the experiment sleep

• General Categories
• Mental Health
• IQ and Intelligence
• Bipolar Disorder

Stanford Sleep Experiment: The Controversial Study That Shook Sleep Science

Dreams shattered and reality blurred as volunteers unwittingly embarked on a nightmarish journey that would forever alter the landscape of sleep science and research ethics. The Stanford Sleep Experiment, conducted in the early 1970s, stands as a pivotal moment in the history of sleep research, leaving an indelible mark on both scientific inquiry and ethical considerations in human studies.

The experiment, led by Dr. William Dement and his team at Stanford University, aimed to explore the effects of prolonged sleep deprivation on human cognitive function and behavior. At the time, sleep science was still in its infancy, and researchers were eager to uncover the mysteries of human slumber. Little did they know that their pursuit of knowledge would lead them down a path fraught with controversy and unexpected consequences.

The study’s significance in sleep research cannot be overstated. It was one of the first large-scale attempts to systematically investigate the impact of sleep deprivation on human subjects over an extended period. The findings would go on to shape our understanding of sleep spindles and other crucial aspects of sleep architecture. However, the experiment’s legacy is not without its dark shadows, as it raised serious ethical concerns that continue to be debated to this day.

The Setup and Methodology of the Stanford Sleep Experiment

The primary goal of the Stanford Sleep Experiment was to investigate the effects of prolonged sleep deprivation on human cognitive function, physiological processes, and behavior. The researchers hypothesized that extended periods without sleep would lead to significant impairments in mental and physical performance, as well as potential alterations in mood and personality.

Participant selection for the study was rigorous. The researchers sought healthy young adults with no history of sleep disorders or mental health issues. Volunteers underwent thorough medical and psychological screenings to ensure they were fit for the demanding nature of the experiment. Ultimately, a group of college students was chosen to participate, lured by the promise of financial compensation and the opportunity to contribute to groundbreaking scientific research.

The experimental design was ambitious and, in retrospect, ethically questionable. Participants were divided into two groups: the sleep-deprived group and the control group. Those in the sleep-deprived group were to remain awake for as long as possible, with the ultimate goal of staying awake for 11 days straight. The control group maintained their regular sleep patterns and served as a baseline for comparison.

To monitor the participants’ sleep patterns and brain activity, the researchers employed state-of-the-art electroencephalography (EEG) equipment. This technology allowed them to track sleep-deprived EEG patterns and observe changes in brain wave activity as the experiment progressed. Additionally, various cognitive tests and behavioral assessments were conducted at regular intervals to measure the participants’ mental acuity and emotional state.

Key Findings and Results of the Stanford Sleep Experiment

As the days wore on, the effects of sleep deprivation on the participants became increasingly apparent and alarming. Cognitive function declined rapidly, with subjects experiencing difficulties in concentration, memory recall, and problem-solving abilities. Simple tasks that were once effortless became insurmountable challenges for the sleep-deprived individuals.

Physiological changes were equally striking. Participants exhibited alterations in hormone levels, immune function, and metabolic processes. Their bodies struggled to maintain homeostasis in the face of prolonged wakefulness, leading to fluctuations in body temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure. These findings would later contribute to our understanding of how sleep is a kind of temporary coma , highlighting the restorative nature of slumber.

Perhaps most concerning were the behavioral alterations and mood swings observed in the sleep-deprived group. As fatigue set in, participants became increasingly irritable, anxious, and prone to emotional outbursts. Some reported vivid hallucinations and paranoid thoughts, blurring the line between reality and delusion. The experiment began to take on a surreal quality, with researchers struggling to maintain control over the increasingly unstable environment.

One unexpected outcome of the study was the discovery of microsleeps – brief, involuntary episodes of sleep lasting only seconds. These microsleeps occurred with increasing frequency as the experiment progressed, demonstrating the brain’s desperate attempts to obtain rest even in the face of forced wakefulness. This finding would later influence research into stimulus control sleep techniques aimed at improving sleep quality and habits.

Ethical Concerns and Criticisms of the Stanford Sleep Experiment

As the experiment unfolded, serious ethical concerns began to emerge. The potential risks to participants’ health became increasingly apparent, with some subjects experiencing physical symptoms such as tremors, blurred vision, and gastrointestinal distress. The long-term effects of such extreme sleep deprivation were unknown, raising questions about the potential for lasting harm to the volunteers.

The psychological impact on the subjects was equally troubling. Many participants reported feelings of intense anxiety, depression, and disorientation. Some struggled with reintegrating into their normal sleep patterns even after the experiment concluded, leading to concerns about the lasting psychological effects of the study.

Debates over informed consent raged in the aftermath of the experiment. While participants had agreed to take part in the study, critics argued that they could not have fully understood or anticipated the extreme nature of the sleep deprivation they would endure. The question of whether true informed consent was possible in such a scenario became a central point of ethical discussion.

Comparisons to other controversial psychology experiments, such as the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment, were inevitable. Both studies pushed the boundaries of ethical research and raised questions about the potential for abuse of power in scientific settings. The Stanford Sleep Experiment, like its notorious counterpart, would come to symbolize the need for stricter ethical guidelines in human research.

Impact and Legacy of the Stanford Sleep Experiment

Despite its ethical shortcomings, the Stanford Sleep Experiment had a profound influence on sleep research methodologies. It highlighted the need for more rigorous protocols and safety measures in sleep studies, leading to the development of standardized procedures for monitoring and ensuring participant well-being during extended sleep deprivation trials.

The experiment made significant contributions to our understanding of sleep disorders, particularly those involving chronic sleep deprivation. Insights gained from the study informed subsequent research into conditions such as insomnia, sleep apnea, and shift work sleep disorder. These findings continue to shape our approach to diagnosing and treating sleep-related health issues.

Perhaps the most lasting impact of the Stanford Sleep Experiment was the changes it prompted in ethical guidelines for human research. The study served as a catalyst for the development of more stringent regulations governing the treatment of human subjects in scientific studies. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) became more vigilant in their oversight of sleep research protocols, ensuring that future studies would prioritize participant safety and well-being.

Public perception and media coverage of the experiment were mixed. While some hailed it as a groundbreaking scientific endeavor, others criticized it as a reckless and potentially dangerous experiment. The study captured the public imagination, sparking debates about the ethics of scientific research and the limits of human endurance. It even inspired comparisons to the longest sleep ever recorded, as people pondered the extremes of human sleep patterns.

Modern Perspectives on the Stanford Sleep Experiment

In recent years, there has been a renewed interest in the Stanford Sleep Experiment, with researchers conducting reanalyses of the original data. These modern examinations have shed new light on the study’s findings, sometimes challenging or refining the initial conclusions drawn by the original researchers.

Current scientific views on the study’s validity are mixed. While many acknowledge the valuable insights gained from the experiment, there is also recognition of its methodological flaws and ethical shortcomings. Some researchers argue that the extreme nature of the sleep deprivation may have produced results that are not generalizable to more common forms of sleep loss experienced in everyday life.

Contemporary sleep studies have built upon the foundation laid by the Stanford experiment, employing more ethical and controlled methods to investigate sleep deprivation. For example, research into sleep contagion and social sleep patterns has provided new insights into the complex relationship between sleep and social behavior. These modern studies often focus on shorter periods of sleep restriction or use advanced imaging techniques to observe brain activity during sleep deprivation, minimizing risks to participants while still yielding valuable data.

The lessons learned from the Stanford Sleep Experiment continue to inform future sleep research. Scientists now approach sleep deprivation studies with greater caution and ethical consideration, balancing the pursuit of knowledge with the paramount importance of participant safety and well-being. The experiment serves as a reminder of the potential risks inherent in pushing the boundaries of human physiology and psychology.

The Stanford Sleep Experiment stands as a watershed moment in the history of sleep science, simultaneously advancing our understanding of sleep deprivation and forcing a reevaluation of research ethics. Its findings have contributed significantly to our knowledge of sleep disorders, cognitive function, and the physiological impacts of sleep loss. The study’s legacy is evident in the pages of the Journal of Sleep Research and other scientific publications, where its influence continues to be felt decades later.

However, the ethical controversies surrounding the experiment serve as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between scientific progress and human welfare. The study prompted crucial changes in research protocols and ethical guidelines, ensuring that future generations of sleep researchers would approach their work with greater responsibility and care for their subjects.

As we continue to explore the frontiers of sleep science, the Stanford Sleep Experiment remains a cautionary tale and a source of valuable lessons. It challenges us to consider the ethical implications of our scientific pursuits and to always prioritize the well-being of those who volunteer to advance our understanding of the human condition.

The ongoing relevance of sleep research in modern society cannot be overstated. As we grapple with the demands of a 24/7 global economy and the pervasive influence of technology on our sleep habits, the insights gained from sleep studies become increasingly crucial. From debunking myths about whether smart people sleep less to understanding the intricate mechanisms of sleep spindles, ongoing research continues to shape our approach to sleep health and well-being.

In the end, the Stanford Sleep Experiment, much like the Randy Gardner sleep deprivation experiment , serves as a testament to human resilience and the complex nature of sleep. It reminds us that while the pursuit of knowledge is noble, it must always be tempered with compassion, ethical consideration, and a deep respect for the volunteers who make scientific progress possible. As we look to the future of sleep research, we carry with us the hard-won wisdom of the past, striving to unlock the mysteries of sleep while never losing sight of our fundamental responsibility to protect and care for those who participate in the journey of discovery.

References:

1. Dement, W. C. (1972). Some Must Watch While Some Must Sleep. Stanford Alumni Association.

2. Dinges, D. F. (1989). The nature of sleepiness: causes, contexts and consequences. In A. Stunkard & A. Baum (Eds.), Perspectives in Behavioral Medicine: Eating, Sleeping, and Sex. Lawrence Erlbaum.

3. Horne, J. A. (1988). Why We Sleep: The Functions of Sleep in Humans and Other Mammals. Oxford University Press.

4. Kleitman, N. (1963). Sleep and Wakefulness. University of Chicago Press.

5. Kryger, M. H., Roth, T., & Dement, W. C. (Eds.). (2017). Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine (6th ed.). Elsevier.

6. Pilcher, J. J., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1996). Effects of sleep deprivation on performance: A meta-analysis. Sleep, 19(4), 318-326.

7. Rechtschaffen, A., & Kales, A. (1968). A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects. Brain Information Service/Brain Research Institute, University of California.

8. Van Dongen, H. P., Maislin, G., Mullington, J. M., & Dinges, D. F. (2003). The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep, 26(2), 117-126.

9. Walker, M. P. (2017). Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams. Scribner.

10. Yoo, S. S., Gujar, N., Hu, P., Jolesz, F. A., & Walker, M. P. (2007). The human emotional brain without sleep—a prefrontal amygdala disconnect. Current Biology, 17(20), R877-R878.

Was this article helpful?

Would you like to add any comments (optional), leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Post Comment

Related Resources

Jerking Awake Out of Sleep: Causes, Consequences, and Coping Strategies

Spitting in Sleep: Spiritual Meanings and Interpretations

State-Like Sleep: Exploring Altered Consciousness and Its Implications

Wake Up, Game, Sleep, Repeat: The Gamer’s Daily Cycle

Brain Feels Weird When Trying to Sleep: Causes, Symptoms, and…

Subconscious Sleep: Exploring the Hidden Depths of Our Nightly Rest

Calf Cramps During Sleep: Causes, Prevention, and Relief

Sleep Chronotypes: Discover Your Natural Sleep-Wake Cycle for Better Rest

Sleep Moaning: Spiritual Meanings and Interpretations

Smile in Your Sleep: Unraveling the Mystery of Nocturnal Grins

The Sleep Experiment Review: A Hair-Raising & Shocking Adaption of the Legendary Internet Urban Legend

Your changes have been saved

Email is sent

Email has already been sent

You’ve reached your account maximum for followed topics.

'Sonic the Hedgehog 3' Review: Jim Carrey's Fantastic in a Third Chapter that Exceeds Expectations

Mufasa: the lion king review | astonishing cgi can't save a dull & predictable prequel, 'superman' will introduce a very different lex luthor than audiences are used to.

The Sleep Experiment is an excellent horror film that dives deep into the psychological damage caused by a top-secret government experiment. Based on Creepypasta’s The Russian Sleep Experiment , writer/director John Farrelly delivers his first feature film that exposes the horrors of what humanity is capable of when pushed to the brink. The film begins with a slow burn, however, as time passes on and the test subjects begin to hallucinate, the plot transitions into the psychological thriller realm before escalating into full physical horror in the final act. The Sleep Experiment has some pretty decent twists and turns along the way (some more obvious than others), but overall has a very solid story with a great performance from the entire cast.

Spoiler Warning Two detectives David (Anthony Murphy) and Robert (Barry John Kinsella) begin an investigation on the ethics involved in the top-secret research facility, Porton Down. One experiment stands out to them as the most horrific, The Sleep Experiment, a scientific experiment that took place during the Cold War. The experiment consisted of five prisoners, deemed Enemies of the State, being locked in a sealed gas chamber. An airborne stimulant was continually administered to keep the subjects awake for 30 consecutive days. The prisoners were promised that they would be set free and erase their prison sentences if they successfully complete the experiment.

In the film’s opening scene, a vehicle is driving through the night on May 16th, 1961, and arrives at a secret facility. Armed guards wearing protective gear wait outside the building as five hooded men are escorted down a dark staircase into an underground bunker. The five men are all prisoners held on national security charges, Luke (Will Murphy), Patrick (Sam McGovern), Edward (Rob James Capel), Sean (Brian Moore), and Eric (Steven Jess). Fifteen years in the future, the two detectives are interviewing Christopher (Tom Kerrisk), about his involvement with the experiment.

As the experiment officially begins, the five prisoners begin to become better acquainted with each other. They each introduce themselves and reveal their backstories as well as why they were originally sent to prison before participating in the experiment. The prisoners were all charged and convicted with either murder or attempted murder. The men are hopeful that they will successfully complete the experiment so that they can be released from prison and return home to their families. Back in 1976, the two detectives believe that Christopher was the person who designed the sleep experiment for the military.

As the interview continues, Christopher reveals that the five prisoners weren’t randomly chosen for the experiment, but in fact, they each volunteered to participate. The detectives accuse Christopher of being responsible for the deaths of nine people when the experiment was being conducted. On the fourth day of the experiment, Eric begins to struggle mentally while Patrick has an asthma attack. The guards enter the room and escort Patrick to receive medical attention. The very next day (Day 5), Patrick returns to the experiment room where the rest of the prisoners immediately become suspicious of his actual whereabouts.

Hallucinations Rapidly Approach

As the film’s timeline continues to shift back and forth between 1961 and 1976, Christopher provides plenty of details and information to the two detectives about his design. During the interview, Christopher discovers that the experiment is connected personally to Robert, learning that his father was one of the test subjects. On Day 12, Patrick has another asthma attack and is escorted out of the room for the second time. The men begin having extreme hallucinations as Eric and Sean scream and demand to be released from the experiment. The next day, Patrick returns to the experiment room where he doesn’t seem to be in the same condition as his fellow test subjects.

Luke becomes even more suspicious of Patrick only to learn that he has been taking notes of everything that has happened for the past twelve days. Edward experiences a severe hallucination where he believes that Luke is responsible for the death of his daughter. As Edward confronts Luke, Luke unveils the notebook that he had stolen from Patrick. It is revealed that Patrick was an undercover test subject the entire time. Luke provokes Edward into believing that he truly killed his daughter until Edward reaches a mental breaking point and brutally kills Luke.

Related: Nocebo Review: An Obvious Plot Derails Supernatural Thriller

With Luke dead and the other test subjects mentally spiraling out of control, on Day 14, the scientists decide to shut down the experiment and immediately send armed guards into the room. As the guards cautiously enter the pitch-dark room, they are violently attacked by the prisoners, causing more deaths in the process. The surviving guards are able to successfully remove the prisoners from the room where they immediately seek medical assistance. Back in 1976, Christopher leaves the interview before apologizing to Robert about his father.

After the interview, the detectives decide to continue their investigation where they speak with a chemical engineer who helped conduct the experiment. They discover that Christopher not only designed the experiment but was also the lead scientist. David races to Christopher’s home only to find that he had already left town. In the basement of Christopher’s home, David finds and listens to a tape recording only to learn the horrible truth of Christopher's intentions and the end result of the five prisoners.

John Farrelly Succeeds in Filmmaking

From the directing standpoint, John Farrelly did not disappoint with The Sleep Experiment . Both timelines in the story transitioned at a very good pace, while the cinematography and soundtrack are superb. With only an hour and 20-minute runtime, the film did seem short, but it gets straight to the point and doesn’t prolong the story whatsoever. The Irish psychological thriller , The Sleep Experiment , is a film worth watching and certainly payoffs as an outstanding first feature film for John Farrelly.

The Sleep Experiment comes to us from Red Water Entertainment and is currently available on a number of digital and cable platforms, including iTunes, Amazon, Google Play, iNDemand, and DISH.

• Movie and TV Reviews
• The Soviet Sleep Experiment

We sent an email to [email protected]

Didn't you get the email?

By joining, you agree to the Terms and Policies and Privacy Policy and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

Log in or sign up for Rotten Tomatoes

Trouble logging in?

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes.

Email not verified

Let's keep in touch.

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

• Upcoming Movies and TV shows
• Rotten Tomatoes Podcast
• Media News + More

By clicking "Sign Me Up," you are agreeing to receive occasional emails and communications from Fandango Media (Fandango, Vudu, and Rotten Tomatoes) and consenting to Fandango's Privacy Policy and Terms and Policies . Please allow 10 business days for your account to reflect your preferences.

OK, got it!

• About Rotten Tomatoes®
• Login/signup

Movies in theaters

• Opening This Week
• Top Box Office
• Coming Soon to Theaters
• Certified Fresh Movies

Movies at Home

• Fandango at Home
• Prime Video
• Most Popular Streaming Movies
• What to Watch New

Certified fresh picks

• 96% The Brutalist Link to The Brutalist
• 87% The Room Next Door Link to The Room Next Door
• 84% Carry-On Link to Carry-On

New TV Tonight

• 100% Laid: Season 1
• -- Fast Friends: Season 1
• -- Virgin River: Season 6
• -- Beast Games: Season 1
• -- Aaron Rodgers: Enigma: Season 1
• -- The Secret Lives of Animals: Season 1

Most Popular TV on RT

• 95% Black Doves: Season 1
• 79% No Good Deed: Season 1
• 89% One Hundred Years of Solitude: Season 1
• 67% Secret Level: Season 1
• 95% Star Wars: Skeleton Crew: Season 1
• 73% Dexter: Original Sin: Season 1
• -- La Palma: Season 1
• 70% Dune: Prophecy: Season 1
• 68% The Agency: Season 1
• 85% The Day of the Jackal: Season 1
• Best TV Shows
• Most Popular TV

Certified fresh pick

• 79% No Good Deed: Season 1 Link to No Good Deed: Season 1
• All-Time Lists
• Binge Guide
• Comics on TV
• Five Favorite Films
• Video Interviews
• Weekend Box Office
• Weekly Ketchup
• What to Watch

All 74 Disney Animated Movies Ranked

All James Cameron Movies Ranked

What to Watch: In Theaters and On Streaming.

Awards Tour

Where to Watch the 2025 Golden Globe Nominees

Sonic the Hedgehog 3 First Reviews: Come for Sonic and Shadow, Stay for Deranged Jim Carrey

• Trending on RT
• Awards Season
• Best Netflix Movies
• Renewed and Cancelled TV
• TV Premiere Dates

The Sleep Experiment

Where to watch.

Rent The Sleep Experiment on Fandango at Home, or buy it on Fandango at Home.

Critics Reviews

Audience reviews, cast & crew.

John Farrelly

Rob James Capel

Sam McGovern

Steven Jess

Will Murphy

Barry John Kinsella

The Sleep Experiment (2022)

Horror, Mystery, Thriller

The Sleep Experiment

Cast & crew.

Rob James Capel

Sam McGovern

Steven Jess

Will Murphy

Barry John Kinsella

Information

© 2020 Jackpot Films

Accessibility

Copyright © 2024 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.

Internet Service Terms Apple TV & Privacy Cookie Policy Support

Wide Awake After This Irish Horror | The Sleep Experiment Review

In lieu of their prison sentences, five men agree to be participants in top-secret experiment in which they will be prevented from sleeping for thirty days. Two detectives are tasked with interviewing the researchers involved in the subsequent events in which the experiment went catastrophically wrong, leading to death and destruction. Weaving these related plots together, The Sleep Experiment is a captivating and frequently horrifying narrative of revelation from first-time Irish director John Farrelly.

Adapted from Russia in the 1940s to Ireland in Cold War era 1961, the film’s script is based on the popular Creepypasta myth the Russian Sleep Experiment, with the basic premise expanded to explore the inner psyches of many of the key players, as well as added arcs, twists and turns. And while evident from its source material that The Sleep Experiment is unabashedly a horror, there are also clear dramatic influences. Its focus on monologue, which characterises the both the detectives’ interviews and the prisoners’ revelations on their pasts, gives the film a the pervading theme of confession, lending the production a particularly Irish flair.

Writer, director and editor Farrelly worked on The Sleep Experiment during his final year of secondary school in 2018, not long after winning Young Filmmaker of the Year at the Limerick Fresh Film Festival. Adding to his undeniably impressive set-up is a strong cast of Irish actors, each tasked with the difficult job of playing layered characters presenting heavily edited versions of themselves in a heavy atmosphere of paranoia – much of which is not just in their heads.

Set primarily in tight, claustrophobic locations, The Sleep Experiment ’s cinematography impressively adds to the film’s overall sense of dread. The production makes impressive use of the prisoners’ Spartan bunker setting, with the camera work keeping the action alive and compelling. The lighting is employed strongly throughout to create jarringly intimate scenes at one moment and horror-filled instances of the uncanny in the next. There are also some disturbing moments of gore and violence, but much of the film’s horror is also delivered via the actors’ speech and the implication of what we don’t see.

Seeing what can be achieved here by a young director and a dedicated cast and crew, The Sleep Experiment has already a considerable success for Irish cinema: following a packed premiere on the 27 th of October it has been released on several streaming platforms including Amazon Prime and Apple TV. With strong performances, a haunting aesthetic and a compelling and ever-evolving plot, The Sleep Experiment is very much worth watching.

The Sleep Experiment is currently available to stream online.

Featured Image Credit

Sarah Cullen is a PhD of American literature who hates all films and wants to tell you why. Her research examines representations of night time in nineteenth-century literature and she lectures in UCD. She's a regular contributor at Film Ireland and the Irish Gothic Journal. You can follow her @sfdcullen

Subtext | The Long Road to Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: Sword of Destiny

IFI French Film Festival | Political Intrigue Turns Hypnotic In Pacification

IFI French Film Festival Review | Alain Guiraudie’s Miséricorde Is a Tragedy of…

Irish Film Review | Psychological Horror Wishes of the Blue Girl Takes The Familiar…

Detective Noir Only The River Flows | A Spiralling Story of Carefully Curated Chaos

New York Indie Comedy Guy Friends Is an Ambitious (And Funny) Exploration of the…

Your email address will not be published.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.