current research topics in developmental psychology

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Guided Meditations
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2024 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

Developmental Psychology Topics

Topics for research, papers, and other projects

Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Emily is a board-certified science editor who has worked with top digital publishing brands like Voices for Biodiversity, Study.com, GoodTherapy, Vox, and Verywell.

• Childhood Topics
• Adolescence Topics
• Adulthood Topics
• How to Choose
• Tips for Students

Are you looking for a developmental psychology topic for a psychology paper , experiment, or science fair project? Topics you might pick can range from prenatal development to health during the final stages of life.

Developmental psychology is a broad topic that involves studying how people grow and change throughout their whole lifetime. Topics don't just include physical growth but also the emotional, cognitive, and social development that people experience at different stages of their lives.

At a Glance

The following are just a few different topics that might help inspire you. Remember, these are just ideas to help you get started. You might opt to explore one of these areas, or you might think of a related question that interests you as well.

Developmental Psychology Topics on Childhood

• Could packaging nutritious foods in visually appealing ways encourage children to make healthier food choices?
• Do children who listen to music while studying perform better or worse on exams?
• Do students who eat breakfast perform better in school than those who do not eat breakfast?
• Does birth order have an impact on procrastination ? Are first-borns less likely to procrastinate? Are last-borns more likely to put off tasks until the last minute?
• Does teaching infants sign language help or hinder the language acquisition process?
• How do parenting styles impact a child's level of physical activity? Are children raised by parents with permissive or uninvolved parents less active than those raised by parents with authoritative or authoritarian styles?
• How does bullying impact student achievement? Are bullied students more likely to have worse grades than their non-bullied peers?
• Which type of reinforcement works best for getting students to complete their homework: a tangible reward (such as a piece of candy) or social reinforcement (such as offering praise when homework is completed on time)?

Developmental Psychology Topics on Adolescence

• What factors tend to influence the onset of depression in teens and young adults?
• How do peer relationships influence identity formation during adolescence and young adulthood?
• What impact do parent-child relationships have in predicting substance use among teens and young adults?
• How does early substance use during adolescence impact impulsivity and risk-taking during early adulthood?
• How does technology use during adolescence influence social and emotional development?
• How does social media use influence body image among teens?
• What factors contribute to success during the transition from the teen years to early adulthood?
• How do cultural differences impact different aspects of adolescent development?

Developmental Psychology Topics on Adulthood

• Are older adults who rate high in self-efficacy more likely to have a better memory than those with low self-efficacy?
• Do the limits of short-term memory change as we age? How do the limits of short-term memory compare at ages, 15, 25, 45, and 65?
• Do mental games such as word searches, Sudoku, and word matching help elderly adults keep their cognitive skills sharp?
• How do explanations for the behavior of others change as we age? Are younger adults more likely to blame internal factors for events and older adults more likely to blame external variables?

Choosing Developmental Psychology Topics

Developmental psychology is a huge and diverse subject, so picking a topic isn't always easy. Some tips that can help you choose a good developmental psychology topic include:

• Focus on a specific topic : Make sure that your topic isn't too broad to avoid getting overwhelmed by the amount of information available
• Have a clear question or hypothesis : Your research question should be focused and clearly defined
• Do some background research : Spend some time reviewing the existing literature to get a better idea about what you want to cover with your topic
• Consider developmental theories : You might consider analyzing your topic through the lens of a particular theory of developmental psychology
• Check out recent research : Use research databases to find the most recently published research on your topic

Before you start working on any paper, experiment, or science project, the first thing you need to do is understand the rules your instructor has established for the assignment.

Also, be sure to check the official guidelines given by your teacher. If you are not sure about these guidelines, ask your instructor if there are any specific requirements before you get started on your research .

If you are going to actually conduct an experiment , you need to present your idea to your instructor to gain their permission before going forward. In some cases, you might have to also present your plan to your school's Institutional Review Board.

Tips for Researching Developmental Psychology Topics

After you have gotten to move forward with your chosen topic, the next step is to do some background research. This step is essential! If you are writing a paper, the information you find will make up your literature review.

If you are performing an experiment, it will provide background information for the introduction of your lab report . For a psychology science project, this research will help you in your presentation and can help you decide how to best approach your own experiment.

What This Means For You

Choosing a topic for a developmental psychology experiment, paper, or project can be tough! The ideas above can be a great place to start, but you might also consider questions you've had about your own life. Once you have a general idea for your topic, narrow it down, do some background research and talk to your instructor.

Nielsen M, Haun D. Why developmental psychology is incomplete without comparative and cross-cultural perspectives .  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci . 2016;371(1686):20150071. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0071

Leite DFB, Padilha MAS, Cecatti JG. Approaching literature review for academic purposes: The Literature Review Checklist .  Clinics (Sao Paulo) . 2019;74:e1403. Published 2019 Nov 25. doi:10.6061/clinics/2019/e1403

Grady C. Institutional review boards: Purpose and challenges .  Chest . 2015;148(5):1148-1155. doi:10.1378/chest.15-0706

Kim WO. Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research . Korean Journal of Anesthesiology . 2012;62(1):3-12. doi:10.4097/kjae.2012.62.1.3

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Developmental Psychology

• Read this journal
• Read free articles
• Journal snapshot
• Advertising information

Journal scope statement

Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development.

The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations.

Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development.

Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.

Disclaimer: APA and the editors of Developmental Psychology ® assume no responsibility for statements and opinions advanced by the authors of its articles.

Equity, diversity, and inclusion

Developmental Psychology supports equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in its practices. More information on these initiatives is available under EDI Efforts .

Open science

The APA Journals Program is committed to publishing transparent, rigorous research; improving reproducibility in science; and aiding research discovery. Open science practices vary per editor discretion. View the initiatives implemented by this journal .

Editor’s Choice

Each issue of Developmental Psychology will highlight one manuscript with the designation as an “ Editor’s Choice ” paper. Selection is based on the recommendations of the associate editors, based on the paper’s potential impact to the field, the distinction of expanding the contributors to, or the focus of, our science, or its discussion of an important future direction for science.

Call for papers

• Varieties of household experiences and children's positive social development in culturally diverse contexts
• Living in a digital ecology

Author and editor spotlights

Explore journal highlights : free article summaries, editor interviews and editorials, journal awards, mentorship opportunities, and more.

Prior to submission, please carefully read and follow the submission guidelines detailed below. Manuscripts that do not conform to the submission guidelines may be returned without review.

Submissions

Please submit manuscripts electronically through the Manuscript Submission Portal in Microsoft Word (.docx) or LaTex (.tex) as a zip file with an accompanied Portable Document Format (.pdf) of the manuscript file.

Prepare manuscripts according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association using the 7 th edition. Manuscripts may be copyedited for bias-free language (see Chapter 5 of the Publication Manual ). APA Style and Grammar Guidelines for the 7 th edition are available.

Submit Manuscript

Koraly Pérez-Edgar The Pennsylvania State University

General correspondence may be directed to the editor's office .

Manuscripts should be the appropriate length for the material being presented. Manuscripts can vary from a maximum of 4,500 words for a brief report to 10,500 words for a larger research report to 15,000 words for a report containing multiple studies or comprehensive longitudinal studies. Please note that the total length includes the cover page, abstract, main manuscript text, references section, tables, and figures. Editors will decide on the appropriate length and may return a manuscript for revision before reviews if they think the paper is too long. Please make manuscripts as brief as possible. We have a strong preference for shorter papers.

Author contribution statements using CRediT

The APA Publication Manual (7th ed.) stipulates that “authorship encompasses…not only persons who do the writing but also those who have made substantial scientific contributions to a study.” In the spirit of transparency and openness, Developmental Psychology has adopted the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) to describe each author's individual contributions to the work. CRediT offers authors the opportunity to share an accurate and detailed description of their diverse contributions to a manuscript.

Submitting authors will be asked to identify the contributions of all authors at initial submission according to this taxonomy. If the manuscript is accepted for publication, the CRediT designations will be published as an author contributions statement in the author note of the final article. All authors should have reviewed and agreed to their individual contribution(s) before submission.

CRediT includes 14 contributor roles, as described below:

• Conceptualization: Ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims.
• Data curation: Management activities to annotate (produce metadata), scrub data, and maintain research data (including software code, where it is necessary for interpreting the data itself) for initial use and later reuse.
• Formal analysis: Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize study data.
• Funding acquisition: Acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication.
• Investigation: Conducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the experiments, or data/evidence collection.
• Methodology: Development or design of methodology; creation of models.
• Project administration: Management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.
• Resources: Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools.
• Software: Programming, software development; designing computer programs; implementation of the computer code and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components.
• Supervision: Oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team.
• Validation: Verification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research outputs.
• Visualization: Preparation, creation, and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualization/data presentation.
• Writing—original draft: Preparation, creation, and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation).
• Writing—review and editing: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary, or revision—including pre- or post-publication stages.

Authors can claim credit for more than one contributor role, and the same role can be attributed to more than one author.

Public significance statements

Authors submitting manuscripts to the journal Developmental Psychology are now required to provide 2–3 brief sentences regarding the relevance or public health significance of their study or review described in their manuscript. This description should be included within the manuscript on the abstract/keywords page.

The public significance statement (similar to the Relevance section of NIH grant submissions) summarizes the significance of the study's findings for a public audience in one to three sentences (approximately 30–70 words long). It should be written in language that is easily understood by both professionals and members of the lay public. Please refer to the Guidance for Translational Abstracts and Public Significance Statements page to help you write these statements. This statement supports efforts to increase dissemination and usage of research findings by larger and more diverse audiences.

When an accepted paper is published, these sentences will be boxed beneath the abstract for easy accessibility. All such descriptions will also be published as part of the table of contents, as well as on the journal's web page. This policy is in keeping with efforts to increase dissemination and usage by larger and diverse audiences.

Facilitating manuscript review

In addition to email addresses, please supply mailing addresses, phone numbers, and fax numbers. Most correspondence will be handled by email. Keep a copy of the manuscript to guard against loss.

Masked review policy

This journal uses masked review for all submissions. Make every effort to see that the manuscript itself contains no clues to the authors' identity, including grant numbers, names of institutions providing IRB approval, self-citations, and links to online repositories for data, materials, code, or preregistrations (e.g., Create a View-only Link for a Project ). The submission letter should indicate the title of the manuscript, the authors' names and institutional affiliations, and the date the manuscript is submitted.

The first page of the manuscript should omit the authors' names and affiliations but should include the title of the manuscript and the date it is submitted. Author notes, acknowledgments, and footnotes containing information pertaining to the authors' identity or affiliations may be added on acceptance.

Methodology

Description of sample.

Authors should be sure to report the procedures for sample selection and recruitment. Major demographic characteristics should be reported, such as sex, age, socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and, when possible and appropriate, disability status and sexual orientation. Even when such demographic characteristics are not analytic variables, they provide a more complete understanding of the sample and of the generalizability of the findings and are useful in future meta-analytic studies.

Authors should provide a justification that their sample size is appropriate beyond just citing convention in the literature. Justification could include a power analysis, a stopping rule, and/or some other type of valid justification.

Significance

For all study results, measures of both practical and statistical significance should be reported. The latter can involve either a standard error or an appropriate confidence interval. Practical significance can be reported using an effect size, a standardized regression coefficient, a factor loading, or an odds ratio.

Reliability

Manuscripts should include information regarding the establishment of interrater reliability when relevant, including the mechanisms used to establish reliability and the statistical verification of rater agreement and excluding the names of the trainers and the amount of personal contact with such individuals.

Journal Article Reporting Standards

Authors must adhere to the APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS) for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. The standards offer ways to improve transparency in reporting to ensure that readers have the information necessary to evaluate the quality of the research and to facilitate collaboration and replication.

Transparency and openness

APA endorses the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines developed by a community working group in conjunction with the Center for Open Science ( Nosek et al. 2015 ). Empirical research, including meta-analyses, submitted to Developmental Psychology  must at least meet the “requirement” level for all aspects of research planning and reporting. Authors should include a subsection in the method section titled “Transparency and Openness.” This subsection should detail the efforts the authors have made to comply with the TOP Guidelines. 

For example:

• We report how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions (if any), all manipulations, and all measures in the study, and we follow JARS (Appelbaum et al., 2018). All data, analysis code, and research materials are available at [stable link to repository]. Data were analyzed using R, version 4.0.0 (R Core Team, 2020) and the package ggplot , version 3.2.1 (Wickham, 2016). This study’s design and its analysis were not pre-registered.

Data, materials, and code

Authors must state whether data, code, and study materials are posted to a trusted repository and, if so, where to access them, including their location and any limitations on use. If they cannot be made available, authors must state the legal or ethical reasons why they are not available. Trusted repositories adhere to policies that make data discoverable, accessible, usable, and preserved for the long term. Trusted repositories also assign unique and persistent identifiers. Recommended repositories include APA’s repository on the Open Science Framework (OSF), or authors can access a full list of other recommended repositories .

In a subsection titled “Transparency and Openness” at the end of the method section, specify whether and where the data and material will be available or note the legal or ethical reasons for not doing so. For submissions with quantitative or simulation analytic methods, state whether the study analysis code is posted to a trusted repository, and, if so, how to access it (or the legal or ethical reason why it is not available).

• All data have been made publicly available at the [trusted repository name] and can be accessed at [persistent URL or DOI].
• Materials and analysis code for this study are not available because [legal or ethical reason].
• The code behind this analysis/simulation has been made publicly available at the [trusted repository name] and can be accessed at [persistent URL or DOI].

Preregistration of studies and analysis plans

Preregistration of studies and specific hypotheses can be a useful tool for making strong theoretical claims. Likewise, preregistration of analysis plans can be useful for distinguishing confirmatory and exploratory analyses. Investigators are encouraged to preregister their studies and analysis plans prior to conducting the research via a publicly accessible registry system (e.g., OSF , ClinicalTrials.gov, or other trial registries in the WHO Registry Network). There are many available templates; for example, APA, the British Psychological Society, and the German Psychological Society partnered with the Leibniz Institute for Psychology and Center for Open Science to create Preregistration Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology (Bosnjak et al., 2022).

Articles must state whether or not any work was preregistered and, if so, where to access the preregistration. If any aspect of the study is preregistered, include the registry link in the method section. Preregistrations must be available to reviewers; authors may submit a masked copy via stable link or supplemental material. Links in the method section should be replaced with an identifiable copy on acceptance.

• This study’s design was preregistered; see [STABLE LINK OR DOI].
• This study’s design and hypotheses were preregistered; see [STABLE LINK OR DOI].
• This study’s analysis plan was preregistered; see [STABLE LINK OR DOI].
• This study was not preregistered.

Replications and Registered Reports

Developmental Psychology publishes direct replications. Submissions should include “A Replication of XX Study” in the subtitle of the manuscript as well as in the abstract.

Developmental Psychology also publishes Registered Reports. Registered Reports require a two-step review process. The first step is the submission of the registration manuscript. This is a partial manuscript that includes hypotheses, rationale for the study, experimental design, and methods. The partial manuscript will be reviewed for rigor and methodological approach.

If the partial manuscript is accepted, this amounts to provisional acceptance of the full report regardless of the outcome of the study. The full manuscript will be reviewed for adherence to the preregistered design (deviations should be reported in the manuscript).

Manuscript preparation

Prepare manuscripts according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association using the 7th edition. Manuscripts may be copyedited for bias-free language (see Chapter 5 of the Publication Manual ).

Review APA's Journal Manuscript Preparation Guidelines before submitting your article.

Double-space all copy. Other formatting instructions, as well as instructions on preparing tables, figures, references, metrics, and abstracts, appear in the Manual . Additional guidance on APA Style is available on the APA Style website .

Below are additional instructions regarding the preparation of display equations, computer code, and tables.

Display equations

We strongly encourage you to use MathType (third-party software) or Equation Editor 3.0 (built into pre-2007 versions of Word) to construct your equations, rather than the equation support that is built into Word 2007 and Word 2010. Equations composed with the built-in Word 2007/Word 2010 equation support are converted to low-resolution graphics when they enter the production process and must be rekeyed by the typesetter, which may introduce errors.

To construct your equations with MathType or Equation Editor 3.0:

• Go to the Text section of the Insert tab and select Object.
• Select MathType or Equation Editor 3.0 in the drop-down menu.

If you have an equation that has already been produced using Microsoft Word 2007 or 2010 and you have access to the full version of MathType 6.5 or later, you can convert this equation to MathType by clicking on MathType Insert Equation. Copy the equation from Microsoft Word and paste it into the MathType box. Verify that your equation is correct, click File, and then click Update. Your equation has now been inserted into your Word file as a MathType Equation.

Use Equation Editor 3.0 or MathType only for equations or for formulas that cannot be produced as Word text using the Times or Symbol font.

Computer code

Because altering computer code in any way (e.g., indents, line spacing, line breaks, page breaks) during the typesetting process could alter its meaning, we treat computer code differently from the rest of your article in our production process. To that end, we request separate files for computer code.

In online supplemental material

We request that runnable source code be included as supplemental material to the article. For more information, visit Supplementing Your Article With Online Material .

In the text of the article

If you would like to include code in the text of your published manuscript, please submit a separate file with your code exactly as you want it to appear, using Courier New font with a type size of 8 points. We will make an image of each segment of code in your article that exceeds 40 characters in length. (Shorter snippets of code that appear in text will be typeset in Courier New and run in with the rest of the text.) If an appendix contains a mix of code and explanatory text, please submit a file that contains the entire appendix, with the code keyed in 8-point Courier New.

Use Word's insert table function when you create tables. Using spaces or tabs in your table will create problems when the table is typeset and may result in errors.

Academic writing and English language editing services

Authors who feel that their manuscript may benefit from additional academic writing or language editing support prior to submission are encouraged to seek out such services at their host institutions, engage with colleagues and subject matter experts, and/or consider several vendors that offer discounts to APA authors .

Please note that APA does not endorse or take responsibility for the service providers listed. It is strictly a referral service.

Use of such service is not mandatory for publication in an APA journal. Use of one or more of these services does not guarantee selection for peer review, manuscript acceptance, or preference for publication in any APA journal.

Submitting supplemental materials

APA can place supplemental materials online, available via the published article in the PsycArticles ® database. Please see Supplementing Your Article With Online Material for more details.

Abstract and keywords

The abstract must include major demographic characteristics about the sample (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status) so the reader can judge the degree to which the sample reflects the diversity, equity, and inclusion of participants. The abstract should not exceed a maximum of 250 words and typed on a separate page. After the abstract, please supply up to six keywords or brief phrases.

List references in alphabetical order. Each listed reference should be cited in text, and each text citation should be listed in the references section.

Examples of basic reference formats:

Journal article

McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Language learning as language use: A cross-linguistic model of child language development. Psychological Review , 126 (1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000126

Authored book

Brown, L. S. (2018). Feminist therapy (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000092-000

Chapter in an edited book

Balsam, K. F., Martell, C. R., Jones. K. P., & Safren, S. A. (2019). Affirmative cognitive behavior therapy with sexual and gender minority people. In G. Y. Iwamasa & P. A. Hays (Eds.), Culturally responsive cognitive behavior therapy: Practice and supervision (2nd ed., pp. 287–314). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000119-012

Software/Code citation

Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package.  Journal of Statistical Software , 36(3), 1–48. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/

Wickham, H. et al., (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4 (43), 1686, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686

All data, program code, and other methods must be cited in the text and listed in the references section.

Data set citation

Alegria, M., Jackson, J. S., Kessler, R. C., & Takeuchi, D. (2016). Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES), 2001–2003 [Data set]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20240.v8

Preferred formats for graphics files are TIFF and JPG, and preferred format for vector-based files is EPS. Graphics downloaded or saved from web pages are not acceptable for publication. Multipanel figures (i.e., figures with parts labeled a, b, c, d, etc.) should be assembled into one file. When possible, please place symbol legends below the figure instead of to the side.

• All color line art and halftones: 300 DPI
• Black and white line tone and gray halftone images: 600 DPI

Line weights

• Color (RGB, CMYK) images: 2 pixels
• Grayscale images: 4 pixels
• Stroke weight: 0.5 points

APA offers authors the option to publish their figures online in color without the costs associated with print publication of color figures.

The same caption will appear on both the online (color) and print (black and white) versions. To ensure that the figure can be understood in both formats, authors should add alternative wording (e.g., “the red (dark gray) bars represent”) as needed.

For authors who prefer their figures to be published in color both in print and online, original color figures can be printed in color at the editor's and publisher's discretion provided the author agrees to pay:

• $900 for one figure
• An additional $600 for the second figure
• An additional $450 for each subsequent figure

Permissions

Authors of accepted papers must obtain and provide to the editor on final acceptance all necessary permissions to reproduce in print and electronic form any copyrighted work, including test materials (or portions thereof), photographs, and other graphic images (including those used as stimuli in experiments).

On advice of counsel, APA may decline to publish any image whose copyright status is unknown.

• Download Permissions Alert Form (PDF, 13KB)

Publication policies

For full details on publication policies, including use of Artificial Intelligence tools, please see APA Publishing Policies .

APA policy prohibits an author from submitting the same manuscript for concurrent consideration by two or more publications.

See also APA Journals ® Internet Posting Guidelines .

APA requires authors to reveal any possible conflict of interest in the conduct and reporting of research (e.g., financial interests in a test or procedure, funding by pharmaceutical companies for drug research).

• Download Full Disclosure of Interests Form (PDF, 41KB)

In light of changing patterns of scientific knowledge dissemination, APA requires authors to provide information on prior dissemination of the data and narrative interpretations of the data/research appearing in the manuscript (e.g., if some or all were presented at a conference or meeting, posted on a listserv, shared on a website, including academic social networks like ResearchGate, etc.). This information (2–4 sentences) must be provided as part of the author note.

Ethical Principles

It is a violation of APA Ethical Principles to publish "as original data, data that have been previously published" (Standard 8.13).

In addition, APA Ethical Principles specify that "after research results are published, psychologists do not withhold the data on which their conclusions are based from other competent professionals who seek to verify the substantive claims through reanalysis and who intend to use such data only for that purpose, provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and unless legal rights concerning proprietary data preclude their release" (Standard 8.14).

APA expects authors to adhere to these standards. Specifically, APA expects authors to have their data available throughout the editorial review process and for at least 5 years after the date of publication.

Authors are required to state in writing that they have complied with APA ethical standards in the treatment of their sample, human or animal, or to describe the details of treatment.

• Download Certification of Compliance With APA Ethical Principles Form (PDF, 26KB)

The APA Ethics Office provides the full Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct electronically on its website in HTML, PDF, and Word format. You may also request a copy by emailing or calling the APA Ethics Office (202-336-5930). You may also read "Ethical Principles," December 1992, American Psychologist , Vol. 47, pp. 1597–1611.

Other information

See APA’s Publishing Policies page for more information on publication policies, including information on author contributorship and responsibilities of authors, author name changes after publication, the use of generative artificial intelligence, funder information and conflict-of-interest disclosures, duplicate publication, data publication and reuse, and preprints.

Visit the Journals Publishing Resource Center for more resources for writing, reviewing, and editing articles for publishing in APA journals.

Koraly Pérez-Edgar, PhD The Pennsylvania State University, United States

Associate editors

Irma Arteaga, PhD University of Missouri, United States

Sheretta T. Butler-Barnes, PhD Washington University in St. Louis, United States

Christopher Beam, PhD University of Southern California, United States

Peter Bos, PhD University of Leiden, The Netherlands 

Natalie Brito, PhD New York University, United States 

Lucas Butler, PhD University of Maryland, United States

Gustavo Carlo, PhD University of California, Irvine, United States

Elisabeth Conradt, PhD University of Utah, United States

Timothy Curby, PhD George Mason University, United States

Judith Danovitch, PhD University of Louisville, United States

John Franchak, PhD University of California, Riverside, United States

Emily Fyfe, PhD Indiana University, United States

Melinda Gonzales Backen, PhD Florida State University, United States

Wendy Gordon, PhD Auburn University, United States

Noa Gueron-Sela, PhD Ben-Gurion University, Israel

Elizabeth Gunderson, PhD Indiana University, United States

Amanda Guyer, PhD University of California, Davis, United States

Larisa Solomon, PhD Columbia University, United States

Lana Karasik, PhD City University of New York, United States

Melissa Kibbe, PhD Boston University, United States

Elizabeth Kiel, PhD Miami University of Ohio, United States

Su Yeong Kim, PhD University of Texas, Austin, United States

Diana Leyva, PhD University of Pittsburgh, United States

Jennifer McDermott, PhD University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States

Kristine Marceau, PhD Purdue University, United States

Julie Markant, PhD Tulane University, United States

Kalina Michalska, PhD University of California, Riverside, United States

Francisco Palermo, PhD University of Missouri, United States

Carlomagno Panlilio, PhD The Pennsylvania State University, United States

Mikko Peltola, PhD Tampere University, Finland

Gavin Price, PhD Exeter University, United Kingdom

Joanna Williams, PhD Rutgers University, United States

Qing Zhou, PhD University of California, Berkeley, United States

Consulting editors

Melissa Barnett, PhD University of Arizona, United States

Martha Ann Bell, PhD Virginia Tech, United States

Deon Benton, PhD Vanderbilt University, United States

Tashauna Blankenship, PhD University of Massachusetts, Boston, United States

David Bridgett, PhD Northern Illinois University, United States

Rebecca Brooker, PhD Texas A&M University, United States

Samantha Brown, PhD Colorado State University, United States

Claire Cameron, PhD University at Buffalo, United States

Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez, PhD University of Southern California, United States

Rona Carter, PhD, LLP, RYT University of Michigan, United States

Stephen Chen, PhD Wellesley College, United States

Elizabeth Davis, PhD University of California, Riverside, United States

Leah Doane, PhD Arizona State University, United States

Jessica Dollar, PhD University of North Carolina, Greensboro, United States

Robert Duncan, PhD Purdue University, United States

Ari Eason, PhD University of California, Berkeley, United States

Katie Ehrlich, PhD University of Georgia, United States

Paola Escudero, PhD Western Sydney University, Australia

Caitlin Fausey, PhD University of Oregon, United States

Gregory M. Fosco, PhD The Pennsylvania State University, United States

Nicole Gardner-Neblett, PhD University of Michigan, United States

Erica Glasper, PhD Ohio State University, United States

Selin Gulgoz, PhD Fordham University, United States

Ernest Hodges, PhD St. John’s University, United States

Adam Hoffman, PhD Cornell University, United States

Stefanie Höhl, PhD University of Vienna, Austria

Caroline Hornburg, PhD Virginia Tech, United States

Yang Hou, PhD University of Kentucky, United States

Marina Kalashnikova, PhD Basque Center on Cognition, Brain, and Language, Spain

Heather Kirkorian, PhD University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States

Olga Kornienko, PhD George Mason University, United States

Deborah Laible, PhD Lehigh University, United States

Jonathan Lane, PhD Vanderbilt University, United States

Tessa Lansu, PhD Radboud University, Netherlands

Kathryn Leech, PhD University of North Carolina, United States

Ryan Lei, PhD Haverford College, United States

Jeffrey Liew, PhD Texas A&M University, United States

Betty Lin, PhD University at Albany, United States

Eric Lindsey, PhD Penn State Berks, United States

Jessica Lougheed, PhD University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Canada

Alexandra Main, PhD University of California, Merced, United States

Henrike Moll, PhD University of Southern California, United States

Santiago Morales, PhD University of Southern California, United States

Dianna Murray-Close, PhD University of Vermont, United States

Shaylene Nancekivell, PhD University of Manitoba, Canada

Justin Parent, PhD Brown University, United States

Livio Provenzi, PhD IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Italy

Laura Quiñones-Camacho, PhD University of Texas, Austin, United States

Rachel Romeo, PhD, CCC-SLP University of Maryland, United States

Samuel Ronfard, EdD University of Toronto, Canada

Kathleen Rudasill, PhD Virginia Commonwealth University, United States

Adena Schachner, PhD University of California, San Diego, United States

Yishan Shen, PhD Texas State University, United States

Cara Streit, PhD University of New Mexico, United States

Cin Cin Tan, PhD University of Toledo, United States

Rachel Thibodeau-Nielson, PhD University of Missouri, United States

Sho Tsuji, PhD University of Tokyo, Japan

Yuuko Uchikoshi, EdD University of California, Davis, United States

Carlos Valiente, PhD Arizona State University, United States

Nicholas Wagner, PhD Boston University, United States

Jinjing Wang, PhD Rutgers University, United States

Jun Wang, PhD Texas A&M University, United States

Christina Weiland, EdD University of Michigan, United States

Eric Wilkey, PhD Louisiana State University, United States

Peer review coordinator

Emily Densmore American Psychological Association

Abstracting and indexing services providing coverage of Developmental Psychology ®

• Academic OneFile
• Academic Search Alumni Edition
• Academic Search Complete
• Academic Search Elite
• Academic Search Index
• Academic Search Premier
• Advanced Placement Psychology Collection
• ASSIA: Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts
• CAB Abstracts
• Cabell's Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Psychology
• Child Development & Adolescent Studies
• CINAHL Complete
• CINAHL Plus
• Criminal Justice Abstracts
• Criminal Justice Abstracts with Full Text
• Current Abstracts
• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences
• EBSCO MegaFILE
• Education Abstracts
• Education Full Text
• Education Research Complete
• Education Source
• Educational Research Abstracts Online
• Educator's Reference Complete
• Expanded Academic ASAP
• Family & Society Studies Worldwide
• Family Studies Abstracts
• General OneFile
• Global Health
• Health & Wellness Resource Center and Alternative Health Module
• Health Reference Center Academic
• Humanities and Social Sciences Index Retrospective
• IBZ / IBR (Internationale Bibliographie der Rezensionen Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlicher Literatur)
• InfoTrac Custom
• Journal Citations Report: Social Sciences Edition
• Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts
• MLA International Bibliography
• NSA Collection
• Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews
• OmniFile Full Text Mega
• Professional Collection
• Professional Development Collection
• Professional ProQuest Central
• ProQuest Central
• ProQuest Criminal Justice
• ProQuest Discovery
• ProQuest Education Journals
• ProQuest Platinum Periodicals
• ProQuest Professional Education
• ProQuest Psychology Journals
• ProQuest Research Library
• ProQuest Social Science Journals
• Psychology Collection
• Social Sciences Abstracts
• Social Sciences Citation Index
• Social Sciences Full Text
• Social Sciences Index Retrospective
• Social Work Abstracts
• Studies on Women and Gender Abstracts
• TOC Premier
• Tropical Diseases Bulletin
• Women's Studies International

Special issue of APA's journal Developmental Psychology, Vol. 60, No. 9, September 2024. This special issue illustrates how prenatal influences affect children’s psychological development across childhood and adolescence and beyond through a diverse array of biobehavioral mechanisms and biosocial processes.

Special issue of the APA journal Developmental Psychology, Vol. 56, No. 3, March 2020. Articles discuss the impact of emotion-related socialization behaviors on children’s emotion, self-regulation, and developmental outcomes.

Special issue of the APA journal Developmental Psychology, Vol. 55, No. 9, September 2019. The issue is intended to present and highlight examples of innovative recent approaches and thinking to a range of questions about emotional development and to inspire new directions for future research.

Special issue of the APA journal Developmental Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 11, November 2017. The articles examine identity in developmental stages ranging from early childhood to young adulthood, and represent samples from 5 different countries.

Special issue of the APA journal Developmental Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 3, March 2013. The articles pose important questions concerning how children learn from others, what the characteristic signatures of social learning might be, and how this learning changes over time.

Transparency and Openness Promotion

APA endorses the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines by a community working group in conjunction with the Center for Open Science ( Nosek et al. 2015 ). The TOP Guidelines cover eight fundamental aspects of research planning and reporting that can be followed by journals and authors at three levels of compliance.

• Level 1: Disclosure—The article must disclose whether or not the materials are posted to a trusted repository.
• Level 2: Requirement—The article must share materials via a trusted repository when legally and ethically permitted (or disclose the legal and/or ethical restriction when not permitted).
• Level 3: Verification—A third party must verify that the standard is met.

At a minimum, empirical research, including meta-analyses, submitted to Developmental Psychology must, at a minimum, meet Level 2 (Requirement) for all aspects of research planning and reporting. Authors should include a subsection in their methods description titled “Transparency and Openness.” This subsection should detail the efforts the authors have made to comply with the TOP Guidelines.

The list below summarizes the minimal TOP requirements of the journal. Please refer to the TOP guidelines for details, and contact the editor (Koraly Pérez-Edgar, PhD) with any further questions. Authors must share data, materials, and code via trusted repositories (e.g., APA’s repository on the Open Science Framework (OSF)). Trusted repositories adhere to policies that make data discoverable, accessible, usable, and preserved for the long term. Trusted repositories also assign unique and persistent identifiers.

We encourage investigators to preregister their studies and to share protocols and analysis plans prior to conducting their research. Clinical trials are studies that prospectively evaluate the effects of interventions on health outcomes, including psychological health. Clinical trials must be registered before enrolling participants on ClinicalTrials.gov or another primary register of the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) . There are many available preregistration forms (e.g., the APA Preregistration for Quantitative Research in Psychology template, ClininalTrials.gov , or other preregistration templates available via OSF ). Completed preregistration forms should be posted on a publicly accessible registry system (e.g., OSF , ClinicalTrials.gov, or other trial registries in the WHO Registry Network).

The following list presents the eight fundamental aspects of research planning and reporting, the TOP level required by  Developmental Psychology , and a brief description of the journal's policy.

• Citation: Level 2, Requirement—All data, program code, and other methods developed by others must be cited in the text and listed in the references section.
• Data Transparency: Level 2, Requirement—Article states whether the raw and/or processed data on which study conclusions are based are available and either where to access them or the legal or ethical reasons why they are not available.
• Analytic Methods (Code) Transparency: Level 2, Requirement—Article states whether computer code or syntax needed to reproduce analyses in an article is posted to a trusted repository and either how to access it or the legal or ethical reasons why it is not available
• Research Materials Transparency: Level 2, Requirement—Article states whether materials described in the method section are posted to a trusted repository and either how to access them or the legal or ethical reasons why they are not available.
• Design and Analysis Transparency (Reporting Standards): Level 2, Requirement—Article must comply with APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS-Quant, JARS-Qual, and/or MARS).
• Study Preregistration: Level 2, Requirement—Article states whether the study design and (if applicable) hypotheses of any of the work reported was preregistered and, if so, how to access it. Authors must submit a masked copy via stable link or supplemental material.
• Analysis Plan Preregistration: Level 2, Requirement—Article states whether any of the work reported preregistered an analysis plan and, if so, how to access it. Authors must submit a masked copy via stable link or supplemental material.
• Replication: Level 3, Verification—The journal publishes replications and Registered Reports.

Other open science initiatives

• Open Science badges: Not offered
• Public significance statements: Offered
• Author contribution statements using CRediT: Required
• Registered Reports: Published
• Replications: Published
• Detailed sample descriptions: Required

Explore open science at APA .

Inclusive study designs

• Registered Reports

Definitions and further details on inclusive study designs are available on the Journals EDI homepage .

Inclusive reporting standards

• Bias-free language and community-driven language guidelines (required)
• Author contribution roles using CRediT (required)
• Data sharing and data availability statements (required)
• Impact statements (required)
• Participant sample descriptions (required)

More information on this journal’s reporting standards is listed under the submission guidelines tab .

Pathways to authorship and editorship

Editorial fellowships.

Editorial fellowships for this journal will begin in 2023.

Other EDI offerings

Orcid reviewer recognition.

Open Research and Contributor ID (ORCID) Reviewer Recognition provides a visible and verifiable way for journals to publicly credit reviewers without compromising the confidentiality of the peer-review process. This journal has implemented the ORCID Reviewer Recognition feature in Editorial Manager, meaning that reviewers can be recognized for their contributions to the peer-review process.

Masked peer review

This journal offers masked peer review (where both the authors’ and reviewers’ identities are not known to the other). Research has shown that masked peer review can help reduce implicit bias against traditionally female names or early-career scientists with smaller publication records (Budden et al., 2008; Darling, 2015).

Editor Spotlight

• Read the January 2023 editorial by Editor Koraly Pérez-Edgar
• Read an interview with Editor Koraly Pérez-Edgar, PhD

From APA Journals Article Spotlight ®

• Does children's biological functioning predict parenting behavior?
• New directions in the study of human emotional development

Journal Alert

Sign up to receive email alerts on the latest content published.

Welcome! Thank you for subscribing.

Subscriptions and access

• Pricing and individual access
• APA PsycArticles database

Calls for Papers

Access options

• APA publishing resources
• Educators and students
• Editor resource center

APA Publishing Insider

APA Publishing Insider is a free monthly newsletter with tips on APA Style, open science initiatives, active calls for papers, research summaries, and more.

Social media

Contact Journals

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

The PMC website is updating on October 15, 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Front Psychol

Challenges in developmental psychology, a focus on Sustainable Development

Peter klaver.

1 Centre for Research and Development, University of Teacher Education in Special Needs, Zurich, Switzerland

2 Institute of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Katharina J. Rohlfing

3 Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany

Introduction

Developmental psychology is traditionally of interdisciplinary nature with the aims to understand mechanisms of normative and individual changes and consistencies throughout the lifespan. The applied fields of developmental psychology target into health and educational sciences. The aims of developmental psychology cannot be reached without understanding and applying the underlying biological, senso-motoric, emotional, social, and cognitive processes that are intertwined with cultural context.

The field changes in dependence on internal and external factors. First, the increase in knowledge, in each of the associated areas can change the focus of interest in subfields or the whole field of developmental psychology. Second, methodological inventions can boost the development of certain subfields or the whole field of developmental psychology. Third, sudden changes in cultural context, by global events, such as strikingly demonstrated recently during the COVID-19 pandemic, affect the focus of interest in certain periods in life, or in interventions. Fourth, there is a solid claim for a bias in research on and from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) countries (Henrich et al., 2010 ), which affect inferences and impact from research in developmental psychology. Awareness toward the cultural context of research in developmental psychology, its limitations and generalizability, can change perspective and course of the field.

In the following Specialty Grand Challenge, we would like to sketch the most important challenges we observe within the field of developmental psychology, which are dependent on the above-mentioned areas of change: changes in knowledge and methodology, changes or bias in environment by global events and cultural context.

Aims of the Specialty Grand Challenge

One of the key challenges we observe in developmental psychology relate to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The Agenda 2030 and the associated SDGs pose new challenges on science as a whole and as such on developmental psychology. The global goals to sustain the resources in the world's biosphere for future generations are balanced across the dimensions of social responsibility, ecological responsibility, and economic growth (United Nations Sustainable Development Group, 2019 ). Local or global actions at each of these dimensions can have an impact on the individual development and potentially on the normative development of people. Thus, they may affect individuals differently in childhood, youth, and adulthood. For example, youth in several countries have shown to take responsibility regarding SDGs to engage against climate change, against poverty, diversity, human rights, and democracy (Plan International UK, 2018 ), while Education for Sustainable Development is part of the curriculum in many countries. The development of youth may be affected alone by the responsibility they take, and the social changes they achieve may affect development of future generations. Participating more actively in a society and being encouraged by children's rights (UNICEF), children might require more support in developing skills that pertains to engagement in active citizenship from early on. The global context and youth's participation put novel requirements on youth's and children's care, caregivers as well as education.

Further, fast economic growth in urban areas as well as political conflicts can lead to migration waves toward these areas, which provides an impact on the health and education infrastructure in both rural and urban areas, which may in turn affect vulnerable populations disproportionally, and particularly children, elderly, and individuals with disabilities. Observations of the kind has been observed in several countries (Jampaklay et al., 2016 ; Holecki et al., 2020 ; Martín-Cano et al., 2020 ).

Actions relating to SDGs

In our view, SDGs require actions in the field of developmental psychology regarding relevant methodologies and topics. We observe two windows of opportunity to take action on the impact of SDGs on developmental psychology. First, global developments in methodology of research, particularly Open Science and Open Research Data help to access, merge, and analyze data in understanding emotion, cognition, and social dynamics in development within cultural context. These approaches initiate new discoveries but require an understanding of the technological functions and their limitations. Second, digitalization has a global impact on the use of knowledge and skills in social, health, and educational systems, which induces challenges and boosts research in the field of developmental psychology.

Regarding the methodologies, we recommend for three levels of actions. First, research in developmental psychology needs to adopt to the principles of Open Science. The movement of Open Science has been seen as an important step toward managing resources at a global scale. Open Access of publications as implemented by Frontiers and other publishers, increases access to knowledge across the globe. However, sharing data by implementing FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles on Open Research Data (ORD) would allow researchers across the globe to reuse data and connect own data to a larger pool of data than ever before. This could increase validation of evidence across different cultural contexts and could diversify and generalize theories on development. Simultaneously, methods can be further developed to adjust to novel contextual circumstances. Furthermore, a reuse of material, measures, procedures, and data contributes to more transparency and works against data loss, fosters collaborations, and generates reproducible workflows (Klein et al., 2018 ). With these methods, key issues relating to development and SDGs can be more easily studied, because contextual differences can be identified in larger datasets. Currently, Frontiers does not have a policy regarding ORD, but in our view, we could and should commit to such a policy within our research communities.

Second, research in developmental psychology should be committed to international standards regarding the adoption of research designs, conducting research, reporting and critical appraisal standards. The EQUATOR network currently provides 529 reporting guidelines for all types of research, which are relevant for social sciences and medicine, such as PRISMA (Page et al., 2021 ). Research communities, for example in neuroscience and medicine, have increased awareness toward such standards and thereby increased the quality of research (O'Brien et al., 2014 ; Song et al., 2017 ). It is important that research communities commit themselves toward such standards to increase reproducibility, transparency, and sustainability of research across the globe. In addition to reporting standards, the reviewing standards should be transparent and compliant with the guidelines. Several valuable critical appraisal tools have been developed, such as CASP or JBI checklists, which can support and standardize reviewing processes. By taking such standards more seriously, and with a higher commitment to them, globally, the rigor in addressing key questions relating to development can be pushed forward, and a sustainable knowledge base can be acquired.

Third, we observe strong innovations and methodological developments in areas, which now affect the field of developmental psychology. It will be important to increase awareness about applying technologies for specific solutions and specific contexts. A recent Research Topic on empirical research at a distance provides a good example of putting together novel and rapid methodical developments driven by COVID-19 pandemic but discussing their limitations thoroughly (Tsuji et al., 2022 ). In our view, it is important for novel methods to be presented in a comprehensive manner to provide informative access not only to procedures but also to its purposes and shortcomings. For this, Frontiers offers formats that might be used more often: Data Report, Technology and Code, Study Protocol, but also Brief Research Report could be used to introduce a technologically innovative method to describe novel possibilities of analysis. It should then involve a reflection about the used technology regarding ethics and privacy, its advantages, and disadvantages by addressing tradeoffs, for example between real world behaviors and in-lab controls. Examples of such technologies, involve techniques to record high resolution spatial and temporal data in more realistic settings such as Real-Time response measurements (Waldvogel and Metz, 2020 ), dyads in Experience Sampling Methods (Xia et al., 2022 ), Near Field Communication (Lorusso et al., 2018 ), Google Trends Research (Jun et al., 2018 ; Mavragani et al., 2018 ), and hyperscanning EEG (Kayhan et al., 2022 ). A debate on the use of these techniques may provide a window of opportunity for global research on development and SDGs.

Regarding topics, we observe a strong impact of digitalization on health and education systems. Health issues have become a global phenomenon. The way in which people at different stages during the life span have access to health care, receive information on health risks and preventions, and are at risk to health problems is not evenly distributed. Industrial pollution, access to nutrients, eating habits, digital literacy and consumption, access to information depend on societal, technological, and climate changes. These potential risk and resources can affect fetal, early development and parenting, as well as later periods in life. The increasing knowledge about the mechanisms and the more widespread possibilities to observe changes longitudinally in several areas around the world lead to a more detailed understanding of the development of health risks and the effect of interventions during life span. In our view, it is important that the knowledge about health risks at all ages and heterogeneous populations is well-documented and (digitally) accessible for use by professional health practitioners.

Along similar lines, we observe that education undergoes changes depending on technological development, particularly digital information technology. Access to information and knowledge about education governance, access to education during political, societal and climate change can all affect the way in which children develop and the way in which communities and families are able to support the development of children. The current access to larger datasets has the potential to facilitate research about the psychological development on these topics. We therefore encourage the research on human development, health, and education specifically concerned with the influence of social and technological change in dynamic cultural contexts.

The main challenges that we observe are related to the global movements in science and society, which affect the course that developmental psychology takes. In the past, developmental psychology has been dominated by European and North American scientists, followed by important research from Japan (Norimatsu, 2018 ). Now, researchers from an increasing number of countries across the world, but particularly China deliver important insights into the field of developmental psychology. Further, the Agenda 2030, the global issues relating to health and education, the Open Science movement, the increasing knowledge about developmental psychology from other counties, the ability to merge greater datasets provide the possibility to understand development at a different level. Our view is indeed in line with these developments, first because we see a chance that normative and individual changes in development can be better understood at both a global and local level. Second, because we trust that applied scientists can address that knowledge. Their task is to improve, for example, health care, health risk prevention and education in cooperation with professionals and providers of social support.

Nevertheless, we are aware of the subjective nature of our view. The foundation of it was mainly based on the set of Research Topics that we evaluate at the Frontiers in Psychology Specialty Section Developmental Psychology, the manuscript we receive in our role as Section Chief Editors, as well as our role we have as professionals at our universities and the research communities we work in. We are also aware of the diversity of ethical and cultural values, which drives our vision of research on developmental psychology and the visions of all researchers in the field. The hope that shared values on the necessity to continue research on developmental psychology in the light of Sustainable Development remains.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

• Henrich J., Heine S. J., Norenzayan A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33 , 61–83. 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Holecki T., Rogalska A., Sobczyk K., Wozniak-Holecka J., Romaniuk P. (2020). Global elderly migrations and their impact on health care systems . Front. Public Health 8 , 386. 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00386 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jampaklay A., Tangchonlatip K., Richter K., Nanthamongkolchai S., Lucktong A., Prasithima C. (2016). The Impact of Internal Migration on Early Childhood Well-Being and Development. Mahidol University . Available online at: https://www.unicef.org/thailand/reports/impact-internal-migration-early-childhood-well-being-and-development (accessed October 27, 2022).
• Jun S.-P., Yoo H. S., Choi S. (2018). Ten years of research change using Google Trends: from the perspective of big data utilizations and applications . Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 130 , 69–87. 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.009 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kayhan E., Matthes D., Marriott Haresign I., Banki A., Michel C., Langeloh M., et al.. (2022). DEEP: a dual EEG pipeline for developmental hyperscanning studies . Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 54 , 101104. 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101104 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Klein O., Hardwicke T. E., Aust F., Breuer J., Danielsson H., Mohr A. H., et al.. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science . Collabra Psychol. 4 , 158. 10.1525/collabra.158 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lorusso M. L., Biffi E., Molteni M., Reni G. (2018). Exploring the learnability and usability of a near field communication-based application for semantic enrichment in children with language disorders . Assist. Technol. 30 , 39–50. 10.1080/10400435.2016.1253046 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Martín-Cano M. D. C., Sampedro-Palacios C. B., Ricoy-Cano A. J., De La Fuente-Robles Y. M. (2020). Superdiversity and disability: social changes for the cohesion of migrations in Europe . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 , 186460. 10.3390/ijerph17186460 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mavragani A., Ochoa G., Tsagarakis K. P. (2018). Assessing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches in google trends research: systematic review . J. Med. Internet Res . 20, e270. 10.2196/jmir.9366 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Norimatsu H. (2018). Uniqueness of Japanese studies in Developmental psychology . Japan. J. Dev. Psychol. 29 , 199–207. 10.11201/jjdp.29.199 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• O'Brien B. C., Harris I. B., Beckman T. J., Reed D. A., Cook D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations . Acad. Med. 89 , 1245–1251. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Page M. J., Mckenzie J. E., Bossuyt P. M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T. C., Mulrow C. D., et al.. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews . J. Clin. Epidemiol. 134 , 178–189. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Plan International UK (2018). What's the Evidence? Youth Engagement and the Sustainable Development Goals. Plan International and Asian Development Bank . Available online at: https://www.adb.org/publications/youth-engagement-sustainable-development-goals (accessed October 27, 2022).
• Song S. Y., Kim B., Kim I., Kim S., Kwon M., Han C., et al.. (2017). Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: a systematic review . PLoS ONE 12 , e0187807. 10.1371/journal.pone.0187807 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tsuji S., Amso D., Cusack R., Kirkham N., Oakes L. M. (2022). Editorial: Empirical research at a distance: New methods for developmental science . Front. Psychol . 13, 938995. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938995 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• United Nations Sustainable Development Group (2019). United Nations Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework – Internal Guidance. New York, NY: United Nations . Available online at: https://unsdg.un.org/resources/united-nations-sustainable-development-cooperation-framework-guidance (accessed October 27, 2022).
• Waldvogel T., Metz T. (2020). Measuring real-time response in real-life settings . Int. J. Publ. Opin. Res. 32 , 659–675. 10.1093/ijpor/edz050 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Xia M., Bray B. C., Fosco G. M. (2022). Triadic family structures and their day-to-day dynamics from an adolescent perspective: a multilevel latent profile analysis . Fam. Process 61 , 1341–1357. 10.1111/famp.12722 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .

Developmental psychology

• Pervasive developmental disorders
• Get an email alert for Developmental psychology
• Get the RSS feed for Developmental psychology

Showing 1 - 13 of 864

View by: Cover Page List Articles

Sort by: Recent Popular

Video-audio neural network ensemble for comprehensive screening of autism spectrum disorder in young children

Shreyasvi Natraj, Nada Kojovic, Thomas Maillart, Marie Schaer

Pharmacological intervention of behavioural traits and brain histopathology of prenatal valproic acid-induced mouse model of autism

Sharmind Neelotpol, Rifat Rezwan,  [ ... ], Mohd Raeed Jamiruddin

Promoting positive youth development in rural communities: Integrating social work, psychology, and education

Cognitive correlates of math abilities in autism spectrum disorder

Irene Tonizzi, M. Carmen Usai

Gender-specific play behavior in relation to autistic traits and behavioral difficulties at the age of seven in the SELMA study

Fatih Özel, Marlene Stratmann,  [ ... ], Carl-Gustaf Bornehag

Feasibility, acceptability, and effects of a web-delivered behavioral parent training intervention for rural parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A protocol

Samantha Ault, Kayla Herbell,  [ ... ], Laureen M. Smith

The impact of paediatric epilepsy and co-occurring neurodevelopmental disorders on functional brain networks in wake and sleep

Leandro Junges, Daniel Galvis,  [ ... ], Andrew P. Bagshaw

Frontal and occipital brain glutathione levels are unchanged in autistic adults

Andreia C. Pereira, Alison Leonard,  [ ... ], Gráinne M. McAlonan

Exploring context for implementation of inclusive education for children with developmental disabilities in mainstream primary schools in Ethiopia

Elisa Genovesi, Ikram Ahmed,  [ ... ], Rosa Anna Hoekstra

Screening accuracy and cut-offs of the Polish version of Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales-Developmental Profile Infant-Toddler Checklist

Mateusz Sobieski, Anna Kopszak, Sylwia Wrona, Maria Magdalena Bujnowska-Fedak

Fallacy of attributing the U.S. firearm mortality epidemic to mental health

Archie Bleyer, Stuart E. Siegel, Jaime Estrada, Charles R. Thomas Jr.

The effectiveness of group interpersonal synchrony in young autistic adults’ work environment: A mixed methods RCT study protocol

Tamar Dvir, Tal-Chen Rabinowitch, Cochavit Elefant

Individual differences and motor planning influence self-recognition of actions

Akila Kadambi, Qi Xie, Hongjing Lu

Connect with Us

• PLOS ONE on Twitter
• PLOS on Facebook

• A-Z Publications

Annual Review of Developmental Psychology

• Navigate this Journal
• Early Publication
• Previous Volumes
• Editorial Committee

AIMS AND SCOPE OF JOURNAL: The Annual Review of Developmental Psychology covers the significant advances in the developmental sciences, including cognitive, linguistic, social, cultural, and biological processes across the lifespan. The invited reviews will  synthesize the theoretical, methodological, and technological developments made over the past several decades that have led to important new discoveries relevant beyond psychology, including education, cognitive science, economics, public health, and public policy.  

Latest Articles Lasest articles RSS feed

Emotion regulation in couples across adulthood, the functioning of offspring of depressed parents: current status, unresolved issues, and future directions, bridging the divide: tackling tensions between life-course epidemiology and causal inference, the study of early child care and youth development (seccyd): studying development from infancy to adulthood, poverty, brain development, and mental health: progress, challenges, and paths forward, a neuroecosocial perspective on adolescent development, developmental neuroimaging of cognitive flexibility: update and future directions, two-hit model of behavioral inhibition and anxiety, a rational account of cognitive control development in childhood, children's acquisition and application of norms, most read this month, most cited most cited rss feed, childhood adversity and neural development: a systematic review, adolescent–parent relationships: progress, processes, and prospects, the life course consequences of very preterm birth, cognitive aging and dementia: a life-span perspective, media and the development of gender role stereotypes, development of adhd: etiology, heterogeneity, and early life course, language development in context, the development of social categorization, screen time, social media use, and adolescent development, neighborhood effects on children's development in experimental and nonexperimental research.