Design and Development Research
- First Online: 01 January 2013
Cite this chapter
- Rita C. Richey 5 &
- James D. Klein 6
35k Accesses
29 Citations
This chapter focuses on design and development research, a type of inquiry unique to the instructional design and technology field dedicated to the creation of new knowledge and the validation of existing practice. We first define this kind of research and provide an overview of its two main categories—research on products and tools and research on design and development models. Then, we concentrate on recent design and development research (DDR) by describing 11 studies published in the literature. The five product and tool studies reviewed include research on comprehensive development projects, studies of particular design and development phases, and research on tool development and use. The six model studies reviewed include research leading to new or enhanced ID models, model validation and model use research. Finally, we summarize this new work in terms of the problems it addresses, the settings and participants examined, the research methodologies employed used, and the role evaluation plays in these studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Similar content being viewed by others
Research methods for design knowledge: clarifying definitions, characteristics, and areas of confusion
The Many Facets of Design and Research in Instructional Design
An Examination of the Systemic Reach of Instructional Design Models: a Systematic Review
*Cifuentes, L., Sharp, A., Bulu, S., Benz, M., & Stough, L. M. (2010). Developing a Web 2.0-based system with user-authored content for community use and teacher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58 (4), 377–398.
Google Scholar
Coetzee, J. S., & Smart, A. (2012). Rapid implementation of e-learning using a technology design model. In N. A. Alias & S. Hashim (Eds.), Instructional technology research, design, and development: Lessons from the field (pp. 219–237). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Cowell, D. (2001). Needs assessment activities and techniques of instructional designers: A qualitative study (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International A, 61 (910), 3873.
*Crossman, D. C. (2010). Gilbert’s Behavioral Engineering Model: Contemporary support for an established theory. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 23 (1), 31–52.
Definition and Terminology Committee of the Association for Educational Communications & Technology. (2007). Definition. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Routledge.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Driscoll, M. P. (1984). Paradigms for research in instructional systems. Journal of Instructional Development, 7 (4), 2–5.
Article Google Scholar
Fischer, K. M., Savenye, W. C., & Sullivan, H. J. (2002). Formative evaluation of computer-based training for a university financial system. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15 (1), 11–24.
Francom, G., Bybee, D., Wolfersberger, M., & Merrill, M. D. (2009). Biology 100: A task-centered, peer-interactive redesign. TechTrends, 53 (4), 35–42.
Gilbert, T. (1978). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance . New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hart, S. M. (2008). The design decisions of teachers during technology integration . (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Hillsman, T. L., & Kuptritz, V. W. (2010). Another look at the relative impact of workplace design on training transfer for supervisory communication skills. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 23 (3), 107–130.
*Hung, W-C., Smith, T. J., Harris, M. S., & Lockard, J. (2010). Development research of a teachers’ educational performance support system: The practices of design, development, and evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58 (1), 61–80.
Jones, T. S., & Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping in action: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 (2), 63–80.
Klein, J. D. (1997). ETR&D—Development: An analysis of content and survey of future direction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45 (3), 57–62.
Klein, J. D., Martin, F., Tutty, J., & Su, Y. (2005). Teaching research to instructional design & technology students. Educational Technology, 45 (4), 29–33.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.
Mooij, T. (2002). Designing a digital instructional management system to optimize early education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50 (4), 11–23.
Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (1999). Exploring the potential of a computer tool for instructional developers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47 (3), 77–98.
Plass, J. L., & Salisbusry, M. W. (2002). A living-systems design model for web-based knowledge management systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50 (1), 35–57.
Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models, volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 633–651). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Reiser, R. A. (2012). What field did you say you were in? Defining and naming our field. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed., pp. 1–7). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Richey, R. C. (1997). Research on instructional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45 (3), 91–100.
*Richey, R. C. (2005). Validating instructional design and development models. In J. M. Spector & D.A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill (pp. 171–185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16 (2), 23–38.
*Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies and issues . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2008). Research on design and development. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 748–757). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
*Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. (2004). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 1099–1130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research and practice . New York, NY: Routledge.
Richey, R. C., & Nelson, W. (1996). Developmental research. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1213–1245). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Roszkowski, M. J., & Soven, M. (2010). Did you learning something useful today? An analysis of how perceived utility relates to perceived learning and their predictiveness of satisfaction with training. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 23 (2), 71–91.
Roytek, M. A. (2000). Contextual factors affecting the use of rapid prototyping within the design and development of instruction (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International A, 61 (01), 76.
Sahrir, M. (2012). Formative evaluation of an Arabic online vocabulary learning game prototype: Lessons from a Malaysian institute of higher learning experience. In N. Alias & S. Hashim (Eds.), Instructional technology research, design and development: Lessons from the field (pp. 357–368). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Sullivan, H., Ice, K., & Niedermeyer, F. (2000). Long-term instructional development: A 20-year ID and implementation project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 (4), 87–99.
Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluation: Improving the quality of education and training . London: Kogan Page.
Tracey, M. S. (2009). Design and development research: A model validation case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57 (4), 553–571.
Vallachia, S. W., Marker, A., & Taylor, K. (2010). But what do they really expect? Employer perceptions of the skills of entry-level instructional designers. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 22 (4), 33–51.
*van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Visscher-Voerman, I., & Gustafson, K. L. (2004). Paradigms in the theory and practice of education and training design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (2), 69–89.
Visser, L., Plomp, T., Armiault, R. J., & Kuiper, W. (2002). Motivating students at a distance: The case of an international audience. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50 (2), 94–110.
*Voss, D. R. (2008). The development of a model for non-verbal factors impacting the design of visual information. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53 (4), 5–23.
Wang, Q., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2007). Designing a computer support system for multimedia curriculum development in Shanghai. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55 (3), 275–295.
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
Rita C. Richey
Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
James D. Klein
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Rita C. Richey .
Editor information
Editors and affiliations.
, Department of Learning Technologies, C, University of North Texas, North Elm 3940, Denton, 76207-7102, Texas, USA
J. Michael Spector
W. Sunset Blvd. 1812, St. George, 84770, Utah, USA
M. David Merrill
, Centr. Instructiepsychol.&-technologie, K.U. Leuven, Andreas Vesaliusstraat 2, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Research Drive, Iacocca A109 111, Bethlehem, 18015, Pennsylvania, USA
M. J. Bishop
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Richey, R.C., Klein, J.D. (2014). Design and Development Research. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_12
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_12
Published : 22 May 2013
Publisher Name : Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN : 978-1-4614-3184-8
Online ISBN : 978-1-4614-3185-5
eBook Packages : Humanities, Social Sciences and Law Education (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
IMAGES
VIDEO