how did john dalton experiment with gases

Universe Today

Space and astronomy news

What Is John Dalton’s Atomic Model?

Atomic theory – that is, the belief that all matter is composed of tiny, indivisible elements – has very deep roots. Initially, the theory appeared in thousands of years ago in Greek and Indian texts as a philosophical idea. However, it was not embraced scientifically until the 19th century, when an evidence-based approach began to reveal what the atomic model looked like.

It was at this time that John Dalton, an English chemist, meteorologist and physicist, began a series of experiments which would culminate in him proposing the theory of atomic compositions – which thereafter would be known as Dalton’s Atomic Theory – that would become one of the cornerstones of modern physics and chemistry.

Beyond creating a model for atomic interactions, John Dalton is also credited with developing laws for understanding how gases work. In time, this would lead him to conclude things about how atoms interacted, the weight of atoms, and to design laws that establish atomic theory as scientific discipline.

Dalton’s Gas Laws:

Dalton came up with his theory of atoms as a result of his research into gases. This began in 1800, when Dalton became a secretary of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society. While there, Dalton began submitted a series of essays that outlined his experiments on the constitution of mixed gases, including the pressure of steam and other vapors at different temperatures, on evaporation. and on the thermal expansion of gases.

In his essays, Dalton described experiments in which he sought to ascertain the pressure of steam at various points between 0 and 100 °C (32 and 212 °F). Based on his observations of six different liquids, Dalton concluded that the variation of vapor pressure for all liquids was equivalent, for the same variation of temperature, and the same vapor of any given pressure.

He also concluded that all elastic fluids under the same pressure expand equally when heat is applied. Further, he observed that for any given expansion of mercury (i.e. noted rise in temperature using a mercury thermometer), that the corresponding expansion of air is proportionally less, the higher the temperature goes.

This became the basis as Dalton’s Law (aka. Dalton’s law of partial pressures), which stated that in a mixture of non-reacting gases, the total pressure exerted is equal to the sum of the partial pressures of the individual gases.

Dalton’s Atomic Theory:

In the course of this research into gases, Dalton also discovered that certain gases could only be combined in certain proportions, even if two different compounds shared the same common element or group of elements.

These experiments built upon two theories that had emerged near the end of the 18th century which dealt with chemical reactions. The first was the law of conservation of mass , formulated by Antoine Lavoisier in 1789, which states that the total mass in a chemical reaction remains constant – i.e. that the reactants have the same mass as the products.

The second was the law of definite proportions , first proven by the French chemist Joseph Louis Proust in 1799. This law states that if a compound is broken down into its constituent elements, then the masses of the constituents will always have the same proportions, regardless of the quantity or source of the original substance.

Studying these laws and building on them, Dalton developed his law of multiple proportions . This law states that if two elements can be combined to form a number of possible compounds, then the ratios of the masses of the second element, which combine with a fixed mass of the first element, will be ratios of small whole numbers.

In other words, elements combine at the atomic level in fixed ratios which naturally differ based on the compounds being combined, due to their unique atomic weights. The findings became the basis of of Dalton’s Atomic Laws or Model, which focuses on five basic theorems. T

The state that elements, in their purest state, consist of particles called atoms; that atoms of a specific element are all the same, down to the very last atom; that atoms of different elements can be told apart by their atomic weights; that atoms of elements unite to form chemical compounds; and that atoms can neither be created or destroyed in chemical reaction, only the grouping ever changes.

Dalton also believed atomic theory could explain why water absorbed different gases in different proportions – for example, he found that water absorbed carbon dioxide far better than it absorbed nitrogen. Dalton hypothesized this was due to the differences in mass and complexity of the gases’ respective particles.

In fact, it was this very observation that is believed to be the first time that Dalton hinted at the supposed existence of atoms. In the paper which addressed gas absorption in water, which was first published in 1805, he wrote:

“Why does not water admit its bulk of every kind of gas alike? This question I have duly considered, and though I am not able to satisfy myself completely I am nearly persuaded that the circumstance depends on the weight and number of the ultimate particles of the several gases .”

Dalton proposed that each chemical element is composed of atoms of a single, unique type, and though they cannot be altered or destroyed by chemical means, they can combine to form more complex structures (i.e. chemical compounds). This marked the first truly scientific theory of the atom, since Dalton reached his conclusions by experimentation and examination of the results in an empirical fashion.

Dalton And Atomic Weights:

Dalton’s also began studying atomic weights based on the mass ratios in which they combined, with the hydrogen atom taken as the standard. However, Dalton was limited by the crudity of his laboratory instruments and the fact that he did not conceive that the atoms of certain elements exist in molecular form, such as pure oxygen (O 2 ).

He also believed that the simplest compound between any two elements is always one atom each. This was best illustrated in how he thought that the chemical formula for water was HO, not H 2 O.

In 1803, Dalton orally presented his first list of relative atomic weights for a number of substances. This paper was published in 1805, but he did not discuss there exactly how he obtained these figures. In 1807, his method was revealed by his acquaintance Thomas Thomson, in the third edition of Thomson’s textbook, A System of Chemistry . Finally, Dalton published a full account in his own textbook, A New System of Chemical Philosophy , in 1808 and 1810.

Scientific Flaws:

The main flaw in Dalton’s theory – i.e. the existence of both molecules and atoms – was later corrected in principle in 1811 by Amedeo Avogadro. Avogadro proposed that equal volumes of any two gases, at equal temperature and pressure, contain equal numbers of molecules. In other words, the mass of a gas’s particles does not affect the volume that it occupies.

Avogadro’s law allowed him to deduce the diatomic nature of numerous gases by studying the volumes at which they reacted. Thus, Avogadro was able to offer more accurate estimates of the atomic mass of oxygen and various other elements, and made a clear distinction between molecules and atoms. Alas, these and other discoveries both contradicted and refined Dalton’s theories.

For instance, scientists have since discovered that the atom – once thought to be the smallest part of matter – can in fact be subdivided into even smaller elementary particles. And whereas Dalton conceived as atoms as a single entity with no separation between positive, negative, and neutral charges, subsequent experiments by J.J. Thomson , Ernest Rutherford, and Neils Bohr revealed a more complex structure to the atom.

These theories were later validated by observations made with the electron microscope. We also know that atomic weight is a product of the structure of the atoms themselves. Hence, Dalton’s Atomic Model, in its purest form, is now only considered valid for chemical reactions. However, this does not diminish Dalton’s contribution to modern science.

Prior to his time, the atom was little more than a philosophical construct passed down from classical antiquity. Dalton’s groundbreaking work not only made the theory a reality but led to many other discoveries, such as Einstein’s theory of relativity and Planck’s quantum theory – two fields of study that form the basis of our modern understanding of the cosmos.

We have written many interesting articles about atomic theory here at Universe today. Here is one about the number of Atoms In The Universe , What Are The Parts Of The Atom? , Who Was Democritus? , Bohr’s Atomic Model , and What Is The Plum Pudding Model?

If you want to learn more about Dalton’s model, check out the article from Central Queensland University about Dalton’s Atomic model .

Astronomy Cast has recorded many interesting episodes on the subject. Check them out – Episode 138: Quantum Mechanics , Episode 378: Rutherford and Atoms , and Episode 392: The Standard Model – Intro .

Share this:

• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

Distillations magazine

John dalton and the scientific method.

Dalton proposed atomic theory in 1808; an additional century passed before the theory was universally accepted by scientists.

Many consider 2008 the 200th anniversary of atomic theory, John Dalton’s momentous theory of the nature of matter. Dalton (1766–1844) proposed that all matter in the universe is made of indestructible, unchangeable atoms—each type characterized by a constant mass—that undergo chemical reactions by joining with and separating from each other. But anniversaries can be deceptive. It was 1808 when Dalton published the first volume of New Systems of Chemical Philosophy , which presented his atomic theory in full, but his ideas were in fact already known, as he had been talking and writing about them for at least five years. Yet, an additional century would pass before atomic theory became universally accepted. 

The theory certainly had its early fans, including Swedish chemist Jöns Jakob Berzelius (1779–1848). There was hard evidence in its favor; conceiving of atoms in this way explained the stoichiometry of reactions, which posited that combined elements retained their proportions before, during, and after reacting with each other. However, not everyone found this fact compelling. Humphry Davy (British, 1748–1829) and Claude-Louis Berthollet (French, 1748–1822) were not convinced. Because atoms could not be seen, Dalton could not base his theory on direct observation, and this was a major stumbling block for many scientists. 

Nevertheless atomic theory was useful, whether proven or not. It was easier to express stoichiometric proportions in terms of atoms than in terms of absolute mass. It is simpler to say that 1 atom of hydrogen joins with 1 atom of chlorine to form 1 molecule of hydrogen chloride than it is to say that 1 gram of hydrogen reacts with 35.45 grams of chlorine to make 36.45 grams of hydrogen chloride. Many chemists found themselves using atomic theory, even if they held their noses all the while. 

Acceptance grew slowly over the next hundred years as the concept of the atom became useful for explaining a variety of things from molecular structure in organic chemistry to the spacing and movement of molecules in gas physics. By 1905 there were still some holdouts, including Marcellin Berthelot and the founding father of physical chemistry, Wilhelm Ostwald, but most chemists had accepted the existence of atoms. That year a young Albert Einstein penned a paper that doesn’t receive nearly as much attention as his work on the photoelectric effect and his special theory of relativity. This work used the concept of the atom to explore the phenomenon of Brownian motion. 

When minute particles are suspended in a liquid, they move in a seemingly random, ever-changing course, each one only slowly moving in any direction. Earlier scientists had proposed that the particles moved because the liquid molecules were constantly in motion and collided with the suspended particles, jostling them in an erratic manner. Einstein took this idea further, building on the observation of Jacobus Henricus van’t Hoff that solute molecules move in the same manner as gas molecules and their behavior can be described using the gas laws. In his 1905 paper Einstein treated suspended particles as if they were giant molecules and went on to predict how they should behave according to the gas laws. For example, he stated that the average speed of the suspended particles should reflect the average kinetic energy of the moving molecules of the liquid in which the particles were suspended. He also predicted that, in a vertical cylinder of an aqueous suspension, gravitational pull would cause a greater density of particles toward the bottom of the cylinder and a lower density near the top, just as the earth’s atmosphere becomes thinner at higher altitudes. 

Three years later, in 1908, Dalton’s New System of Chemical Philosophy turned 100 years old. Berthelot had died the previous year, rejecting atoms until the end. Ostwald still did not accept the existence of atoms. French scientist Jean Perrin took up Einstein’s challenge and began studying Brownian motion in great detail. Perrin carried out incredibly meticulous observations, plotting the paths of protein particles in aqueous suspensions. He studied their variations in distribution as a function of the tiniest variations in vertical height. He was able to show that their behavior matched Einstein’s predictions for particles that are being constantly rammed by unseen molecules. Once and for all the particulate nature of matter had been demonstrated in an unequivocal manner. A final crowning validation came in 1926 when Perrin received the Nobel Prize in Physics for his work. 

Later scientists would use atomic force microscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy to give us even clearer observations of the particulate nature of matter. Today atomic theory is covered in the first chapters of most general chemistry textbooks. Most of us have grown accustomed to seeing it in this exalted place, and it can be easy to forget that it has not been there all along since 1808.

Mark Michalovic was consultant for educational services at the Science History Institute.

More from our magazine

What Doomed Central Park’s Dinosaurs?

Historians unmask the villain who killed off New York’s Paleozoic Museum.

Water and Power

Could a century-old aqueduct point the way to Los Angeles’s clean energy future?

We’re Going to Work Miracles

The failed promises of Project Plowshare.

Copy the above HTML to republish this content. We have formatted the material to follow our guidelines, which include our credit requirements. Please review our full list of guidelines for more information. By republishing this content, you agree to our republication requirements.