nursing problem solving examples

The Value of Critical Thinking in Nursing

• How Nurses Use Critical Thinking
• How to Improve Critical Thinking
• Common Mistakes

Some experts describe a person’s ability to question belief systems, test previously held assumptions, and recognize ambiguity as evidence of critical thinking. Others identify specific skills that demonstrate critical thinking, such as the ability to identify problems and biases, infer and draw conclusions, and determine the relevance of information to a situation.

Nicholas McGowan, BSN, RN, CCRN, has been a critical care nurse for 10 years in neurological trauma nursing and cardiovascular and surgical intensive care. He defines critical thinking as “necessary for problem-solving and decision-making by healthcare providers. It is a process where people use a logical process to gather information and take purposeful action based on their evaluation.”

“This cognitive process is vital for excellent patient outcomes because it requires that nurses make clinical decisions utilizing a variety of different lenses, such as fairness, ethics, and evidence-based practice,” he says.

How Do Nurses Use Critical Thinking?

Successful nurses think beyond their assigned tasks to deliver excellent care for their patients. For example, a nurse might be tasked with changing a wound dressing, delivering medications, and monitoring vital signs during a shift. However, it requires critical thinking skills to understand how a difference in the wound may affect blood pressure and temperature and when those changes may require immediate medical intervention.

Nurses care for many patients during their shifts. Strong critical thinking skills are crucial when juggling various tasks so patient safety and care are not compromised.

Jenna Liphart Rhoads, Ph.D., RN, is a nurse educator with a clinical background in surgical-trauma adult critical care, where critical thinking and action were essential to the safety of her patients. She talks about examples of critical thinking in a healthcare environment, saying:

“Nurses must also critically think to determine which patient to see first, which medications to pass first, and the order in which to organize their day caring for patients. Patient conditions and environments are continually in flux, therefore nurses must constantly be evaluating and re-evaluating information they gather (assess) to keep their patients safe.”

The COVID-19 pandemic created hospital care situations where critical thinking was essential. It was expected of the nurses on the general floor and in intensive care units. Crystal Slaughter is an advanced practice nurse in the intensive care unit (ICU) and a nurse educator. She observed critical thinking throughout the pandemic as she watched intensive care nurses test the boundaries of previously held beliefs and master providing excellent care while preserving resources.

“Nurses are at the patient’s bedside and are often the first ones to detect issues. Then, the nurse needs to gather the appropriate subjective and objective data from the patient in order to frame a concise problem statement or question for the physician or advanced practice provider,” she explains.

Top 5 Ways Nurses Can Improve Critical Thinking Skills

We asked our experts for the top five strategies nurses can use to purposefully improve their critical thinking skills.

Case-Based Approach

Slaughter is a fan of the case-based approach to learning critical thinking skills.

In much the same way a detective would approach a mystery, she mentors her students to ask questions about the situation that help determine the information they have and the information they need. “What is going on? What information am I missing? Can I get that information? What does that information mean for the patient? How quickly do I need to act?”

Consider forming a group and working with a mentor who can guide you through case studies. This provides you with a learner-centered environment in which you can analyze data to reach conclusions and develop communication, analytical, and collaborative skills with your colleagues.

Practice Self-Reflection

Rhoads is an advocate for self-reflection. “Nurses should reflect upon what went well or did not go well in their workday and identify areas of improvement or situations in which they should have reached out for help.” Self-reflection is a form of personal analysis to observe and evaluate situations and how you responded.

This gives you the opportunity to discover mistakes you may have made and to establish new behavior patterns that may help you make better decisions. You likely already do this. For example, after a disagreement or contentious meeting, you may go over the conversation in your head and think about ways you could have responded.

It’s important to go through the decisions you made during your day and determine if you should have gotten more information before acting or if you could have asked better questions.

During self-reflection, you may try thinking about the problem in reverse. This may not give you an immediate answer, but can help you see the situation with fresh eyes and a new perspective. How would the outcome of the day be different if you planned the dressing change in reverse with the assumption you would find a wound infection? How does this information change your plan for the next dressing change?

Develop a Questioning Mind

McGowan has learned that “critical thinking is a self-driven process. It isn’t something that can simply be taught. Rather, it is something that you practice and cultivate with experience. To develop critical thinking skills, you have to be curious and inquisitive.”

To gain critical thinking skills, you must undergo a purposeful process of learning strategies and using them consistently so they become a habit. One of those strategies is developing a questioning mind. Meaningful questions lead to useful answers and are at the core of critical thinking .

However, learning to ask insightful questions is a skill you must develop. Faced with staff and nursing shortages , declining patient conditions, and a rising number of tasks to be completed, it may be difficult to do more than finish the task in front of you. Yet, questions drive active learning and train your brain to see the world differently and take nothing for granted.

It is easier to practice questioning in a non-stressful, quiet environment until it becomes a habit. Then, in the moment when your patient’s care depends on your ability to ask the right questions, you can be ready to rise to the occasion.

Practice Self-Awareness in the Moment

Critical thinking in nursing requires self-awareness and being present in the moment. During a hectic shift, it is easy to lose focus as you struggle to finish every task needed for your patients. Passing medication, changing dressings, and hanging intravenous lines all while trying to assess your patient’s mental and emotional status can affect your focus and how you manage stress as a nurse .

Staying present helps you to be proactive in your thinking and anticipate what might happen, such as bringing extra lubricant for a catheterization or extra gloves for a dressing change.

By staying present, you are also better able to practice active listening. This raises your assessment skills and gives you more information as a basis for your interventions and decisions.

Use a Process

As you are developing critical thinking skills, it can be helpful to use a process. For example:

• Ask questions.
• Gather information.
• Implement a strategy.
• Evaluate the results.
• Consider another point of view.

These are the fundamental steps of the nursing process (assess, diagnose, plan, implement, evaluate). The last step will help you overcome one of the common problems of critical thinking in nursing — personal bias.

Common Critical Thinking Pitfalls in Nursing

Your brain uses a set of processes to make inferences about what’s happening around you. In some cases, your unreliable biases can lead you down the wrong path. McGowan places personal biases at the top of his list of common pitfalls to critical thinking in nursing.

“We all form biases based on our own experiences. However, nurses have to learn to separate their own biases from each patient encounter to avoid making false assumptions that may interfere with their care,” he says. Successful critical thinkers accept they have personal biases and learn to look out for them. Awareness of your biases is the first step to understanding if your personal bias is contributing to the wrong decision.

New nurses may be overwhelmed by the transition from academics to clinical practice, leading to a task-oriented mindset and a common new nurse mistake ; this conflicts with critical thinking skills.

“Consider a patient whose blood pressure is low but who also needs to take a blood pressure medication at a scheduled time. A task-oriented nurse may provide the medication without regard for the patient’s blood pressure because medication administration is a task that must be completed,” Slaughter says. “A nurse employing critical thinking skills would address the low blood pressure, review the patient’s blood pressure history and trends, and potentially call the physician to discuss whether medication should be withheld.”

Fear and pride may also stand in the way of developing critical thinking skills. Your belief system and worldview provide comfort and guidance, but this can impede your judgment when you are faced with an individual whose belief system or cultural practices are not the same as yours. Fear or pride may prevent you from pursuing a line of questioning that would benefit the patient. Nurses with strong critical thinking skills exhibit:

• Learn from their mistakes and the mistakes of other nurses
• Look forward to integrating changes that improve patient care
• Treat each patient interaction as a part of a whole
• Evaluate new events based on past knowledge and adjust decision-making as needed
• Solve problems with their colleagues
• Are self-confident
• Acknowledge biases and seek to ensure these do not impact patient care

An Essential Skill for All Nurses

Critical thinking in nursing protects patient health and contributes to professional development and career advancement. Administrative and clinical nursing leaders are required to have strong critical thinking skills to be successful in their positions.

By using the strategies in this guide during your daily life and in your nursing role, you can intentionally improve your critical thinking abilities and be rewarded with better patient outcomes and potential career advancement.

Frequently Asked Questions About Critical Thinking in Nursing

How are critical thinking skills utilized in nursing practice.

Nursing practice utilizes critical thinking skills to provide the best care for patients. Often, the patient’s cause of pain or health issue is not immediately clear. Nursing professionals need to use their knowledge to determine what might be causing distress, collect vital information, and make quick decisions on how best to handle the situation.

How does nursing school develop critical thinking skills?

Nursing school gives students the knowledge professional nurses use to make important healthcare decisions for their patients. Students learn about diseases, anatomy, and physiology, and how to improve the patient’s overall well-being. Learners also participate in supervised clinical experiences, where they practice using their critical thinking skills to make decisions in professional settings.

Do only nurse managers use critical thinking?

Nurse managers certainly use critical thinking skills in their daily duties. But when working in a health setting, anyone giving care to patients uses their critical thinking skills. Everyone — including licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, and advanced nurse practitioners —needs to flex their critical thinking skills to make potentially life-saving decisions.

Meet Our Contributors

Crystal Slaughter, DNP, APRN, ACNS-BC, CNE

Crystal Slaughter is a core faculty member in Walden University’s RN-to-BSN program. She has worked as an advanced practice registered nurse with an intensivist/pulmonary service to provide care to hospitalized ICU patients and in inpatient palliative care. Slaughter’s clinical interests lie in nursing education and evidence-based practice initiatives to promote improving patient care.

Jenna Liphart Rhoads, Ph.D., RN

Jenna Liphart Rhoads is a nurse educator and freelance author and editor. She earned a BSN from Saint Francis Medical Center College of Nursing and an MS in nursing education from Northern Illinois University. Rhoads earned a Ph.D. in education with a concentration in nursing education from Capella University where she researched the moderation effects of emotional intelligence on the relationship of stress and GPA in military veteran nursing students. Her clinical background includes surgical-trauma adult critical care, interventional radiology procedures, and conscious sedation in adult and pediatric populations.

Nicholas McGowan, BSN, RN, CCRN

Nicholas McGowan is a critical care nurse with 10 years of experience in cardiovascular, surgical intensive care, and neurological trauma nursing. McGowan also has a background in education, leadership, and public speaking. He is an online learner who builds on his foundation of critical care nursing, which he uses directly at the bedside where he still practices. In addition, McGowan hosts an online course at Critical Care Academy where he helps nurses achieve critical care (CCRN) certification.

ANA Nursing Resources Hub

Search Resources Hub

Critical Thinking in Nursing: Tips to Develop the Skill

4 min read • February, 09 2024

Critical thinking in nursing helps caregivers make decisions that lead to optimal patient care. In school, educators and clinical instructors introduced you to critical-thinking examples in nursing. These educators encouraged using learning tools for assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation.

Nurturing these invaluable skills continues once you begin practicing. Critical thinking is essential to providing quality patient care and should continue to grow throughout your nursing career until it becomes second nature. 

What Is Critical Thinking in Nursing?

Critical thinking in nursing involves identifying a problem, determining the best solution, and implementing an effective method to resolve the issue using clinical decision-making skills.

Reflection comes next. Carefully consider whether your actions led to the right solution or if there may have been a better course of action.

Remember, there's no one-size-fits-all treatment method — you must determine what's best for each patient.

How Is Critical Thinking Important for Nurses? 

As a patient's primary contact, a nurse is typically the first to notice changes in their status. One example of critical thinking in nursing is interpreting these changes with an open mind. Make impartial decisions based on evidence rather than opinions. By applying critical-thinking skills to anticipate and understand your patients' needs, you can positively impact their quality of care and outcomes.

Elements of Critical Thinking in Nursing

To assess situations and make informed decisions, nurses must integrate these specific elements into their practice:

• Clinical judgment. Prioritize a patient's care needs and make adjustments as changes occur. Gather the necessary information and determine what nursing intervention is needed. Keep in mind that there may be multiple options. Use your critical-thinking skills to interpret and understand the importance of test results and the patient’s clinical presentation, including their vital signs. Then prioritize interventions and anticipate potential complications. 
• Patient safety. Recognize deviations from the norm and take action to prevent harm to the patient. Suppose you don't think a change in a patient's medication is appropriate for their treatment. Before giving the medication, question the physician's rationale for the modification to avoid a potential error. 
• Communication and collaboration. Ask relevant questions and actively listen to others while avoiding judgment. Promoting a collaborative environment may lead to improved patient outcomes and interdisciplinary communication. 
• Problem-solving skills. Practicing your problem-solving skills can improve your critical-thinking skills. Analyze the problem, consider alternate solutions, and implement the most appropriate one. Besides assessing patient conditions, you can apply these skills to other challenges, such as staffing issues . 

How to Develop and Apply Critical-Thinking Skills in Nursing

Critical-thinking skills develop as you gain experience and advance in your career. The ability to predict and respond to nursing challenges increases as you expand your knowledge and encounter real-life patient care scenarios outside of what you learned from a textbook. 

Here are five ways to nurture your critical-thinking skills:

• Be a lifelong learner. Continuous learning through educational courses and professional development lets you stay current with evidence-based practice . That knowledge helps you make informed decisions in stressful moments.  
• Practice reflection. Allow time each day to reflect on successes and areas for improvement. This self-awareness can help identify your strengths, weaknesses, and personal biases to guide your decision-making.
• Open your mind. Don't assume you're right. Ask for opinions and consider the viewpoints of other nurses, mentors , and interdisciplinary team members.
• Use critical-thinking tools. Structure your thinking by incorporating nursing process steps or a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) to organize information, evaluate options, and identify underlying issues.
• Be curious. Challenge assumptions by asking questions to ensure current care methods are valid, relevant, and supported by evidence-based practice .

Critical thinking in nursing is invaluable for safe, effective, patient-centered care. You can successfully navigate challenges in the ever-changing health care environment by continually developing and applying these skills.

Images sourced from Getty Images

Related Resources

Item(s) added to cart

What is Critical Thinking in Nursing? (With Examples, Importance, & How to Improve)

Successful nursing requires learning several skills used to communicate with patients, families, and healthcare teams. One of the most essential skills nurses must develop is the ability to demonstrate critical thinking. If you are a nurse, perhaps you have asked if there is a way to know how to improve critical thinking in nursing? As you read this article, you will learn what critical thinking in nursing is and why it is important. You will also find 18 simple tips to improve critical thinking in nursing and sample scenarios about how to apply critical thinking in your nursing career.

What is Critical Thinking in Nursing?

4 reasons why critical thinking is so important in nursing, 1. critical thinking skills will help you anticipate and understand changes in your patient’s condition., 2. with strong critical thinking skills, you can make decisions about patient care that is most favorable for the patient and intended outcomes., 3. strong critical thinking skills in nursing can contribute to innovative improvements and professional development., 4. critical thinking skills in nursing contribute to rational decision-making, which improves patient outcomes., what are the 8 important attributes of excellent critical thinking in nursing, 1. the ability to interpret information:, 2. independent thought:, 3. impartiality:, 4. intuition:, 5. problem solving:, 6. flexibility:, 7. perseverance:, 8. integrity:, examples of poor critical thinking vs excellent critical thinking in nursing, 1. scenario: patient/caregiver interactions, poor critical thinking:, excellent critical thinking:, 2. scenario: improving patient care quality, 3. scenario: interdisciplinary collaboration, 4. scenario: precepting nursing students and other nurses, how to improve critical thinking in nursing, 1. demonstrate open-mindedness., 2. practice self-awareness., 3. avoid judgment., 4. eliminate personal biases., 5. do not be afraid to ask questions., 6. find an experienced mentor., 7. join professional nursing organizations., 8. establish a routine of self-reflection., 9. utilize the chain of command., 10. determine the significance of data and decide if it is sufficient for decision-making., 11. volunteer for leadership positions or opportunities., 12. use previous facts and experiences to help develop stronger critical thinking skills in nursing., 13. establish priorities., 14. trust your knowledge and be confident in your abilities., 15. be curious about everything., 16. practice fair-mindedness., 17. learn the value of intellectual humility., 18. never stop learning., 4 consequences of poor critical thinking in nursing, 1. the most significant risk associated with poor critical thinking in nursing is inadequate patient care., 2. failure to recognize changes in patient status:, 3. lack of effective critical thinking in nursing can impact the cost of healthcare., 4. lack of critical thinking skills in nursing can cause a breakdown in communication within the interdisciplinary team., useful resources to improve critical thinking in nursing, youtube videos, my final thoughts, frequently asked questions answered by our expert, 1. will lack of critical thinking impact my nursing career, 2. usually, how long does it take for a nurse to improve their critical thinking skills, 3. do all types of nurses require excellent critical thinking skills, 4. how can i assess my critical thinking skills in nursing.

• Ask relevant questions • Justify opinions • Address and evaluate multiple points of view • Explain assumptions and reasons related to your choice of patient care options

5. Can I Be a Nurse If I Cannot Think Critically?

Account Management

Log in to manage your policy, generate a certificate of insurance (COI), make a payment, and more.

Log in to your account to update your information or manage your policy.

Download a Certificate of Insurance (COI) to provide to your employer.

Make a Payment

Make a one-time payment, set up autopay, or update your payment information.

Submit a notice of an incident or claim in just minutes.

Topics on this page:

Why Critical Thinking in Nursing Is Important

8 examples of critical thinking in nursing, improving the quality of patient care, the importance of critical thinking in nursing.

Jul 24, 2024

While not every decision is an immediate life-and-death situation, there are hundreds of decisions nurses must make every day that impact patient care in ways small and large.

“Being able to assess situations and make decisions can lead to life-or-death situations,” said nurse anesthetist Aisha Allen . “Critical thinking is a crucial and essential skill for nurses.”

The National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission (NLNAC) defines critical thinking in nursing this way: “the deliberate nonlinear process of collecting, interpreting, analyzing, drawing conclusions about, presenting, and evaluating information that is both factually and belief-based. This is demonstrated in nursing by clinical judgment, which includes ethical, diagnostic, and therapeutic dimensions and research.”

An eight-year study by Johns Hopkins reports that 10% of deaths in the U.S. are due to medical error — the third-highest cause of death in the country.

“Diagnostic errors, medical mistakes, and the absence of safety nets could result in someone’s death,” wrote Dr. Martin Makary , professor of surgery at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Everyone makes mistakes — even doctors. Nurses applying critical thinking skills can help reduce errors.

“Question everything,” said pediatric nurse practitioner Ersilia Pompilio RN, MSN, PNP . “Especially doctor’s orders.” Nurses often spend more time with patients than doctors and may notice slight changes in conditions that may not be obvious. Resolving these observations with treatment plans can help lead to better care.

Key Nursing Critical Thinking Skills

Some of the most important critical thinking skills nurses use daily include interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation.

• Interpretation: Understanding the meaning of information or events.
• Analysis: Investigating a course of action based on objective and subjective data.
• Evaluation: Assessing the value of information and its credibility.
• Inference: Making logical deductions about the impact of care decisions.
• Explanation: Translating complicated and often complex medical information to patients and families in a way they can understand to make decisions about patient care.
• Self-Regulation: Avoiding the impact of unconscious bias with cognitive awareness.

These skills are used in conjunction with clinical reasoning. Based on training and experience, nurses use these skills and then have to make decisions affecting care.

It’s the ultimate test of a nurse’s ability to gather reliable data and solve complex problems. However, critical thinking goes beyond just solving problems. Critical thinking incorporates questioning and critiquing solutions to find the most effective one. For example, treating immediate symptoms may temporarily solve a problem, but determining the underlying cause of the symptoms is the key to effective long-term health.

Here are some real-life examples of how nurses apply critical thinking on the job every day, as told by nurses themselves.

Example #1: Patient Assessments

“Doing a thorough assessment on your patient can help you detect that something is wrong, even if you’re not quite sure what it is,” said Shantay Carter , registered nurse and co-founder of Women of Integrity . “When you notice the change, you have to use your critical thinking skills to decide what’s the next step. Critical thinking allows you to provide the best and safest care possible.”

Example #2: First Line of Defense

Often, nurses are the first line of defense for patients.

“One example would be a patient that had an accelerated heart rate,” said nurse educator and adult critical care nurse Dr. Jenna Liphart Rhoads . “As a nurse, it was my job to investigate the cause of the heart rate and implement nursing actions to help decrease the heart rate prior to calling the primary care provider.”

Nurses with poor critical thinking skills may fail to detect a patient in stress or deteriorating condition. This can result in what’s called a “ failure to rescue ,” or FTR, which can lead to adverse conditions following a complication that leads to mortality.

Example #3: Patient Interactions

Nurses are the ones taking initial reports or discussing care with patients.

“We maintain relationships with patients between office visits,” said registered nurse, care coordinator, and ambulatory case manager Amelia Roberts . “So, when there is a concern, we are the first name that comes to mind (and get the call).”

“Several times, a parent called after the child had a high temperature, and the call came in after hours,” Roberts said. “Doing a nursing assessment over the phone is a special skill, yet based on the information gathered related to the child’s behavior (and) fluid intake, there were several recommendations I could make.”

Deciding whether it was OK to wait until the morning, page the primary care doctor, or go to the emergency room to be evaluated takes critical thinking.

Example #4: Using Detective Skills

Nurses have to use acute listening skills to discern what patients are really telling them (or not telling them) and whether they are getting the whole story.

“I once had a 5-year-old patient who came in for asthma exacerbation on repeated occasions into my clinic,” said Pompilio. “The mother swore she was giving her child all her medications, but the asthma just kept getting worse.”

Pompilio asked the parent to keep a medication diary.

“It turned out that after a day or so of medication and alleviation in some symptoms, the mother thought the child was getting better and stopped all medications,” she said.

Example #5: Prioritizing

“Critical thinking is present in almost all aspects of nursing, even those that are not in direct action with the patient,” said Rhoads. “During report, nurses decide which patient to see first based on the information gathered, and from there they must prioritize their actions when in a patient’s room. Nurses must be able to scrutinize which medications can be taken together, and which modality would be best to help a patient move from the bed to the chair.”

A critical thinking skill in prioritization is cognitive stacking. Cognitive stacking helps create smooth workflow management to set priorities and help nurses manage their time. It helps establish routines for care while leaving room within schedules for the unplanned events that will inevitably occur. Even experienced nurses can struggle with juggling today’s significant workload, prioritizing responsibilities, and delegating appropriately.

Example #6: Medication & Care Coordination

Another aspect that often falls to nurses is care coordination. A nurse may be the first to notice that a patient is having an issue with medications.

“Based on a report of illness in a patient who has autoimmune challenges, we might recommend that a dose of medicine that interferes with immune response be held until we communicate with their specialty provider,” said Roberts.

Nurses applying critical skills can also help ease treatment concerns for patients.

“We might recommend a patient who gets infusions come in earlier in the day to get routine labs drawn before the infusion to minimize needle sticks and trauma,” Robert said.

Example #7: Critical Decisions

During the middle of an operation, the anesthesia breathing machine Allen was using malfunctioned.

“I had to critically think about whether or not I could fix this machine or abandon that mode of delivering nursing anesthesia care safely,” she said. “I chose to disconnect my patient from the malfunctioning machine and retrieve tools and medications to resume medication administration so that the surgery could go on.”

Nurses are also called on to do rapid assessments of patient conditions and make split-second decisions in the operating room.

“When blood pressure drops, it is my responsibility to decide which medication and how much medication will fix the issue,” Allen said. “I must work alongside the surgeons and the operating room team to determine the best plan of care for that patient’s surgery.”

“On some days, it seems like you are in the movie ‘The Matrix,’” said Pompilio. “There’s lots of chaos happening around you. Your patient might be decompensating. You have to literally stop time and take yourself out of the situation and make a decision.”

Example #8: Fast & Flexible Decisions

Allen said she thinks electronics are great, but she can remember a time when technology failed her.

“The hospital monitor that gives us vitals stopped correlating with real-time values,” she said. “So I had to rely on basic nursing skills to make sure my patient was safe. (Pulse check, visual assessments, etc.)”

In such cases, there may not be enough time to think through every possible outcome. Critical thinking combined with experience gives nurses the ability to think quickly and make the right decisions.

Nurses who think critically are in a position to significantly increase the quality of patient care and avoid adverse outcomes.

“Critical thinking allows you to ensure patient safety,” said Carter. “It’s essential to being a good nurse.”

Nurses must be able to recognize a change in a patient’s condition, conduct independent interventions, anticipate patients and provider needs, and prioritize. Such actions require critical thinking ability and advanced problem-solving skills.

“Nurses are the eyes and ears for patients, and critical thinking allows us to be their advocates,” said Allen.

Image courtesy of iStock.com/ davidf

Last updated on Jul 24, 2024. Originally published on Aug 25, 2021.

• Career Growth

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Berxi™ or Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company. This article (subject to change without notice) is for informational purposes only, and does not constitute professional advice. Click here to read our full disclaimer

The product descriptions provided here are only brief summaries and may be changed without notice. The full coverage terms and details, including limitations and exclusions, are contained in the insurance policy. If you have questions about coverage available under our plans, please review the policy or contact us at 833-242-3794 or  [email protected] . “20% savings” is based on industry pricing averages.

Berxi™ is a part of Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance ( BHSI ). Insurance products are distributed through Berkshire Hathaway Global Insurance Services, California License # 0K09397. BHSI is part of Berkshire Hathaway’s National Indemnity group of insurance companies, consisting of National Indemnity and its affiliates, which hold financial strength ratings of A++ from AM Best and AA+ from Standard & Poor’s. The rating scales can be found at  www.ambest.com  and  www.standardandpoors.com , respectively.

No warranty, guarantee, or representation, either expressed or implied, is made as to the correctness, accuracy, completeness, adequacy, or sufficiency of any representation or information. Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.

The information on this web site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment, and does not purport to establish a standard of care under any circumstances. All content, including text, graphics, images and information, contained on or available through this web site is for general information purposes only based upon the information available at the time of presentation, and does not constitute medical, legal, regulatory, compliance, financial, professional, or any other advice.

BHSI makes no representation and assumes no responsibility or liability for the accuracy of information contained on or available through this web site, and such information is subject to change without notice. You are encouraged to consider and confirm any information obtained from or through this web site with other sources, and review all information regarding any medical condition or treatment with your physician or medical care provider. NEVER DISREGARD PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY SEEKING MEDICAL TREATMENT BECAUSE OF SOMETHING THAT YOU HAVE READ ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH THIS WEB SITE.

BHSI is not a medical organization, and does not recommend, endorse or make any representation about the efficacy, appropriateness or suitability of any specific tests, products, procedures, treatments, services, opinions, health care providers or other information contained on or available through this web site. BHSI IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY FOR, ANY ADVICE, COURSE OF TREATMENT, DIAGNOSIS OR ANY OTHER SERVICES OR PRODUCTS THAT YOU OBTAIN AFTER REVIEWING THIS WEB SITE.

Want Berxi articles delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for our monthly newsletter below!

" * " indicates required fields

How we use your email address Berxi will not sell or rent your email address to third parties unless otherwise notified. Other than where necessary to administer your insurance policy or where required by law, Berxi will not disclose your email address to third parties. Your email address is required to identify you for access to the Berxi website. You may also receive newsletters, product updates, and communications about quotes and policies.

Paul Dughi is a contributing writer for Berxi, as well as a journalist and freelance writer. He has held executive management positions in the media industry for the past 25 years.

Related Articles

Breaking Bad News to Patients: A Nurse’s Guide to SPIKES

Michael Walton Jul 24, 2024

Delegation in Nursing: Steps, Skills, & Solutions for Creating Balance at Work

Kristy Snyder Jul 24, 2024

The 7 Most Common Nursing Mistakes (And What You Can Do If You Make One)

Paul Dughi Aug 28, 2024

How To Improve Critical Thinking Skills In Nursing? 24 Strategies With Examples

Last updated on August 19th, 2023

Nurses play a critical role in making critical decisions that directly impact patient outcomes in the dynamic field of healthcare. Developing strong critical thinking skills is essential for success in this role.

In this article, we present a comprehensive list of 23 nursing-specific strategies aimed at improving critical thinking and improve the quality of patient care.

24 Strategies to improve critical thinking skills in nursing

You may also want to check out: 15 Attitudes of Critical Thinking in Nursing (Explained W/ Examples)

1. Reflective Journaling: Delving into Deeper Understanding

Reflective journaling is a potent tool for nurses to explore their experiences, actions, and decisions.

By regularly pondering over situations and analyzing their thought processes, nurses can identify strengths and areas for improvement.

This practice encourages the conscious development of critical thinking by comparing past experiences with current knowledge and exploring alternative solutions.

After a particularly challenging case, a nurse reflects on their decision-making process, exploring what worked well and what could have been done differently.

2. Meeting with Colleagues: Collaborative Learning for Critical Thinking

Regular interactions with colleagues foster a collaborative learning environment. Sharing experiences, discussing diverse viewpoints, and providing constructive feedback enhance critical thinking skills .

Colleagues’ insights can challenge assumptions and broaden perspectives, ultimately leading to more well-rounded clinical judgments.

A nursing team gathers to discuss a recent complex case, sharing their perspectives, insights, and lessons learned to collectively improve patient care strategies.

3. Concept Mapping: Visualizing Complexity

Concept mapping is an excellent technique to synthesize intricate patient information. By creating visual representations of patient problems and interventions, nurses can identify relationships and patterns that might not be apparent otherwise.

This strategy aids in comprehensive care planning and encourages nurses to think holistically about patient care.

Creating a concept map to connect patient symptoms, diagnostics, and interventions reveals patterns that help the nurse formulate a comprehensive care plan.

4. Socratic Questioning: Digging Deeper into Situations

The art of Socratic questioning involves asking probing questions that lead to deeper understanding.

Applying this technique allows nurses to uncover assumptions, examine inconsistencies, and explore multiple viewpoints.

This approach is especially valuable when reviewing patient history, discussing conditions, and planning care strategies.

When assessing a patient’s deteriorating condition, a nurse asks probing questions to uncover potential underlying causes and prioritize appropriate interventions.

5. Inductive and Deductive Reasoning: From Specifics to Generalizations

Developing skills in both inductive and deductive reasoning equips nurses to analyze situations from different angles.

Inductive reasoning involves drawing conclusions from specific observations, while deductive reasoning starts with general premises to arrive at specific conclusions.

Proficient use of these methods enhances nurses’ ability to make accurate clinical judgments.

When encountering a series of patients with similar symptoms, a nurse uses inductive reasoning to identify a common pattern and deduce potential causes.

6. Distinguishing Statements: Fact, Inference, Judgment, and Opinion

Clear thinking demands the ability to differentiate between statements of fact, inference, judgment, and opinion.

Nurses must critically evaluate information sources, ensuring they rely on evidence-based practice.

This skill safeguards against misinformation and supports informed decision-making.

While reviewing a patient’s history, a nurse differentiates factual medical information from inferences and subjective judgments made by different healthcare professionals.

7. Clarifying Assumptions: Promoting Effective Communication

Recognizing assumptions and clarifying their underlying principles is vital for effective communication. Nurses often hold differing assumptions, which can impact patient care.

By acknowledging these assumptions and encouraging open discussions, nursing teams can collaboratively create care plans that align with patients’ best interests.

Before suggesting a treatment plan, a nurse engages in a conversation with a patient to understand their cultural beliefs and preferences, ensuring assumptions are not made.

8. Clinical Simulations: Learning through Virtual Scenarios

Clinical simulations provide nurses with a risk-free environment to practice decision-making and problem-solving skills.

These virtual scenarios mimic real-life patient situations and allow nurses to test different approaches, assess outcomes, and reflect on their choices.

By engaging in simulations, nurses can refine their critical thinking abilities, learn from mistakes, and gain confidence in their clinical judgment.

Engaging in a simulated scenario where a patient’s condition rapidly changes challenges a nurse’s decision-making skills in a controlled environment.

9. Case Studies and Grand Rounds: Analyzing Complex Cases

Engaging in case studies and participating in grand rounds exposes nurses to complex patient cases that require in-depth analysis.

Working through these scenarios encourages nurses to consider various factors, potential interventions, and their rationale.

Discussing these cases with colleagues and experts fosters collaborative critical thinking and widens the spectrum of possible solutions.

Nurses participate in grand rounds, discussing a challenging case involving multiple medical specialties, encouraging a holistic approach to patient care.

10. Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning: Expanding Knowledge

Staying up-to-date with the latest advancements in nursing and healthcare is crucial for effective critical thinking.

Pursuing continuing education opportunities, attending conferences, and engaging in self-directed learning keeps nurses informed about new research, technologies, and best practices.

This continuous learning enriches their knowledge base, enabling them to approach patient care with a well-rounded perspective.

Attending a nursing conference on the latest advancements in wound care equips a nurse with evidence-based techniques to improve patient outcomes.

11. Debates and Discussions: Encouraging Thoughtful Dialogue

Organizing debates or participating in structured discussions on healthcare topics stimulates critical thinking.

Engaging in debates requires researching and presenting evidence-based arguments, promoting the evaluation of different perspectives.

Nurses can exchange insights, challenge assumptions, and refine their ability to defend their viewpoints logically.

Engaging in a debate on the pros and cons of a new treatment method encourages nurses to critically analyze different viewpoints and strengthen their own understanding.

12. Multidisciplinary Collaboration: Gaining Insights from Various Disciplines

Collaborating with professionals from diverse healthcare disciplines enriches nurses’ critical thinking.

Interacting with doctors, pharmacists, therapists, and other experts allows nurses to benefit from different viewpoints and approaches.

This cross-disciplinary collaboration broadens their understanding and encourages innovative problem-solving.

Collaborating with physical therapists, nutritionists, and pharmacists helps a nurse develop a holistic care plan that addresses all aspects of a patient’s recovery.

13. Ethical Dilemma Analysis: Balancing Patient Autonomy and Best Practice

Ethical dilemmas are common in nursing practice. Analyzing these situations requires nurses to weigh the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice.

By critically examining ethical scenarios, nurses develop the capacity to navigate morally complex situations, prioritize patient welfare, and make ethically sound decisions.

When faced with a patient’s refusal of treatment due to religious beliefs, a nurse evaluates the ethical considerations, respects autonomy, and seeks alternatives.

14. Root Cause Analysis: Investigating Adverse Events

When adverse events occur, performing a root cause analysis helps identify the underlying causes and contributing factors.

Nurses engage in a systematic process of analyzing events, exploring the “5 Whys” technique , and developing strategies to prevent similar occurrences in the future.

This approach cultivates a thorough and analytical approach to problem-solving.

After a medication error, a nurse leads a root cause analysis to identify system failures and implement preventive measures to enhance patient safety.

15. Creative Thinking Exercises: Expanding Solution Repertoire

Encouraging creative thinking through brainstorming sessions or scenario-based exercises widens the range of possible solutions nurses consider.

By thinking outside the box and exploring innovative approaches, nurses develop adaptable problem-solving skills that can be applied to complex patient care challenges.

Brainstorming creative approaches to comfort a distressed pediatric patient empowers a nurse to find innovative methods beyond routine interventions.

16. Journal Clubs: Fostering Evidence-Based Discussion

Participating in journal clubs involves healthcare professionals coming together to dissect recent research articles.

This practice ignites critical thinking by allowing nurses to evaluate study methodologies, scrutinize findings, and consider the implications for their practice.

Engaging in evidence-based discussions not only cultivates a culture of critical inquiry but also reinforces continuous learning.

At the monthly journal club meeting, Nurse Mark engages in a discussion on a recent research article focusing on pain management strategies for post-operative patients.

The group analyzes the study design, scrutinizes the findings, and considers the potential implications for their practice.

During the discussion, Mark raises thought-provoking questions about the study’s methodology and suggests potential applications in their hospital’s patient care protocols.

This active participation in journal clubs not only refines Mark’s critical thinking but also instills evidence-based practices into his nursing approach.

17. Critical Reflection Groups: Collaborative Learning and Analysis

Similarly, establishing critical reflection groups, where nurses meet regularly to discuss experiences, cases, and challenges, fosters collective learning.

These sessions encourage the exchange of diverse perspectives, enriching the analysis process and ultimately enhancing patient care strategies.

Through shared insights and discussions, nurses can refine their clinical reasoning and broaden their problem-solving capabilities.

Nurse Emma actively participates in critical reflection groups in order to broaden her clinical knowledge. During a recent meeting, the group tackled a difficult patient case with complicated symptomatology.

Emma suggests alternative diagnostic pathways based on her own experiences. Emma’s critical thinking skills are honed as a result of the group’s dynamic interaction, which also emphasizes the importance of collaborative decision-making in complex scenarios.

18. Mindfulness and Reflection Practices: Enhancing Self-Awareness

Mindfulness techniques, such as meditation and deep breathing, encourage self-awareness and a clear mind.

Engaging in these practices helps nurses become more attuned to their thoughts and emotions, leading to better self-regulation and improved decision-making during high-pressure situations.

Engaging in mindfulness exercises before a demanding shift helps a nurse maintain focus, manage stress, and make clear-headed decisions.

19. Problem-Based Learning: Applying Knowledge in Real Scenarios

Problem-based learning involves presenting nurses with real-world patient cases and encouraging them to collaboratively solve the problems.

This approach bridges the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, fostering critical thinking through active problem-solving.

Working through a simulated patient case challenges nurses to apply theoretical knowledge to practical situations, refining their clinical reasoning.

20. Self-Assessment and Feedback: Evaluating Decision-Making Skills

Regularly assessing one’s own decision-making process and seeking feedback from peers and mentors is essential for improvement.

Reflecting on past decisions, considering alternative approaches, and understanding the rationale behind them contribute to the refinement of critical thinking skills.

A nurse evaluates their performance after a patient’s unexpected complication, seeking feedback from peers and mentors to identify areas for improvement.

21. Cultural Competence Training: Navigating Diverse Perspectives

Cultural competence training enhances critical thinking by enabling nurses to understand the diverse cultural beliefs and practices of patients.

This knowledge is vital for providing patient-centered care, as it encourages nurses to think critically about the unique needs of each individual.

A nurse attends cultural competence training to understand the dietary preferences of a diverse patient population, ensuring respectful and patient-centered care.

22. Active Listening and Empathetic Communication: Gathering Insights

Active listening and empathetic communication with patients and their families enable nurses to gather comprehensive information about their conditions, concerns, and preferences.

This data forms the basis for critical analysis and informed decision-making in patient care.

Through attentive listening, a nurse uncovers a patient’s underlying concerns, leading to an informed care plan that addresses both medical needs and emotional well-being.

23. Mentorship and Preceptorship: Learning from Experienced Professionals

Having a mentor or preceptor provides novice nurses with the opportunity to learn from experienced professionals.

Mentors guide critical thinking by sharing their insights, challenging assumptions, and offering guidance in complex situations. This relationship fosters growth and expertise development.

A novice nurse gains valuable insight from a mentor, who guides them through complex cases, offering real-world wisdom and refining critical thinking skills.

24. Self-Assessment and Feedback: Evaluating Decision-Making Skills

Reflecting on past decisions, considering alternative approaches, and understanding the rationale behind them contribute to the refinement of critical thinking skills .

Nurse Sarah regularly takes time to assess her decision-making skills by reviewing past patient cases. After a challenging case involving conflicting symptoms, she reflects on her initial approach, the outcomes, and what she could have done differently.

She seeks feedback from her senior colleague, who provides insights on alternative diagnostic paths. Sarah’s self-assessment and feedback-seeking process enable her to identify areas for improvement and refine her critical thinking in similar situations.

• Clinical Reasoning In Nursing (Explained W/ Example)
• 8 Stages Of The Clinical Reasoning Cycle
• What is Critical Thinking in Nursing? (Explained W/ Examples)

Enhancing critical thinking skills is an ongoing journey that transforms nursing practice.

Reflective journaling, collaborative learning, concept mapping, Socratic questioning , reasoning techniques, distinguishing statements, and clarifying assumptions all play integral roles in nurturing these skills.

By incorporating these strategies into their daily routines, nurses can improve their critical thinking skills.

Additionally, this will help nurses in navigating the complexities of the healthcare field with confidence, expertise, and the ability to make well-informed decisions that improve patient outcomes.

Comments are closed.

Medical & Legal Disclaimer

All the contents on this site are for entertainment, informational, educational, and example purposes ONLY. These contents are not intended to be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or practice guidelines. However, we aim to publish precise and current information. By using any content on this website, you agree never to hold us legally liable for damages, harm, loss, or misinformation. Read the  privacy policy  and  terms and conditions.

Privacy Policy

Terms & Conditions

© 2024 nurseship.com. All rights reserved.

Two Examples of How I Used Critical Thinking to Care for my Patient (Real Life Nursing Stories) | NURSING.com

What are you struggling with in nursing school?

NURSING.com is the BEST place to learn nursing. With over 2,000+ clear, concise, and visual lessons, there is something for you!

Critical Thinking on the Nursing Floor

Critical thinking can seem like such an abstract term that you don’t practically use. However, this could not be farther from the truth. Critical thinking is frequently used in nursing. Let me give you a few examples from my career in which critical thinking helped me take better care of my patient.

The truth is, that as nurses we can’t escape critical thinking . . . I know you hate the word . . . but let me show you how it actually works!

Critical Thinking in Nursing: Example 1

I had a patient that was scheduled to go to get a pacemaker placed at 0900. The physician wanted the patient to get 2 units of blood before going downstairs for the procedure. I administered it per protocol. About 30 minutes after that second unit got started, I noticed his oxygen went from 95% down to 92% down to 90%. I put 2L of O2 on him and it came up to 91%. But it just sort of hung around the low 90s on oxygen.

I stopped. And thought. What the heck is going on?

I looked at his history. Congestive heart failure.

I looked at his intake and output. He was positive 1.5 liters.

I thought about how he’s got extra fluid in general, and because of his CHF, he can’t really pump out the fluid he already has, let alone this additional fluid. Maybe I should listen to his lungs..

His lungs were clear earlier. I heard crackles throughout both lungs.

OK, so he’s got extra fluid that he can’t get out of his body. What do I know that will get rid of extra fluid and make him pee? Maybe some Lasix?

I ran over my thought process with a coworker before calling the doc. They agreed. I called the doc and before I could suggest anything, he said “Give him 20 mg IV Lasix one time, and I’ll put the order in.” CLICK.

I gave the Lasix. He peed like a racehorse (and was NOT happy with me for making that happen!). And he was off of oxygen before he went down to get his pacemaker.

Badda Bing Bada Boom!

Critical Thinking in Nursing: Example 2

My patient just had her right leg amputated above her knee. She was on a Dilaudid PCA and still complaining of awful pain. She maxed it out every time, still saying she was in horrible pain. She told the doctor when he rounded that morning that the meds weren’t doing anything. He added some oral opioids as well and wrote an order that it was okay for me to give both the oral and PCA dosings, with the goal of weaning off PCA.

“How am I going to do that?” I thought. She kept requiring more and more meds and I’m supposed to someone wean her off?

I asked her to describe her pain. She said it felt like nerve pain. Deep burning and tingling. She said the pain meds would just knock her out and she’d sleep for a little while but wake up in even worse pain. She was at the end of her rope.

I thought about nerve pain. I thought about other patients that report similar pain. Diabetics with neuropathy would talk about similar pain… “What did they do for it? ” I thought. Then I remembered that many of my patients with diabetic neuropathy were taking gabapentin daily for pain.

“So if this works for their nerve pain, could it work for a patient who has had an amputation?” I thought.

I called the PA for the surgeon and asked them what they thought about trying something like gabapentin for her pain after I described my patient’s type of pain and thought process.

“That’s a really good idea, Kati. I’ll write for it and we’ll see if we can get her off the opioids sooner. ”

She wrote for it. I gave it. It takes a few days to really kick in and once it did, the patient’s pain and discomfort were significantly reduced. She said to get rid of those other pain meds because they “didn’t do a damn thing,” and to “just give her that nerve pain pill because it’s the only thing that works”.

And that we did!

She was able to work with therapy more because her pain was tolerable and was finally able to get rest.

What the HELL is Critical Thinking . . . and Why Should I Care?

What your nursing professor won’t tell you about critical thinking .

by Ashely Adkins RN BSN

When I started nursing school, I remember thinking,   “how in the world am I going to remember all of this information, let alone be able to apply it and critically think?”   You are not alone if you feel like your critical thinking skills need a little bit of polishing.

Let’s step back for a moment, and take a walk down memory lane. It was my first semester of nursing school and I was sitting in my Fundamentals of Nursing course. We were learning about vital signs, assessments, labs, etc. Feeling overwhelmed with all of this new information (when are you   not   overwhelmed in nursing school?), I let my mind wonder to a low place…

Am I really cut out for this? Can I really do this? How can I possibly retain all of this information?  Do they really expect me to remember everything AND critically think at the same time?

One of my first-semester nursing professors said something to me that has stuck with me throughout my nursing years. It went a little something like this:

“Critical thinking does not develop overnight . It takes time. You don’t learn to talk overnight or walk overnight. You don’t   learn to critically think overnight .”

My professor was absolutely right.

As my journey throughout nursing school, and eventually on to being a “real nurse” continued, my critical thinking skills began to BLOSSOM. With every class, lecture, clinical shift, lab, and simulation, my critical thinking skills grew.

You may ask…how?

Well, let me tell you…

• Questioning

These are the key ingredients to growing your critical thinking skills.

Time.   Critical thinking takes time. As I mentioned before, you do not learn how to critically think overnight. It is important to set   realistic   expectations for yourself both in nursing school and in other aspects of your life.

Exposure.   It is next to impossible to critically think if you have never been exposed to something. How would you ever learn to talk if no one ever talked to you? The same thing applies to nursing and critical thinking.

Over time, your exposure to new materials and situations will cause you to think and ask yourself, “why?”

This leads me to my next point.   Questioning.   Do not be afraid to ask yourself…

“Why is this happening?”

“Why do I take a blood pressure and heart rate before I give a beta-blocker?”

“Why is it important to listen to a patient’s lung sounds before and after they receive a blood transfusion?”

It is important to constantly question yourself. Let your mind process your questions, and discover answers.

Confidence.   We always hear the phrase, “confidence is key!” And as cheesy as that phrase may be, it really holds true. So many times, we often times sell ourselves short.

YOU KNOW MORE THAN YOU THINK YOU KNOW.

In case you did not catch it the first time…

Be confident in your knowledge, because trust me, it is there. It may be hiding in one single neuron in the back of your brain, but it is there.

It is impossible to know everything. Even experienced nurses do not know everything.

And if they tell you that they do…they are wrong!

The   key   to critical thinking is   not about knowing everything ; It is about   how you respond when you do not know something .

How do you reason through a problem you do not know the answer to? Do you give up? Or do you persevere until you discover the answer?

If you are a nursing student preparing for the NCLEX, you know that the NCLEX   loves   critical thinking questions. NRSNG has some great tips and advice on   critical thinking when it comes to taking the NCLEX .

There are so many pieces to the puzzle when it comes to nursing, and it is normal to feel overwhelmed. The beauty of nursing is when all of those puzzle pieces come together to form a beautiful picture.

That is critical thinking.

Critical thinking is something you’ll do every day as a nurse and honestly, you probably do it in your regular non-nurse life as well. It’s basically stopping, looking at a situation, identifying a solution, and trying it out. Critical thinking in nursing is just that but in a clinical setting.

We’ve written a MASSIVE lesson on Care Plans and Critical Thinking :

Mastering The COPD Nursing Care Plan in Just 10 Minutes!

Renal Failure Pt Care

4 "real world" examples of using clinical judgement to figure out what to do first as a nurse | nursing.com, 12 study tips for how to study for pharmacology in nursing school | nursing.com, similar blog posts.

Critical Thinking and Nursing Care Plans Go Together Like Chicken and Waffles | NURSING.com

Patients We Will Never Forget | NURSING.com

Stress Overload Nursing Diagnosis and Care Plan | NURSING.com

• Adult Nursing
• Critical Care Nursing
• Family Nursing
• Holistic Nursing
• Home Health Nursing – visiting nurse
• Neonatal Intensive Care Nursing
• Pediatric Nursing
• Perinatal Nursing
• Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
• Public Health or Community Nursing
• Rehabilitation Nursing
• Faye Abdellah
• Phil Barker
• Dr. Patricia Benner
• Helen C. Erickson
• Katie Eriksson
• Lydia E. Hall
• Virginia Henderson
• Dorothy E. Johnson
• Imogene King
• Katharine Kolcaba
• Madeleine Leininger
• Myra Estrine Levine
• Ramona Mercer
• Betty Neuman
• Margaret A. Newman
• Florence Nightingale
• Ida Jean Orlando
• Dorothea E. Orem
• Rosemarie Rizzo Parse
• Nola Pender
• Hildegard Peplau
• Isabel Hampton Robb
• Martha E. Rogers
• Nancy Roper
• Sister Callista Roy
• Henry Stack-Sullivan
• Joyce Travelbee
• Jean Watson
• Ernestine Wiedenbach
• Alfred Adler
• Lawrence Kohlberg
• Robert R. Carkhuff
• Albert Bandura
• Carl O. Helvie
• Dr. Joyce Fitzgerald
• Clarissa Harlowe Barton
• Mary Ann Bickerdyke
• Mary Carson Breckinridge
• Dorothea Lynde Dix
• Sarah Emma Edmonds
• Helen Fairchild
• Eddie Bernice Johnson
• Mary Todd Lincoln
• Mary Eliza Mahoney
• Malinda Ann Judson Richards
• Dr. Lauranne Sams
• Margaret Higgins Sanger
• Dame Cicely Mary Saunders
• Mary Jane Seacole
• Susie King Taylor
• Lillian D. Wald
• Alyce Faye Wattleton
• Walt Whitman
• National Nurses Week
• First Annual Travel Nurse Day
• AACN Synergy Model
• Trans-Cultural Nursing
• Evidence-Based Nursing
• Modern Nursing
• Nursing Techniques
• Methods of Nursing
• Nursing Theories and a Philosophy of Nursing
• Nursing Mentors
• Nursing Leaders
• How to Study and Pass the NCLEX
• How to Study in Nursing School
• Pain Scale 1-10
• Nursing Clinicals and Nursing Theories
• Nursing Program
• Nursing Theory Definition
• Nursing Ethics and the Nursing Process
• History of Nursing
• Definition of Nursing
• The Nursing Process
• Nursing Care Plans in Action
• Nursing Technology
• Nursing Home Jobs and Getting Qualified
• Standards and Criteria Used by the NLNAC
• How Much Does Nursing School Cost
• Unsubsidized Nursing Student Loans
• A Statistical Look at Patient-Centered Care
• Being A Nurse At Christmas
• Nemours Brings Nursing Opportunities to Central Florida
• How Have the Sequester Cuts Affected Nursing and Health Care

21 Nursing Problems by Faye Abdellah

The Twenty-One Nursing Problems Theory was developed by Faye Glenn Abdellah . Her model of nursing was progressive for the time in that it refers to a nursing diagnosis during a time in which nurses were taught that diagnoses were not part of their role in health care.

There are specific characteristics identifiable in the Twenty-One Nursing Problems. The theory has interrelated the concepts of health, nursing problems, and problem-solving. Problem-solving is an activity that is inherently logical in nature. The framework focuses on nursing practice and individual patients.

The twenty-one nursing problems identified in the nursing theory are comprised of ten steps used to identify the patient’s problems and eleven skills used in developing a treatment typology or nursing care plan .

The ten steps to identify the patient’s problems are:

• Learn to know the patient
• Sort out relevant and significant data
• Make generalizations about available data in relation to similar nursing problems presented by other patients
• Identify the therapeutic plan
• Test generalizations with the patient and make additional generalizations
• Validate the patient’s conclusions about his nursing problems
• Continue to observe and evaluate the patient over a period of time to identify any attitudes and clues affecting his behavior
• Explore the patient’s and family’s reaction to the therapeutic plan and involve them in the plan
• Identify how the nurses feel about the patient’s nursing problems
• Discuss and develop a comprehensive nursing care plan

The eleven nursing skills in the theory are:

• observation of health status
• skills of communication
• application of knowledge
• teaching of patients and families
• planning and organization of work
• use of resource materials
• use of personnel materials
• problem-solving
• direction of work of others
• therapeutic use of the self
• nursing procedure

The twenty-one nursing problems fall into three categories: physical, sociological, and emotional needs of patients; types of interpersonal relationships between the patient and nurse; and common elements of patient care.

The needs of patients are divided into four categories: basic to all patients, sustenal care needs, remedial care needs, and restorative care needs.

Needs that are basic to all patients are to maintain good hygiene and physical comfort; promote optimal activity, including exercise, rest and sleep; promote safety through the prevention of accidents, injury or other trauma and through the prevention of the spread of infection; and maintain good body mechanics and prevent or correct deformity.

Sustenal care needs facilitate the maintenance of a supply of oxygen to all body cells; facilitate the maintenance of nutrition of all body cells; facilitate the maintenance of elimination; facilitate the maintenance of fluid and electrolyte balance; recognize the physiological responses of the body to disease conditions; facilitate the maintenance of regulatory mechanisms and functions; and facilitate the maintenance of sensory function.

Remedial care needs identify and accept positive and negative expressions, feelings, and reactions; identify and accept the interrelatedness of emotions and organic illness; facilitate the maintenance of effective verbal and non-verbal communication; promote the development of productive interpersonal relationships; facilitate progress toward achievement of personal spiritual goals; create and maintain a therapeutic environment; and facilitate awareness of the self as an individual with varying physical, emotional, and developmental needs.

Restorative care needs include the acceptance of the optimum possible goals in light of limitations, both physical and emotional; the use of community resources as an aid to resolve problems that arise from illness; and the understanding of the role of social problems as influential factors in the case of illness.

According to the Twenty-One Nursing Problems model, patients are described as having physical, emotional, and sociological needs. People are also the only justification for the existence of nursing. That is, without people, nursing would not be a profession since they are the recipients of nursing.

Patient-centered approaches to nursing health are described as a state mutually exclusive of illness. Abdellah does not provide a definition of health, but speaks to “total health needs” and “a healthy state of mind and body” in her description of nursing.

In this nursing model , society is included in “planning for optimum health on local, state, national, and international levels.” However, the focus of nursing is the individual. The environment is the home or community from which the patient comes.

Nursing is a helping profession. Nursing care is doing something for or to the patient or giving the patient information with the goals of meeting needs, increasing or restoring self-help ability, or alleviating impairments. The role of the nurse is to help the patient achieve goals to reach optimum health.

Abdellah explained nursing as a comprehensive service, which includes:

• Recognizing the nursing problems of the patient
• Deciding the appropriate course of action to take in terms of relevant nursing principles
• Providing continuous care of the individual’s total needs
• Providing continuous care to relieve pain and discomfort and provide immediate security for the individual
• Adjusting the total nursing care plan to meet the patient’s individual needs
• Helping the individual to become more self-directing in attaining or maintaining a healthy state of body and mind
• Instructing nursing personnel and family to help the individual do for himself that which he can within his limitations
• Helping the individual to adjust to his limitations and emotional problems
• Working with allied health professions in planning for optimum health on local, state, national, and international levels
• Carrying out continuous evaluation and research to improve nursing techniques and to develop new techniques to meet people’s health needs

The twenty-one problems can be applied to the nursing process . In the assessment phase, the nursing problems provide guidelines for data collection. The results of data collection determines the patient’s specific problems, which leads to the nursing diagnosis. The statements of nursing problems resemble goal statements, so once the patient has been diagnosed, nursing goals have already been established. The goals can be used as a framework to develop a plan and nursing interventions. In terms of evaluation, the nurse’s progress or lack of progress toward the achievement of stated goals is the appropriate evaluation. The theory provides a basis for determining and organizing nursing care, as well as a basis for organizing nursing strategies.

• LOGIN / FREE TRIAL

‘Racism absolutely must not be tolerated’

STEVE FORD, EDITOR

• You are here: Archive

Thinking your way to successful problem-solving

13 September, 2001 By NT Contributor

VOL: 97, ISSUE: 37, PAGE NO: 36

Jacqueline Wheeler, DMS, MSc, RGN, is a lecturer at Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College

Problems - some people like them, some do not think they have any, while others shy away from them as if they were the plague. Opportunities, in the form of problems, are part of your life.

The most difficult decision is deciding to tackle a problem and implement a solution, especially as it is sometimes easier to ignore its existence. Problem-solving takes time and effort, but once a problem has been addressed the nurse can feel satisfied that the issue has been resolved and is therefore less likely to re-emerge.

Nurses make clinical decisions using two different approaches. The first is the rationalist approach, which involves an analysis of a situation so that subsequent actions are rational, logical and based on knowledge and judgement. The second approach is based on a phenomenological perspective, where a fluid, flexible and dynamic approach to decision-making is required, such as when dealing with an acutely ill patient.

Types of problems

Problems come in different guises and the solver can perceive them either as a challenge or a threat. One of the most common types of problem is when the unexpected happens. As a nurse you plan and implement care for a patient based on your knowledge and experience, only to find that the patient’s reaction is totally different from that expected but without any apparent reason.

Another type of problem is an assignment where others set a goal or task. Throughout your working life you will be required to undertake duties on behalf of other people. For some this is difficult as they feel unable to control their workload. Others see it as an opportunity to develop new skills or take on additional responsibilities. Opportunities can be perceived as problems by those who fear failure.

A third type of problem is when a dilemma arises. This is when it is difficult to choose the best solution to a problem because the nurse is confronted with something that challenges his or her personal and/or professional values.

Diagnosing problems

The sooner a problem is identified and solutions devised, the better for all involved. So try to anticipate or identify problems when they occur through continuously monitoring staff performance and patient outcomes.

Listening to and observing junior staff will help you to detect work or organisational concerns, because when there are problems staff are likely to behave in an unusual or inconsistent manner.

Initial analysis

Remember that people view things differently, so what you perceive as a problem may not be one to anyone else. So before you begin thinking about what to do - whether to keep it under surveillance, contain it or find a solution - you should undertake an initial analysis. This will help you to understand the problem more clearly.

An analysis will also enable you to prioritise its importance in relation to other problems as problems do not occur one at a time.

Routine problems often need little clarification, so an initial analysis is recommended for non-routine problems only. Even then, not all problems justify the same degree of analysis. But where it is appropriate, an initial analysis will provide a basis from which to generate solutions.

Perception is also important when dealing with patients’ problems. For example, if a patient gives up reading because he or she cannot hold the book (objective), the nurse may assume it is because the patient has lost interest (subjective, one’s own view).

Generating solutions

It is essential for the problem-solver to remember that, where possible, solutions must come from those connected with the problem. If it is to be resolved, agreement must be owned by those involved as they are probably the best and only people who can resolve their differences. The manager should never feel that he or she must be on hand to deal with all disputes.

To solve a problem you need to generate solutions. However, the obvious solution may not necessarily be the best. To generate solutions, a mixture of creative and analytical thinking is needed (Bransford, 1993).

Creativity is about escaping from preconceived ideas that block the way to finding an innovative solution to a problem. An effective tool for assisting in this process is the technique of lateral thinking, which is based largely on the work of Edward de Bono, who regards thinking as a skill.

There are several ways to encourage creative decision-making. One method that works best for specific or simple problems is brainstorming. If the ground rules of confidentiality and being non-judgemental are applied, it will produce a free flow of ideas generated without fear of criticism (Rawlinson, 1986).

Time constraints and staff availability may make it difficult for all those involved in a problem to meet. In such cases an adaptation of brainstorming - where a blank piece of paper is given to those involved and each writes down four solutions to the problem - may be the answer. A similar technique is the collective notebook, where people are asked to record their thoughts and ideas about a problem for a specified period.

An alternative is where one person writes down a list of solutions in order of priority, which is then added to by others. This helps to prioritise the ideas generated. All these methods produce data that can then be analysed by the problem-solver.

When the problem affects people in different geographical areas, solutions can be generated by obtaining the opinion of experts through the use of a questionnaire, which is known as the Delphi technique (McKenna, 1994).

When an apparently insurmountable problem presents itself, it is often useful to divide it into smaller pieces. This is known as convergent thinking. Using divergent thinking - where you consider a problem in different ways to expand your view - may also help. 

A final alternative is the stepladder technique, which is time-consuming but effective if the issue is stirring up strong feelings. This requires the people involved in the problem to be organised into groups. First, two people try to solve the problem, then a third member is drawn in, to whom the solution reached by the first two is presented. All three then try to agree a solution. More people are added to the group, if necessary, in a similar way, until there is agreement of all involved. Provided the individuals are motivated to solve the problem, this technique creates ownership and commitment to implementing the agreed solution.

Analytical thinking, which follows a logical process of eliminating ideas, will enable you to narrow the range down to one feasible solution.

Although someone has to make the ultimate decision on which solution to implement, there are advantages to group decision-making: a greater number of possible solutions are generated and conflicts are resolved, resulting in decisions being reached through rational discussion.

This does, however, require the group to be functioning well or the individuals involved may feel inhibited in contributing to the decision-making. One individual may dominate the group or competition between individuals may result in the need to win taking precedence over deciding on an agreed practical solution.

As nursing becomes less bureaucratic individuals are being encouraged to put forward their own ideas, but social pressures to conform may inhibit the group. We do not solve problems and make decisions in isolation, but are influenced by the environment in which we work and the role we fulfil in that environment. If group members lack commitment and/or motivation, they may accept the first solution and pay little attention to other solutions offered.

Making a decision

There are three types of decision-making environments: certain, risk and uncertain. The certain environment, where we have sufficient information to allow us to select the best solution, is the most comfortable within which to make a decision, but it is the least often encountered.

We usually encounter the risk environment, where we lack complete certainty about the outcomes of various courses of action.

Finally, the uncertain environment is the least comfortable within which to make decisions as we are almost forced to do this blind. We are unable to forecast the possible outcomes of alternative courses of action and, therefore, have to rely heavily on creative intuition and the educated guess.

Taking this into consideration, you should not contemplate making a decision until you have all the information needed. Before you make your decision, remind yourself of the objective, reassess the priorities, consider the options and weigh up the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of each solution.

An alternative is to use the method that Thomas Edison used to solve the problem of the electric light bulb. Simply focus on your problem as you drift off to sleep, and when you wake up your subconscious mind will have presented you with the answer. But bear in mind that this is not a scientific way of solving problems - your subconscious can be unreliable.

If you are not sure about your decision, test the solution out on others who do not own the problem but may have encountered a similar dilemma. Once you have made your choice stick to it, or you may find it difficult to implement because those involved will never be sure which solution is current. They will also be reluctant to become involved in any future decision-making because of your uncertainty.

The next step is to ensure that all the people involved know what decision has been made. Where possible, brief the group and follow this up with written communication to ensure everyone knows what is expected of them. You may need to sell the decision to some, especially if they were not involved in the decision-making process or the solution chosen is not theirs.

Implementing the solution

Finally, to ensure the solution is implemented, check that the people involved know who is to do what, by when and that it has happened. Review the results of implementing your solution (see Box) and praise and thank all those involved.

- Part 1 of this series was published in last week’s issue: Wheeler, J. (2001) How to delegate your way to a better working life. Nursing Times; 97: 36, 34-35.

Next week. Part three: a step-by-step guide to effective report writing.

• Add to Bookmarks

Related articles

Christmas prize gave winner a head start in her studies

As we announce the winner of the Nursing Times Christmas Competition for 2017, we…

Competition winner goes the extra mile to put patients at ease

In December, Nursing Times invited readers to nominate a nurse who makes a real…

Inter-professional education: if we are working together, shouldn’t we be learning together?

As nurses, no matter what our field of practice, we always work…

Special recognition for nurses who treated terror attack victims

Nurses from the hospital trusts that treated the victims of this year’s…

Have your say

Sign in or Register a new account to join the discussion.

• Get new issue alerts Get alerts
• Submit your manuscript

Secondary Logo

Journal logo.

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.

Save my selection

Relationship Between the Problem-Solving Skills and Empathy Skills of Operating Room Nurses

AY, Fatma 1* ; POLAT, Şehrinaz; KASHIMI, Tennur

1 PhD, RN, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Turkey

2 PhD, RN, Directorate of Nursing Services, Hospital of Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Turkey

3 MS, RN, Director, Operating Room, Hospital of Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Turkey.

Accepted for publication: January 21, 2019

*Address correspondence to: Fatma AY, No.25, Dr. Tevfik Saglam Street, Dr. Zuhuratbaba District, Bakirkoy, Istanbul 34147, Turkey. Tel: +90 212 4141500 ext. 40140; Fax: +90 212 4141515; E-mail: [email protected]

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this article as: Ay, F., Polat, Ş., & Kashimi, T. (2019). Relationship between the problem-solving skills and empathy skills of operating room nurses. The Journal of Nursing Research , 28 (2), e75. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000357

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background 

The use of empathy in problem solving and communication is a focus of nursing practice and is of great significance in raising the quality of patient care.

Purpose 

The purposes of this study are to investigate the relationship between problem solving and empathy among operating room nurses and to explore the factors that relate to these two competencies.

Methods 

This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study. Study data were gathered using a personal information form, the Interpersonal Problem Solving Inventory, and the Basic Empathy Scale ( N = 80). Descriptive and comparative statistics were employed to evaluate the study data.

Results 

Age, marital status, and career length were not found to affect the subscale scores of cognitive empathy ( p > .05). A negative correlation was found between the subscale scores for “diffidence” and “cognitive empathy.” Moreover, the emotional empathy scores of the graduate nurses were higher than those of the master's/doctorate degree nurses to a degree that approached significance ( p = .078). Furthermore, emotional empathy levels were found to decrease as the scores for insistent/persistent approach, lack of self-confidence, and educational level increased ( p < .05). The descriptive characteristics of the participating nurses were found not to affect their problem-solving skills.

Conclusions/Implications for Practice 

Problem solving is a focus of nursing practice and of great importance for raising the quality of patient care. Constructive problem-solving skills affect cognitive empathy skills. Educational level and career length were found to relate negatively and level of self-confidence was found to relate positively with level of cognitive empathy. Finally, lower empathy scores were associated with difficult working conditions in operating rooms, intense stress, and high levels of potential stress-driven conflicts between workers in work settings.

Introduction

Healthcare institutions are where individuals seek remedies to their health problems. These institutions face problems, which relate to both employees and care recipients. These problems may occur spontaneously and require immediate solution. Moreover, these problems require that the preferred remedies be adapted to address the unique nature of both organizational circumstances and individual requirements. Therefore, it is important that nurses, who are a major component of the healthcare system, have problem-solving skills.

Operating rooms are complex, high-risk environments with intense levels of stress that require rapid judgment making and fast implementation of appropriate decisions to increase patients' chances of survival ( Kanan, 2011 ; Jeon, Lakanmaa, Meretoja, & Leino-Kilpi, 2017 ). Furthermore, aseptic principles may never be compromised, and a high level of coordination and cooperation among team members should be maintained in these areas ( Kanan, 2011 ; Sandelin & Gustafsson, 2015 ). The members of a surgical team may vary in the operating room ( Sandelin & Gustafsson, 2015 ; Sonoda, Onozuka, & Hagihara, 2018 ). Under these difficult conditions, time management and workload are important stress factors for nurses ( Happell et al., 2013 ; Suresh, Matthews, & Coyne, 2013 ). At the same time, operating room nurses are legally responsible for the nature and quality of the healthcare service received by patients before, during, and after their surgical intervention ( Kanan, 2011 ). The American Nurses Association defines a nurse as “the healthcare professional establishing, coordinating and administering the care while applying the nursing process in an aim to meet the identified physiological, psychological, sociocultural and spiritual needs of patients who are potentially at the risk of jeopardized protective reflexes or self-care ability because of surgery or invasive intervention” ( Association of periOperative Registered Nurses, 2015 ).

Problem solving is the most critical aspect of the nursing practice. The fact that nursing requires mental and abstract skills, such as identifying individual needs and finding appropriate remedies, was first stated in 1960s. In 1960s, the nursing theorists Abdellah, Orem, and Levin emphasized the mental aspect of nursing. They argued that the most critical requirement of nurses in the clinical field is the ability to decide on and plan the right action and that nursing care should be founded on a sound knowledge base ( Taşci, 2005 ).

The World Health Organization has stated that “taking measures and applying a problem-solving approach to provide appropriate care is one of the compulsory competencies of nurses” ( Taşci, 2005 ). Thus, enhancing the problem-solving skills of nurses is of great importance in raising the quality of patient care ( Taylor, 2000 ; Yu & Kirk, 2008 ). On the other hand, Bagnal (1981) argued that people with problem-solving skills need to be equipped with personal traits including innovation, clear manifestation of preferences and decisions, having a sense of responsibility, flexible thinking, courage and adventurousness, ability to show distinct ideas, self-confidence, a broad area of interest, acting rationally and objectively, creativity, productivity, and critical perspective (as cited in Çam & Tümkaya, 2008 ).

To provide the best surgical care to a patient, team members must work together effectively ( Sonoda et al., 2018 ). One of the most important factors affecting the quality of healthcare service delivery is effective communication between healthcare professionals and healthcare recipients, with empathy forming the basis for effective communication.

Because of the intrinsic nature of the nursing profession, nurses should have empathy skills. Thus, empathy is the essence of the nursing profession ( Fields et al., 2004 ; Vioulac, Aubree, Massy, & Untas, 2016 ). A review of resources in the literature on problem solving reveals that gathering problem-related data is the first major step toward determining the root causes of a problem. In this respect, empathy is an important skill that helps properly identify a problem. On the basis of the definition of empathy, sensing another person's feelings and thoughts and placing oneself in his or her position or feeling from within his or her frame of reference should work to improve one's problem-solving skills, particularly those skills related to social problem solving ( Taşci, 2005 ; Topçu, Baker, & Aydin, 2010 ; Vioulac et al., 2016 ). It is possible to explain empathic content emotionally as well as cognitively. Emotional empathy (EE) means feeling the emotions of another person and providing the most appropriate response based on his or her emotional state. This is very important in patient–nurse communications. Cognitive empathy (CE) is the ability to recognize the feelings of another without experiencing those feelings yourself ( de Kemp, Overbeek, de Wied, Engels, & Scholte, 2007 ).

Gender, age, level of education, marital status, years of work, duration working at current institution, and problem-solving situations have been shown in the literature not to affect the problem-solving or empathy skills of nurses ( Abaan & Altintoprak, 2005 ; Kelleci & Gölbaşi, 2004 ; Yu & Kirk, 2008 ). Empathy is especially critical to the quality of nursing care and is an essential component of any form of caring relationship. The findings in the literature regarding empathy among nurses are inconsistent ( Yu & Kirk, 2008 ), and no findings in the literature address the relationship between problem-solving skills and empathy skills in operating room nurses.

Today, the healthcare system demands that nurses use their professional knowledge to handle patient problems and needs in flexible and creative ways. Problem solving is a primary focus of the nursing practice and is of great importance to raising the quality of patient care ( Kelleci & Gölbaşi, 2004 ; Yu & Kirk, 2008 ). Enhancing the problem-solving and empathy skills of nurses may be expected to facilitate their identification of the sources of problems encountered during the delivery of healthcare services and their resolution of these problems.

The purposes of this study are to investigate the relationship between problem solving and empathy in operating room nurses and to explore the factors related to these two competencies.

Study Model and Hypotheses

This study is a cross-sectional and descriptive study. The three hypotheses regarding the relationships between the independent variables are as follows:

• H1: Sociodemographic characteristics affect problem-solving skills.
• H2: Sociodemographic characteristics affect level of empathy.
• H3: Problem-solving skills are positively and significantly correlated with empathy.

Study Population and Sample

The study was conducted during the period of May–June 2015 at three hospitals affiliated with Istanbul University. The study population consisted of 121 nurses who were currently working in the operating rooms of these hospitals. The study sample consisted of the 80 nurses who volunteered to participate and answered all of the questions on the inventory.

Data Collection Tool

Study data were gathered using a personal information form, the Interpersonal Problem Solving Inventory (IPSI), and the Basic Empathy Scale.

Personal information form

This questionnaire, created by the researchers, is composed of 10 questions on the age, gender, educational background, organization and department, position, and organizational and professional functions of the respondent.

Interpersonal problem solving inventory

The IPSI, developed and validated by Çam and Tümkaya (2008) , was used in this study. The Cronbach's α internal consistency coefficients of the IPSI subscales were previously evaluated at between .67 and .91. The IPSI includes 50 items, all of which are scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 = strictly inappropriate and 5 = fully appropriate . The lack of self-confidence (LSC) subscale assesses lack of confidence in problem solving. The constructive problem solving (CPS) subscale assesses emotions, thoughts, and behaviors that contribute to the effective and constructive solution of interpersonal problems. The negative approach to the problem subscale assesses intensely the negative emotions and thoughts such as helplessness, pessimism, and disappointment that are experienced when an interpersonal problem is encountered. The abstaining from responsibility subscale assesses failure to take responsibility for solving the problem. The persistent approach (PA) subscale assesses self-assertive/persistent thoughts and behaviors in solving problems encountered in interpersonal relationships. A high score on a subscale indicates a high interpersonal-problem-solving capability for that subscale category ( Çam & Tümkaya, 2008 ). A high score on the negative approach to the problem subscale indicates a higher likelihood of experiencing intense negative feelings and thoughts such as helplessness, pessimism, and sadness when encountering a problem. A high score on CPS indicates that the respondent will show more of the emotions, thoughts, and behaviors that contribute to the problem in an effective and constructive way. A low level of self-confidence indicates that the respondent will exhibit low self-confidence toward effectively resolving a problem. A high score on the abstaining from responsibility subscale indicates a high inclination to assume responsibility to resolve a problem ( Table 1 ). The high level of insistent approach indicates that the participant is more willing to solve problems ( Çam & Tümkaya, 2008 ). In this study, the Cronbach's α reliability coefficients were .901, .899, .763, .679, and .810, respectively.

Basic empathy skill scale

The Basic Empathy Skill Scale was developed by Jolliffe and Farrington (2006) and validated by Topçu et al. (2010) in Turkish. It is a 5-Likert scale (1 = s trictly disagree and 5 = strictly agree ) consisting of 20 items, of which nine measure CE and 11 measure EE. The Cronbach's α coefficients that were calculated for the reliability study range between .76 and .80. The lowest possible scores are 9 and 45 and the highest possible scores are 11 and 55 for the CE and EE subscales, respectively. A high score on the CE subscale indicates that the CE level is high, and a high score on the EE subscale indicates that the EE level is high ( Topçu et al., 2010 ). The two subscales of the Basic Empathy Skill Scale have been found to be highly reliable. The Cronbach's α reliability coefficients in this study were .782 for the CE subscale and .649 for the EE subscale.

Data Collection

The study was conducted between May and June 2015 at three hospitals affiliated with Istanbul University. The researcher explained the study to those nurses who agreed to participate. The questionnaire form was distributed to the participants, the purpose of the investigation was clarified, and permission to use participant data was obtained. The participants completed the questionnaire on their own, and the completed questionnaires were collected afterward. The time required to complete the questionnaire was 15–20 minutes in total.

Evaluation of Data

Number Cruncher Statistical System 2007 (Kaysville, UT, USA) software was used to perform statistical analysis. To compare the quantitative data, in addition to using descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency, ratio, minimum, maximum), the Student t test was used to compare the parameters with the regular distribution in the two groups and the Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the parameters without normal distribution in the two groups. In addition, a one-way analysis of variance test was used to compare three or more groups with normal distribution, and a Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare three or more groups without normal distribution. Pearson's correlation analysis and Spearman's correlation analysis were used to evaluate the relationships among the parameters. Finally, linear regression analysis was employed to evaluate multivariate data. Significance was determined by a p value of < .05.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical conformity approval was obtained from the Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Board at Istanbul Medipol University (108400987-165, issued on March 30, 2015). Written consent was obtained from the administrations of the participating hospitals. Furthermore, the informed consent of nurses who volunteered to participate was obtained. Permission to use the abovementioned scales that were used in this study as data collection tools was obtained via e-mail from their original authors.

Eighty nurses (97.5% female, n = 78; 2.5% male, n = 2) were enrolled as participants. The age of participants ranged between 24 and 64 (mean = 37.56 ± 8.12) years, mean years of professional nursing experience was 15.84 ± 8.30, and mean years working in the current hospital was 13.19 ± 8.23. Other descriptive characteristics for the participants are provided in Table 2 .

A comparison of scale subdimension scores revealed a negative and statistically significant correlation at a level of 22.3%. Statistical significance was reached only between the LSC subscale and the CE subscale ( r = −.223, p = .047; Table 3 ). Thus, a higher LSC score was associated with a lower CE score.

Comparisons between participants' descriptive characteristics and subdimension scores on the problem-solving skill scale revealed no significant differences. Thus, demographic characteristics such as age, educational background, and career length were found to have no influence on problem-solving skills ( p > .05; Table 4 ).

Age, marital status, and professional career length were not found to affect the CE and EE subscale scores, with no statistically significant correlations found between the two subscales ( p > .05; Table 4 ). However, the EE scores of undergraduate nurses were found to be higher than those of postgraduate nurses, at a level that approached statistical significance ( p = .078). In addition, the average CE scores of nurses who had worked for 1–10 and 11–20 years were higher than those of nurses who had worked for 21 years or more, at a level that approached statistical significance ( p = .066).

A statistically significant difference was found between mean years working in the current hospital and educational background, respectively, and CE scores ( p = .027 and p = .013; Table 4 ). On the basis of paired comparison analysis, the CE scores of participants with 1–10 years of working experience at their current hospital were higher than those with ≥ 21 years of working experience at their current hospital ( p = .027). Also on the basis of paired comparison analysis, the CE score of participants educated to the undergraduate level was found to be higher at a statistically significant level than those educated to the master's/doctorate degree level ( p = .013).

The comparison of problem-solving skill scores by descriptive characteristics revealed no statistically significant difference between subscale scores and the variables of age, marital status, length of professional and organizational career, or educational background ( p > .05). Thus, the descriptive characteristics of the participants did not affect their problem-solving skills.

Regression Analysis of Risk Factors Affecting Cognitive and Empathy Skills

Variables found after univariate analysis to have significance levels of p < .01 were subsequently modeled and evaluated. A regression analysis was conducted to determine the effect on CE skills of educational level, duration of institutional work, CPS level, and self-insecurity level. The explanatory power of this model was 29.9% ( R 2 = .299), and the model was significant ( p < .001). As a result of the analysis, CPS ( p = .006), educational status of graduate ( p < .001), and working for the current hospital for a period of more than 20 years ( p = .004) were found to have a significant and positive influence on the CE score.

A 1-unit increase in the CPS score was found to increase CE skills by 0.139 points (β = 0.139, 95% CI [0.041, 0.237], p < .01). For education, graduate education was found to decrease the CE score by 4.520 points (β = −4.520, 95% CI [−6.986, −2.054], p < .001). For duration working for the current hospital, working for the same institution for a period exceeding 20 years was found to decrease the CE score by 3.429 points (β = −3.429, 95% CI [−5.756, −1.102], p < .05). In addition, a 1-unit increase in the LSC score was found to decrease the CE score by 0.114 points, which did not achieve statistical significance (β = 0.114, 95% CI [−0.325, 0.096], p > .05).

Regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of education, PA, and LSC on the risk factors affecting EE. As a result of this evaluation, the explanatory power of the model was determined as 15.3% ( R 2 = .153), which was significant despite the low level ( F = 3.388, p = .001). The effects of PA ( p = .021) and educational status ( p = .015) on the EE score were shown through analysis to be statistically significant ( Table 5 ). A 1-unit increase in PA score was found to increase the EE score by 0.323 points (β = 0.323, 95% CI [0.049, 0.596], p < .05). For education, having a graduate education was found to decrease the EE score by 3.989 points (β = −3.989, 95% CI [−7.193, −0.786], p < .05). Moreover, the LSC score was found to be 0.119 points lower than the EE score. However, this result was not statistically significant (β = −0.193, 95% CI [−0.467, 0.080], p > .05). Dummy variables were used in the regression analysis of sociodemographic characteristics (educational status and years working for the current hospital).

This study found that age, marital status, educational background, years of professional working experience, and years working for the current hospital did not affect the problem-solving skills of the participants. In the literature, the findings of several studies indicate that characteristics such as age, educational background, department of service, and career length do not affect the problem-solving skills of nurses ( Abaan & Altintoprak, 2005 ; Kelleci & Gölbaşi, 2004 ; Yu & Kirk, 2008 ), whereas other studies indicate that these variables do affect these skills ( Ançel, 2006 ; Watt-Watson, Garfinkel, Gallop, Stevens, & Streiner, 2000 ; Yu & Kirk, 2008 ). However, beyond these characteristics, some studies have reported a positive correlation between the problem-solving skills of nurses and their educational level, with this correlation mediated by the physical conditions of the workplace, good relationships with colleagues, and educational background ( Yildiz & Güven, 2009 ). These findings suggest that factors affecting the empathy and problem-solving skills of nurses working in operating rooms differ from known and expected factors.

Operating room nurses deliver dynamic nursing care that requires attention and close observation because of the fast turnover of patients. In addition to the problem-solving skills that they use during the patient care process, these nurses must use or operate a myriad of lifesaving technological devices and equipment ( AbuAlRub, 2004 ; Özgür, Yildirim, & Aktaş, 2008 ). The circumstances in which nurses employ their problem-solving skills are generally near-death critical conditions and emergencies. Furthermore, operating rooms are more isolated than other areas of the hospital, which affects nurses who work in operating rooms and intensive care units ( AbuAlRub, 2004 ; Özgür et al., 2008 ).

Communication is a critical factor that affects the delivery of healthcare services. Communication does not only take place between a service recipient and a provider. To establish a teamwork philosophy between employees, it is essential to build effective communication ( Sandelin & Gustafsson, 2015 ). Empathic communication helps enhance the problem-solving skills of nurses as they work to learn about individual experiences ( Kumcağiz, Yilmaz, Çelik, & Avci, 2011 ). Studies in the literature have found that nurses who are satisfied with their relationships with colleagues, physicians, and supervisors have a high level of problem-solving skills ( Abaan & Altintoprak, 2005 ; Kumcağiz et al., 2011 ) and that higher problem-solving skills are associated with a higher level of individual achievement ( Abaan & Altintoprak, 2005 ; Chan, 2001 ). Another finding of this study is that CPS increases the cognitive emphatic level. This may be attributed to constructive problem-solving skills increasing CE, as these skills are associated with feelings, thoughts, and behaviors that contribute to problem resolution.

A review of the literature on empathy and communication skills revealed, as expected, that these skills increased with level of education ( Kumcağiz et al., 2011 ; Vioulac et al., 2016 ). However, a number of studies have reported no significant correlation between age, marital status, and professional working experience and empathy skills or communication abilities in nurses ( Kumcağiz et al., 2011 ; Yu & Kirk, 2008 ).

EE is assumed to be a more intuitive reaction to emotions. Factors that affect EE are nurses working with small patient groups, frequent contact with patient groups, and long periods spent accompanying or being in close contact with patient groups ( Vioulac et al., 2016 ). Studies in the literature have reported no correlation between the empathy skills of nurses and demographic characteristics ( Vioulac et al., 2016 ). This study supports this finding, with the empathy skills of operating room nurses found to be close to the peak value of the scale.

Studies in the literature reveal a positive correlation between empathy and career length ( Watt-Watson et al., 2000 ; Yu & Kirk, 2008 ) as well as a correlation between increased professional experience and lower empathy ( Yu & Kirk, 2008 ). This study found an association between longer periods working for the same hospital and higher levels of education with lower empathy scores. This may be attributed to the difficult working conditions in operating rooms, intense stress, and high level of potential stress-driven conflicts between employees in work settings.

Stress is a major factor that affects the empathy skills and relationship-building abilities of nurses ( Vioulac et al., 2016 ). Nurses are exposed to a wide variety of stressors such as quality of the service, duration of shifts, workload, time pressures, and limited decision-making authority ( Patrick & Lavery, 2007 ; Shimizutani et al., 2008 ; Vioulac et al., 2016 ). In particular, environments evoking a sense of death (e.g., operating rooms) is another factor known to elevate perceived stress ( Ashker, Penprase, & Salman, 2012 ). High stress may lead to negative consequences such as reduced problem-solving abilities ( Zhao, Lei, He, Gu, & Li, 2015 ). Both having a long nursing career and working in stressful environments such as operating rooms may negatively affect empathy and problem-solving skills. However, this study revealed that working for a long period at the current hospital had no influence on problem-solving skills. The low reliability of the scales means that the variance may be high in other samples that are drawn from the same main sample, with the resultant data thus not reflecting the truth.

Low reliability coefficients reduce the significance and value of the results obtained by increasing the standard error of the data ( Şencan, 2005 ). The Cronbach's α of the EE scale used in the study was between .60 and .80 and is highly trustworthy. However, the Cronbach's α value is close to .60 (i.e., .649). This result may elicit suspicion in regression analysis estimates that are done to determine the variables that affect EE. In the correlation analysis, a statistically significant weak correlation was found only between the LSC subdimension and CE. However, the fact that the subscales of empathy and problem-solving skills are significantly related to the regression models may also be related to the reliability levels of the scales.

According to the results of the regression analysis, all of the variables remaining in Model A affected level of low for the CE ( R 2 = .299). Having constructive problem-solving skills ( p = .006), having a high level of education ( p < .001), and working for the current hospital for over 20 years ( p = .004) were found to be significantly related to CE.

Other variables were found to have no significant effect. According to the results of the regression analysis, all of the remaining variables in Model B accounted for a relatively low portion of the EE ( R 2 = .153). When the t test results for the significance of the regression coefficients were examined, it was determined that PA ( p = .021) and educational status ( p = .015) were significant predictors of EE. Other variables had no significant effect ( Table 5 ). The increase in the level of education of nurses may have increased their cognitive and emotional development. Thus, working in the same hospital for over 20 years was found to increase the levels of CE and EE. This result may be because of greater professional experience and regular experience handling numerous, different problems. In addition, the low explanatory power of the models may also be because of the fact that many other arguments that may affect empathy were not modeled. When constant values are fixed and the value of the independent variables entering the regression formula is zero, constant value is the estimated value of the dependent variable. According to findings of this study, sociodemographic characteristics and problem-solving abilities did not affect empathy level, although the CE value was 31.707 and the EE value was 37.024. Repeating this research in larger and different nurse groups may be useful to verify these research results.

Conclusions

The following results were derived from this study: First, constructive problem-solving skills affect CE skills. EE is adversely affected by the PA and LSC. Second, no correlation was found between the demographic characteristics of nurses and their problem-solving skills. Third, as level of education increases, cognitive and emotional levels of empathy decrease.

Duration of time spent working at one's current healthcare institution and educational level were both found to correlate negatively with the CE score. The higher the educational level and PA and the lower the self-confidence of the participants, the lower their EE levels. Finally, higher constructive problem-solving scores were associated with higher CE skills.

Limitations

The major limitation of the study is that it was conducted in the affiliated hospitals of one healthcare organization. The study data were obtained from operating room nurses who currently worked in these hospitals and who volunteered to participate. The conditions of nurses who did not participate in the study cannot be ascertained. A second important limitation is that the data reflect the subjective perceptions and statements of the participants. A third important limitation is that participant characteristics such as trust in management, trust in the institution, burnout, and communication skills were not assessed. For this reason, the effects of these variables on problem-solving and empathy skills remain unknown.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design: SP

Data collection: TK

Data analysis and interpretation: FA, SP

Drafting of the article: FA

Critical revision of the article: FA

• Cited Here |
• Google Scholar

operating room; critical thinking; surgery; cognitive; emotional

• + Favorites
• View in Gallery

Readers Of this Article Also Read

Effectiveness of a patient safety incident disclosure education program: a..., the relationship between critical thinking skills and learning styles and....

Nursing Diagnosis Guide: All You Need to Know to Master Diagnosing

In this ultimate tutorial and nursing diagnosis list, we’ll walk you through the concepts behind writing nursing diagnosis. Learn what a nursing diagnosis is, its history and evolution, the nursing process , the different types and classifications, and how to write nursing diagnoses correctly. Included also in this guide are tips on how you can formulate better nursing diagnoses, plus guides on how you can use them in creating your nursing care plans .

Table of Contents

• What is a Nursing Diagnosis? 

Purposes of Nursing Diagnosis

Differentiating nursing diagnoses, medical diagnoses, and collaborative problems, classification of nursing diagnoses (taxonomy ii), nursing process, problem-focused nursing diagnosis, risk nursing diagnosis, health promotion diagnosis, syndrome diagnosis, possible nursing diagnosis, problem and definition.

• Etiology 

Risk Factors

Defining characteristics, analyzing data, identifying health problems, risks, and strengths, formulating diagnostic statements, one-part nursing diagnosis statement, two-part nursing diagnosis statement, three-part nursing diagnosis statement, nursing diagnosis for care plans, recommended resources, references and sources, what is a nursing diagnosis.

A nursing diagnosis is a clinical judgment concerning a human response to health conditions/life processes, or a vulnerability to that response, by an individual, family, group, or community. A nursing diagnosis provides the basis for selecting nursing interventions to achieve outcomes for which the nurse has accountability.  Nursing diagnoses are developed based on data obtained during the nursing assessment and enable the nurse to develop the care plan.

The purpose of the nursing diagnosis is as follows:

• For nursing students, nursing diagnoses are an effective teaching tool to help sharpen their problem-solving and critical thinking skills.
• Helps identify nursing priorities and helps direct nursing interventions based on identified priorities.
• Helps the formulation of expected outcomes for quality assurance requirements of third-party payers.
• Nursing diagnoses help identify how a client or group responds to actual or potential health and life processes and knowing their available resources of strengths that can be drawn upon to prevent or resolve problems.
• Provides a common language and forms a basis for communication and understanding between nursing professionals and the healthcare team.
• Provides a basis of evaluation to determine if nursing care was beneficial to the client and cost-effective.

The term nursing diagnosis is associated with different concepts. It may refer to the distinct second step in the nursing process , diagnosis (“D” in “ ADPIE “). Also, nursing diagnosis applies to the label when nurses assign meaning to collected data appropriately labeled a nursing diagnosis. For example, during the assessment , the nurse may recognize that the client feels anxious , fearful, and finds it difficult to sleep . Those problems are labeled with nursing diagnoses: respectively, Anxiety , Fear , and Disturbed Sleep Pattern. In this context, a nursing diagnosis is based upon the patient’s response to the medical condition. It is called a ‘nursing diagnosis’ because these are matters that hold a distinct and precise action associated with what nurses have the autonomy to take action about with a specific disease or condition. This includes anything that is a physical, mental, and spiritual type of response. Hence, a nursing diagnosis is focused on care.

On the other hand, a medical diagnosis is made by the physician or advanced health care practitioner that deals more with the disease, medical condition, or pathological state only a practitioner can treat. Moreover, through experience and know-how, the specific and precise clinical entity that might be the possible cause of the illness will then be undertaken by the doctor, therefore, providing the proper medication that would cure the illness. Examples of medical diagnoses are Diabetes Mellitus , Tuberculosis , Amputation, Hepatitis , and Chronic Kidney Disease.  The medical diagnosis normally does not change. Nurses must follow the physician’s orders and carry out prescribed treatments and therapies.

Collaborative problems are potential problems that nurses manage using both independent and physician-prescribed interventions. These are problems or conditions that require both medical and nursing interventions , with the nursing aspect focused on monitoring the client’s condition and preventing the development of the potential complication.

As explained above, now it is easier to distinguish a nursing diagnosis from a medical diagnosis. Nursing diagnosis is directed towards the patient and their physiological and psychological response. On the other hand, a medical diagnosis is particular to the disease or medical condition. Its center is on the illness.

How are nursing diagnoses listed, arranged, or classified? In 2002, Taxonomy II was adopted, which was based on the Functional Health Patterns assessment framework of Dr. Mary Joy Gordon. Taxonomy II has three levels: Domains (13), Classes (47), and nursing diagnoses. Nursing diagnoses are no longer grouped by Gordon’s patterns but coded according to seven axes: diagnostic concept, time, unit of care, age, health status, descriptor, and topology. In addition, diagnoses are now listed alphabetically by their concept, not by the first word.

• Class 1. Health Awareness
• Class 2. Health Management
• Class 1. Ingestion
• Class 2. Digestion
• Class 3. Absorption
• Class 4. Metabolism
• Class 5. Hydration
• Class 1. Urinary function
• Class 2. Gastrointestinal function
• Class 3. Integumentary function
• Class 4. Respiratory function
• Class 1. Sleep/Rest
• Class 2. Activity/Exercise
• Class 3. Energy balance
• Class 4. Cardiovascular/Pulmonary responses
• Class 5. Self-care
• Class 1. Attention
• Class 2. Orientation
• Class 3. Sensation/Perception
• Class 4. Cognition
• Class 5. Communication
• Class 1. Self-concept
• Class 2. Self-esteem
• Class 3. Body image
• Class 1. Caregiving roles
• Class 2. Family relationships
• Class 3. Role performance
• Class 1. Sexual identity
• Class 2. Sexual function
• Class 3. Reproduction
• Class 1. Post-trauma responses
• Class 2. Coping responses
• Class 3. Neurobehavioral stress
• Class 1. Values
• Class 2. Beliefs
• Class 3. Value/Belief/Action congruence
• Class 1. Infection
• Class 2. Physical injury
• Class 3. Violence
• Class 4. Environmental hazards
• Class 5. Defensive processes
• Class 6. Thermoregulation
• Class 1. Physical comfort
• Class 2. Environmental comfort
• Class 3. Social comfort
• Class 1. Growth
• Class 2. Development

The five stages of the nursing process are assessment, diagnosing, planning , implementation , and evaluation . All steps in the nursing process require critical thinking by the nurse. Apart from understanding nursing diagnoses and their definitions, the nurse promotes awareness of defining characteristics and behaviors of the diagnoses, related factors to the selected nursing diagnoses, and the interventions suited for treating the diagnoses.

The steps, importance, purposes, and characteristics of the nursing process are discussed more in detail here: “ The Nursing Process: A Comprehensive Guide “

Types of Nursing Diagnoses

The four types of nursing diagnosis are Actual (Problem-Focused), Risk, Health Promotion , and Syndrome. Here are the four categories of nursing diagnoses:

A problem-focused diagnosis (also known as actual diagnosis ) is a client problem present at the time of the nursing assessment . These diagnoses are based on the presence of associated signs and symptoms. Actual nursing diagnosis should not be viewed as more important than risk diagnoses. There are many instances where a risk diagnosis can be the diagnosis with the highest priority for a patient.

Problem-focused nursing diagnoses have three components: (1) nursing diagnosis, (2) related factors, and (3) defining characteristics. Examples of actual nursing diagnoses are:

• Anxiety related to stress as evidenced by increased tension, apprehension, and expression of concern regarding upcoming surgery
• Acute pain related to decreased myocardial flow as evidenced by grimacing, expression of pain , guarding behavior.

The second type of nursing diagnosis is called risk nursing diagnosis.  These are clinical judgments that a problem does not exist, but the presence of risk factors indicates that a problem is likely to develop unless nurses intervene. A risk diagnosis is based on the patient’s current health status, past health history , and other risk factors that may increase the patient’s likelihood of experiencing a health problem. These are integral part of nursing care because they help to identify potential problems early on and allows the nurse to take steps to prevent or mitigate the risk.

There are no etiological factors (related factors) for risk diagnoses. The individual (or group) is more susceptible to developing the problem than others in the same or a similar situation because of risk factors. For example, an elderly client with diabetes and vertigo who has difficulty walking refuses to ask for assistance during ambulation may be appropriately diagnosed with risk for injury or risk for falls.

Components of a risk nursing diagnosis include (1) risk diagnostic label, and (2) risk factors. Examples of risk nursing diagnosis are:

• Risk for injury
• Risk for infection

Health promotion diagnosis (also known as wellness diagnosis ) is a clinical judgment about motivation and desire to increase well-being. It is a statement that identifies the patient’s readiness for engaging in activities that promote health and well-being. For example, if a first-time mother shows interest on how to properly breastfeed her baby, a nurse make make a health promotion diagnosis of “Readiness for Enhanced Breastfeeding .” This nursing diagnosis will be then used to guide nursing interventions aimed at supporting the patient in learning about proper breastfeeding.

Additionally, health promotion diagnosis is concerned with the individual, family, or community transition from a specific level of wellness to a higher level of wellness. Components of a health promotion diagnosis generally include only the diagnostic label or a one-part statement. Examples of health promotion diagnosis:

• Readiness for enhanced health literacy

A syndrome diagnosis is a clinical judgment concerning a cluster of problem or risk nursing diagnoses that are predicted to present because of a certain situation or event. They, too, are written as a one-part statement requiring only the diagnostic label. Examples of a syndrome nursing diagnosis are:

• Chronic Pain Syndrome

A possible nursing diagnosis is not a type of diagnosis as are actual, risk, health promotion , and syndrome. Possible nursing diagnoses are statements describing a suspected problem for which additional data are needed to confirm or rule out the suspected problem. It provides the nurse with the ability to communicate with other nurses that a diagnosis may be present but additional data collection is indicated to rule out or confirm the diagnosis. Examples include:

• Possible chronic low self-esteem
• Possible social isolation .

Components of a Nursing Diagnosis

A nursing diagnosis has typically three components: (1) the problem and its definition, (2) the etiology, and (3) the defining characteristics or risk factors (for risk diagnosis).

The problem statement , or the diagnostic label , describes the client’s health problem or response to which nursing therapy is given concisely. A diagnostic label usually has two parts: qualifier and focus of the diagnosis. Qualifiers (also called modifiers ) are words that have been added to some diagnostic labels to give additional meaning, limit, or specify the diagnostic statement. Exempted in this rule are one-word nursing diagnoses (e.g., Anxiety, Constipation , Diarrhea , Nausea , etc.) where their qualifier and focus are inherent in the one term.

The etiology , or related factors , component of a nursing diagnosis label identifies one or more probable causes of the health problem, are the conditions involved in the development of the problem, gives direction to the required nursing therapy, and enables the nurse to individualize the client’s care. Nursing interventions should be aimed at etiological factors in order to remove the underlying cause of the nursing diagnosis. Etiology is linked with the problem statement with the phrase “ related to ” for example:

• Activity intolerance related to generalized weakness .
• Decreased cardiac output related to abnormality in blood profile

Risk factors are used instead of etiological factors for risk nursing diagnosis. Risk factors are forces that put an individual (or group) at an increased vulnerability to an unhealthy condition. Risk factors are written following the phrase “as evidenced by” in the diagnostic statement.

• Risk for falls as evidenced by old age and use of walker.
• Risk for infection as evidenced by break in skin integrity .

Defining characteristics are the clusters of signs and symptoms that indicate the presence of a particular diagnostic label. In actual nursing diagnosis, the defining characteristics are the identified signs and symptoms of the client. For risk nursing diagnosis, no signs and symptoms are present therefore the factors that cause the client to be more susceptible to the problem form the etiology of a risk nursing diagnosis. Defining characteristics are written following the phrase “as evidenced by” or “as manifested by” in the diagnostic statement.

Diagnostic Process: How to Diagnose

There are three phases during the diagnostic process: (1) data analysis, (2) identification of the client’s health problems, health risks, and strengths, and (3) formulation of diagnostic statements.

Analysis of data involves comparing patient data against standards, clustering the cues, and identifying gaps and inconsistencies.

In this decision-making step, after data analysis, the nurse and the client identify problems that support tentative actual, risk, and possible diagnoses. It involves determining whether a problem is a nursing diagnosis, medical diagnosis, or a collaborative problem. Also, at this stage, the nurse and the client identify the client’s strengths, resources, and abilities to cope.

Formulation of diagnostic statements is the last step of the diagnostic process wherein the nurse creates diagnostic statements. The process is detailed below.

How to Write a Nursing Diagnosis?

In writing nursing diagnostic statements, describe an individual’s health status and the factors that have contributed to the status. You do not need to include all types of diagnostic indicators. Writing diagnostic statements vary per type of nursing diagnosis (see below).

Another way of writing nursing diagnostic statements is by using the PES format, which stands for Problem (diagnostic label), Etiology (related factors), and Signs/Symptoms (defining characteristics). Diagnostic statements can be one-part, two-part, or three-part using the PES format.

Health promotion nursing diagnoses are usually written as one-part statements because related factors are always the same: motivated to achieve a higher level of wellness through related factors may be used to improve the chosen diagnosis. Syndrome diagnoses also have no related factors. Examples of one-part nursing diagnosis statements include:

• Readiness for enhanced coping
• Rape Trauma Syndrome

Risk and possible nursing diagnoses have two-part statements: the first part is the diagnostic label and the second is the validation for a risk nursing diagnosis or the presence of risk factors. It’s not possible to have a third part for risk or possible diagnoses because signs and symptoms do not exist. Examples of two-part nursing diagnosis statements include:

• Risk for infection as evidenced by weakened immune system response
• Risk for injury as evidenced by unstable hemodynamic profile

An actual or problem-focus nursing diagnosis has three-part statements: diagnostic label, contributing factor (“related to”), and signs and symptoms (“as evidenced by” or “as manifested by”). The three-part nursing diagnosis statement is also called the PES format which includes the Problem, Etiology, and Signs and Symptoms. Example of three-part nursing diagnosis statements include:

• Acute pain related to tissue ischemia as evidenced by statement of “I feel severe pain on my chest!”

Variations on Basic Statement Formats

Variations in writing nursing diagnosis statement formats include the following:

• Using “ secondary to ” to divide the etiology into two parts to make the diagnostic statement more descriptive and useful. Following the “secondary to” is often a pathophysiologic or disease process or a medical diagnosis. For example, Risk for Decreased Cardiac Output related to reduced preload secondary to myocardial infarction .
• Using “ complex factors ” when there are too many etiologic factors or when they are too complex to state in a brief phrase. For example, Chronic Low Self-Esteem related to complex factors.
• Using “ unknown etiology ” when the defining characteristics are present but the nurse does not know the cause or contributing factors. For example, Ineffective Coping related to unknown etiology.
• Specifying a second part of the general response or diagnostic label to make it more precise. For example, Impaired Skin Integrity (Right Anterior Chest) related to disruption of skin surface secondary to burn injury .

This section is the list or database of the common nursing diagnosis examples that you can use to develop your nursing care plans .

See also: Nursing Care Plans (NCP): Ultimate Guide and List

• Chronic Pain
• Constipation
• Decreased Cardiac Output
• Hopelessness
• Hyperthermia
• Hypothermia

Recommended nursing diagnosis and nursing care plan books and resources.

Disclosure: Included below are affiliate links from Amazon at no additional cost from you. We may earn a small commission from your purchase. For more information, check out our privacy policy .

Ackley and Ladwig’s Nursing Diagnosis Handbook: An Evidence-Based Guide to Planning Care We love this book because of its evidence-based approach to nursing interventions. This care plan handbook uses an easy, three-step system to guide you through client assessment, nursing diagnosis, and care planning. Includes step-by-step instructions showing how to implement care and evaluate outcomes, and help you build skills in diagnostic reasoning and critical thinking.

Nursing Care Plans – Nursing Diagnosis & Intervention (10th Edition) Includes over two hundred care plans that reflect the most recent evidence-based guidelines. New to this edition are ICNP diagnoses, care plans on LGBTQ health issues, and on electrolytes and acid-base balance.

Nurse’s Pocket Guide: Diagnoses, Prioritized Interventions, and Rationales Quick-reference tool includes all you need to identify the correct diagnoses for efficient patient care planning. The sixteenth edition includes the most recent nursing diagnoses and interventions and an alphabetized listing of nursing diagnoses covering more than 400 disorders.

Nursing Diagnosis Manual: Planning, Individualizing, and Documenting Client Care  Identify interventions to plan, individualize, and document care for more than 800 diseases and disorders. Only in the Nursing Diagnosis Manual will you find for each diagnosis subjectively and objectively – sample clinical applications, prioritized action/interventions with rationales – a documentation section, and much more!

All-in-One Nursing Care Planning Resource – E-Book: Medical-Surgical, Pediatric, Maternity, and Psychiatric-Mental Health   Includes over 100 care plans for medical-surgical, maternity/OB, pediatrics, and psychiatric and mental health. Interprofessional “patient problems” focus familiarizes you with how to speak to patients.

Other recommended site resources for this nursing care plan:

• Nursing Care Plans (NCP): Ultimate Guide and Database MUST READ! Over 150+ nursing care plans for different diseases and conditions. Includes our easy-to-follow guide on how to create nursing care plans from scratch.
• Nursing Diagnosis Guide and List: All You Need to Know to Master Diagnosing Our comprehensive guide on how to create and write diagnostic labels. Includes detailed nursing care plan guides for common nursing diagnostic labels.

References for this Nursing Diagnosis guide and recommended resources to further your reading.

• Berman, A., Snyder, S., & Frandsen, G. (2016).  Kozier & Erb’s Fundamentals of Nursing: Concepts, process and practice . Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Edel, M. (1982). The nature of nursing diagnosis. In J. Carlson, C. Craft, & A. McGuire (Eds.), Nursing diagnosis (pp. 3-17). Philadelphia: Saunders.
• Fry, V. (1953). The Creative approach to nursing. AJN, 53(3), 301-302.
• Gordon, M. (1982). Nursing diagnosis: Process and application. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Gordon, M. (2014).  Manual of nursing diagnosis . Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
• Gebbie, K., & Lavin, M. (1975.) Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the First National Conference. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
• McManus, R. L. (1951). Assumption of functions in nursing. In Teachers College, Columbia University, Regional planning for nurses and nursing education . New York: Columbia University Press.
• Powers, P. (2002). A discourse analysis of nursing diagnosis . Qualitative health research , 12 (7), 945-965.

88 thoughts on “Nursing Diagnosis Guide: All You Need to Know to Master Diagnosing”

Very useful document indeed.

Thank you Sima! Hope it helps come up with great nursing care plans!

Thank you for this resource material. This is very simple, concise and easy to understand. This would be of great help both for the students and the teacher.

Please make proper table for nursing diagnosis it’ll be easy to read and understand .

This is simple and easy to understand.

Happy to know! Hope you visit our guide on nursing care plans too! Thanks for dropping by Modupe!

I need a complete pdf file

Hi! If you want to save it as a PDF file, simply “Print” this page and “Save as PDF”.

So very happy to stumble upon nurseslabs. Thanks so much

Happy to have helped you. Please do check out our nursing care plans list too! Thanks for visiting, Hussaina!

I want to acknowledge the writer of Understand, Matt Vera for using the initiative in simplifying the nursing notes into simple English that we as upcoming nursing students can understand nursing notes in order to practice them in our clinical. I’ve learned so much from this website and I want to be part of the nurses website so I can gather some more informations. Get me on my email. Thanks so much..

Thank you Lawrencia. Glad to be of help!

VERY NICE EXPLANATION .THANK YOU . DEAR MADAM /SIR PLEASE CAN YOU PROVIDE ME LIST OF NURSING DIAGNOSIS ALONG WITH REVISED ONE TILL DATE . I am Lecturer in college of nursing ,India Thank You

this is so educative thank you

Thank you! Glad you liked it.

really simple and effective, thank you so much.

This is great! Simple and easy to understand for the nursing students.

Comment:nice work, great nurses.

I am a nurse more than 30 yeras and try to teach my team how to used nursing process but it not success. You make me feel it simple and easy to understand . I will use your concept for my team. Thank you somuch

THANK, THANK YOU, THANK YOU FOR THE RESOURCEFUL INFORMATION.

please i want care plan on risk for unstable blood pressure i am a nursing student

@joseph auarshie jnr, can you please send me your care plan if you made it already ? I am a nursing student too. Thank you appreciated

Thanks, I look forward to learning more from you and maybe joining you in writing once am done with school. It’s awesome.

You’re very much welcome! Please feel free to ask further questions. Thank you and goodluck!

I what to check out nursing care plan

Comment: good explanation of health issue pattern

This is great. Thanks for given your time to this. Is so educative. Up thumb

Thanks alot am so interested on this

Great Work!

Thank you for the resourceful information which I was thought in school but almost forgotten until now, brain refresh, thanks

Excellent job done congratulations to all the team worker .

Please is the component of nursing diagnosis the same as type of nursing diagnosis

Each time I research about nursing diagnoses, there is something new to learn. This is a very well written piece giving great insights about nursing. More than ever, I have a better understanding of the unique body of nursing knowledge. Bravo to the Matt and entire Nurseslabs team

Thank you! Be sure to visit also our nursing care plans here .

Sorry madam the risk factors thus the potential problem has the related factors not the sign and symptom because that something has not happed yet so there is no sign and symptoms. Thank you

Excellent work and expertise team work

Usefull information

Nice work Sir/Madam thank you for giving us more hints on Nursing Diagnoses. Excellent team work.

Thank you so much for this nursing diagnosis.

Formulations of the DX has been hectic but thanks to matt vera has been of great help especally answering medsurge quizes just try to expand more on the second part (related to)of actual diagnosis

Hi Mary, Thanks you so much for your comment and endorsement. We welcome your students, thanks again!

Very useful indeed. thank you

I’m practicing nursing diagnosis by using the practice case studies my professor provided but I’m not sure if I’m doing it correctly. Here’s what I’m thinking: Problem:Anxiety Etiology: morning bouts of fear Signs and symptoms: patient stated waking nervous, light headed, agitated, and having a pounding heart Anxiety related to morning bouts of fear as evidenced by patient’s reports of waking light headed, agitated, and having a pounding heart.

In this case study we know to patient has been experiencing anxiety since childhood and was verbally abused by his father. His anxiety is causing difficulties for him to make decisions and he fears he’ll experience misfortunes whenever going to school. We also know about these bouts he has ever morning, which I thought would be a good primary diagnosis because they almost seem like a panic attack which would be extreme anxiety which is a big deal right? Am I thinking about this the right way or not and if not, what should I be concerned about as most important and how should my diagnosis be worded?

The nursing diagnostic statement you made sounds right. For the “as evidenced by” part, I would add the statement of the patient in verbatim since this is a subjective data (place it also under quotation marks) and if possible, do your own assessment and objectively obtain the data.

I would write it this way:

Anxiety related to morning bouts of fear as evidenced by increased in heart rate, apprehensiveness, and patient stating “waking lightheaded, agitated, and having a pounding heart”

well precised and nice to read.

Thanks so much for this readings, am so interested with this website I hope i could use this for my whole time

Hello Professor Matt Vera

I am Mai Ba Hai, from Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy,faculty of nursing.I found that this content is very useful and helpful to me. I think that this content is really fit to my teaching, so I would like to ask your permission that I can translate this content into my languages (Vietnamese) to teach for my nursing students in Vietnam. I will cite you as author of this document. If you are willing to help in this point I really appreciate about it. I am looking forward to receiving your agreement. Yours sincerely.

This is so fantastic!! Thank you for taking out time to create this wonderful piece

You guys are wonderful. Thanks so much.

Very nice and very interested More ink to your pen I pray

Very useful, thank you so much

Thanks so much for the good job. Nurse Timothy Idachaba (RN, RNE, .MSC in view) from Nigeria

Matt Vera, BSN, R.N, First, I want to thank you for your amazing, short and precise note you provided for us. But I think I’ve got some trouble understanding about 3 components of Nursing diagnosis. This is because there is some variation between defining characteristics among your examples of actual and potential nursing diagnosis. Actual nursing diagnosis -Ineffective breathing pattern related to decreased lung expansion AS EVIDENCED BY dyspnoea, coughing, and difficulty of breathing. Risk diagnosis -Risk for ineffective airway clearance AS EVIDENCED BY accumulation_of_secreations_in_the_Lung. -Risk for fall AS EVIDENCED BY Muscle_weakness ……………………………………………………. As I know before, risk Nursing diagnosis misses Defining characteristics. because, the problem is not happened. but it is to happen.

So, when I compare defining characteristics among actual and risk diagnosis, there is disagreement. Accumulation of secretion in the lung is aetiology for ineffective airway clearance. But you provided it as defining characteristics. So, please make it clear.

Well elaborated, i like using nurseslabs, i always understand easily

Educative I appreciate

Such a beautiful explanation. Thank you

Very comprehensive and understandable. A job Well done by the group

Nice piece, thanks for painstakingly organizing this concise notes, God bless you

Very educative and simple to understand. Thank you for the effort

This is very handy. Your work is appreciated

This is an excellent work . I was having lectures just now on nursing diagnosis and care plan and this note helps me a lot

Its so helpful. Thank you!

Very good content. Happy to learn the Nursing diagnosis. Thanks Nurseslabs

This is a great educative article, kind of review of the nursing diagnosis. Thanks a lot for refreshing my memory.

Sorry, it’s not.

This was so simple and very helpful

So simple, concise and very helpful.

I APPRECIATE THIS WORK, USEFUL AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND.

Beautiful. I love the nursing care plan links. it is just what I have been searching for to assist my students. Thank you

I’ve been a nurse (currently working PRN) since 2015 and not having used nursing diagnosis in my day to day, this source was super helpful and a great refresher! Much thanks to the author!

Thanks for this it was very good and easy to comprehend

Thank you for your opinion; however, I agree with Mebratu. The description shown in your article for statement of “risk for” problem is confusing to me.

My view is as follows: “Actual problem” has 3 parts: nursing diagnosis (client’s problem) related to etiology (pathophysiology of what is causing the problem) as evidenced by defining characteristics (signs and symptoms of the problem)

“Risk for problem” has 2 parts: nursing diagnosis (client’s potential problem) related to etiology (client condition that may cause the problem) There is no “as evidenced by” because there IS no evidence of the problem since the problem does not yet exist.

Very nice and easy explanation, thanku

Please I need the actual manual that’s currently being used or at least a link to it -the NANDA-I document.

For the most current NANDA-I Nursing Diagnosis manual, you might want to check out the latest edition of the “Nursing Diagnosis Handbook” by NANDA International. This handbook is frequently updated with new diagnoses and guidelines.

congratulations MATT VERA, for the very nice and usefully presentation in nursing diagnosis. it has been very usefully for patient care and teaching activities. simple and very nice understandable.

Thanks a lot Matt Vera for the simplicity of the nursing diagnoses. Continue with other pieces of work

You’re welcome! I’m thrilled to hear you found the simplicity of the nursing diagnoses helpful. Your encouragement means a lot, and I’m definitely motivated to keep creating and simplifying more content for you and others in the nursing community.

If there are any specific topics or areas you’d like to see covered next, please let me know. Your feedback is invaluable in guiding the work I do.

Really interesting I thank you

Very impressive step by step explanations

Its good explanation. how to download

Really helpful Thank you

Hi Aneena, You’re welcome! I’m glad to hear you found the nursing diagnosis guide helpful. Is there a particular area or diagnosis you’d like to explore more deeply, or do you have any other questions about nursing diagnoses? Always here to help!

what a wonderful text,i really love it…….

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

The Ultimate Guide to Nursing Diagnosis in 2024

What is a nursing diagnosis.

• NANDA Nursing Diagnosis
• Classification

NANDA Nursing Diagnosis List

Writing a nursing diagnosis.

• Nursing Diagnosis vs Medical Diagnosis
• American vs International

A nursing diagnosis is a part of the nursing process and is a clinical judgment that helps nurses determine the plan of care for their patients. These diagnoses drive possible interventions for the patient, family, and community. They are developed with thoughtful consideration of a patient’s physical assessment and can help measure outcomes for the nursing care plan .

In this article, we'll explore the NANDA nursing diagnosis list, examples of nursing diagnoses, and the 4 types. 

Some nurses may see nursing diagnoses as outdated and arduous. However, it is an essential tool that promotes patient safety by utilizing evidence-based nursing research. 

According to NANDA-I, the official definition of the nursing diagnosis is: 

“Nursing diagnosis is a clinical judgment about individual, family, or community responses to actual or potential health problems/life processes. A nursing diagnosis provides the basis for selection of nursing interventions to achieve outcomes for which the nurse is accountable.”

Popular Online Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) Programs

GCU's College of Nursing and Health Care Professions has a nearly 35-year tradition of preparing students to fill evolving healthcare roles as highly qualified professionals. GCU offers a full spectrum of nursing degrees, from a pre-licensure BSN degree to a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) program.

Enrollment: Nationwide

• MSN - Family NP
• MSN - Adult Gerontology Acute Care NP
• MSN - Nursing Education
• MSN - Health Informatics
• MSN - Public Health Nursing
• MSN - Health Care Quality & Patient Safety
• MBA & MSN - Nursing Leadership in Health Care Systems
• See more GCU nursing programs

WGU's award-winning online programs are created to help you succeed while graduating faster and with less debt. WGU is a CCNE accredited, nonprofit university offering nursing bachelor's and master's degrees.

• BSN-to-MSN - Family NP
• BSN-to-MSN - Psychiatric Mental Health NP
• BSN-to-MSN - Nursing Education
• RN-to-MSN - Nursing Education
• RN-to-MSN - Nursing Leadership & Management

As a working RN, you need a flexible, transfer-friendly program to help you save time and money as you take the next step in your nursing career. In our CCNE-accredited4 RN to BSN program, you can transfer in up to 134 credits—which is nearly 75% of program requirements. Your transfer credits can be reviewed in one business day (on average).

Enrollment: FL

• MSN - Pediatric NP - Primary Care
• MSN - Adult-Gerontology NP - Primary Care
• MSN - Psychiatric-Mental Health NP
• MSN - Nursing Leadership & Admin
• MSN - Healthcare Tech, Simulation & Informatics
• See more Rasmussen nursing programs

Enrollment: Nationwide, excluding NY and WA.

• MSN - Women's Health NP
• MSN - Nurse-Midwifery/Women's Health NP

What is The Purpose of a Nursing Diagnosis?

According to NANDA International , a nursing diagnosis is “a judgment based on a comprehensive nursing assessment.” The nursing diagnosis is based on the patient’s current situation and health assessment, allowing nurses and other healthcare providers to see a patient's care from a holistic perspective. 

Proper nursing diagnoses can lead to greater patient safety, quality care, and increased reimbursement from private health insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid. 

They are just as beneficial to nurses as they are to patients.

NANDA Nursing Diagnosis 

NANDA diagnoses help strengthen a nurse’s awareness, professional role, and professional abilities. 

Formed in 1982, NANDA  is a professional organization that develops, researches, disseminates, and refines the nursing terminology of nursing diagnosis. Originally an acronym for the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, NANDA was renamed to NANDA International in 2002 as a response to its broadening worldwide membership.

According to its website, NANDA International’s mission is to:

• Provide the world’s leading evidence-based nursing diagnoses for use in practice and to determine interventions and outcomes
• Contribute to patient safety through the integration of evidence-based terminology into clinical practice and clinical decision-making
• Fund research through the NANDA-I Foundation
• Be a supportive and energetic global network of nurses, who are committed to improving the quality of nursing care and improvement of patient safety through evidence-based practice

NANDA members can be found worldwide, specifically in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Portugal, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Netherlands, Belgium, and Nigeria-Ghana.  

NANDA Classification of Nursing Diagnoses

NANDA-I adopted the Taxonomy II after consideration and collaboration with the National Library of Medicine (NLM) in regards to healthcare terminology codes. Taxonomy II has three levels: domains, classes, and nursing diagnoses. 

There are currently 13 domains and 47 classes:

• Health Awareness
• Health Management
• Urinary Function
• Gastrointestinal Function
• Integumentary Function
• Respiratory Function
• Activity/Exercise
• Energy Balance
• Cardiovascular-Pulmonary Responses
• Orientation
• Sensation/Perception
• Communication
• Self-concept
• Self-esteem
• Caregiving Roles
• Family Relationships
• Role Performance
• Sexual Identity
• Sexual Function
• Reproduction
• Post-trauma Responses
• Coping Response
• Neuro-Behavioral Stress
• Value/Belief Action Congruence
• Physical Injury
• Environmental Hazards
• Defensive Processes
• Thermoregulation
• Physical Comfort
• Environmental Comfort
• Social Comfort
• Development

  This refined Taxonomy is based on the Functional Health Patterns assessment framework of Dr. Mary Joy Gordon. Furthermore, the NLM suggested changes because the Taxonomy I code structure included information about the location and the level of the diagnosis. 

NANDA-I nursing diagnoses and Taxonomy II comply with the International Standards Organization (ISO) terminology model for a nursing diagnosis. 

The terminology is also registered with Health Level Seven International (HL7), an international healthcare informatics standard that allows for nursing diagnoses to be identified in specific electronic messages among different clinical information systems. 

A full list of NANDA-I-approved nursing diagnoses can be found here . Additional examples include:

• Dysfunctional ventilatory weaning response
• Impaired transferability
• Activity intolerance
• Situational low self-esteem
• Risk for disturbed maternal-fetal dyad
• Impaired emancipated decision-making
• Risk for impaired skin integrity
• Risk for metabolic imbalance syndrome
• Urge urinary incontinence
• Risk for unstable blood pressure
• Impaired verbal communication
• Acute confusion
• Disturbed body image
• Relocation stress syndrome
• Ineffective role performance
• Readiness for enhanced sleep

Examples of Nursing Diagnoses

The three main components of a nursing diagnosis are as follows.

• Problem and its definition
• Defining characteristics or risk factors 

Examples of proper nursing diagnoses may include:

>> Related: What is the Nursing Process?

NANDA Nursing Diagnosis Types

There are 4 types of nursing diagnoses according to NANDA-I. They are:

• Problem-focused
• Health promotion

Popular Online RN-to-BSN Programs

When you earn an ASU nursing degree, you are gaining skills from a respected and accredited institution. Our online nursing degrees are accredited by the Arizona State Board of Nursing and the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education.

1. Problem-focused diagnosis

A patient problem present during a nursing assessment is known as a problem-focused diagnosis. Generally, the problem is seen throughout several shifts or a patient’s entire hospitalization. However, depending on the nursing and medical care, it may be resolved during a shift. 

Problem-focused diagnoses have three components. 

• Nursing diagnosis
• Related factors
• Defining characteristics

Examples of this type of nursing diagnosis include:

• Decreased cardiac output 
• Chronic functional constipation
• Impaired gas exchange

Problem-focused nursing diagnoses are typically based on signs and symptoms present in the patient. They are the most common nursing diagnoses and the easiest to identify. 

2. Risk nursing diagnosis

A risk nursing diagnosis applies when risk factors require intervention from the nurse and healthcare team prior to a real problem developing.

• Risk for imbalanced fluid volume
• Risk for ineffective childbearing process
• Risk for impaired oral mucous membrane integrity

This type of diagnosis often requires clinical reasoning and nursing judgment.

3. Health promotion diagnosis

The goal of a health promotion nursing diagnosis is to improve the overall well-being of an individual, family, or community.

• Readiness for enhanced family processes
• Readiness for enhanced hope
• Sedentary lifestyle

4. Syndrome diagnosis

A syndrome diagnosis refers to a cluster of nursing diagnoses that occur in a pattern or can all be addressed through the same or similar nursing interventions.

Examples of this diagnosis include:

• Decreased cardiac output
• Decreased cardiac tissue perfusion
• Ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion
• Ineffective peripheral tissue perfusion

Possible nursing diagnosis

While not an official type of nursing diagnosis, possible nursing diagnosis applies to problems suspected to arise. This occurs when risk factors are present and require additional information to diagnose a potential problem.

Nursing Diagnosis Components

The three main components of a nursing diagnosis are:

• Etiology or risk factors 

1. The problem statement explains the patient’s current health problem and the nursing interventions needed to care for the patient. 

2. Etiology, or related factors , describes the possible reasons for the problem or the conditions in which it developed. These related factors guide the appropriate nursing interventions. 

3. Finally, defining characteristics are signs and symptoms that allow for applying a specific diagnostic label. Risk factors are used in place of defining characteristics for risk nursing diagnosis. They refer to factors that increase the patient’s vulnerability to health problems.

>> Show Me Online Nursing Programs

Problem-focused and risk diagnoses are the most difficult nursing diagnoses to write because they have multiple parts. According to NANDA-I , the simplest ways to write these nursing diagnoses are as follows:

PROBLEM-FOCUSED DIAGNOSIS

Problem-Focused Diagnosis related to ______________________ (Related Factors) as evidenced by _________________________ (Defining Characteristics).

RISK DIAGNOSIS

The correct statement for a NANDA-I nursing diagnosis would be: Risk for _____________ as evidenced by __________________________ (Risk Factors).

Nursing Diagnosis vs Medical Diagnosis 

While all important,  nursing diagnoses  are primarily handled through specific nursing interventions, while  medical diagnoses are  made by a physician or advanced healthcare practitioner.

The nursing diagnosis can be mental, spiritual, psychosocial, and/or physical. It focuses on the overall care of the patient while the medical diagnosis involves the medical aspect of the patient’s condition.

 A medical diagnosis does not change if the condition is resolved, and it remains part of the patient’s health history forever. A nursing diagnosis, however, generally refers to a specific period of time. 

Examples of medical diagnosis include:

• Congestive Heart Failure
• Diabetes Insipidus

Collaborative problems are ones that can be resolved or worked on through both nursing and medical interventions. Oftentimes, nurses will monitor the problems while the medical providers prescribe medications or obtain diagnostic tests. 

History of Nursing Diagnoses

• 1973: The first conference to identify nursing knowledge and a classification system; NANDA was founded
• 1977: First Canadian Conference takes place in Toronto
• 1982: NANDA formed with members from the United States and Canada
• 1984: NANDA established a Diagnosis Review Committee
• 1987: American Nurses Association (ANA) officially recognizes NANDA to govern the development of a classification system for nursing diagnosis
• 1987: International Nursing Conference held in Alberta, Canada
• 1990: 9th NANDA conference and the official definition of the nursing diagnosis established
• 1997: Official journal renamed from “Nursing Diagnosis” to “Nursing Diagnosis: The International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications”
• 2002: NANDA changes to NANDA International (NANDA-I) and Taxonomy II released
• 2020: 244 NANDA-I approved diagnosis 

American vs. International Nursing Diagnosis

There is currently no difference between American nursing diagnoses and international nursing diagnoses. Because NANDA-I is an international organization, the approved nursing diagnoses are the same. 

Discrepancies may occur when the translation of a nursing diagnosis into another language alters the syntax and structure. However, since there are NANDA-I offices around the world, the non-English nursing diagnoses are essentially the same. 

What is an example of a nursing diagnosis? 

• A nursing diagnosis is something a nurse can make that does not require an advanced provider’s input. It is not a medical diagnosis. An example of a nursing diagnosis is: Excessive fluid volume related to congestive heart failure as evidenced by symptoms of edema.

What is the most common nursing diagnosis? 

• According to NANDA, some of the most common nursing diagnoses include pain, risk of infection, constipation, and body temperature imbalance. 

What is a potential nursing diagnosis?

• A potential problem is an issue that could occur with the patient’s medical diagnosis, but there are no current signs and symptoms of it. For instance, skin integrity breakdown could occur in a patient with limited mobility. 

How is a nursing diagnosis written?

• Nursing diagnoses are written with a problem or potential problem related to a medical condition, as evidenced by any presenting symptoms. There are 4 types of nursing diagnoses: risk-focused, problem-focused, health promotion-focused, or syndrome-focused.

What is the clinical diagnosis?

• A clinical diagnosis is the official medical diagnosis issued by a physician or other advanced care professional. 

Find Nursing Programs

Kathleen Gaines (nee Colduvell) is a nationally published writer turned Pediatric ICU nurse from Philadelphia with over 13 years of ICU experience. She has an extensive ICU background having formerly worked in the CICU and NICU at several major hospitals in the Philadelphia region. After earning her MSN in Education from Loyola University of New Orleans, she currently also teaches for several prominent Universities making sure the next generation is ready for the bedside. As a certified breastfeeding counselor and trauma certified nurse, she is always ready for the next nursing challenge.

Plus, get exclusive access to discounts for nurses, stay informed on the latest nurse news, and learn how to take the next steps in your career.

By clicking “Join Now”, you agree to receive email newsletters and special offers from Nurse.org. You may unsubscribe at any time by using the unsubscribe link, found at the bottom of every email.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Problem solving in nursing practice: application, process, skill acquisition and measurement

Affiliation.

• 1 King's College, University of London, England.
• PMID: 8320382
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18060886.x

This paper analyses the role of problem solving in nursing practice including the process, acquisition and measurement of problem-solving skills. It is argued that while problem-solving ability is acknowledged as critical if today's nurse practitioner is to maintain effective clinical practice, to date it retains a marginal place in nurse education curricula. Further, it has attracted limited empirical study. Such an omission, it is argued, requires urgent redress if the nursing profession is to meet effectively the challenges of the next decade and beyond.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• The perceived problem-solving ability of nurse managers. Terzioglu F. Terzioglu F. J Nurs Manag. 2006 Jul;14(5):340-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00551.x. J Nurs Manag. 2006. PMID: 16787468
• Problem-solving skills of senior student nurses: an exploratory study using simulation. Roberts JD. Roberts JD. Int J Nurs Stud. 2000 Apr;37(2):135-43. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(99)00064-4. Int J Nurs Stud. 2000. PMID: 10684955
• Clinical problem-solving in nursing: insights from the literature. Taylor C. Taylor C. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Apr;31(4):842-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01342.x. J Adv Nurs. 2000. PMID: 10759980 Review.
• Knowledge-driven problem-solving models in nursing education. Chowlowski KM, Chan LK. Chowlowski KM, et al. J Nurs Educ. 1995 Apr;34(4):148-54. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19950401-04. J Nurs Educ. 1995. PMID: 7782881 Review.
• Responsible education for today's professional nurses. Bartels JE. Bartels JE. J Prof Nurs. 1997 Jan-Feb;13(1):4. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(97)80018-x. J Prof Nurs. 1997. PMID: 9183104 No abstract available.

Publication types

• Search in MeSH

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.