assignment brief hypotheticals 09.1

Provide details on what you need help with along with a budget and time limit. Questions are posted anonymously and can be made 100% private.

Studypool matches you to the best tutor to help you with your question. Our tutors are highly qualified and vetted.

Your matched tutor provides personalized help according to your question details. Payment is made only after you have completed your 1-on-1 session and are satisfied with your session.

• Homework Q&A
• Become a Tutor

All Subjects

Mathematics

Programming

Health & Medical

Engineering

Computer Science

Foreign Languages

Access over 35 million academic & study documents

Bus 115 chapter 9 apply brief hypotheticals 09 1.

Sign up to view the full document!

24/7 Study Help

Stuck on a study question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic  math  to advanced rocket science !

Similar Documents

working on a study question?

Studypool is powered by Microtutoring TM

Copyright © 2024. Studypool Inc.

Studypool is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.

Ongoing Conversations

Access over 35 million study documents through the notebank

Get on-demand Q&A study help from verified tutors

Read 1000s of rich book guides covering popular titles

Sign up with Google

Sign up with Facebook

Already have an account? Login

Login with Google

Login with Facebook

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Presidential Power in 2017 , Live from Town Hall, Seattle   LIVE STREAM  7:30–9 p.m. Pacific

Index to Lesson Topics

Introduction to law, juvenile justice, criminal law, consumer law/contracts, individual rights, employment/housing law, intellectual property, mock trial preparation, environmental law, street law at the uw school of law, model lesson plans.

The following lesson plans have been developed by University of Washington School of Law Students for the Street Law Course and are available for use at no charge. Most lesson plans are available in Microsoft Word , Adober PDF or Power Point document. Additional files are available as noted.

Users should note that the law changes, and varies from state to state. Please check for updates on the law, and variations in your state.

Get Microsoft Office Viewers Get Adobe Reader

Top of Page

Connect with us:

• Required Disclosures

© Copyright 2024, All Rights Reserved University of Washington School of Law

4293 Memorial Way Northeast, Seattle, WA 98195

assignment brief hypotheticals 9.1

Pardon our interruption.

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

• About this site
• Schedule (general)
• Comm Law short course
• Gov’s School 2023
• COMS 611 graduate syllabus
• Cases in Comm Law
• FIRAC analysis
• Laws & Treaties
• R1 – Int’l Media research
• MC1 – About moot court
• Moot Court Cases
• MC2 – Writing a legal brief
• Exam reviews
• 1.2 First Amendment (US)
• 1.3 Legal systems
• 1.4 Case example Smith v Johnson
• 1.5 Comm law basics
• 1.6 Civics & principles of law
• 1.7 Concepts & terms in law
• 1.8 Jurisprudence
• 1.Q Civics quiz
• 2.2 Traditions of ethics
• 2.3 Professional ethics
• 2.4 Social responsibility
• 2.5 Images & ethics
• 2.6 Ethics hypotheticals
• 2.Q Ethics quiz
• 3.2 Enlightenment
• 3.3 The US Constitution
• 3.4 Nineteenth Century
• 3.Q History quiz
• CENSORSHIP 4.1
• 4.2 Twentieth century
• 4.3 Compelled speech
• 4.4 Right of Association
• 4.5 Public Schools & Universities
• 4.6 Local Gov’t & First Amendment
• 4.7 Hate speech
• 4.8 Obscenity
• 4.Q Prior restraint quiz
• 5.2 Background on Libel
• 5.3 Sullivan and related cases
• 5.4 Libel – Current cases
• 5.5 Int’l Defamation
• 5.6 Hypotheticals: Libel
• 5.Q Libel quiz
• PRIVACY 6.1
• 6.2 RTBF & Privacy
• 6.3 Hypotheticals: Privacy
• 6.Q Privacy quiz
• 7.2 Advertising legal history
• 7.3 Advertising cases
• 7.4 Advertising regulation
• 7.5 Deceptive advertising
• 7.6 FDA, Oxycontin and ‘Dopesick’
• 7.7 Alcohol ads
• 7.8 Tobacco ads
• 7.9 Regulating children’s ads
• 7.10 Public forum ads
• 7.11 Signs & advertising
• 7.12 Corporate speech (PR)
• 7.13 Int’l Ad Regs
• 7.Q Ad law quiz
• 8.2 Radio & TV Regulation
• 8.3 Broadcast censorship
• 8.4 Film censorship
• 8.Q R-TV-F quiz
• 9.2 News gathering photo & video
• 9.3.1 Virginia FOIA
• 9.4 Free press fair trial
• 9.4.1 Pre-trial publicity
• 9.5 Shield laws
• 9.6 Student press law
• 9.Q News reporting quiz
• 10.2 Section 230
• 10.3 Digital access & de-platforming
• 10.4 Digital Privacy
• 10.5 Digital structure
• 10.Q Section 10 quiz
• 11.2 Copyright basics & history
• 11.3.1 More parodies
• 11.4 Copyright cases
• 11.5 Copyright & Public Domain
• 11.6 Copyright and digital media
• 11.7 Trademark issues
• 11.Q Copyright quiz
• 12.2 Antitrust & traditional media
• 12.3 Structure of broadcasting
• 12.4 Digital media structure
• 12.Q Anti-trust quiz

Ethics hypotheticals

Ethical reasoning process for ethics hypotheticals  

• Describe or restate the problem in its context
• Identify  stakeholders and their goals
• Identify the relevant professional, traditional and moral ethical codes
• Consider a  variety of possible decisions
• Apply balancing tests to determine which of the ethical codes can best guide the decision
• Explain / defend your decision

Ask the right questions — According to SPJ’s Fred Brown:  “The best way to arrive at an ethical decision is to ask the right questions. If you can do that, and if your answers to those questions make sense to you — and if you can then explain your reasoning sensibly to other people — you’ve done what you needed to do to reach a sound, defensible ethical decision. That’s true even if someone else, given the same set of circumstances, might arrive at the opposite decision and consider it just as defensible.  (Brown, Fred . Media Ethics (pp. 9-10). Sigma Delta Chi Foundation. Kindle Edition.)

• Background:  People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, is a nonprofit animal rights organization known for its controversial approach to communications and public relations. In 2003, PETA launched a new campaign, named “Holocaust on Your Plate,” that compares the slaughter of animals for human use to the murders of 12 million people in WWII. The question whether Holocaust on Your Plate”     is unethical posturing  or a truthful and appropriate comparison.
• Stakeholders: This is a public relations effort by a well-known advocacy organization which is using a great historical tragedy that is not associated with their issues, so Jewish people worldwide are also stakeholders.  Another group of stakeholders are government  regulators, especially in Europe, who keep close control over hate speech.  In Europe,  advertising standards authorities banned the ad, and the European Court of Human Rights  turned down PETA appeals saying that it “trivialized” the Holocaust. The US Federal Trade Commission did not ban the ad since hate speech is not regulated in  the US the same way that European governments regulate it, but Jewish organizations in the US were opposed to the ad.
• Duty ethics: PETA members believe they have an ethical duty to protect animals and to send that message in a compelling and attention-grabbing way.
• Bioethics, especially the question of relative value of animal life, is also a compelling side of PETA’s argument. Animals rights advocates believe that all living creatures have rights beyond their utility to humans. Hindus and Buddhists also believe that it is not moral to harm any living thing.
• Consequence ethics:  Human rights organizations object to the use of one of history’s deepest human tragedies to advance PETA’s point of view. Also, from the utilitarian perspective, human rights groups believe that one  consequence of the ad is that the real Holocaust is cheapened.
• Justice ethics:  Should the great injustice of the Holocaust be compared with that of raising animals for meat?
• Public relations professional ethics code s emphasize responsible advocacy.  From a practical standpoint, an argument that is offensive or goes too far may fail to persuade.
• Balancing tests: PETA’s campaign  to protect animals by reminding people of the Holocaust has to be balanced against a perceived offensiveness. Given that the Holocaust is an enormous human tragedy, and that butchering of animal meat is a longstanding practice in history that has not traditionally been held on the same level as murder, PETA’s comparison is a very strong and potentially offensive exaggeration.
• Options: PETA could consider alternative campaign themes.  And PETA could (and did) run the campaign in the US, even if some find it offensive.
•  Decision:  PETA should find a less offensive way to campaign for better treatment of animals.

Example:   1. Photojournalism   

A photographer for the newspaper has taken a very strong photo of the face of a middle aged woman at the scene of a fire. You learn that she was a co-owner of the house that was on fire, and that her husband and three children were lost in the fire.  The look on her face is so very strong because she is experiencing a great tragedy.

The editors believe that the photo is too invasive, but the photographer feels it tells a cautionary story and would be good for fire prevention efforts. The photographer also believe this may win him a Pulitzer, and thinks it should run.  What do you think?

Use the Ethics Evaluation (above)  as well as the SPJ Code of Ethics, Virtue, Duty, Utilitarian and Justice ethics and (also if you think it’s appropriate) your religious and ethical traditions.

Example:   2. Advertising a nuclear waste process 

You have been asked to help with a GoFundMe campaign for an inventor who says he can turn radioactive waste into harmless water with a secret process. He wants to raise investment money for his company, which he says is a non-profit and therefore eligible for charity donations. He won’t provide any proof for his claim, and says if he does, someone might steal his invention.

Clearly, the guy is out to make a buck, but what’s wrong with that? Maybe it’s true that he has a process – You’re no scientist.  Besides, he’s offering a commission of 25% on donations to his research.

Evaluate the situation from the standpoint of  the American Advertising Federation Code of Ethics;  from the standpoint of Virtue, Duty, Utilitarian and Justice ethics; and (also if appropriate) your religious and ethical traditions.

Example: 3.  Bomb scare 

In June, 2020, a fundamentalist Christian group took out a full page ad in the Nashville, TN newspaper claiming that a nuclear bomb would be detonated  and that the attack will be carried out by unspecific interests of “Islam.”  Clearly this did not happen, but the editorial side of the paper was “horrified” that the advertising management let the ad slip through.

Question: Should you publish bomb scares of any kind?  What if anything is different about the Nashville scare?

Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like MediaContact, Inc., specializes in sending spam on behalf of its clients. MediaContact may be required to do which of the following in order to comply with state laws?, GoInternet, Inc., is an Internet-access service provider that is being forced to manage numerous unwanted e-mail messages from a sender of e-mail advertisements ...

Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Egbert, age 16, purchases a $500 video game system and a $50 computer chair from CompuStore. Egbert changes his mind, and wants to avoid the contract for the video game system but not the computer chair. Egbert may, Melissa is a minor who agrees to purchase a car from Umberto for $10,000 one month after she turns 18 years of age ...

a. his firm made a profit on the product. b. he acted in good faith. c. his attorney was incompetent. d. the law is unfair. b. he acted in good faith. Regan owns and manages The Coffee Shoppe. She likes to experiment with different management styles and life philosophies.

Irene sues Mark for defamation. During the lawsuit, Irene wants to obtain copies of Mark's posts on his social media. Irene will: be allowed to obtain Mark's social media posts before the trial begins. Takota Retail discovers that one of its employees, Barry, has disparaged the company on Facebook about its selling practices.

BUS&201 - Brief Hypotheticals 9.1. Molly signs a contract with a publishing company to edit text manuscripts. This contract is governed by. a. federal statute. b. the law of quasi contract. c. state common law. d. Article 2 of the UCC. Click the card to flip 👆.

CLASS SCHEDULE: Day Read & Prepare Assignment(s) Due (Before Class) 1/17 Cengage MindTap Intro Syllabus review & agreement Instructor Intro 1/22 Seating Chart creation Ch. 1: The Legal Environment Worksheets 1.1& 1.2 1/24 Ch. 3: Courts & ADR Brief Hypotheticals 1.1 Worksheets 3.1 & 3.2 1/29 Ch. 9: Business Ethics Case Problem Blueprint 3.1 ...

Ethical reasoning process for ethics hypotheticals. Describe or restate the problem in its context. Identify stakeholders and their goals. Identify the relevant professional, traditional and moral ethical codes. Consider a variety of possible decisions. Apply balancing tests to determine which of the ethical codes can best guide the decision.

Chapter 9.1 Apply: Brief Hypotheticals. Curious to see its worth, Irene takes a beautiful oil painting that she inherited from her grandmother to Eleanor, a respected art appraiser. Eleanor tells Irene the artwork is a worthless piece of junk, so Irene sells the painting to Aziz at a yard sale for $50. The following week, Irene finds out that ...

The declaration of beliefs in a mission statement is most often associated with: Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like No, because legal compliance is regarded as the moral minimum., he acted in good faith., consider their actions in light of the consequences if everyone in society acted the same way. and more.

Related documents. BLAW 2080 - Exam 1; BLAW2080 - Ethical Decision Making- Nolan Ryan Rookie Card Case; BLAW2080 - Brief Hypotheticals 18.1; BLAW2080 - Brief Hypotheticals 11.1

Roger McDonald decides to open up a series of liquor stores in his home state. He calls his chain McDonald's and uses a large, blue, curvy M as his logo. McDonald's Corporation, the famous fast food restaurant chain, wants him to stop using the curvy M, as it resembles McDonald's Corporation's famous golden arches.

an independent contractor. Sam goes out shopping and, using his wife Juanita's credit card, buys $221 worth of groceries. Under agency law, Juanita will probably be deemed: liable for the purchase, based on the creation of an agency by operation of law. Charlie tells Jamal that Marisol has agreed to allow him to sell her racing bicycle.

Brief Hypotheticals 11.1. 15 terms. emmawaaramaa. Preview. fin 240 kaplowitz case problem analysis 11.1: identifying the facts & issues. 10 terms. jasminrhyle. Preview. Chapter 5 BWQ 2. 11 terms. addymcguire98. Preview. LAW 210 Final Exam Study Guide (Midterm 1 Content Part 5) 16 terms. urizarca. Preview. Final Fin Problems.

Assignment: Apply: Brief Hypotheticals 19.1 & Quiz 19. William wants to obtain information from the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding the number of active cases related to insider trading. To request this information, he would need to fill which of the following with the SEC: a Freedom of Information Act request.

MindTap: Brief Hypotheticals 12.1. Julius asks Rachel if she would like to sell her boat. Rachel privately has no interest in selling her boat and believes that Julius can't afford her boat anyway. Rachel says, "I'd sell my boat to you for $400." To Rachel's surprise, Julius responds "Ok, it's a deal." Rachel does not want to sell the boat to ...

Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Heather is sixteen but looks much older. She goes into a jewelry store and buys a diamond bracelet with the money she has been saving for college. If Heather realizes a year later that it was unwise to spend the money on the bracelet, she: a. can return the bracelet and get her money back. b. can return the bracelet, but she will ...

steps for hypothesis testing. 1. State the hypothesis. 2. check assumptions. 3. calculate the test statistic (TS) 4. form the rejection region (RR) or calculate the p-value. 5. make a decision (reject or ftr the null) 6. make inference about the entire population. types of errors that can occur.