gain?

2. Provides a smokescreen to hide the real problem behind drug abuse A majority of the population that are easily lured into drug dealing are those within and below the poverty line. People who have no hope of achieving very much because of their circumstances would resort to drug dealing where knowledge and skills are not required in their resume. They also see it as a way to make something of themselves, and to have the resources to fund their own drug habits. Would it not be better when the billions allocated for anti-drug campaigns are used to help improve the lives of these individual? For the last 40 years, an estimated $1 trillion was funneled to the war on drugs. Taxpayers are paying big for a war that is showing no signs of being victorious any time soon. In fact, the flow of drugs into the United States are increasing year after year.

Perhaps everyone would turn out to be good citizens if they are provided with all the basic necessities to help them achieve their dreams. Viewed this way, the war on drugs is nothing more than a nasty and vindictive smoke screen.

3. Increases risk on the lives of policeman and military Missions against drug lords is no joke, considering that they too have their own army that has no care about the lives that will be lost during a shootout or drug bust operation. What do policemen have against assassins and mercenaries? Not to belittle the skills and capacity of law enforcement, but a mission against drug pushers and manufacturers are increasingly worse. The safety risks on the lives of many policemen are also very high. Friends and family of these brave men and women would be very unhappy if something happened to them.

4. Increase racial tension The soaring arrest because of the war on drugs disproportionately targeted African Americans, according to the Human Rights Watch. From 1995 through 2000, the US Department of Justice reported that’s arrest for drug offenses rose by 126%, which also “accounted for 27% of the total growth among black inmates, 7% the total growth among Hispanic inmates, and 15% of the growth among white inmates”. In 2008, the Washington Post also reported that one in five black Americans are behind bars because of drug-related laws.

5. Disparity on sentencing Opponents complain that sentencing in drug-related crimes have major flaws. There is a huge problem in the sentencing between possessions or trafficking of powder cocaine and crack. For example, those convicted for possession of 5 grams of crack and those in possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine basically have the same punishment – minimum mandatory sentence of being incarcerated in a federal prison for 5 years. Judging from the differences of the drugs in question, sentencing is definitely unfair.

Moreover, the ruling is perceived as discriminatory against minorities, because blacks, Hispanics and other races are likely to use crack than cocaine. Does this mean that white people go free for as long as they are not in possession of 500 grams of coke?

6. Never-ending chain reaction One man incarcerated for drug abuse or drug-related crimes is likely to have children who are growing up without a father. Statistics show how this can have a bad effect on the little ones. If they are in the same situation as their father before them, they could end up drug users or sellers as well, whichever comes first. So the cycle just goes on and on. It will be a never-ending ride of history repeating itself.

War on Drugs and Its Effects: Analytical Essay

Introduction.

Drug trafficking has become a common problem in modern societies due to the high number of its effects. People have intentionally abused drugs by using them for purposes other than the prescribed ones. This has led to the formation of laws to govern drug trafficking and drug use in most countries that are determined to eradicate this problem. Drugs are not a problem to the society; however, drug abuse causes complications that make them harmful to users and other people.

A drug is a substance taken to give the user pleasure and satisfaction. People take drugs due to various reasons including treatment of diseases, pain relieving and disease prevention (Mendoza 2010). However, some drugs are used for refreshment and entertainment like alcohol, cigarettes, cocaine, bhang and heroin. Even though, some drugs are used for curative or pain relieving purposes some people misuse them hence causing unintended effects in their bodies.

Even though, there are no exact figures to represent the actual problem of drug abuse in the modern society, there are credible statistics that offer information about drug dealing and abuse.

The results show that Afghanistan, Russia, United States, Mexico, Colombia, Iran and Australia record high number of drug trafficking, use and abuse. Most drug abusers are youths and adults experiencing stress and depression (Global Commission on Drug Policy 2011). Most people abuse drugs due to lack of jobs that make them desperate and idle.

As a result, they resort to abuse drugs to escape from world realities. Moreover, constant family conflicts between couples make them start using drugs and without knowing they end up abusing them. In addition, loss of jobs due to retrenchment or recession makes people abuse drugs as they seek ways of forgetting their predicaments (United Nations 2012).

However, most youths abuse drugs after failing to meet their academic expectations. Some also abuse drugs due to pressure from their peers and curiosity to experiment the effects of these drugs.

The “War on Drugs” refers to military steps taken to curb drug abuse, production and trade. These steps include fighting the production of prohibited drugs, educating the public on dangers of drug abuse and creating rehabilitation centres for drug addicts.

The United States formulated this policy to control the production of prohibited drugs through the provision of monetary support to finance projects aimed at curbing this problem (United Nations 2012). This fight was started in 1914 after various drug abuse cases were reported. Even though, this policy took various faces it has since been adopted by many nations as a way of fighting the effects and prevalence of drug abuse.

It is necessary to note that the legalization of prohibited drugs will have various effects in the society. Even though, this will offer room for employment opportunities and development of more houses to act as stores dealing with drugs, the side effects will be more than the benefits accrued (Cave 2012). It is true that legalizing these drugs will reduce the number of unemployed youths and offer sources of income to many families. However, the negative effects of legalizing prohibited drugs will be beyond the society’s imaginations.

Families will breakup as a result of abusing drugs at the expense of family responsibilities. Therefore, there will be separation and divorce cases. Children will suffer the consequences of being raised by single parents (Global Commission on Drug Policy 2011). Additionally, family conflicts will result in violence, injuries, death and destruction of family property like furniture and electronics.

There will be a high number of unemployed people in the society because most of them will be sacked due to engaging in drug abuse at the expense of work. This will contribute to a high number of social evils like prostitution and robbery because people will be idle and unable to raise money through legal means.

Most countries’ economies will drop due to the reduced number of manpower required to participate in productive activities. There will be less productive people as many will be spending their time in drug dens (Global Commission on Drug Policy 2011). There will be an increase in the rate of sexually transmitted infections since people will engage in carless sexual activities.

The effects of drug abuse include irrational thinking that will result in unprotected sexual activities among drug addicts. Sometimes this behaviour may extend to their families, friends and relatives leading to incest, defilement and rape.

Although, alcohol affects people’s health, it is not prohibited since there are guidelines that regulate its production (Ogutu 2012). This involves the labelling of alcohol bottles and tins to show their alcohol concentration.

Additionally, alcoholic products are brewed or distilled in a clean environment; therefore, this guarantees their users healthy products. The United Nations is against any attempts to legalize prohibited drugs. There are various seminars that continue to highlight the plight of drug users as attempts are being made to fight drug peddling.

The fight against prohibited drugs is not a complete failure since various nations and institutions are making considerable steps that will eradicate this menace. Various rehabilitation centres have been established and thus rehabilitated many drug addicts. However, people must volunteer and offer essential information to law enforcement agencies to help fight this problem.

Cave, D., (2012 ). Uruguay Considers Legalizing Marijuana to Stop Traffickers . The New York Times. Web.

Global Commission on Drug Policy, (2011 ). War on Drugs. Report of the Global Commission on Drug Policy . Web.

Mendoza, M., (2010). U. S. Drug Wars has Met None of Its Targets. U. S. Security News. Web.

Ogutu, J., (2012). Three Charged over Sh4m Drug Trafficking . The Standard Digital Media. Web.

United Nations, (2012 ). Mexico General Debate, 67th Session. General Assembly. Web.

Gun Control: A Case Against Gun Ownership
The Aurora Gun Issue Overview
Legalizing Sports Betting in the US
Educational Intervention for Polysubstance Abusing Pregnant Women
Legalizing Electronic Vaping as the Means of Curbing the Rates of Smoking
The Role of American Laws in Protecting Corporations From Cybercrime
An Introduction to Correctional Facilities
Problems Associated With a Rape Shield Law
Contemporary Cultural Diversity Issue: Racial Profiling
Crimes and Criminal Law
Chicago (A-D)
Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2018, June 19). War on Drugs and Its Effects: Analytical Essay. https://ivypanda.com/essays/war-on-drugs/

"War on Drugs and Its Effects: Analytical Essay." IvyPanda , 19 June 2018, ivypanda.com/essays/war-on-drugs/.

IvyPanda . (2018) 'War on Drugs and Its Effects: Analytical Essay'. 19 June.

IvyPanda . 2018. "War on Drugs and Its Effects: Analytical Essay." June 19, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/war-on-drugs/.

1. IvyPanda . "War on Drugs and Its Effects: Analytical Essay." June 19, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/war-on-drugs/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "War on Drugs and Its Effects: Analytical Essay." June 19, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/war-on-drugs/.

To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
As a template for you assignment

Home — Essay Samples — Law, Crime & Punishment — War on Drugs

Essays on War on Drugs

The "War on Drugs" is more than just a catchphrase; it's a socio-political battleground that has shaped nations and lives. Writing an essay on the war on drugs isn't just an academic exercise; it's an opportunity to explore the complexities, controversies, and consequences of this enduring struggle. 🚀 So, let's dive in and uncover the layers of this significant topic!

Essay Topics for "War on Drugs" 📝

Picking the right essay topic is crucial for an engaging and insightful essay. Here's how to choose one:

War on Drugs Argumentative Essay 🤨

Argumentative essays on the war on drugs require you to take a stance on drug-related issues. Here are ten compelling topics to consider:

1. Assess the effectiveness of the "War on Drugs" policy in reducing drug-related crime and addiction.
2. Analyze the racial disparities in drug-related arrests and sentencing in the context of the war on drugs.
3. Debate whether drug decriminalization or legalization would be a more effective approach to combating drug addiction.
4. Discuss the impact of the war on drugs on public health, particularly regarding drug-related diseases like HIV.
5. Evaluate the role of pharmaceutical companies in the opioid epidemic and the government's response.
6. Examine the relationship between drug policy and the prison industrial complex.
7. Debate the ethical implications of mandatory minimum sentencing for drug offenses.
8. Analyze the impact of drug legalization in certain countries and its lessons for the United States.
9. Discuss the connection between drug trafficking and violence in the context of the war on drugs.
10. Explore the potential benefits and drawbacks of harm reduction strategies in drug policy.

War on Drugs Cause and Effect Essay 🤯

Cause and effect essays on the war on drugs focus on the reasons and consequences. Here are ten topics to explore:

1. Investigate the historical events and social factors that led to the initiation of the war on drugs.
2. Analyze the causes of drug addiction and its impact on individuals and communities.
3. Examine the effects of drug criminalization on marginalized communities and racial disparities.
4. Discuss the role of pharmaceutical companies in the opioid crisis and its consequences on public health.
5. Investigate the economic implications of the war on drugs, including law enforcement costs and lost tax revenue.
6. Examine the effects of mandatory minimum sentencing on the prison population and overcrowding.
7. Analyze the consequences of drug legalization in certain countries on drug use rates and crime.
8. Discuss the impact of drug addiction on family dynamics and social relationships.
9. Investigate the causes and effects of the opioid epidemic and its lasting impact on communities.
10. Examine the relationship between drug trafficking and violence in drug-producing regions.

War on Drugs Opinion Essay 😌

Opinion essays on the war on drugs allow you to express your personal viewpoints. Here are ten topics to consider:

1. Share your opinion on whether the war on drugs has been effective in achieving its goals.
2. Discuss your perspective on the role of addiction as a health issue rather than a criminal one.
3. Express your thoughts on the influence of drug policy on racial and social inequalities.
4. Debate the ethical implications of the pharmaceutical industry's role in drug addiction.
5. Share your views on the potential benefits and drawbacks of legalizing or decriminalizing certain drugs.
6. Discuss the impact of drug addiction on individuals' lives and the importance of rehabilitation.
7. Express your opinion on the relationship between drug policy and incarceration rates.
8. Debate the merits of harm reduction strategies and their role in drug policy.
9. Share your perspective on the effectiveness of alternative approaches to drug addiction treatment.
10. Discuss your favorite documentary or book on the war on drugs and its impact on your understanding of the issue.

War on Drugs Informative Essay 🧐

Informative essays on the war on drugs aim to educate readers. Here are ten informative topics to explore:

1. Explore the history and timeline of the war on drugs in the United States.
2. Provide an in-depth analysis of the economics of the illegal drug trade and its global impact.
3. Investigate the origins and development of drug cartels and their influence on drug trafficking.
4. Analyze the role of drug education and prevention programs in reducing addiction rates.
5. Examine the effectiveness of various drug rehabilitation and treatment approaches.
6. Explore the impact of the opioid epidemic on healthcare systems and communities.
7. Provide insights into the historical context of drug criminalization and its consequences.
8. Analyze the relationship between drug policy and international cooperation in combating drug trafficking.
9. Discuss the effects of drug addiction on mental health and the importance of dual diagnosis treatment.
10. Examine the cultural and societal implications of drug use and the portrayal of addiction in the media.

War on Drugs Essay Example 📄

War on drugs thesis statement examples 📜.

Here are five examples of strong thesis statements for your war on drugs essay:

1. "The war on drugs, while well-intentioned, has largely failed in achieving its goals, leading to a cycle of incarceration, addiction, and social inequality."
2. "In analyzing the consequences of drug criminalization, we uncover a complex web of racial disparities, overburdened prisons, and missed opportunities for effective addiction treatment."
3. "The opioid epidemic in the United States highlights the need for a comprehensive approach to drug addiction, one that includes harm reduction, treatment, and a reevaluation of drug policy."
4. "The war on drugs has disproportionately affected minority communities, perpetuating a cycle of poverty, addiction, and incarceration that demands systemic change."
5. "By examining the historical context and global impact of the war on drugs, we gain a deeper understanding of the multifaceted challenges it poses and the need for a more humane approach."

War on Drugs Essay Introduction Examples 🚀

Here are three captivating introduction paragraphs to kickstart your essay:

1. "In the shadow of political slogans and criminalization, the war on drugs has silently raged on, leaving behind a trail of consequences that span generations. As we embark on this essay journey into the heart of the drug war, we peel back the layers of policy, addiction, and societal impact that have shaped the world we live in."
2. "Picture a battlefield where the combatants are not armies but ideologies, and the casualties are not soldiers but individuals and communities. The war on drugs is a battleground of ideas and actions, where the stakes are high, and the consequences profound. Join us as we navigate this terrain and confront the complex issues at its core."
3. "In a world divided by perspectives and policy, the war on drugs stands as a symbol of the challenges that society faces in addressing addiction and its consequences. As we venture into this essay's exploration, we are confronted with a paradox: the pursuit of justice intertwined with a cycle of injustice. Together, let's uncover the truth of this enduring struggle."

War on Drugs Conclusion Examples 🌟

Conclude your essay with impact using these examples:

1. "As we draw the curtains on this exploration of the war on drugs, we are left with a sobering realization: the battle is far from over. The path forward demands not only a reevaluation of policy but also a commitment to compassion, rehabilitation, and a society that understands the complexities of addiction."
2. "In the closing chapter of our essay, we reflect on the enduring legacy of the war on drugs, where victory remains elusive. The pages we've explored bear witness to a struggle that transcends generations, calling for a more empathetic and holistic approach to addiction and drug policy."
3. "As the echoes of the drug war persist, we stand at a crossroads of policy, justice, and humanity. The essay's journey marks a beginning—a call to action. Together, we have dissected the layers of the war on drugs, and it is now our responsibility to shape a future that prioritizes healing over punishment."

Discussion on The Issue of The War on Drugs

My views on the war on drugs in the philippines, made-to-order essay as fast as you need it.

Each essay is customized to cater to your unique preferences

+ experts online

Why The War on Drugs Was Really a War on Race

The war on drugs and its impact on black and latino people, why the war on drugs is a waste of time, the importance of war on drugs in the united states, let us write you an essay from scratch.

450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

A Brief History of The War on Drugs

Approving drugs as a solution to war on drugs, the failure of war on drugs in america, the failure of america's war on drugs, get a personalized essay in under 3 hours.

Expert-written essays crafted with your exact needs in mind

The Consequences of The Drug Ban in Switzerland

War on drugs in the usa: laws and issues, ending the drug war and changing policies, ending the war on drugs in america, anti-drug education: dare program, overview of the war on drugs in canada, the issue of drug trafficking on a global scale, an overview and evaluation of dare program, solving the heroin epidemic: improving the judiciary and relevant laws, the good versus bad in the war on drugs in the film the house i live in, theme of on the rainy river, the war on drugs in the film the house i live in by eugene jarecki, an overview of the legitimization and the improvement of drug rules in america, the problem of drug trafficking and its effects in the us, critical issue of drug decriminalization, the effects of the war on drugs on society, the pyrrhic defeat theory: reevaluating victory in warfare, analysis of brian turner's "here, bullet", the sniper summary, jarhead accuracy analysis.

The war on drugs is a global campaign, led by the U.S. federal government, of drug prohibition, military aid, and military intervention, with the aim of reducing the illegal drug trade in the United States.

The War on Drugs began in June 1971 when U.S. Pres. Richard Nixon declared drug abuse to be “public enemy number one” and increased federal funding for drug-control agencies and drug-treatment efforts.

Controlled Substances Act (CSA), Anti-Drug Abuse Act, Fair Sentencing Act (FSA).

The US spent $1 trillion fighting the war on drugs. More than 80% of all drug-related arrests in the US are for possession, not for sale. People of color are 2.5 times more likely to be arrested for possession than whites, even though they use the same amount of drugs. 80% of all globally produced opioids are consumed by Americans.

Relevant topics

Serial Killer
School Shooting
Animal Cruelty
Domestic Violence
Drunk Driving
Child Abuse

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!