experiment art meaning

Subscriber Services
For Authors
Publications
Archaeology
Art & Architecture
Bilingual dictionaries
Classical studies
Encyclopedias
English Dictionaries and Thesauri
Language reference
Linguistics
Media studies
Medicine and health
Names studies
Performing arts
Science and technology
Social sciences
Society and culture
Overview Pages
Subject Reference
English Dictionaries
Bilingual Dictionaries

'experimental art' can also refer to...

West Coast Pop Art Experimental Band

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

experimental art

Quick reference.

An imprecise term which has sometimes been applied to art that is concerned with exploring new ideas and/or technology. It is sometimes used virtually synonymously with *‘avant‐garde’, but ‘experimental’ usually suggests a more explicit desire to extend the boundaries of the art in terms of materials or techniques, whereas ‘avant‐garde’ can include novel and provocative ideas expressed through traditional techniques. Most writers today would prefer more precise terms such as Kinetic or installation art for such activities.

The term implies a link with science. In 1923 Picasso said ‘I can hardly understand the importance given to the word research in connection with modern painting. In my opinion to search means nothing in painting. To find, is the thing’ (A. H. Barr Picasso: Fifty Years of his Art, 1946). These magisterial words are hardly an end to the matter. In practice the scientific notion of experiment or research has, legitimately or not, frequently been invoked by avant‐garde artists. Picasso himself spoke of a period in 1912 when ‘the studio became a laboratory’ (J. Richardson, Braque, 1959). In its early days the Surrealist movement conducted what it called a ‘Bureau of Surrealist Research’ and its first journal, La Révolution surréaliste, was modelled on a scientific journal.

Stephen Bann's 1970 book Experimental Painting uses the idea to cover a very wide range of art. It begins with Constable and Monet (because of their ‘scientific’ approach to nature) and goes through to Constructivists and abstract artists with a methodical or technological bent such as Vasarely. Then he takes in some figurative artists such as Giacometti and Auerbach, whom he sees as having an approach in common with the ‘auto‐destructive’ art of Gustav Metzger.

John A. Walker (Glossary of Art, Architecture and Design Since 1945, 1973, 3rd edn, 1992) writes of ‘experimental’: ‘It is a word with both positive and negative connotations: it is used to praise and condemn. Those writers for whom it is a term of praise often mean by it an empirical practice in which the artist plays with his materials and adopts chance procedures in the expectation that something of value will result…Those writers for whom “experimental” is a pejorative description mean by it “a trial run”, “not the finished work”, “something transitional”.’ Walker points out that in E. H. Gombrich's celebrated book The Story of Art, first published in 1950, the whole of 20th‐century art was originally embraced in a chapter called ‘Experimental Art’. Paradoxically it was Gombrich, in Art and Illusion (1960), who made one of the most thoroughly worked‐out attempts to relate the artistic process to that of scientific experiment. He was concerned here, not with strictly technical experimentation, but to argue for an analogy between the processes of representation as a series of experiments and that of the scientific ‘testing’ of a theory. Artists, in this model, test their theories (representations) against experience. As in science, therefore, there can be a kind of ‘progress’ as mistakes in the ‘theory’ are gradually corrected. There is no contradiction whatsoever between this notion of ‘experiment’ and Gombrich's generally conservative view of 20th‐century developments (see abstract art).

From: experimental art in A Dictionary of Modern and Contemporary Art »

Subjects: Art & Architecture

What Is Experimental Art?

One typically hears unusual art called three different things, often interchangeably:

Avant-Garde
Experimental

But what do these three words mean? Do they mean the same thing? I don’t think so, and in this post I’ll point out some basic differences between them. I’ll also define what I think experimental art essentially is, and how such art operates.

As I’ve argued here and here —and hopefully have been able to demonstrate in both those places and elsewhere—one encounters innovation simply everywhere : high art, low art, experimental art, mainstream commercial art. The Matrix (1999), for instance, was one of the most popular films of the late 1990s in large part because it exposed mainstream audiences to techniques and ideas that they hadn’t seen before. (I first heard about the film from friends who were bursting with excitement over it, talking on and on about how they couldn’t believe what they had just seen.)

Of course, the Wachowskis mostly borrowed/stole/derived those things from other sources:

Jean Baudrillard (who disliked how the Matrix films used his ideas )

Blade Runner (1982)

Heroic Trio (1993) (dubbed—blame the Weinsteins!—but a high-quality copy)

Ghost in the Shell (1995)

A lot of the art we call innovative works this way. As I wrote in this post :

To innovate literally means “to introduce something new.” But it also means to “make changes in anything established.” Which is the historical meaning of the word’s root: “to renew, alter.”

Innovation does not necessarily mean something new. It means doing something unfamiliar , often with old familiar things. The Matrix draws very heavily from Ghost in the Shell , often recreating images in that film:

Indeed, the Wachowskis originally pitched their film as a live-action version of Ghost in the Shell . But the Wachowskis still had to find ways to recreate those images in real space—a problem requiring often unique solutions. As the above video claims, their success was to synthesize the various things they liked—manga, Hong Kong martial arts films, Buddhism, Continental Theory—into something coherent.

Meanwhile, look what happened after The Matrix came out. As its novelty factor wore off, people grew increasingly tired of films that merely imitated it (including, it seems, The Matrix ’s own sequels). Consider Underworld (2003)—just one of dozens of Matrix clones I could have chosen:

This all said, The Matrix is not what we’d call an experimental film. The Harry Potter novels are in their own way rather innovative —and influential—but J.K. Rowling isn’t an experimental author.

So the experimental isn’t tied exclusively to innovation. (Or, rather: innovation is not tied exclusively to the experimental.)

The Avant-Garde

In 1863, Manet submitted the above painting to the Paris Salon for exhibition. It was rejected. Manet then took advantage of the Salon des Refusés, a venue better than no venue at all.

Which didn’t solve his problems. Manet’s work kept getting refused by the official Salon: it was too flat, too contemporary—and too erotic. (In 1867, he even paid for his own solo exhibition—the equivalent of today’s self-publishing.) But over time, he befriended other refusés (in particular, Edgar Degas, who—always the contrarian—was in self-imposed exile from the Salon). They, inspired by Manet’s solo efforts and by the Salon des Refusés, banded together in 1873 as the “Cooperative and Anonymous Association of Painters, Sculptors, and Engravers” in order to form their own exhibitions. (Members were supposed to denounce the Salon, but Manet kept submitting his work.)

In 1874, they had their first independent exhibition; other, more successful shows, followed. People started calling them “the Impressionists.” (Degas hated the term, insisting that he was actually a realist). By the mid-1880s, Manet and his colleagues were the leading celebrities of the Parisian art world: the avant-garde of painting.

The term “avant-garde” predates the Impressionists; it was first recorded in the 1825 Saint-Simonian essay “L’artiste, le savant et l’industriel” (“The artist, the scientist and the industrialist”), where it has a very different meaning. That essay called upon artists to serve as the advance guard of the utopian socialist revolution :

It is we artists who will serve as your vanguard; the power of the arts is indeed most immediate and the quickest. We possess arms of all kinds: when we want to spread new ideas among men, we inscribe them upon marble or upon a canvas; we popularize them through poetry and through song; we employ by turns the lyre and the flute, the ode and the song, the story and the novel; the dramatic stage is spread out before us, and it is there that we exert a galvanizing and triumphant influence. We address ourselves to man’s imagination and to his sentiments. We therefore ought always to exert the most lively and decisive action.

(Henri de Saint-Simon was a major influence on Karl Marx. Some attribute this tract to him; others to his follower Olinde Rodrigues .)

As Matei Călinescu notes in Five Faces of Modernity (1987):

By the mid-nineteenth century, the metaphor of the avant-garde had been used by social utopists, reformers of various sorts, and radical journalists, but, to my knowledge, had scarcely been used by literary or artistic figures. (108)

Călinescu sees the term starting to shift toward its more modern usage in 1856, in the literary criticism of Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve. But even then the term,

[f]requently used in the political language or radicalism, […] tended to point toward that type of commitment one would have expected from an artist who conceived of his role as consisting mainly in party politics. That was perhaps one of the reasons why Baudelaire, in the early 1860s, disliked and disapproved of both the term and the concept. (109)

By the time of (and partially due to) Manet and his fellow Impressionists, “avant-garde” had come to mean a group of artists whose work is initially rejected by authority, but that eventually comes to be accepted by society. (Visit any local art fair today, and you’ll see the Impressionists’ long-lasting influence.)

But it doesn’t always work that way. Consider serial music, one of the most powerful experimental forms of 20 th century composition. Derived from Arnold Schönberg’s twelve-tone technique (and atonal ideas well before that), serial composition dominated Western academies and conservatories from 1945 until some point in the 1970s (if not longer):

Serial music has numerous advocates (I rather like all of these works), but they tend to be academicians and others who love music theory—it never really caught on with the general populace, or had that much influence on popular music, or the culture at large. (Here’s the Chicago Symphony Orchestra’s current season : Beethoven, Shostakovich, Sibelius, Schubert, Bach, …)

Does that mean that serialist music wasn’t experimental? Quite the contrary! But it wasn’t a successful avant-garde (if it was even avant-garde in the first place).

Minimalism was a more proper avant-garde movement. Its early practitioners—La Monte Young, Terry Riley, Steve Reich, Philip Glass—were acting in opposition to the authority of the academy, looking for an alternative to serialism (as well as to the aleatory techniques of John Cage et al). Excluded by music’s ruling class, they embraced different principles of composition (sustained tones, repetition with variation), and brought their work to alternative venues (loft parties, galleries, museums):

The Minimalists eventually achieved mainstream success—partly because, unlike the serialists, they courted mainstream audiences:

Their influence can be heard throughout modern popular music:

…to choose just a few possible examples.

How many self-professed avant-garde movements turned out to have little or even no effect on the rest of the culture? I’m not claiming that such movements were bad, mind you. But “avant-garde” is often a marketing term, inspired by the fantastic success that the Impressionists had a century ago. And sometimes marketing campaigns work…and sometimes they don’t… But the art can still be experimental even if the rest of the culture never “comes around” to adopting its techniques—or even liking it.

The Experimental

So what is experimental art? What defines it? What makes it experimental ?

To answer those question—to propose answers to those question—I’d first like to invoke Roman Jakobson’s notion of the dominant , which I discussed more at length in this post . Jakobson defined the dominant as

the focusing component of a work of art: it rules, determines, and transforms the remaining components. It is the dominant which guarantees the integrity of the structure. (41)

The dominant, in other words, is that artistic element that the artist values over all others: John Cage and his colleagues took chance techniques as their dominant. The Oulipians work under arbitrary and often severe constraints. The Language poets resist narrative pressures by emphasizing parataxis. And so on. All other aspects then bow to the dominant component.

Experimental artists often claim that they are breaking with the past:

The Impressionists favored color over line, worked en plein air , and chose contemporary rather than classical subjects. The Minimalists refused serialist and chance techniques, preferring to look for some other way of working (one that wasn’t simply a return to the tonal harmony of the 19th century).

But historical precedents can be found even in experimental art:

That Manet! What a little copycat he was! Furthermore, as the popular (and possibly apocryphal) story puts it , Manet met Degas while they were both copying the same painting:

(Regardless of whether that story is true, both Manet and Degas were both enthusiastic—and tremendously skilled—copyists.)

Philip Glass was influenced by Ravi Shankar. Steve Reich was influenced by Ghanan drumming and Balinese gamelan music. Terry Riley was influenced by Pandit Pran Nath and La Monte Young. La Monte Young (a truly great oddball) was influenced by the sounds of high tension power lines, and the wind whipping across the plains :

The very first sound that I recall hearing was the sound of the wind blowing through the chinks and all around the log cabin in Idaho where I was born. I have always considered this among my most important early experiences. It was very awesome and beautiful and mysterious. Since I could not see it and did not know what it was, I questioned my mother about it for long hours. During my childhood there were certain sound experiences of constant frequency that have influenced my musical ideas and development: the sounds of insects; the sounds of telephone poles and motors; sounds produced by steam escaping, such as my mother’s tea-kettle and the sounds of whistles and signals from trains; and resonations set off by the natural characteristics of particular geographic areas such as canyons, valleys, lakes, and plains. Actually, the first sustained single tone at a constant pitch, without a beginning or end, that I heard as a child was the sound of telephone poles, the hum of the wires. This was a very important auditory influence upon the sparse sustained style of work of the genre of the Trio for Strings (1958), Composition 1960 #7 (B and F# “To be held for a long time”) and The Four Dreams of China (1962).

Well, even anarchists like Alec Empire enjoy engaging with older materials:

Continuity is everywhere, even in situations of discontinuity. La Monte Young made music based on noise and drones, but he brought those noises and drones inside lofts, as parts of titled and performed musical compositions. And he synthesized those noises and drones with ideas he’d learned from Don Cherry, Ornette Coleman, Karlheinz Stockhausen, and John Cage. (Young was more open to serialist and chance techniques than the other Minimalists, which is part of why his music sounds so different than theirs.)

The experimental artist can want to quit with all previous convention, but he or she still must communicate by means of some convention. As Frank Kermode put it in The Sense of an Ending (1967):

[N]ovelty in the arts is either communication or noise. If it is noise then there is no more to say about it. If it is communication it is inescapably related to something older than itself. (102)

Schism is simply meaningless without reference to some prior condition; the absolutely New is simply unintelligible, even as novelty. (116)

Furthermore, experimental art often draws on the same materials that non-experimental art does. Here’s an example of Donald Barthelme, Batman comic books, Tim Burton, William Castle, German Expressionism, J.D. Salinger, and Mark Twain all drawing inspiration, to some extent or another, from the same Victor Hugo story (sometimes directly, and sometimes through other works that had themselves been inspired).

So much, then, for the experimental dream of art ex nihilo . But what about the notion of art sui generis ? Synthesizing Jakobson and Kermode, here is my current conception of experimental art:

Experimental art is that which takes unfamiliarity as its dominant— even to the point of schism .

The experimental artist wants her artwork to be different from all the other artworks around her. She desires that her results be unusual, unfamiliar to the point of looking peculiar, perplexing. She may be drawing on conventions, she may be working inside one or more traditions. But her conventions and traditions are not dominant ones; they are, perhaps, older ones, or unpopular ones. Or she may be importing ideas and conventions from one medium into another, where they are not well known.

Or it may be that she has noticed an idea—a possibility—that has not been fully developed in other artworks, and therefore seeks to develop it. She exaggerates or expands that minor concept or idea (something that isn’t dominant in other works) until it overwhelms the more familiar aspects of her artwork, distorting and enstranging the entire thing. Hence Manet and Degas exaggerated the de-emphasis of line and more energetic brushstrokes that they observed in works by Velázquez, J. M. W. Turner, and Eugène Delacroix, developing that idea until they arrived at Impressionism.

Luckily for experimental artists, there exist audiences and critics who prize unfamiliarity. (Often they are other experimental artists.) In his wonderful essay “Is a Cognitive Approach to the Avant-garde Cinema Perverse?” , James Peterson identifies

a common feature of avant-garde film viewing—one that usually passes without comment: viewers initially have difficulty comprehending avant-garde films, but they learn to make sense of them. Students who take my course in the avant-garde cinema are at first completely confused by the films I show; by the end of the term, they can speak intelligently about the films they see. (110)

Audiences who enjoy such films would rather see the artist make something strange, even if the resulting work is “not as good” as a more familiar type of artwork. They enjoy being confronted with something that’s like a puzzle to figure out, a viewing experience that will initially confound and challenge them. (I of course disagree with Peterson’s use of the term avant-garde ; I would substitute for it experimental .) (But no doubt others will take issue with my use of the term experimental…)

One thing that I like about the view of the experimental that Peterson describes, and that I’m developing here, is that it’s close to the word experimental ‘s original meaning : “a test, trial, or tentative procedure; an act or operation for the purpose of discovering something unknown or of testing a principle, supposition, etc.” (Both experiment and experience share a root with peril .)

Furthermore, this view of experimental art does not require that the art or artist do anything new per se; it requires only that the art and artist be out of step with the dominant techniques and styles of the moment, preferring the unfamiliar to the familiar. (This helps explain why outsider art , née Art Brut , is often valued by experimentalists.) And this definition is comfortable with artworks like The Matrix or Harry Potter , which it admits employ innovative and unfamiliar concepts and styles, but doesn’t go on to claim as experimental . The innovations in those works are relatively minor features in regard to the whole, and ultimately dominated by other, familiar aspects of the work—more recognizable forms and concepts. Harry Potter is at heart a fairly familiar kind of novel. J.K. Rowling’s innovations lie in hybridizing genre, and not with, say, grammar (a la Stein) or novel structure (a la Cortázar).

Finally, this concept of experimental art helps explain why such art often stops being experimental. As time goes on, the artwork loses its unfamiliarity. This is why students scratching film emulsion today in imitation of Stan Brakhage are not making experimental cinema: they’re working within a known tradition, and not seeking to maximize their works’ unfamiliarity. (To be fair, many people remain sadly unfamiliar with Brakhage’s work, so a scratch film in 2010 might still blow a lot of minds. One must allow for context.) The experienced experimental film fan, meanwhile, always seeking new challenges, will sniff disdainfully when confronted with such work—”It’s so imitative!”—and go look for something he hasn’t seen before. Hence the pervasive emphasis in experimental art circles on novelty (real or imagined).

Of course, as time goes on, we may continue to enjoy previously experimental artworks. Stan Brakhage’s scratched films opened up my mind to a new aspect of cinema, and showed me a kind of beauty I hadn’t before then suspected existed. I appreciate that, and respect his films for their historical import. And I think that they continue to look rather pretty—although that’s an example of my liking them for the ways in which they’re familiar: canonical, rather than experimental .

Similarly, John Cage’s 4’33” initially confounded me—”Surely he can’t be serious! That isn’t art!” But after performing it dozens if not hundreds of times myself, I now consider it an old friend.

(Of course, 4’33” always shows you something new—especially when you perform it outside the concert hall. That’s part of what makes it such a great experimental artwork.) (That’s also why people have been looking at nature for millennia.)

Elsewhere, some experimental artworks don’t outlive their experimentation. In that case, one is free to do with them as the Zen monks advise that we do, when confronted by koans. Or as Wittgenstein put it so famously, at the end of his Tractatus :

My propositions are elucidatory in this way: he who understands me finally recognizes them as senseless, when he has climbed out through them, on them, over them. (He must so to speak throw away the ladder, after he has climbed up on it.) (189)

Works Cited

Călinescu, Matei. Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-Garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism . Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1987.
Jakobson, Roman. “The Dominant.” Language in Literature . Trans. Krystyna Pomorska. Eds. Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudy. Boston: Belknap Press, 1990.
Kermode, Frank. The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction . New York: Oxford University Press, 1967.
Peterson, James. “Is a Cognitive Approach to the Avant-garde Cinema Perverse?” Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Ed. David Bordwell and Noël Carroll. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1996.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus . Trans. C.K Ogden. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company, 1922.

A. D. Jameson is the author of five books, most recently I FIND YOUR LACK OF FAITH DISTURBING: STAR WARS AND THE TRIUMPH OF GEEK CULTURE and CINEMAPS: AN ATLAS OF 35 GREAT MOVIES (with artist Andrew DeGraff). Last May, he received his Ph.D. in Creative Writing from the Program for Writers at UIC.

Jamming Their Transmission, Episode 20: A Conversation About Post-Post Human

From the Archives: Ten Cigarettes My Cigarette Parts Open Up My Throat Doctor, by Nick Francis Potter

Literature as Time-Space Travel: On DeWitt Henry’s Foundlings: Found Poems from Prose

Andrei Tarkovsky on Art, Life, Writing, Cinema, and More

32 thoughts on “ what is experimental art ”.

I attended a performance of 4’33” recently, at a Cage event including the screening of Cage/Cunningham. It was lovely. What’s been your favorite recital?

Back in 2007, the Kimmel Center for the Performing Arts in Philadelphia, PA, had a “Pay-To-Play!” fundraiser to inaugurate “the Fred J. Cooper Memorial Organ.” You could pay $25/minute or $75 for five minutes to play this “King of Instruments”—”a versatile 6,938-pipe beast with wide tonal palette and ‘heft'” (that assessment according to the organ aficionados at the Wall Street Journal ).

A friend of mine said at the time that he was going to pay $75 to play 4’33” on the thing. It actually never happened, but that’s still my favorite performance.

Pingback: Looking for Pago Pago « BIG OTHER
Pingback: HTMLGIANT / Mondo Review/Reflection/Notes On Inception
Pingback: Why I Hate the Avant-Garde « BIG OTHER
Pingback: Why I Hate the Avant-Garde, pt 2 « BIG OTHER
Pingback: A Guide to My Writing Here at Big Other « BIG OTHER
Pingback: Rethinking Experimental Literature / the Avant-Garde / what Henry Miller calls “the inhuman ones” | HTMLGIANT
Pingback: Bowerbird #20: Stain Mimic Admire Perish « avian architext
Pingback: Azazel with tail X-Men First Class « BIG OTHER
Pingback: The Higgs-Jameson Experimental Fiction Debate, part 1 | HTMLGIANT
Pingback: Research on experimental art « cheryline Gonsalves

I am writing a Meeting the Bar: Critique and Craft article for dVerse Poets Pub, an online community of poets, to inspire our poets to explore experimentation. The pub supports weekly opportunities for poets around the world to connect with one another, learn about craft and the cannon, and from each other. Meeting the Bar is designed to provide them with a challenge and I am writing a series over the next several months on the language poets. I would like to link to your article for further investigation. Also, I would like to quote your definition/synthesis. The article will go up this Thursday and the site usually receives several hundred views each day (they have about 200,000/year). The site is here: http://dversepoets.com/ . If you would let me know by early Wednesday I would appreciate it. Thank you for your consideration and an excellent article.

Thanks for the kind words, Anna! By all means, please feel free to link and quote away (to anything that I write).

Thanks again, Adam

Thank you very much! Once the article at dVerse has posted I will send you the link. Warm regards, Anna

Thanks! Looking forward to it.

dang this is rich….i could spend the better part of a day checking out all the vids and processing the thoughts….pre-read anna’s piece for tomorrow and chased the link over to read….intriguing…will be back…

Pingback: Meeting the Bar: Postmodern (Prose) « dVerse

Here’s the link to the article at dVerse http://dversepoets.com/2012/10/04/meeting-the-bar-postmodern-prose/ (you’ll figure into future posts too :)). Thanks so much!

Thank you , Anna!

Pingback: A Guide to My Writing Here at Big Other (reposted) « BIG OTHER
Pingback: Meeting the Bar: Postmodern (Experimental) « dVerse
Pingback: Historical Precedents in Experimental Art… and 21st Century Themes… | Experimental Media
Pingback: Welcome to the 2014 MA Experimental Practice Website and Blog | Experimental Practice (MA)

Reblogged this on Bíboros and commented: nothing

Interesting! Thanks for the article. I would have liked to know more about experimental or avant-garde art in contemporary pop culture (music, literature, any other art form)

Pingback: ‘Experimentation’ Introduction | SKYLA EARDLEY

Adam, Great article!! Working on a senior thesis art film in NC. Wanted to give you a shoutout to thank you for your information and insight–keep writing! :)

Pingback: Experimental Art | Experimental Film
Pingback: Week 6, day 5 – Aug 4th! – Create Camps @ CAM
Pingback: Experimental illustration and style – UH MA Illustration (Online) :: Research & Enquiry
Pingback: The Rise Of Pop Art In The 1950s – laurarusso.com

Asian Contemporary Art

Study guides for every class, that actually explain what's on your next test, experimental art, from class:.

Experimental art refers to creative practices that push boundaries, challenge conventions, and explore new mediums, techniques, or ideas in the art-making process. This form of art often embraces innovation and unpredictability, encouraging artists to take risks and question traditional forms of expression.

congrats on reading the definition of experimental art . now let's actually learn it.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

The '85 New Wave Movement in Asia embraced experimental art as a way to express cultural identity and address social issues in innovative ways.
Artists involved in this movement often incorporated elements of pop culture, technology, and performance into their experimental works.
Experimental art during this time was characterized by its use of mixed media, allowing artists to blend painting, sculpture, video, and installation.
The movement encouraged collaboration among artists from different backgrounds, leading to a rich tapestry of diverse influences and ideas.
Critics and audiences were sometimes challenged by experimental art due to its unconventional nature, sparking conversations about what constitutes art.

Review Questions

Experimental art redefined artistic practices during the '85 New Wave Movement by pushing against established norms and encouraging artists to explore new techniques and media. This exploration allowed for a fresh dialogue about cultural identity, as artists utilized innovative methods to engage with social issues relevant to their communities. The movement's emphasis on experimentation fostered an environment where traditional boundaries between genres and forms were blurred, ultimately transforming how art was perceived and created.
The integration of pop culture and technology into experimental art significantly impacted its reception during the '85 New Wave Movement by making it more relatable and accessible to a broader audience. Artists utilized familiar references from everyday life and emerging technologies to create works that resonated with contemporary experiences. This approach not only attracted attention but also prompted discussions about the role of media in society and how it shapes cultural identity, highlighting the intersection between art and popular culture.
The legacy of experimental art from the '85 New Wave Movement has had a profound influence on contemporary artistic practices by inspiring ongoing innovation and exploration across various mediums. Today's artists continue to embrace interdisciplinary approaches, drawing from a diverse range of influences to create works that challenge traditional definitions of art. This legacy fosters an environment where experimentation is celebrated, encouraging new generations of artists to question established norms and engage with current social issues through creative expression.

Related terms

Avant-garde : A cultural movement that seeks to challenge the status quo and innovate beyond established norms in art, literature, and other fields.

Intermedia : Art that merges different artistic disciplines or media, creating new forms and experiences that blur the lines between them.

Conceptual art : A movement where the idea or concept behind the artwork is considered more important than the finished product, often focusing on the intellectual engagement of the viewer.

" Experimental art " also found in:

Experimental Art: How Taking Risks Impacts the Arts and Creators

Ready to explore the wild side of art? Embrace experimentation and see how taking risks impacts your art! Get inspired and become an innovator!

Are you looking to break out of the doldrums and try something new, even if it’s a little risky?

Take heart!

Experiments in creativity can be extremely rewarding - not just for yourself as an artist but also for the art world at large.

Experimental art--the process of pushing boundaries in the arts and taking risks with your own projects--is a fantastic way to express yourself and grow as an artist.

As artists, we often get comfortable with our styles and techniques, but taking creative risks and experimenting with different methods can result in game-changing discoveries, leading to incredible breakthroughs in our artistic pursuits.

Just like any creative endeavor, art requires constant experimentation, risk-taking and adventurousness.

If you want to breathe new life into your creative pursuits , it's time to embrace experimentation.

By understanding how experimental art works, what it has achieved thus far, and why it's so important to take chances with your creativity , creators of all sorts can unlock their full potential.

In this blog post, we’ll explore the impacts of stepping away from your comfort zone and pushing the limits of what we think is possible in our artwork.

Whether you are an amateur hobbyist or a professional artist, exploring new and unique ways of creating can spark creativity and inspiration that will invigorate your work in unique and unexpected ways.

Let's take a look at how taking risks helps artists explore different art mediums and techniques, why experimentation is important even (and often especially) when it doesn't lead to success right away, plus plenty of tips on getting started with experimenting in arts and crafts .

Get ready to take off on an experimental journey, where you will find new ideas and fresh ways to create unique works that are sure to spark inspiration among all kinds of artists!

Read on to see how embracing risk-taking can help open up a world of exciting opportunities for creators everywhere!

Artistic Experimentation

Art is a realm of boundless possibilities, where creativity knows no limits.

It is in this realm that experimentation takes center stage, pushing the boundaries and challenging the established norms.

In the context of art, experimentation refers to the act of exploring new approaches, techniques, and ideas that deviate from traditional or established methods.

It is an essential tool for artists seeking to break free from the confines of conformity and unlock their true creative potential .

Experimental art, my friends, is like a breath of fresh air in the stuffy room of traditional art forms.

It's an artistic movement that thrives on unfamiliarity, cherishing the element of surprise and pushing the limits of artistic expression.

It's about stepping outside the comfort zone and diving headfirst into the unknown, armed with nothing but curiosity and a thirst for innovation.

It's the rebellious cousin at the family gathering, the eccentric artist who dances to their own tune.

It's about pushing boundaries, embracing the unfamiliar, and daring to break free from the shackles of conventionalism.

Experimental art is essentially a style of art that aims to break free from tradition that explores new ideas, approaches, and techniques to create something unique, unconventional, and innovative.

The key to successful experimental art lies in taking risks and pushing boundaries to create something new and original.

But why is experimentation so crucial in the creative realm?

Well, my dear readers, it's because experimentation opens doors to uncharted territories; it allows artists to tap into their deepest wells of imagination, unearthing hidden treasures that would otherwise remain buried.

It challenges the status quo, forcing us to question our preconceived notions of what art should be.

Picture this: an artist standing before a blank canvas, armed with brushes, paints, and an unwavering desire to create something that has never been seen before.

They throw caution to the wind, surrendering themselves to the process of experimentation.

Colors blend in unexpected ways, brushstrokes dance across the canvas in a frenzy, and forms emerge from the chaos.

This is the magic of experimental art unfolding before your eyes.

Let's delve into the world of experimentation and discover its impact on the arts, creativity , and creators.

The Evolution of Experimentation

Experimentation in art has evolved over time, taking on various forms and embracing new technologies and mediums.

From the Renaissance period's scientific approach to artists like Leonardo da Vinci, who explored anatomy and perspective, to the avant-garde movements of the 20th century, such as Dadaism and Surrealism, that challenged societal norms, experimentation has always been a driving force in pushing artistic boundaries.

Throughout history, experimentation has played a pivotal role in shaping artistic movements and propelling artists to greatness.

Take, for instance, Jackson Pollock, the maestro of abstract expressionism.

With his iconic drip paintings, he revolutionized the art world, defying conventional techniques and embracing spontaneous gestures.

His experimentation paved the way for future generations of artists to let loose their creativity and follow their artistic instincts.

In modern society, experimentation has expanded beyond traditional mediums like painting and sculpture.

With the advent of digital art , installation art, performance art, and conceptual art, artists now have a vast playground to experiment with.

The rise of technology has opened up new avenues for exploration, allowing artists to blend traditional techniques with digital tools, creating immersive experiences that transcend the boundaries of the physical world.

Modern and contemporary art is a testament to the power of experimentation and risk-taking in art.

From interactive installations, to virtual reality works, and multimedia performances - these are all examples of how artists have transcended the limitations of traditional forms by embracing risk-taking.

In the contemporary art scene, experimental art has become a guiding force, igniting the flames of creativity and inspiring artists to think outside the box.

It encourages us to see the world through a different lens, to question the norms, and to embrace the freedom of self-expression .

It challenges us to confront our own biases and preconceptions, opening our minds to new possibilities.

Experimental art is about pushing boundaries in every artistic medium imaginable.

Think immersive installations that transport you to alternate realities, sculptures crafted from unconventional materials, and performances that challenge our very perception of time and space.

Experimental art takes us on a journey beyond the realm of the familiar and into uncharted territories of imagination .

It's an adventure that's full of surprises and delights, allowing us to explore new realms and rediscover our inherent creative powers.

Experimental art is a powerful tool for sparking creativity, inspiring innovators , and propelling the arts forward.

The Importance and Power of Experimentation

Experimentation is the lifeblood of artistic evolution.

It fuels innovation , challenges conventions, and propels the arts forward.

Without experimentation, art would remain stagnant, confined to predefined rules and limitations.

It is through experimentation that artists discover their true potential, find their voice, and leave an enduring impact on the world.

Experimentation holds immense significance in the arts, offering numerous perks for creators and the wider artistic community.

Firstly, experimentation allows artists to break through creative roadblocks by encouraging them to step outside their comfort zones.

By venturing into uncharted territory, artists can discover new techniques, materials, and forms of expression that they may never have encountered otherwise.

Moreover, experimentation challenges established norms and pushes the boundaries of what art is and can be; it disrupts the status quo, inviting viewers to question their preconceived notions and experience art in unconventional ways.

By embracing experimentation, artists can pave the way for new artistic movements, redefine artistic practices, and ignite critical conversations.

Experimental art is also an excellent platform for cultivating collaboration.

It encourages artists to embrace different perspectives, work together to find innovative solutions, and explore new ideas that may not have been possible alone.

At its core, experimentation in art fosters a culture of discovery, creativity, and innovation—one that is essential for the development of the arts and the growth of individual creators.

Benefits of Creative Experimentation

Experimentation is a powerful tool for unlocking creativity and uncovering hidden potential.

By taking risks and exploring unfamiliar methods, artists can discover new techniques, refine their skills, and create unique works of art that stand out from the crowd.

Whether practicing the visual arts, performing arts, or any other artistic endeavor, experimentation can help artists hone their craft and unlock the full range of their talents .

So, why should you take risks with your creative pursuits?

Here are some key benefits of embracing creative experimentation:

Inspiration and Motivation:

Experimenting encourages artist to explore their creative limits and think outside the box.

It can be an excellent source of motivation when tackling large projects, allowing them to stay inspired and focused on the task at hand.

Refinement of Skills:

By exploring different approaches and methods of creating, artists can hone their skills and refine their techniques.

With practice, they can become more comfortable working with unfamiliar materials and styles, gaining valuable knowledge in the process.

Experimentation also allows artists to explore different techniques, encouraging them to think critically and push their creative boundaries.

Unlocking Potential:

Experimentation can help artists unlock hidden potential, prompting them to discover new forms of expression that may not have been possible before.

By taking risks, they can explore uncharted territories, uncover latent talents, and potentially create works of art that can truly stand out.

Overcoming Creative Roadblocks:

Experimentation can be an effective tool for overcoming creative roadblocks, allowing artists to view their current situation from a new perspective and discover fresh ideas and solutions that they may not have thought of before.

While the outcomes of experimentation are never guaranteed, it can lead to incredible breakthroughs in creativity , providing a much-needed spark of inspiration for tackling tough projects.

Professional Growth:

Experimenting can help artists stand out from their peers, broadening their network of contacts and paving the way for professional success.

It also serves as an excellent platform for learning new skills, building confidence , and showcasing their talents to the world.

In short, experimentation can open up a world of exciting opportunities for artists of all skill levels.

Real-Life Examples

Throughout history, countless artists have embraced experimentation, leaving an indelible mark on the art world.

Experimental artists come in all sorts of shapes and sizes, each with their own unique creative style .

To get a better sense of the power of experimentation in art, let's take a look at some real-life examples.

One notable example is Pablo Picasso, whose cubist paintings shattered traditional notions of representation.

His bold exploration of multiple viewpoints and fragmented forms revolutionized the art scene and inspired generations of artists to challenge conventions.

Another artist who exemplifies the power of experimentation is Yayoi Kusama.

Through her immersive installations and polka dot motifs, she transports viewers to otherworldly realms, blurring the boundaries between art and reality.

Her fearless experimentation with space and repetition has captivated audiences worldwide and propelled her to iconic status.

Hiroshi Fuji's recycled art sculptures offer yet another example of the potential impacts of experimentation.

His sculptures, crafted from discarded materials embody his environmentalist ethos while redefining what art can be.

By embracing unconventional materials and techniques, Fuji has transformed everyday objects into fascinating works of art, inspiring a wave of eco-friendly creatives in the process.

These examples illustrate the many ways in which experimentation can lead to groundbreaking works and transform the art scene as we know it.

They also demonstrate how taking risks can inspire others to embrace their creative potential, explore uncharted territories, and leave an unforgettable mark on the world.

The art world is filled with artists who have embraced experimentation, offering us a glimpse into the potential of taking risks in art.

Some showcase their artworks in an exhibition, others whisper it from the rooftops, while some simply let their work speak for itself.

Regardless of how they choose to showcase their artworks, these artists are a testament to the power of experimentation and risk-taking in art.

By understanding their stories and exploring their works, we can gain valuable insights that will help us expand our own creative horizons.

Artistic production is, after all, a process of experimentation and exploration - one that should be embraced and celebrated.

Only by taking risks can we hope to create something truly unique and memorable.

Incorporate Experimentation into Your Practice

For creators looking to incorporate experimentation into their own art making practice, there are several practical steps to consider.

Formal innovation isn't the only way to make art; it's also important to explore informal techniques and methods that challenge traditional practices.

Creating a conducive environment that fosters experimentation is crucial.

This includes setting aside dedicated time for exploration, creating a supportive network of fellow artists, and embracing a growth mindset that welcomes failure as an opportunity for growth.

Another way to experiment with your art is to change your approach to materials; taking risks is an essential aspect of experimentation.

Instead of sticking to the same canvas and paint, why not experiment with new materials and mediums?

Artists should be willing to step outside their comfort zones, try new techniques, and explore unfamiliar subject matters.

By stepping out of your comfort zone and using new materials, you can unlock new artistic possibilities and discover new avenues of creative expression.

Another way to experiment with your art is to change your perception and outlook.

Try looking at your subjects from a different angle, or trying out a different color scheme.

This can help you to explore new perspectives and unlock new artistic possibilities.

An idea that is often overlooked when it comes to experimenting with art is collaboration .

When like-minded artists come together, they can trade ideas and techniques, collaborate to create unique artwork together, and bring fresh perspectives to the table.

Collaboration plays a significant role in experimentation, as it allows artists to combine their unique perspectives and skills, pushing the boundaries even further.

Working with fellow artists can unlock powerful insights, spark innovative ideas, and provide valuable feedback on your works.

By collaborating with other creatives, you can break down creative roadblocks, explore new possibilities, and discover hidden potential in your work.

At the end of the day, experimentation is an essential tool for unlocking creativity , inspiring innovation, and propelling the arts forward.

Whether drawing, crafting a story with written word, or playing around with sound, experimentation is a powerful tool that can help you explore new artistic territories and uncover your true creative potential.

By embracing experimentation, artists can unlock a world of possibilities and create something truly remarkable.

A single risk could lead to an incredible breakthrough in your creative practice, so take a chance and see what happens.

Tips for Experimentation in Art

So, you're ready to take a leap of faith and dive into the world of artistic experimentation?

Awesome! Here are some useful tips to get your creative juices flowing.

Start Small:

It's perfectly fine to start experimenting with smaller projects and gradually expand your creative endeavors.

Small experiments can help you to gain confidence in the process and build up your artistic skills before tackling more ambitious projects.

Experiment with Different Techniques:

From traditional mediums to digital tools, there are many techniques that artists can experiment with.

Try mixing different mediums together, combine painting and photography, or experiment with materials and textures.

Embrace Technology:

In the digital age, technology is an invaluable tool for experimentation.

Try exploring virtual reality, augmented reality, 3D printing , or any other tools that can expand your artistic capabilities.

Take Risks:

Experimentation requires taking risks and pushing boundaries.

Don't be afraid to take risks and explore uncharted territories; you never know what new creations you may come up with!

Find Inspiration Everywhere:

For inspiration , look beyond the art world for ideas.

Draw inspiration from everyday life, nature, music , literature—anything that can help to spark your imagination.

Get Feedback:

Asking for feedback is essential to experimentation.

It can help you identify areas for improvement and uncover new creative possibilities.

Above all, remember to have fun!

Enjoy the process and don't take yourself too seriously; experimentation should be liberating and enjoyable.

So, dear creators, dare to dream, embrace the unknown, and let experimentation guide you on a journey of self-discovery and artistic growth.

As the great artist Henri Matisse once said, "Creativity takes courage."

Embrace that courage, ignite your imagination, and let experimentation be your guide to unlocking the true essence of your artistic brilliance.

Embracing Experimental Art

Experimentation is the key to unlocking your true creative potential as an artist.

From inspiring innovation to cultivating collaboration, experimentation can open up endless possibilities in the arts.

Don't be afraid to try new techniques, materials or collaborate with others to create something unique.

It might seem daunting at first, but risk-taking and adventurousness can result in game-changing discoveries.

By embracing experimentation, artists can discover new techniques, challenge themselves to think outside the box, and leave an unforgettable mark on the art world.

If you're looking to take the next step in your artistic pursuits, embrace experimentation and unleash the incredible creativity that resides within you.

Let's celebrate the bold, the audacious, and the wonderfully weird.

Let us immerse ourselves in the world of experimental art and allow our imaginations to run wild.

After all, it is through experimentation that we discover the true essence of creativity and unlock the boundless potential within ourselves!

Now, go forth and explore the unexplored, embrace the unconventional, and let your creativity soar to new heights.

The world is your canvas, so why not paint it with the vibrant colors of experimentation?

Interested in learning more about experimenting in art and the creative process ? Check out Helen Wells Artist: Sketchbooks + Art Ideas' video!

Want even more content about creativity and art?

Be sure to check out all of our creative chronicles !

Ready to experiment and tap into your creative side ?

Check out some of our other articles:

- Art for social change

- Art of mindfulness

- Reflection in art

- Break generational trauma

- Benefits of microlearning

- Digital nomadism

- Creative burnout

- Art of resilience

What Are the 7 Fundamentals of Art? Unlocking Secrets to Master!

What Are the Basics of Painting? Unlock Creativity and Painting Mastery

Is It Too Late to Learn to Paint? Unleash Your Creativity!

What Should I Start Painting as a Beginner? The Brushstrokes of Beginnings

Can I Learn to Paint by Myself? Acquire Painting Mastery All by Yourself!

What is the Most Common Painting Technique? Unlocking Painting Mastery

IMAGES

Seven Examples of Experimentation in Art
Make Art with Science
Developing Your Art Style Through Experimentation
Seven Examples of Experimentation in Art
Experimental Art: How Taking Risks Impacts Creativity
Let's Mix Art and Science Experiments at Home

VIDEO

40 Science Experiments
How does the Rorschach inkblot test work?
Experimental Art Video-Time, Memory, Oblivion
Who decides what art means?
Experimental Design in Science: Definition and Method
40 Crazy Science Experiments

COMMENTS

What Is Experimental Art?
Experimental art is that which takes unfamiliarity as its dominant—even to the point of schism. The experimental artist wants her artwork to be different from all the other artworks around her. She desires that …
Unlocking Creativity: Exploring the Vast Landscape of Experimental …
1. Encouraging Creative Thinking: One of the most significant benefits of engaging with experimental art is its ability to stimulate creative thinking. By diverging from conventional …
Experimental art
Experimental art refers to creative practices that push boundaries, challenge conventions, and explore new mediums, techniques, or ideas in the art-making process. This form of art often …
Experimental Art: How Taking Risks Impacts Creativity
Experimentation is a powerful tool for unlocking creativity and uncovering hidden potential. By taking risks and exploring unfamiliar methods, artists can discover new techniques, refine their skills, and create unique …
What Do We Mean by Experimental Art?
Experimental art as commonly understood often means not fully achieved art. The essay then sets the term “experimental” next to another term, “inventive”, drawing on the work of Jacques …
Volume 08 Creative Technologies Experimental Arts
When we describe art as “experimental”, then, we are often referring not to a formal testing procedure but to the inclination to test social boundaries and conventions; in other words, to …

Recently viewed (0)

Related Content